Elizabeth A. Edgerton
Health Resources and Services Administration
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Elizabeth A. Edgerton.
JAMA Pediatrics | 2015
Marianne Gausche-Hill; Michael Ely; Russell Telford; Katherine Remick; Elizabeth A. Edgerton; Lenora M. Olson
IMPORTANCE Previous assessments of readiness of emergency departments (EDs) have not been comprehensive and have shown relatively poor pediatric readiness, with a reported weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) of 55. OBJECTIVES To assess US EDs for pediatric readiness based on compliance with the 2009 guidelines for care of children in EDs; to evaluate the effect of physician/nurse pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) on pediatric readiness; and to identify gaps for future quality initiatives by a national coalition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Web-based assessment of US EDs (excluding specialty hospitals and hospitals without an ED open 24 hours per day, 7 days per week) for pediatric readiness. All 5017 ED nurse managers were sent a 55-question web-based assessment. Assessments were administered from January 1 through August 23, 2013. Data were analyzed from September 12, 2013, through January 11, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES A modified Delphi process generated a WPRS. An adjusted WPRS was calculated excluding the points received for the presence of physician and nurse PECCs. RESULTS Of the 5017 EDs contacted, 4149 (82.7%) responded, representing 24 million annual pediatric ED visits. Among the EDs entered in the analysis, 69.4% had low or medium pediatric volume and treated less than 14 children per day. The median WPRS was 68.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 56.1-83.6). The median WPRS increased by pediatric patient volume, from 61.4 (IQR, 49.5-73.6) for low-pediatric-volume EDs compared with 89.8 (IQR, 74.7-97.2) for high-pediatric-volume EDs (P < .001). The median percentage of recommended pediatric equipment available was 91% (IQR, 81%-98%). The presence of physician and nurse PECCs was associated with a higher adjusted median WPRS (82.2 [IQR, 69.7-92.5]) compared with no PECC (66.5 [IQR, 56.0-76.9]) across all pediatric volume categories (P < .001). The presence of PECCs increased the likelihood of having all the recommended components, including a pediatric quality improvement process (adjusted relative risk, 4.11 [95% CI, 3.37-5.02]). Barriers to guideline implementation were reported by 80.8% of responding EDs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These data demonstrate improvement in pediatric readiness of EDs compared with previous reports. The physician and nurse PECCs play an important role in pediatric readiness of EDs, and their presence is associated with improved compliance with published guidelines. Barriers to implementation of guidelines may be targeted for future initiatives by a national coalition whose goal is to ensure day-to-day pediatric readiness of our nations EDs.
Pediatrics | 2016
Thomas H. Chun; Sharon E. Mace; Emily R. Katz; Joan E. Shook; James M. Callahan; Gregory P. Conners; Edward E. Conway; Nanette C. Dudley; Toni Gross; Natalie E. Lane; Charles G. Macias; Nathan L. Timm; Kim Bullock; Elizabeth A. Edgerton; Tamar Magarik Haro; Madeline Joseph; Angela Mickalide; Brian R. Moore; Katherine Remick; Sally K. Snow; David W. Tuggle; Cynthia Wright-Johnson; Alice D. Ackerman; Lee Benjamin; Susan Fuchs; Marc H. Gorelick; Paul E. Sirbaugh; Joseph L. Wright; Sue Tellez; Lee S. Benjamin
This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have fi led confl ict of interest statements with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Any confl icts have been resolved through a process approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial involvement in the development of the content of this publication. Clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics benefi t from expertise and resources of liaisons and internal (AAP) and external reviewers. However, clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics may not refl ect the views of the liaisons or the organizations or government agencies that they represent. The guidance in this report does not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. All clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffi rmed, revised, or retired at or before that time. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1570
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2018
Kristin N. Ray; Lenora M. Olson; Elizabeth A. Edgerton; Michael Ely; Marianne Gausche-Hill; David J. Wallace; Jeremy M. Kahn
Objective To determine the geographic accessibility of emergency departments (EDs) with high pediatric readiness by assessing the percentage of US children living within a 30‐minute drive time of an ED with high pediatric readiness, as defined by collaboratively developed published guidelines. Study design In this cross‐sectional analysis, we examined geographic access to an ED with high pediatric readiness among US children. Pediatric readiness was assessed using the weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) of US hospitals based on the 2013 National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) survey. A WPRS of 100 indicates that the ED meets the essential guidelines for pediatric readiness. Using estimated drive time from ZIP code centroids, we determined the proportions of US children living within a 30‐minute drive time of an ED with a WPRS of 100 (maximum), 94.3 (90th percentile), and 83.6 (75th percentile). Results Although 93.7% of children could travel to any ED within 30 minutes, only 33.7% of children could travel to an ED with a WPRS of 100, 55.3% could travel to an ED with a WPRS at or above the 90th percentile, and 70.2% could travel to an ED with a WPRS at or above the 75th percentile. Among children within a 30‐minute drive of an ED with the maximum WPRS, 90.9% lived closer to at least 1 alternative ED with a WPRS below the maximum. Access varied across census divisions, ranging from 14.9% of children in the East South Center to 56.2% in the Mid‐Atlantic for EDs scoring a maximum WPRS. Conclusion A significant proportion of US children do not have timely access to EDs with high pediatric readiness.
Journal of Emergency Nursing | 2017
Juliana Sadovich; Terry Adirim; Russell Telford; Lenora M. Olson; Marianne Gausche-Hill; Elizabeth A. Edgerton
Introduction: In 2014, 45 Indian Health Service (IHS)/Tribal emergency departments serving American Indian and Alaskan Native communities treated approximately 650,000 patients of which, 185,000 (28%) were children and youth younger than 19 years. This study presents the results of the National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) assessment of the 45 IHS/Tribal emergency departments. Methods: Data were obtained from the 2013 NPRP national assessment, which is a 55‐question Web‐based questionnaire based on previously published 2009 national consensus guidelines. The main measure of readiness is the weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS), with the highest score being 100. Results: The overall mean WPRS for all emergency departments is 60.9. Of the IHS/Tribal emergency departments that had pediatric emergency care coordinators, scores across all domains were higher than those of emergency departments without pediatric emergency care coordinators. All 45 emergency departments have readily available a pediatric medication dosing chart, length‐based tape, medical software, or other system to ensure proper sizing of resuscitation equipment and proper dosing of medication. Of the 45 IHS/Tribal 37% report having 100% of the equipment items, and 78% report having at least 80% of these items. Discussion: This article reports the results of the NPRP assessment in IHS/Tribal emergency departments that, despite serving a historically vulnerable population, scored favorably when compared with national data. The survey identified areas for improvement, including implementation of QI processes, stocking of pediatric specific equipment, implementation of policies and procedures on interfacility transport, and maintaining staff pediatric competencies.
Pediatric Emergency Care | 2017
Andrea Lynn Genovesi; Lenora M. Olson; Russell Telford; Diana G. Fendya; Ellen Schenk; Theresa Morrison-Quinata; Elizabeth A. Edgerton
Objective Every year, emergency medical services agencies transport approximately 150,000 pediatric patients between hospitals. During these transitions of care, patient safety may be affected and contribute to adverse events when important clinical information is missing, incomplete, or inaccurate. Written interfacility transfer policies are one way to standardize procedures and facilitate communication between the hospitals leading to improved patient safety and satisfaction for children and families. Methods We assessed the presence and components of written interfacility transfer guidelines and agreements for pediatric patients via a survey sent to US hospital emergency department (ED) nurse managers during 2010 and 2013. Results Although there was an increase in the presence of written interfacility transfer guidelines and agreements, a third of hospitals did not have either by 2013, and only 50% had guidelines with all recommended pediatric components. Hospitals with medium and low ED pediatric patient volumes were less likely to have written guidelines or agreements compared with hospitals with high volume. Hospitals with advanced pediatric resources, such as a pediatric emergency care coordinator or EDs designated approved for pediatrics, were more likely to have guidelines or agreements than less resourced hospitals. Conclusions Although there was improvement over time, opportunities exist for increasing the presence of written interfacility transfer guidelines as well as agreements for pediatric patients. Further studies are needed to demonstrate whether improved delivery of patient care is associated with the presence of written interfacility transfer guidelines and agreements and to identify other elements in the process to ensure optimal pediatric patient care.
Maternal and Child Health Journal | 2018
Tara Trudnak Fowler; Gregory Matthews; Cydny Black; Hendi Crosby Kowal; Pamella Vodicka; Elizabeth A. Edgerton
Objectives In 2011, the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, within the Health Resources and Services Administration, awarded a 4-year grant to increase access to and assure the delivery of quality oral health preventive and restorative services to children. The grant was awarded to organizations serving high-need communities through school-based health centers (SBHCs). This article describes an independent evaluation investigating program efficacy, integration, and sustainability. Methods Program process and outcomes data were gathered from interim and final reports. Interviews with key informants were conducted by phone, and analyzed in NVivo qualitative software. Results Students had great need for comprehensive services: on average, 45% had dental caries at enrollment. Enrollment increased from 5000 to more than 9700, and the percent receiving preventive services increased from 58 to 88%. Results of the analytically weighted linear regression show statistically significant increases in the proportion of enrollees who had their teeth cleaned in the past year (t(4) = 5.19, β = 8.85, p < 0.05) and those receiving overall preventive services (t(4) = 13.52, β = 10.93, p < 0.01). Grantees integrated into existing programs using clear, consistent, and open communication. Grantees sustained the full suite of services beyond the grant period by increasing billing and insurance claims while still offering free and reduced-cost services to those uninsured or otherwise unable to pay. Conclusions for Practice This project demonstrates that access to comprehensive oral health care for children can be expanded through SBHCs. State Title V Block Grant and other similar federal initiatives can learn from the strategic approaches used to overcome challenges in the school-based environment.
Health Promotion Practice | 2016
Elizabeth A. Edgerton; Erin Reiney; Siobhan Mueller; Barry Reicherter; Katherine Curtis; Stephanie Waties; Susan P. Limber
Every day in classrooms, playgrounds and school hallways, through text messages and mobile technology apps, children are bullied by other children. Conversations about this bullying—what it is, who is involved, and how to stop it—are taking place online. To fill a need for relevant, research-based materials on bullying, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Health Resources and Services Administration worked with Widmeyer Communications to investigate the scope of media conversations about bullying and discover new strategies for promoting appropriate public health messages about bullying to intended audiences. Key components of the methodology included: analyzing common search terms and aligning social media content with terms used in searches rather than technical language; identifying influencers in social media spheres, cultivating relationships with them, and sharing their positive, relevant content; examining which digital formats are most popular for sharing and creating content across platforms; tracking and reporting on a wide variety of metrics (such as click-through and engagement rates and reach, resonance, relevance, and Klout scores) to understand conversations around bullying; and looking at online conversations and engaging participants using applicable resources and calls to action. A key finding included a significant gap between search terms and online content and has led to recommendations and comprehensive ideas for improving the reach and resonance of StopBullying.gov content and communications.
Annals of Emergency Medicine | 2016
Katherine Remick; Amy H. Kaji; Lenora M. Olson; Michael Ely; Nancy E. McGrath; Elizabeth A. Edgerton; Marianne Gausche-Hill
Journal of Rural Health | 2018
Diane Pilkey; Christy Edwards; Rachel Richards; Lenora M. Olson; Michael Ely; Elizabeth A. Edgerton
Journal of Child and Family Studies | 2018
Lydie A. Lebrun-Harris; Laura Sherman; Susan P. Limber; Bethany D. Miller; Elizabeth A. Edgerton