Elisabeth G. Klompenhouwer

Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: A prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands

PURPOSE To prospectively determine the screening mammography outcome at blinded and non-blinded double reading in a biennial population based screening programme in the south of the Netherlands. METHODS We included a consecutive series of 87,487 digital screening mammograms, obtained between July 2009 and July 2011. Screening mammograms were double read in either a blinded (2nd reader was not informed about the 1st readers decision) or non-blinded fashion (2nd reader was informed about the 1st readers decision). This reading strategy was alternated on a monthly basis. Women with discrepant readings between the two radiologists were always referred for further analysis. During 2 years follow-up, we collected the radiology reports, surgical correspondence and pathology reports of all referred women and interval breast cancers. RESULTS Respectively 44,491 and 42,996 screens had been read either in a blinded or non-blinded fashion. Referral rate (3.3% versus 2.8%, p<0.001) and false positive rate (2.6% versus 2.2%, p=0.002) were significantly higher at blinded double reading whereas the cancer detection rate per 1000 screens (7.4 versus 6.5, p=0.14) and positive predictive value of referral (22% versus 23%, p=0.51) were comparable. Blinded double reading resulted in a significantly higher programme sensitivity (83% versus 76%, p=0.01). Per 1000 screened women, blinded double reading would yield 0.9 more screen detected cancers and 0.6 less interval cancers than non-blinded double reading, at the expense of 4.4 more recalls. CONCLUSION We advocate the use of blinded double reading in order to achieve a better programme sensitivity, at the expense of an increased referral rate and false positive referral rate.

Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) in clinically node positive breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is a technique to map and preserve upper extremity lymphatic drainage during axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients. We prospectively evaluated the metastatic involvement of ARM-nodes in patients who underwent an ALND for clinically node positive disease following (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in comparison to patients in whom primary ALND was performed without NAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with clinically node positive invasive breast cancer, confirmed by fine needle aspiration cytology and scheduled for primary ALND were enrolled in the study. Patients were separated into two groups: one group treated with NAC (NAC+ group) and one group not treated with NAC (NAC- group). ARM was performed in all patients by injecting blue dye into the ipsilateral upper extremity. During ALND, ARM-nodes were first identified and removed separately, followed by a standard ALND. RESULTS 91 patients were included in the NAC+ and 21 patients in the NAC- group. There was no difference in the ARM visualization rate between the two groups (86.8% for NAC+ group versus 90.5% for NAC- group, P = 0.647). In the NAC+ group 16.5% of the patients had metastatic involvement of the ARM-nodes versus 36.8% of the patients in the NAC- group (P = 0.048). CONCLUSION The risk of metastatic involvement of ARM-nodes in clinically node positive breast cancer patients is significantly lower in patients who have received NAC.

The clinical relevance of axillary reverse mapping (ARM): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAxillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast cancer has the potential to induce side-effects, including upper-limb lymphedema. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is a technique that enables discrimination of the lymphatic drainage of the breast from that of the upper limb in the axillary lymph node (LN) basin. If lymphedema is caused by removing these lymphatics and nodes in the upper limb, the possibility of identifying these lymphatics would enable surgeons to preserve them. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical relevance of selective axillary LN and lymphatic preservation by means of ARM. To minimize the risk of overlooking tumor-positive ARM nodes and the associated risk of undertreatment, we will only include patients with a tumor-positive sentinel lymph node (SLN). Patients who are candidates for ALND because of a proven positive axillary LN at clinical examination can be included in a registration study.Methods/designThe study will enroll 280 patients diagnosed with SLN biopsy-proven metastasis of invasive breast cancer with an indication for a completion ALND. Patients will be randomized to undergo standard ALND or an ALND in which the ARM nodes and their corresponding lymphatics will be left in situ. Primary outcome is the presence of axillary surgery-related lymphedema at 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively, measured by the water-displacement method. Secondary outcome measures include pain, paresthesia, numbness, and loss of shoulder mobility, quality of life, and axillary recurrence risk.DiscussionThe benefit of ALND in patients with a positive SLN is a subject of debate. For many patients, an ALND will remain the treatment of choice. This multicenter randomized trial will provide evidence of whether or not axillary LN preservation by means of ARM decreases the side-effects of an ALND. Enrolment of patients will start in April 2013 in five breast-cancer centers in the Netherlands, and is expected to conclude by April 2016.Trial registrationTC3698

David procedure during a reoperation for ongoing chronic Q fever infection of an ascending aortic prosthesis

Chronic Q fever infections, caused by Coxiella burnetii, are associated with cardiovascular complications, mainly endocarditis and vascular (graft) infections. We report a case of a patient with a C. burnetii infected thoracic aorta graft treated initially in a conservative way. However, surgical excision of the infected graft was eventually necessary. This case report highlights the challenges regarding the treatment of patients with chronic vascular C. burnetii infections. In the absence of practical guidelines, treatment is tailored to the individual patient. Furthermore, we want to emphasize the need to include chronic Q fever in the differential diagnosis in patients with culture negative aortitis, especially in the regions with Q fever epidemics in the recent past.

Arbitration of discrepant BI-RADS 0 recalls by a third reader at screening mammography lowers recall rate but not the cancer detection rate and sensitivity at blinded and non-blinded double reading

PURPOSE To evaluate the characteristics of low suspicion lesions (BI-RADS 0) at blinded and non-blinded double reading of screening mammograms and to determine the potential effect of arbitration of discrepant BI-RADS 0 recalls by a third reader on screening outcome. METHODS We included a series of 84,927 consecutive digital screening mammograms, double read in a blinded (43,184 screens) or non-blinded (41,743 screens) fashion, between July 2009 and July 2011. Discrepant readings were routinely recalled for further evaluation. During 2 years of follow-up, radiology, surgical and pathology reports were collected of all recalled women. Arbitration of discrepant BI-RADS 0 recalls (only one radiologist assigning a BI-RADS 0 score) was retrospectively performed by a third screening radiologist. RESULTS At blinded and non-blinded double reading, 32.0% and 32.5% of recalls were assigned BI-RADS 0 with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 7.2% and 6.8%, respectively. Compared to non-blinded double reading, BI-RADS 0 recalls at blinded double reading showed a higher discrepancy rate (9.0 versus 4.3 per 1000 screens, p < 0.001) and false positive recall rate (10.1 versus 8.4 per 1000 screens, p = 0.012). Arbitration of discrepant BI-RADS 0 recalls would have significantly lowered recall rate (from 3.4% to 2.8% at blinded double reading, p < 0.001, and from 2.8% to 2.5% at non-blinded double reading, p = 0.008), without a decrease in cancer detection rate (from 7.5‰ to 7.3‰, p = 0.751, and from 6.6‰ to 6.5‰, p = 0.832, respectively) and program sensitivity (from 83.2% to 81.2%, p = 0.453, and from 76.0% to 74.6%, p = 0.667, respectively). Arbitration would have significantly increased the PPV at blinded double reading (from 22.3% to 26.3%, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION We advise arbitration of discrepant BI-RADS 0 recalls, at (non-)blinded double reading of screening mammograms, to reduce recall rates and improve the PPV of recall at blinded double reading.

Endovascular treatment of a hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm associated with gastrointestinal tract bleeding

Hemosuccus pancreaticus is a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding from the pancreatic duct originating from aneurysms or pseudoaneurysms of peripancreatic arteries. It is a life-threatening cause of gastrointestinal bleeding that should always be considered in patients with prolonged or intermittent obscure gastrointestinal blood loss, or both, especially in patients with pancreatic disorders or prior pancreatic surgery. We demonstrate an endovascular treatment strategy in a patient with a common hepatic pseudoaneurysm and upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, with preserved flow in the hepatic artery. This treatment consisted of a covered stent placement in the hepatic artery, followed by transcatheter coil embolization of collateral feeding arteries.

Clinical impact of breast MRI with regard to axillary reverse mapping in clinically node positive breast cancer patients following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is a technique that discerns axillary lymphatic drainage of the arm from the breast. In the current study, we retrospectively evaluated the incidence of metastatic axillary lymph node involvement, including ARM lymph nodes, in clinically node positive breast cancer patients (cN+ patients) in whom neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was administered followed by primary ALND using breast MRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 98 cN+ breast cancer patients were analysed retrospectively. Patients without residual axillary disease at breast MRI following NAC (RAD-, n = 64) were compared with patients with residual axillary disease (RAD+, n = 34). Presence of suspect axillary lymph nodes on pre-NAC and post-NAC breast MRI was determined by experienced breast radiologists and was correlated to histopathological findings. RESULTS In the RAD-group residual axillary disease on pathological analysis following NAC was found in 25 patients (39.1%), as compared to 24 patients (70.6%) in the RAD + group (p = 0.003). Metastatic involvement of ARM lymph nodes following NAC was demonstrated in 5 patients (7.8%) in the RAD-group as compared to 10 patients (29.4%) in the RAD + group (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Breast MRI following NAC is not suitable to detect residual metastatic disease of the axilla. However, breast MRI post-NAC may be of use to identify cN+ patients with a low risk of ARM lymph node metastases. This may help to select a subgroup of cN+ patients in whom sparing of ARM lymph nodes during axillary lymph node dissection can be considered.

Treatment of temporal artery pseudoaneurysms

Purpose To give an overview of the etiology and diagnostic process of superficial temporal artery pseudoaneurysms and to evaluate different treatment modalities. Basic methods PubMed was used for searching multiple databases for relevant clinical studies. Principal findings A total of 62 studies were included, harboring 82 patients. Surgical excision is the most frequently described treatment, but less invasive treatment modalities as coiling and thrombin injections are gaining popularity. Surgical treatment was successful in all cases (67/67). Endovascular treatment was successful in 69% (9/13); the five cases treated with thrombin injection were all successful. Complementary, a description of our experience with thrombin injection is given. Conclusions Limited evidence of minimal invasive treatment for superficial temporal artery pseudoaneurysm is available. Based on this review combined with our limited experience, we suggest thrombin injections to be considered as the future primary treatment modality. In the case of unsuccessful exclusion of the aneurysm, surgical excision can be performed.

Axillary reverse mapping in axillary surgery for breast cancer: an update of the current status

Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is a technique by which the lymphatic drainage of the upper extremity that traverses the axillary region can be differentiated from the lymphatic drainage of the breast during axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Adding this procedure to ALND may reduce upper extremity lymphedema by preserving upper extremity drainage. This review of the current literature on the ARM procedure discusses the feasibility, safety and relevance of this technique. A PubMed literature search was performed until 12 August 2015. A total of 31 studies were included in this review. The studies indicated that the ARM procedure adequately identifies the upper extremity lymph nodes and lymphatics in the axillary basin using blue dye or fluorescence. Preservation of ARM lymph nodes and corresponding lymphatics was proven to be oncologically safe in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with metastatic lymph node involvement in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) who are advised to undergo a completion ALND. The ARM procedure is technically feasible with a high visualisation rate using blue dye or fluorescence. ALND combined with ARM can be regarded as a promising surgical refinement in order to reduce the incidence of upper extremity lymphedema in selected groups of patients.

Comparison of the diagnostic workup of women referred at non-blinded or blinded double reading in a population-based screening mammography programme in the south of the Netherlands.

Background:To determine whether referred women experience differences in diagnostic workup at non-blinded or blinded double reading of screening mammograms.Methods:We included a consecutive series of respectively 42.996 and 44.491 screens, double read either in a non-blinded or blinded manner between 2009 and 2011. This reading strategy was alternated on a monthly basis.Results:The overall ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) rate and stereotactic CNB (SCNB) rate per 1000 screens were higher at blinded than at non-blinded reading (7.5 vs 6.0, P=0.008 and 8.1 vs 6.6, P=0.009). Among women with benign workup, these rates were higher at blinded reading (2.6 vs 1.4, P<0.001 and 5.9 vs 4.7, P=0.013). The benign biopsy rates were higher at blinded double reading (P<0.001), whereas the positive predictive value of biopsy did not differ (P=0.103).Conclusions:Blinded double-reading results in higher overall CNB and SCNB rates than non-blinded double reading, as well as a higher benign biopsy rate.