Elisabeth Quoix

CYFRA 21-1 is a prognostic determinant in non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a meta-analysis in 2063 patients.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of a high pretreatment serum CYFRA 21-1 level (a cytokeratin 19 fragment) adjusted for the effects of well-known co-variables in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This meta-analysis based on individual updated data gathered comprehensive databases from published or unpublished controlled studies dealing with the prognostic effect of serum CYFRA 21-1 level at presentation in NSCLC of any stage (nine institutions, 2063 patients). Multivariate regression was carried out with the Cox model. The proportional hazard assumption for each of the selected variables retained in the final model was originally checked by log minus log plots baseline hazard ratio. The follow-up ranged from 25 to 78 months. A total of 1616 events were recorded. In the multivariate analysis performed at the 1-year end point, a high pretreatment CYFRA 21-1 level was an unfavourable prognostic determinant in all centres except one (Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.88 (1.64–2.15), P<10−4). Other significant variables were stage of the disease, age and performance status. Within the first 18 months, the procedure disclosed a nearly similar hazard ratio for patients having a high pretreatment serum CYFRA 21-1 level (1.62 (1.42–1.86), P<10−4). For patients who did not undergo surgery, the hazard ratio during the first year of follow-up was 1.78 (1.54–2.07), P<10−4. Finally, in the surgically treated population, at the 2-year end point, a high pretreatment CYFRA 21-1 and a locally advanced stage remained unfavourable prognostic determinants. In conclusion CYFRA 21-1 might be regarded as a putative co-variable in analysing NSCLC outcome inasmuch as a high serum level is a significant determinant of poor prognosis whatever the planned treatment.

Dabrafenib in patients with BRAFV600E-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-arm, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Activating BRAF(V600E) (Val600Glu) mutations are found in about 1-2% of lung adenocarcinomas, which might provide an opportunity for targeted treatment in these patients. Dabrafenib is an oral selective inhibitor of BRAF kinase. We did a trial to assess the clinical activity of dabrafenib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) positive for the BRAF(V600E) mutation. METHODS In this phase 2, multicentre, non-randomised, open-label study, we enrolled previously treated and untreated patients with stage IV metastatic BRAF(V600E)-positive NSCLC. Patients received oral dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response, which was assessed in patients who had received at least one dose of dabrafenib; safety was also assessed in this population. The study is ongoing but not enrolling patients in this cohort. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01336634. FINDINGS Between Aug 3, 2011, and Feb 25, 2014, 84 patients were enrolled, six of whom had not previously received systemic treatment for NSCLC. 26 of the 78 previously treated patients achieved an investigator-assessed overall response (33% [95% CI 23-45]). Four of the six previously untreated patients had an objective response. One patient died from an intracranial haemorrhage that was judged by the investigator to be due to the study drug. Serious adverse events were reported in 35 (42%) of 84 patients. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma in ten (12%), asthenia in four (5%), and basal-cell carcinoma in four (5%). INTERPRETATION Dabrafenib showed clinical activity in BRAF(V600E)-positive NSCLC. Our findings suggest that dabrafenib could represent a treatment option for a population of patients with limited therapeutic options. FUNDING GlaxoSmithKline.

Plasma DNA microsatellite panel as sensitive and tumor-specific marker in lung cancer patients

The majority of lung cancer patients have tumor‐derived genetic alterations in circulating plasma DNA that could be exploited as a diagnostic tool. We used fluorescent microsatellite analysis to detect alterations in plasma and tumor DNA in 34 patients who underwent bronchoscopy for lung cancer, including 11 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 23 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (12 adenocarcinomas, 11 squamous cell carcinomas) and 20 controls. Allelotyping was performed with a selected panel of 12 microsatellites from 9 chromosomal regions 3p21, 3p24, 5q, 9p, 9q, 13q, 17p, 17q and 20q. Plasma DNA allelic imbalance (AI) was found in 88% (30 of 34 patients), with a similar sensitivity in SCLC and NSCLC. In the 24 paired available tumor tissues, 83% (20 of 24) presented at least 1 AI. Among these patients, 85% (17 of 20) presented also at least 1 AI in paired plasma DNA, but the location of the allelic alterations in paired plasma and tumor DNA could differ, suggesting the presence of heterogeneous tumor clones. None of the 20 controls displayed plasma or bronchial DNA alteration. A reduced panel of six markers (at 3p, 5q, 9p, 9q) showed a sensitivity of 85%. Moreover, a different panel of microsatellites at 3p and 17p13 in SCLC and at 5q, 9p, 9q and 20q in NSCLC patients could be specifically used. Analysis of plasma DNA using this targeted panel could be a valuable noninvasive test and a useful tool to monitor disease progression without assessing the tumor.

Impact of Systematic EGFR and KRAS Mutation Evaluation on Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated by Erlotinib in a French Prospective Cohort (ERMETIC Project—Part 2)

Background: Epidermal growth factor and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten ras sarcoma (KRAS) mutation status, although associated with EGFR- tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) efficacy, has not been used in clinical practice until recently. The prospective Evaluation of the EGFR Mutation status for the administration of EGFR-TKIs in non small cell lung Carcinoma (ERMETIC) study aimed to implement these biomarkers in France. Methods: Between March 2007 and April 2008, EGFR and KRAS were studied by sequencing DNA tumor specimens from 522 consecutive advanced non–small-cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR-TKI, mostly in second- or third-line settings. Cox models were used to investigate the impact of patient characteristics and mutations on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Added value from mutation status was evaluated using likelihood ratio (LR) tests. Classification and regression tree analysis aimed to identify homogeneous groups in terms of survival. Results: Among the 522 patients, 87% were white, 32% were women, and 18% were never-smokers, with 65% presenting with adenocarcinoma. Biological data were available for 307 patients, showing 44 EGFR mutations (14%) and 42 KRAS (14%) mutations. Median PFS was 2.4 months (interquartile range, 1.4–4.6) and median OS 5.6 months (interquartile range, 2.2–14.0). Factors independently associated with PFS were performance status 1 or 2 to 3 (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–1.9; and HR = 2.3, CI 1.7–3.1, respectively; p < 0.001); former or current smoker status (HR = 1.8, CI 1.4–2.4 and 2.0,CI 1.4–2.8, respectively; p < 0.001); nonadenocarcinoma histology (squamous cell: HR = 0.9 CI 0.7–1.2]; others: HR = 1.6, 1.3–2.1; p < 0.001); at least two metastatic sites (HR = 1.3, CI 1.1–1.6 and 1.6, CI 1.3–2.1, respectively; p < 0.001); prior taxane-based chemotherapy (HR = 1.3, CI 1.0–1.3, p = 0.01); non-white (HR = 0.7, CI 0.5–0.9, p = 0.009). Similar results were found for OS. In addition, EGFR and KRAS mutations were significantly associated with PFS (HR = 0.5, CI 0.3–0.7 and HR = 1.2, CI 0.8–1.8, respectively, versus no mutation; LR p = 0.001). In the OS model, adjusted HR was 0.7 (0.4–1.0) for EGFR mutation and 1.7 (1.1–2.4) for KRAS (LR p = 0.004). Classification and regression tree analysis revealed EGFR mutation to be the primary factor for identifying homogeneous patient subgroups in terms of PFS. Conclusions: EGFR and KRAS status independently impacts outcomes in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR-TKI. However, EGFR status impacts both PFS and OS whereas KRAS only impacts OS. These findings support the nationwide use of EGFR status for patient selection before EGFR-TKI therapy. The role of KRAS mutations remains to be elucidated.

Customized Adjuvant Phase II Trial in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: IFCT-0801 TASTE

PURPOSE Surgical resection plus adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is considered standard care for stage II to III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its efficacy is limited, and it involves toxic risks, justifying patient-tailored treatment. Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) was shown to predict cisplatin-based chemotherapy response; EGFR mutations were predictive of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition response. PATIENTS AND METHODS This prospective randomized phase II trial enrolled 150 patients with completely resected non-squamous cell stage II or IIIA (non-N2) tumors. Patients in the control arm (n = 74) were treated with four standard-dose courses of cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP). In the customized treatment arm (n = 76), patients with activated EGFR mutations received erlotinib 150 mg for 1 year; ERCC1-negative patients received four CP courses, whereas ERCC1-positive patients underwent follow-up. The trial sought to demonstrate the feasibility of customized adjuvant chemotherapy based on timely biomarker analysis within a 2-month postsurgery delay. Secondary objectives were tolerability, compliance with adjuvant therapy, and biomarker distribution. RESULTS In arm A, all patients received CP; in arm B, seven received erlotinib, 53 were administered CP, and 16 underwent follow-up. Median erlotinib exposure was 344 days. Of the 127 patients allocated to CP, 82% received four cycles with good tolerability. The overall success rate of the trial (ie, percentage of patients with complete biomarker status able to start adjuvant treatment within 2 months of surgery) was 80%. CONCLUSION The primary end point of the trial was met, demonstrating the feasibility of a national biology-driven trial in the adjuvant NSCLC setting. Nevertheless, the phase III part was canceled because of the unreliability of the ERCC1 immunohistochemical readouts.

IFCT-0401 Trial: a phase II study of gefitinib administered as first-line treatment in advanced adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma subtype.

Purpose: Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique-0401 phase II trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib as a first-line treatment for patients with adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma subtype (ADC-BAC). Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients (n = 88) with advanced ADC-BAC were treated with 250 mg/d of gefitinib. The primary objective was assessment of disease control rate (DCR [objective response + stable disease]) at 3 months using World Health Organization criteria. A disease control rate of 25% or greater would be of interest in this patient population. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were the secondary criteria. Clinical and disease characteristics that conferred a favorable prognosis under gefitinib were also analyzed. Results: Disease control was achieved in 25 patients (29.4%); 11 patients (12.9%) had partial response and 14 (16.4%) had stable disease. Median PFS was 2.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3–3.2) and median OS was 13.2 months (95% CI, 10.2–17.3). Never smokers, patients with low respiratory symptoms score, occurrence of cutaneous rash, and nonmucinous ADC-BAC subtype were associated with increased probability of disease control. Nonmucinous ADC-BAC was associated with increased PFS and OS at 3 years. Patients with nonmucinous BAC had longer OS and PFS compared with patients with other ADC-BAC variants; median PFS for nonmucinous BAC was 11.3 months (95% CI, 3.2–14.7), whereas it was 2.6 months (95% CI, 2.1–3) for mucinous BAC. As expected, toxicity was low, with dermatological problems, diarrhea, and nausea being the most common adverse events. Conclusion: Results from the Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique-0401 trial demonstrate that gefitinib combines efficacy with low toxicity and is, therefore, suitable as a first-line treatment of advanced ADC-BAC, particularly in patients with nonmucinous BAC subtype.

Progress in the management and outcome of small-cell lung cancer in a French region from 1981 to 1994.

Recent analyses of series of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients included in clinical trials have shown improved survival over time, but it has been impossible to determine whether this was due to selection biases, stage migration, or true therapeutic improvement. To determine if there has been a true improvement of survival over time, we reviewed the medical records of all consecutive patients diagnosed with SCLC between 1981 and 1994 in the Bas-Rhin in France. Among the 787 patients (median age 63), there was no significant period effect for sex, age, or stage. Staging work-ups became increasingly thorough (significant period effect). The mean number of investigations and of tumour sites detected correlated significantly. The chemotherapy rate increased (from 76.4% in 1981–1983 to 91.7% in 1993–1994, P = 10–5) and mediastinal irradiation decreased (to roughly 25% of patients after 1983). Median survival time increased for the overall population from 6.6 months in 1981–1983 to 11.3 months in 1993–1994 (P = 10–5), for patients with limited disease (LD) from 9.2 (P = 0.002) months to 14.0 months, and for those with extensive (ED) disease from 3.5 months to 9.6 months (P = 10–5). Significant independent prognostic factors were disease extent, clinical trial participation, period, type of chemotherapy, and mediastinal irradiation in LD. Survival time has truly improved as ‘state of the art’ management of SCLC has changed.

Specific features of non-small cell lung cancer in women: a retrospective study of 1738 cases diagnosed in Bas-Rhin between 1982 and 1997.

Introduction: The literature suggests that lung cancer may represent a different disease in women compared with men and that gender specificities have been reported mostly in clinical trials patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based study of a sample of 1738 patients diagnosed with a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the department of Bas-Rhin (northeastern France) between 1982 and 1997. Our study aimed to describe symptoms at presentation, stage, histological distribution, treatment modalities, and survival, according to sex. Results: Tobacco exposure differed significantly according to sex: 28.9% of women were nonsmokers versus 1.4% of the men. More NSCLC were metastatic at diagnosis in women than in men (41.1% versus 29.9%). Adenocarcinoma predominated in women (54.4%), whereas squamous cell carcinoma predominated in men (65.9%). Invasive procedures, such as transthoracic needle biopsy, contributed more frequently to histological diagnosis in women. Men and women underwent the same procedures for disease staging, excepted for the abdominal computed tomography scan, which was performed more frequently in women. Treatment also differed: in resectable disease, fewer pneumonectomies were performed in women; in locally advanced disease, the mean doses of thoracic irradiation were significantly lower in women (48.0 grays versus 55.5 grays); in metastatic-stage disease, fewer women received platin-based chemotherapy, but this difference was not significant. Sex was not a significant prognostic factor in our study, contrary to most North American studies, where women seem to have had better survival rates. Conclusions: This study emphasizes gender differences in smoking exposure, presentation (stage, histological subtype), and diagnostic and therapeutic management of NSCLC.

Risk factors for early mortality and morbidity after pneumonectomy: a reappraisal.

BACKGROUND Pneumonectomy remains a high-risk procedure. Comprehensive patient selection should be based on analysis of proven risk factors. METHODS The records of 323 pneumonectomy patients were retrospectively reviewed. Multiple demographic data were collected. End points were operative mortality at 30 and at 90 days, major procedurally related complications, and cardiovascular events. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS Smoking habits, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) status, induction chemotherapy status, diabetes, and obesity had no statistical influence on short-term outcomes. After right pneumonectomy, 30-day mortality (p = 0.045) and the incidence of bronchopleural fistulas (p = 0.009) were increased. Multivariate analysis for postoperative bronchopleural fistulas discovered that right pneumonectomies are the sole risk factor (p = 0.015). Univariate analysis for postoperative atrial fibrillation showed that male gender, age 70 and older, hypertension, and dyslipidemia are risk factors. Multivariate analysis found no definite risk factor. Patients with coronary artery disease had more postoperative cardiovascular events (p = 0.003). Among patients free of coronary artery disease, COPD led to an increased 90-day mortality rate (p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS Patients with right pneumonectomies are at increased risk. Postoperative cardiovascular events are more frequent in coronary artery disease patients. COPD is a risk factor in patients free of coronary disease.

Pathologic complete response to preoperative chemotherapy predicts cure in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: combined analysis of two IFCT randomized trials.

Introduction: Our study aimed to evaluate whether pathologic complete response (pCR) in early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted in improved outcome, and to determine predictive factors for pCR. Methods: Eligible patients with stage-IB or -II NSCLC were included in two consecutive Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique phase-III trials evaluating platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with pCR defined by the absence of viable cancer cells in the resected surgical specimen. Results: Among the 492 patients analyzed, 41 (8.3%) achieved pCR. In the pCR group, 5-year overall survival was 80.0% compared with 55.8% in the non-pCR group (p = 0.0007). In multivariate analyses, pCR was a favorable prognostic factor of overall survival (relative risk = 0.34; 95% confidence interval = 0.18–0.64) in addition to squamous-cell carcinoma, weight loss less than or equal to 5%, and stage-IB disease. Five-year disease-free survival was 80.1% in the pCR group compared to 44.8% in the non-pCR group (p < 0.0001). Two patients (4.9%) in the pCR group experienced disease recurrence compared to 193 patients (42.8%) in the non-pCR group. SCC subtype was the only independent predictor of pCR (odds ratio [OR] = 4.30; 95% confidence interval = 1.90–9.72). Conclusion: Our results showed that pCR after preoperative chemotherapy was a favorable prognostic factor in stage-IB–II NSCLC. Our study is the largest published series evaluating pCRs after preoperative chemotherapy. The only factor predictive of pCR was squamous-cell carcinoma. Identifying molecular predictive markers for pCR may help in distinguishing patients likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in choosing the most adequate preoperative chemotherapy regimen.