Elisabeth Woodhams

Motivational interviewing to improve postabortion contraceptive uptake by young women: development and feasibility of a counseling intervention ☆ ☆☆

OBJECTIVE The objective was to develop and test a postabortal contraception counseling intervention using motivational interviewing (MI) and to determine the feasibility, impact and patient acceptability of the intervention when integrated into an urban academic abortion clinic. STUDY DESIGN A single-session postabortal contraception counseling intervention for young women aged 15-24 years incorporating principles, skills and style of MI was developed. Medical and social work professionals were trained to deliver the intervention, their competency was assessed, and the intervention was integrated into the clinical setting. Feasibility was determined by assessing ability to approach and recruit participants, ability to complete the full intervention without interruption and participant satisfaction with the counseling. RESULTS We approached 90% of eligible patients and 71% agreed to participate (n=20). All participants received the full counseling intervention. The median duration of the intervention was 29 min. Immediately after the intervention and at the 1-month follow-up contact, 95% and 77% of participants reported that the session was helpful, respectively. CONCLUSIONS MI counseling can be tailored to the abortion setting. It is feasible to train professionals to use MI principles, skills and style and to implement an MI-based contraception counseling intervention in an urban academic abortion clinic. The sessions are acceptable to participants. IMPLICATIONS The use of motivational interviewing in contraception counseling may be an appropriate and effective strategy for increasing use of contraception after abortion. This study demonstrates that this patient-centered, directive and collaborative approach can be developed into a counseling intervention that can be integrated into an abortion clinic.

In the Clinic. Contraception.

Section Editors Deborah Cotton, MD, MPH Darren Taichman, MD, PhD Sankey Williams, MD The content of In the Clinic is drawn from the clinical information and education resources of the American College of Physicians (ACP), including PIER (Physicians’ Information and Education Resource) and MKSAP (Medical Knowledge and SelfAssessment Program). Annals of Internal Medicine editors develop In the Clinic from these primary sources in collaboration with the ACP’s Medical Education and Publishing divisions and with the assistance of science writers and physician writers. Editorial consultants from PIER and MKSAP provide expert review of the content. Readers who are interested in these primary resources for more detail can consult http://pier.acponline.org, http://www.acponline.org/products_services/ mksap/15/?pr31, and other resources referenced in each issue of In the Clinic.