Elisabeth Bronder

Epidemiology of symptomatic drug-induced long QT syndrome and torsade de pointes in Germany

AIMS Drug-induced long QT syndrome (diLQTS) leading to Torsade de Pointes (TdP) is a potentially lethal condition, which has led to several post-marketing drug withdrawals in the past decade. The true incidence of diLQTS/TdP is largely unknown. One explanation is under-reporting of this potentially life-threatening adverse event by physicians and other medical staff to pharmacovigilance agencies. To gain more insight into the incidence of diLQTS and TdP, the Berlin Pharmacovigilance Center (PVZ-FAKOS) has actively and prospectively identified patients who developed this particular type of drug-induced adverse event. Here, the basic characteristics of the affected patients are summarized and suspected drugs are discussed. Furthermore, an extrapolation of the Berlin incidence rates to the German Standard Population is presented. METHODS AND RESULTS Using a Berlin-wide network of 51 collaborating hospitals (>180 clinical departments), adult patients presenting with long QT syndrome (LQTS/TdP) between 2008 and 2011 were identified by active surveillance of these hospitals. Drug exposures as well as other possible risk factors were obtained from the patients files and in a face-to-face interview with the patient. One-hundred and seventy patients of possible LQTS/TdP were reported to the Pharmacovigilance Center of whom 58 cases were confirmed in a thorough validation process. The majority (66%) of these cases were female and 60% had developed LQTS/TdP in the outpatient setting. Thirty-five (60%) of 58 confirmed cases were assessed as drug-related based on a standardized causality assessment applying the criteria of the World Health Organization. Drugs assessed as related in more than two cases were metoclopramide, amiodarone, melperone, citalopram, and levomethadone. The age-standardized incidence of diLQTS/TdP in Berlin was estimated to be 2.5 per million per year for males and 4.0 per million per year for females. CONCLUSION While European annual reporting rates based on spontaneous reports suggest an annual diLQTS/TdP incidence of 0.26 per million in Germany, we estimated a considerably higher incidence of diLQTS/TdP in an active surveillance approach. Further measures are warranted to better sensitize physicians against this potentially life-threatening drug-induced adverse event.

Drug-induced immune thrombocytopaenia: results from the Berlin Case–Control Surveillance Study

PurposeDrug-induced immune thrombocytopaenia is a rare, serious condition that can be triggered by numerous medications. To characterize the spectrum of drugs associated with immune thrombocytopaenia (ITP) in the Berlin Case–Control Surveillance Study (FAKOS).MethodsAdult hospitalized patients with new onset idiopathic, secondary or drug-induced acute ITP and hospital control patients were ascertained by active surveillance in 50 Berlin hospitals (>180 clinical departments) between 2000 and 2009. Drug exposures were obtained in a personal interview. Chronic cases were excluded in a follow-up after 6 or more months. A standardized causality assessment was conducted for each ITP patient to assess possible drug aetiology. Drug risks were quantified in a case–control design with unconditional logistic regression analysis.ResultsNinety out of 169 validated cases of acute ITP were assessed as being at least possibly drug-related (n = 85 different drugs overall, n = 30 drugs with certain or probable causality). Drugs involved in ≥2 cases with a probable or certain relationship were tirofiban (n = 10 cases), abciximab (n = 4), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (n = 4), influenza vaccine (n = 3), and citalopram (n = 2). Pneumococcal and poliomyelitis vaccine were assessed as probably causing ITP in one case each. In the case–control analyses, significantly increased risks were observed for tirofiban, abciximab, trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole, gentamicin, triamterene/hydrochlorothiazide, drospirenone/ethinylestradiol, and influenza vaccination.ConclusionsOur study confirms known ITP risks for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists and sulphonamides and generates signals for several other drugs and vaccines. New onset of ITP should not only direct attention to drugs as possible aetiological agents, but also to vaccines that are known to cause autoimmune phenomena.

Drug induced immune haemolytic anaemia in the Berlin Case-Control Surveillance Study.

Drug‐induced immune haemolytic anaemia is a rare but serious condition. This study investigated the possibility of drug aetiology of immune haemolytic anaemia (IHA) in 134 patients with new onset of IHA who were identified in the Berlin Case‐Control Surveillance Study between 2000 and 2009. Single drugs related to IHA in three or more patients and assessed more than once as a certain or probable cause of IHA in a standardized causality assessment included diclofenac, fludarabine, oxaliplatin, ceftriaxone and piperacillin. In a case‐control study including all 124 IHA cases developed in outpatient care and 731 controls, significantly increased odds ratios (OR) were observed for beta‐lactam antibiotics (OR = 8·8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3·2–25·2), cotrimoxazole (OR = 6·5; CI 1·1–37·9), ciprofloxacin (OR = 6·9, CI 1·3–38·5), fludarabine (OR = 22·2; CI: 2·8–454·5) and lorazepam (OR = 5·3; CI: 1·2–21·2). Excluding new onset cases with a chronic IHA disease course, an increased risk became also apparent for diclofenac with an OR of 3·1 (CI 1·3–7·0). This is the first case‐control study investigating drugs as risk factors for IHA. It corroborates an increased risk for several drugs that have been implicated as a cause of IHA in the standardized causality assessment of individual cases.

Drug-induced agranulocytosis in the Berlin case–control surveillance study

PurposeDrug-induced agranulocytosis (DIAG) is a rare but serious adverse drug reaction. The Berlin Case–Control Surveillance Study (FAKOS) aimed to identify pharmaceuticals with an increased risk for this condition.MethodsAdult patients with acute non-chemotherapy–induced agranulocytosis, developed in hospital or in the outpatient setting, were ascertained by active surveillance in all 51 Berlin hospitals between the years 2000 and 2010. Applying the criteria of the World Health Organization, a standardized drug causality assessment was conducted for each agranulocytosis patient to determine possible drug aetiology. Drug risks were quantified in a case–control design with unconditional logistic regression analysis.ResultsSixty-three out of 88 validated cases of agranulocytosis were identified as being at least probably drug-related. Drug causality assessment resulted in 36 pharmaceuticals with a certain or probable relationship to agranulocytosis. Drugs involved in ≥ 3 cases with a probable or certain causality were metamizole (dipyrone) (N = 10), clozapine (N = 6), sulfasalazine (N = 5), thiamazole (N = 5), and carbamazepine (N = 3). In case–control analysis, six drugs were identified with significant odds ratios for DIAG. The highest odds ratios were observed for clozapine, sulfasalazine, and thiamazole.ConclusionsOur findings are generally in agreement with those of earlier case–control studies. The spectrum of drugs causing acute agranulocytosis has not changed considerably over recent years, despite many newly marketed drugs. Evidence for induction of agranulocytosis by some new pharmaceuticals is supported.

Severe sustained cholestatic hepatitis following temozolomide in a patient with glioblastoma multiforme: case study and review of data from the FDA adverse event reporting system

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in adults. Its established first-line adjuvant treatment is radiotherapy in combination with temozolomide (TZM). Hematotoxicity is listed as a frequent adverse drug reaction in the US prescribing information and hepatotoxicity has been reported infrequently in the postmarketing period. We here present the case of a patient diagnosed with GBM who developed severe sustained cholestatic hepatitis following treatment with TZM. The cholestasis was not reversible after withdrawal of TZM during 6 months before the patients death. Another 2 published case reports of sustained cholestasis following TZM treatment were identified; however, the sustained nature of cholestasis was not emphasized in these reports. Sixteen cases of cholestatic hepatitis/cholestasis associated with TZM were identified in the FDA spontaneous reporting system between 2007 and 2010. Information on the course of the cholestasis in these cases could not be retrieved. In the literature there are other published reports of hepatotoxicity associated with TZM that have reported reversibility upon withdrawal of the drug. Thus, TZM appears to cause different types of hepatotoxicity. Particular attention should be paid to sustained cholestasis as a very serious type of TZM-associated liver toxicity.

Drug-induced liver injury: results from the hospital-based Berlin Case–Control Surveillance Study

AIM Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is often responsible for acute liver failure, drug withdrawal, boxed warnings or drug non-approval. Therefore, we conducted a case-control study to determine the hepatotoxic risk of a wide range of drugs. METHODS The Berlin Case-Control Surveillance Study FAKOS included all 51 Berlin hospitals in a hospital network. Between 2002 and 2011, 198 patients with acute idiopathic hepatitis, 377 inpatient controls and 708 outpatient controls were ascertained. Case patients were thoroughly validated using anamnestic, clinical, laboratory and histological data. Drug exposure was obtained in a face-to-face interview. A possible drug aetiology was assessed in individual patients by applying the updated Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) scale. Drug risks were further quantified [odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)] in a case-control design with unconditional logistic regression analysis. Drug intake in the last 28 days before index date was considered for the analysis. RESULTS The study corroborated hepatotoxic risks for a number of drugs, including phenprocoumon (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.5, 6.7), amiodarone (OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.3, 21.2), clozapine (OR 34.6, 95% CI 2.8, 824.9) and flupirtine (OR 40.2, 95% CI 5.5, 856.9). Increased risks were also suggested for less commonly reported substances such as angiotensin II receptor blockers, atypical antipsychotics and for biperiden, a drug never before reported to be hepatotoxic. CONCLUSIONS Our study identified a large number of drugs as possible causes of hepatotoxicity. The observed risk for seldom reported substances highlights the need for further post-authorization safety studies not exclusively focusing on drugs already labelled as potentially hepatotoxic.

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: results from the hospital-based Berlin case–control surveillance study of 102 cases

Drug toxicity is a well‐known cause of acute pancreatitis (AP). Although many drugs have been associated with AP, the magnitude of the risk of most of them remains largely unknown.

Herb-Induced Liver Injury in the Berlin Case-Control Surveillance Study

Herb-induced liver injury (HILI) has recently attracted attention due to increasing reports of hepatotoxicity associated with use of phytotherapeutics. Here, we present data on HILI from the Berlin Case-Control Surveillance Study. The study was initiated in 2000 to investigate the serious toxicity of drugs including herbal medicines. Potential cases of liver injury were ascertained in more than 180 Departments of all 51 Berlin hospitals from October 2002 to December 2011. Drug or herb intake was assessed through a standardized face-to-face interview. Drug or herbal aetiology was assessed based on the updated Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences scale. In ten of all 198 cases of hepatotoxicity included in the study, herbal aetiology was assessed as probable (once ayurvedic herb) or possible (Valeriana five times, Mentha piperita once, Pelargonium sidoides once, Hypericum perforatum once, Eucalyptus globulus once). Mean age was 56.4 ± 9.7 years, and the predominant pattern of liver injury was hepatocellular. No cases of acute liver failure or death were observed. This case series corroborates known risks for ayurvedic herbs, supports the suspected association between Valeriana use and liver injury, and indicates a hepatotoxic potential for herbs such as Pelargonium sidoides, Hypericum perforatum or Mentha piperita that were rarely associated with liver injury before. However, given that possible causality does not prove clinical significance, further studies in this field are needed.

Citalopram-Induced Bleeding Due to Severe Thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND In case reports and observational studies, serotonin reuptake-inhibitors (SSRIs) have been linked to an increased risk of bleeding, possibly due to platelet dysfunction as a consequence of serotonin-uptake blockade into platelets. OBJECTIVE The authors propose that bleeding as a result of SSRI use may also be caused by other mechanisms. METHOD Here, the authors report on a 32-year-old woman with hemorrhages resulting from severe drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia after 4 weeks of citalopram therapy. RESULTS After withdrawal of citalopram and treatment with platelet concentrates and prednisolone, the patient recovered completely. CONCLUSION As this case report shows, drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia may present another possible mechanism for bleeding in SSRI-treated patients.

Ramipril-induced liver injury: case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND Ramipril, an inhibitor of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACEI), is a drug commonly used in the therapy of hypertension. ACEI-induced hepatotoxicity is rare, and most of the reported cases are associated with captopril. Here, we present the first case of ramipril-induced liver injury proven by positive rechallenge and a review of the literature including the data from the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS). METHODS Patient data were collected in the Berlin Case-Control Surveillance Study for adverse drug reactions. PubMed research on ACEI-induced hepatotoxicity included all ACEIs except captopril; analysis of the FAERS database focused on ramipril-induced hepatotoxicity in the period 2009-2011. RESULTS A 40-year-old male patient presented with acute onset jaundice and highly (>20-fold increase of alanine aminotranferase (ALT)) elevated liver enzymes (LEs). Viral or autoimmune hepatitis and biliary etiology were ruled out. Withdrawal of several medications including ramipril resulted in an immediate decrease in LEs, whereas a subsequent re-exposure with ramipril resulted in a striking increase in LEs (>35-fold increase of ALT). After definitely discontinuing ramipril, a rapid decline in LEs was observed, suggesting a certain causal relationship between drug intake and hepatic damage. Analysis of the FAERS database retrieved 65 cases of ramipril-associated hepatotoxicity, with jaundice being the most frequent hepatic adverse event. PubMed research detected 23 relevant publications, with enalapril being the ACEI most commonly reported as being associated with liver injury. CONCLUSIONS ACEI-induced hepatotoxicity is rare. Our case confirms a hepatotoxic potential of ramipril, highlighting the need for alertness among physicians regarding this matter.