Elizabeth A. Carter

Adherence to ATLS primary and secondary surveys during pediatric trauma resuscitation

STUDY AIM Adherence to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol has been associated with improved management of injured patients. The objective of this study is to determine factors associated with delayed and omitted ATLS primary and secondary survey tasks at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. METHODS Video recorded resuscitations of 237 injured patients <18 years old obtained over a four month period at our hospital were evaluated to assess completeness and timeliness of essential tasks in the primary and secondary survey of ATLS. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify features associated with decreased ATLS performance. RESULTS Primary survey findings were stated less often in patients with burn injuries compared to those with blunt injuries (RR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.26-2.35) and less often during the overnight shift [11 PM-7 AM] (RR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.02-1.46). Secondary survey findings were verbalized less often in patients with penetrating injures (RR=2.30; 95% CI: 1.06-5.00). Time to statement of primary surveys findings was delayed in patients with burn injuries (HR=0.69; 95% CI: 0.48-0.98) and among those transferred from another hospital. Completeness and timeliness of ATLS task performance were not associated with age or injury severity score. CONCLUSIONS Mechanism of injury and hospital factors are associated with incomplete and delayed primary and secondary surveys. Interventions that address deficient ATLS adherence related to these factors may lead to a reduction in errors during this critical period of patient care.

Effect of a checklist on advanced trauma life support task performance during pediatric trauma resuscitation

OBJECTIVES Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) has been shown to improve outcomes related to trauma resuscitation; however, omissions from this protocol persist. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a trauma resuscitation checklist on performance of ATLS tasks. METHODS Video recordings of resuscitations of children sustaining blunt or penetrating injuries at a Level I pediatric trauma center were reviewed for completion and timeliness of ATLS primary and secondary survey tasks, with and without checklist use. Patient and resuscitation characteristics were obtained from the trauma registry. Data were collected during two 4-month periods before (n = 222) and after (n = 213) checklist implementation. The checklist contained 50 items and included four sections: prearrival, primary survey, secondary survey, and departure plan. RESULTS Five primary survey ATLS tasks (cervical spine immobilization, oxygen administration, palpating pulses, assessing neurologic status, and exposing the patient) and nine secondary survey ATLS tasks were performed more frequently (p ≤ 0.01 for all) and vital sign measurements were obtained faster (p ≤ 0.01 for all) after the checklist was implemented. When controlling for patient and event-specific characteristics, primary and secondary survey tasks overall were more likely to be completed (odds ratio [OR] = 2.66, primary survey; OR = 2.47, secondary survey; p < 0.001 for both) and primary survey tasks were performed faster (p < 0.001) after the checklist was implemented. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a trauma checklist was associated with greater ATLS task performance and with increased frequency and speed of primary and secondary survey task completion.

Association between trauma center type and mortality among injured adolescent patients

IMPORTANCE Although data obtained from regional trauma systems demonstrate improved outcomes for children treated at pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) compared with those treated at adult trauma centers (ATCs), differences in mortality have not been consistently observed for adolescents. Because trauma is the leading cause of death and acquired disability among adolescents, it is important to better define differences in outcomes among injured adolescents by using national data. OBJECTIVES To use a national data set to compare mortality of injured adolescents treated at ATCs, PTCs, or mixed trauma centers (MTCs) that treat both pediatric and adult trauma patients and to determine the final discharge disposition of survivors at different center types. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Data from level I and II trauma centers participating in the 2010 National Trauma Data Bank (January 1 to December 31, 2010) were used to create multilevel models accounting for center-specific effects to evaluate the association of center characteristics (PTC, ATC, or MTC) on mortality among patients aged 15 to 19 years who were treated for a blunt or penetrating injury. The models controlled for sex; mechanism of injury (blunt vs penetrating); injuries sustained, based on the Abbreviated Injury Scale scores (post-dot values <3 or ≥3 by body region); initial systolic blood pressure; and Glasgow Coma Scale scores. Missing data were managed using multiple imputation, accounting for multilevel data structure. Data analysis was conducted from January 15, 2013, to March 15, 2016. EXPOSURES Type of trauma center. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mortality at each center type. RESULTS Among 29 613 injured adolescents (mean [SD] age, 17.3 [1.4] years; 72.7% male), most were treated at ATCs (20 402 [68.9%]), with the remainder at MTCs (7572 [25.6%]) or PTCs (1639 [5.5%]). Adolescents treated at PTCs were more likely to be injured by a blunt than penetrating injury mechanism (91.4%) compared with those treated at ATCs (80.4%) or MTCs (84.6%). Mortality was higher among adolescents treated at ATCs and MTCs than those treated at PTCs (3.2% and 3.5% vs 0.4%; P < .001). The adjusted odds of mortality were higher at ATCs (odds ratio, 4.19; 95% CI, 1.30-13.51) and MTCs (odds ratio, 6.68; 95% CI, 2.03-21.99) compared with PTCs but was not different between level I and II centers (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.99). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Mortality among injured adolescents was lower among those treated at PTCs, compared with those treated at ATCs and MTCs. Defining resource and patient features that account for these observed differences is needed to optimize adolescent outcomes after injury.

Effect of a Checklist on Advanced Trauma Life Support Workflow Deviations during Trauma Resuscitations without Pre-Arrival Notification

BACKGROUND Trauma resuscitations without pre-arrival notification are often initially chaotic, which can potentially compromise patient care. We hypothesized that trauma resuscitations without pre-arrival notification are performed with more variable adherence to ATLS protocol and that implementation of a checklist would improve performance. STUDY DESIGN We analyzed event logs of trauma resuscitations from two 4-month periods before (n = 222) and after (n = 215) checklist implementation. Using process mining techniques, individual resuscitations were compared with an ideal workflow model of 6 ATLS primary survey tasks performed by the bedside evaluator and given model fitness scores (range 0 to 1). Mean fitness scores and frequency of conformance (fitness = 1) were compared (using Students t-test or chi-square test, as appropriate) for activations with and without notification both before and after checklist implementation. Multivariable linear regression, controlling for patient and resuscitation characteristics, was also performed to assess the association between pre-arrival notification and model fitness before and after checklist implementation. RESULTS Fifty-five (12.6%) resuscitations lacked pre-arrival notification (23 pre-implementation and 32 post-implementation; p = 0.15). Before checklist implementation, resuscitations without notification had lower fitness (0.80 vs 0.90; p < 0.001) and conformance (26.1% vs 50.8%; p = 0.03) than those with notification. After checklist implementation, the fitness (0.80 vs 0.91; p = 0.007) and conformance (26.1% vs 59.4%; p = 0.01) improved for resuscitations without notification, but still remained lower than activations with notification. In multivariable analysis, activations without notification had lower fitness both before (b = -0.11, p < 0.001) and after checklist implementation (b = -0.04, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Trauma resuscitations without pre-arrival notification are associated with a decreased adherence to key components of the ATLS primary survey protocol. The addition of a checklist improves protocol adherence and reduces the effect of notification on task performance.

Assessment of workload during pediatric trauma resuscitation.

BACKGROUND Trauma resuscitations are high-pressure, time-critical events during which health care providers form ad hoc teams to rapidly assess and treat injured patients. Trauma team members experience varying levels of workload during resuscitations resulting from the objective demands of their role-specific tasks, the circumstances surrounding the event, and their individual previous experiences. The goal of this study was to determine factors influencing workload experienced by trauma team members during pediatric trauma resuscitations. METHODS Workload was measured using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (TLX). TLX surveys were administered to four trauma team roles: charge nurse, senior surgical resident (surgical coordinator), emergency medicine physician, and junior surgical resident or nurse practitioner (bedside clinician). A total of 217 surveys were completed. Univariate and multivariate statistical techniques were used to examine the relationship between workload and patient and clinical factors. RESULTS Bedside clinicians reported the highest total workload score (208.7), followed by emergency medicine physicians (156.3), surgical coordinators (144.1), and charge nurses (129.1). Workload was higher during higher-level activations (235.3), for events involving intubated patients (249.0), and for patients with an Injury Severity Score greater than 15 (230.4) (p, 0.001 for all). When controlling for potential confounders using multiple linear regression, workload was increased during higher level activations (79.0 points higher, p = 0.01) and events without previous notification (38.9 points higher, p = 0.03). Workload also remained significantly higher for the bedside clinician compared with the other three roles (p ⩽ 0.005 for all). CONCLUSION Workload during pediatric trauma resuscitations differed by team role and was increased for higher-level activations and events without previous notification. This study demonstrates the validity of the TLX as a tool to measure workload in trauma resuscitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level II.

Factors affecting team size and task performance in pediatric trauma resuscitation

Objectives Varying team size based on anticipated injury acuity is a common method for limiting personnel during trauma resuscitation. While missing personnel may delay treatment, large teams may worsen care through role confusion and interference. This study investigates factors associated with varying team size and task completion during trauma resuscitation. Methods Video-recorded resuscitations of pediatric trauma patients (n = 201) were reviewed for team size (bedside and total) and completion of 24 resuscitation tasks. Additional patient characteristics were abstracted from our trauma registry. Linear regression was used to assess which characteristics were associated with varying team size and task completion. Task completion was then analyzed in relation to team size using best-fit curves. Results The average bedside team ranged from 2.7 to 10.0 members (mean, 6.5 [SD, 1.7]), with 4.3 to 17.7 (mean, 11.0 [SD, 2.8]) people total. More people were present during high-acuity activations (+4.9, P < 0.001) and for patients with a penetrating injury (+2.3, P = 0.002). Fewer people were present during activations without prearrival notification (−4.77, P < 0.001) and at night (−1.25, P = 0.002). Task completion in the first 2 minutes ranged from 4 to 19 (mean, 11.7 [SD, 3.8]). The maximum number of tasks was performed at our hospital by teams with 7 people at the bedside (13 total). Conclusions Resuscitation task completion varies by team size, with a nonlinear association between number of team members and completed tasks. Management of team size during high-acuity activations, those without prior notification, and those in which the patient has a penetrating injury may help optimize performance.

Compliance with barrier precautions during paediatric trauma resuscitations.

PURPOSE Barrier precautions protect patients and providers from blood-borne pathogens. Although barrier precaution compliance has been shown to be low among adult trauma teams, it has not been evaluated during paediatric resuscitations in which perceived risk of disease transmission may be low. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with compliance with barrier precautions during paediatric trauma resuscitations. METHODS Video recordings of resuscitations performed on injured children (<18 years old) were reviewed to determine compliance with an established policy requiring gowns and gloves. Depending on activation level, trauma team members included up to six physicians, four nurses, and a respiratory therapist. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the effect of team role, resuscitation factors, and injury mechanism on barrier precaution compliance. RESULTS Over twelve weeks, 1138 trauma team members participated in 128 resuscitations (4.7% penetrating injuries, 9.4% highest level activations). Compliance with barrier precautions was 81.3%, with higher compliance seen among roles primarily at the bedside compared to positions not primarily at the bedside (90.7% vs. 65.1%, p<0.001). Bedside residents (98.4%) and surgical fellows (97.6%) had the highest compliance, while surgical attendings (20.8%) had the lowest (p<0.001). Controlling for role, increased compliance was observed during resuscitations of patients with penetrating injuries (OR=3.97 [95% CI: 1.35-11.70], p=0.01), during resuscitations triaged to the highest activation level (OR=2.61 [95% CI: 1.34-5.10], p=0.005), and among team members present before patient arrival (OR=4.14 [95% CI: 2.29-7.39], p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compliance with barrier precautions varies by trauma team role. Team members have higher compliance when treating children with penetrating and high acuity injuries and when arriving before the patient. Interventions integrating barrier precautions into the workflow of team members are needed to reduce this variability and improve compliance with universal precautions during paediatric trauma resuscitations.

Factors associated with patient exposure and environmental control during pediatric trauma resuscitation.

BACKGROUND Exposure and environmental control are essential components of the advanced trauma life support primary survey, especially during the resuscitation of pediatric patients. Proper exposure aids in early recognition of injuries in patients unable to communicate their injuries, while warming techniques, such as the use of blankets, assist in maintaining normothermia. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with exposure compliance and duration during pediatric trauma resuscitation. METHODS All pediatric trauma resuscitations over a 4-month period were reviewed for compliance and time to completion of clothing removal and warm blanket placement. Video review data were then linked with clinical data obtained from the trauma registry. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the associations of patient characteristics, injury mechanism, and clinical factors on exposure compliance and duration. RESULTS Of 145 patients, 65 (52%) were never exposed. Lower exposure compliance was associated with increasing age (odds ratio, [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–0.98), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 14 or greater (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03–0.76), Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 15 or less (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09–0.82), and the absence of head injury (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08–0.87). Among those exposed, the duration of exposure was longer among children with GCS score of less than 14 (4.3 [1.6], p = 0.009), head injuries (3.33 [1.6], p = 0.04), and the need for intubation (8.4 [2.2], p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, older age and ISS of 15 or less were associated with a decreased odds of exposure (p = 0.009, p = 0.04, respectively), while intubation was associated with increased exposure duration (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Despite the importance of exposure and environmental control during pediatric trauma resuscitation, compliance with these tasks was low, even among severely injured patients. Interventions are needed to promote the proper exposure of patients during the initial evaluation, while also limiting the duration of exposure during examinations and procedures in the trauma bay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiologic study, level III.

Effects of designated leadership and team-size on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: The Basel-Washington SIMulation (BaWaSim) trial

Objective: During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), it remains unclear whether designating an individual person as team leader compared with emergent leadership results in better team performance. Also, the effect of CPR team size on team performance remains understudied. Methods: This randomized‐controlled trial compared designated versus emergent leadership and size of rescue team (3 vs 6 rescuers) on resuscitation performance. Results: We included 90 teams with a total of 408 students. No difference in mean (±SD) hands‐on time (seconds) were observed between emergent leadership (106 ± 30) compared to designated leadership (103 ± 27) groups (adjusted difference − 2.97 (95%CI ‐15.75 to 9.80, p = 0.645), or between smaller (103 ± 30) and larger teams (106 ± 26, adjusted difference 3.53, 95%CI ‐8.47 to 15.53, p = 0.56). Emergent leadership groups had a shorter time to circulation check and first defibrillation, but the quality of CPR based on arm and shoulder position was lower. No differences in CPR quality measures were observed between smaller and larger teams. Conclusions: Within this international US/Swiss trial, leadership designation and larger team size did not improve hands‐on time, but emergent leadership teams initiated defibrillation earlier. Improvements in performance may be more likely to be achieved by optimization of emergent leadership than increasing the size of cardiac arrest teams.