Elizabeth A. Dragon

High pre-treatment serum hepatitis B virus titre predicts failure of lamivudine prophylaxis and graft re-infection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS Orthotopic liver transplantation has an established role for the treatment of patients with chronic liver failure secondary to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Unfortunately, recurrent infection of the graft can be associated with aggressive disease, and with diminished graft and patient survival. Currently, the role of nucleoside analogues for prevention of graft re-infection is being evaluated. Preliminary results are encouraging, but treatment failure has been associated with emergence of drug-resistant virus. METHODS We have studied ten consecutive patients who received lamivudine prophylaxis for prevention of HBV graft reinfection. Sequential sera, collected prelamivudine then during treatment before and after liver transplantation, were examined. Conventional serological markers were measured, as were serum viral DNA levels with a sensitive quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. RESULTS Lamivudine treatment effected a reduction in serum HBV levels, but six patients still had measurable viral DNA at the time of transplantation. Five patients developed graft re-infection with lamivudine-resistant virus. Resistant virus emerged 8 to 15 months post-transplant. The likelihood of emergence of resistant virus was related to the pre-treatment serum HBV titre. Persistent serum viral DNA positivity and evidence of graft re-infection during the early post-transplant period did not predict the subsequent emergence of resistant virus. CONCLUSIONS Our observations suggest that the resistant species may be present in the viral quasispecies in the serum and liver of patients with high-level replication prior to lamivudine exposure. The resistant species can persist during lamivudine treatment prior to transplantation, and emerge following transplantation. These observations suggest strategies which might prevent the emergence of drug-resistant species, and imply that graft re-infection may be a preventable phenomenon.

Evaluation of a new assay for HBV DNA quantitation in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND The Amplicor HBV Monitor Test for quantitative determination of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA has recently been introduced. This assay is based on PCR and a non-radioactive hybridization and detection system on microwell plates. OBJECTIVE The performance of the Amplicor HBV Monitor Test was evaluated in a routine diagnostic laboratory. The Amplicor HBV Monoitor assay was compared to the Digene Hybrid Capture System HBV DNA assay for the quantitation of HBV in patient sera. STUDY DESIGN Sensitivity and reproducibility were determined with 10-fold dilution series of two Eurohep HBV reference plasma specimens. Furthermore, 196 sera from 14 children with chronic HBV infection and interferon therapy were tested with both assays. RESULTS The detection limit was found to be 10(3) copies/ml with the Amplicor PCR assay compared to 10(6) to 10(7) copies/ml with the Digene hybridization assay. Both assays were quasi-linear over the measurable ranges. The new PCR assay proved to be very reliable. With the Amplicor PCR assay, 26.2% of the HBV DNA-positive clinical samples were found between 10(3) and 10(7) copies/ml and all of them tested below the detection limit with the hybridization assay. CONCLUSION The Amplicor HBV Monitor Test shows excellent sensitivity and provides a valuable tool for the detection of HBV DNA in serum. It can be used for recognizing those patients who might benefit from antiviral therapy, for evaluation of the efficacy of anti-HBV therapy, and for validation of blood products.

Blood screening by nucleic acid amplification technology: Current issues, future challenges

AbstractBackground: Nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) is presently being evaluated in US clinical trials to determine the safety and efficacy of mini-pool testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in the blood-donor population. Although the risk for transfusion-transmitted HIV and HCV infection is extremely low, there is still a small chance that blood donated by infected individuals before seroconversion can escape detection by current antibody-based assays. Methods: This report describes the amplification technologies being used and reviews several issues surrounding NAT-based blood screening. The performance features of NAT and current enzyme immunoassay technologies are compared, and the benefits of NAT in reducing transfusion-transmitted infections are discussed. Conclusions: The current US clinical trials of mini-pool NAT testing for HIV and HCV RNA have successfully identified preseroconversion infectious blood units. Although the current NAT-based screening systems are semiautomated, mini-pool testing represents an unprecedented innovation among government and nongovernment agencies in the highly regulated blood transfusion industry. Despite cost-effectiveness issues, based on the public perception of infectious diseases acquired through blood transfusion, NAT-based screening of the blood supply is expected to become a standard in transfusion medicine.

Performance of the automated COBAS AMPLICOR™ system for the detection of hepatitis C virus RNA

BACKGROUND The COBAS AMPLICOR (CA) instrument for the amplification and detection steps of the AMPLICOR molecular diagnostic assays has recently been introduced. The system contains a single thermal cycler with two independently controlled heating/cooling blocks, a pipettor, a magnetic particle washer, a photometer and an incubator. OBJECTIVE The performance of the CA instrument was evaluated in a routine diagnostic laboratory for the detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA. The new system was compared with the corresponding microwell plate assay (AMPLICOR HCV Test). STUDY DESIGN Routine clinical sera (350) from hemodialysis patients and patients with chronic HCV infection and interferon therapy were studied. If discrepant results were obtained, both assays were repeated (specimen preparation, amplification and detection); in addition, the HCV copy number was determined with the AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR Test. RESULTS There was a correlation between the CA HCV Test and the AMPLICOR HCV Test in 341 of 350 specimens (97%). After resolution of 9 discrepant results, the CA HCV Test gave a sensitivity of 97.8% and a specificity of 99.4%. The most common reason for discrepant results was a low HCV RNA copy number. CONCLUSION The CA system was found to be a labor-saving, fast and reliable instrument for the amplification and detection steps of a RT-PCR molecular assay for detection of HCV RNA.

Non-isotopic polymerase chain reaction methods for the detection of HIV-1 in Ugandan mothers and infants.

Two non-isotopic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods were evaluated by testing blood from 41 HIV-1-seropositive and 16 HIV-1-seronegative Ugandan mothers and 56 of their children (aged 0.5-15.0 months). Amplification of HIV-1 sequences was performed in duplicate using a biotinylated primer pair to the gag region (SK 462-431) and nested primer pairs (JA 17-20) to the pol region of HIV-1. gag sequences were hybridized using a microtiter plate coated with the SK 102 probe followed by colorimetric detection using an avidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate and tetramethylbenzidine/peroxide substrate. pol sequences were detected on agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Results of HIV-1 PCR analysis showed that 40 out of 41 (98%) seropositive mothers and 10 out of 29 (34%) seropositive children had detectable HIV-1 gag and pol sequences. None of the 16 seronegative mothers nor 27 seronegative or Western blot-indeterminate children had detectable HIV-1 sequences. Our results suggest that non-isotopic PCR methods are sensitive, specific, and potentially useful in the early diagnosis of HIV-1 infection in developed and developing countries.

Utility of early testing for HCV viremia as predictive factor of sustained response during interferon or interferon plus ribavirin treatment

BACKGROUND/AIM To evaluate the utility of early testing for hepatitis C viremia as a predictor of treatment outcome during interferon or combination therapy. METHODS We studied 184 patients with chronic hepatitis C who received interferon and were monitored for HCV RNA. Sixty-two patients received interferon alone for 12 months and 122 patients, who were still HCV RNA positive at 2 months, received an additional 12-month course of interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. RESULTS Using this strategy, sustained response occurred in a total of 34 patients (18.5%). Independent variables associated with sustained response were HCV genotype (p=0.06), viral load < or = 5.1 logs/ml (p= 0.005) and negative HCV RNA at 1 month (p<0.0001) in the interferon group, and female sex (p=0.04), genotype (p=0.03), viral load < or = 5.5 logs/ml (p=0.01), normal ALT (p=0.001) and decline in viral load > or = 1.2 logs/ml after 2 months of interferon monotherapy (p<0.001) and negative viremia at 5 months of ribavirin onset (p<0.0001) in the combination therapy group. Persistence of viremia at 1 month of interferon monotherapy and at 5 months of combination therapy were the strongest predictors of non-response (negative predictive value of 100% and 99%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Qualitative assessment of HCV RNA during treatment is the strongest predictor of sustained response during interferon or combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C.

Evaluation of hepatitis C virus RNA RT/PCR qualitative and quantitative second generation assays

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA qualitative and quantitative second generation assays (Amplicor HCV v2.0 and Amplicor HCV Monitor v2.0, respectively) were evaluated by testing serum samples from 132 blood donors anti-HCV positive HCV RNA negative by first generation qualitative assay and 326 viremic patients. An HCV RNA transcript was synthesized and ten-fold dilutions were used to assess sensitivity. Second generation assays were one log more sensitive than their respective first generation tests (10(2) copies per ml vs. 10(3) for the qualitative tests; 10(3) copies per ml vs. 10(4) for the quantitative tests). From the 132 anti-HCV positive RNA negative subjects, 6 (5%) were positive by Amplicor v2.0. Quantification figures by Monitor v2.0 were similar in genotypes 1, 2 and 3, whereas Monitor 1.0 values were higher in genotype 1 than in genotype 2 or 3. In 114 patients, branched-DNA v2.0 obtained higher values than Monitor v2.0 and Monitor v1.0 (6.6+/-0.6 log RNA copies per ml, 6.4+/-0.6, and 5.3+/-0.7, respectively, P<0.001). HCV RNA qualitative and quantitative second generation assays are more sensitive and genotype independent than first generation assays.

Quality control of the polymerase chain reaction.

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has revolutionized both the basic and the applied aspects of the biomedical field with more than 40,000 papers having been published employing this technique. PCR has become an indispensable tool for basic research applications, such as cloning (1), sequencing (2), mRNA analysis (3), DNA and RNA quantitation (4-6), mutagenesis (7), and gene detection (8). Because of its ability to amplify minute quantities of nucleic acid specifically, PCR has also been applied with great success in clinical diagnostics (9-11), genetic testing (12-15), forensics (16,17), and environmental testing (18,19).

The AMPLICOR® HCV Tests for the Detection and Quantitation of Serum or Plasma HCV RNA

Clinical diagnosis of HCV infection is generally accomplished by using immunoserological assays to detect the presence of anti-HCV antibodies. Such immunoserological assays have been approved for blood donor screening, thereby reducing the incidence of post-transfusion hepatitis in the United States. Although useful, immunoserological assays have several limitations. Recent evaluations have shown that interpretation of these immunological tests often is difficult, since 25-90% (depending on the risk group under evaluation) of samples repeatedly reactive in the screening assay are negative on supplemental evaluation with a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) (1,2). Also, the presence of anti-HCV antibodies indicates prior exposure to HCV infection, but cannot be considered a marker for current infection. Nor can anti-HCV antibody levels be used to monitor response to therapeutic agents. Finally, in cases of acute HCV infection resulting from accidental needlestick exposure, many patients fail to produce antibody to HCV (3), which makes diagnosis of HCV infection impossible using immunoserological techniques. At the present time, an immunological assay for direct detection of HCV antigen is unavailable.