Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Elizabeth A. Richey is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Elizabeth A. Richey.


Blood | 2009

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after rituximab therapy in HIV-negative patients: a report of 57 cases from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports project

Kenneth R. Carson; Andrew M. Evens; Elizabeth A. Richey; Thomas M. Habermann; Daniele Focosi; John F. Seymour; Jacob P. Laubach; Susie D. Bawn; Leo I. Gordon; Jane N. Winter; Richard R. Furman; Julie M. Vose; Andrew D. Zelenetz; Ronac Mamtani; Dennis W. Raisch; Gary W. Dorshimer; Steven T. Rosen; Kenji Muro; Numa R. Gottardi-Littell; Robert L. Talley; Oliver Sartor; David Green; Eugene O. Major; Charles L. Bennett

Rituximab improves outcomes for persons with lymphoproliferative disorders and is increasingly used to treat immune-mediated illnesses. Recent reports describe 2 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and 1 with rheumatoid arthritis who developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) after rituximab treatment. We reviewed PML case descriptions among patients treated with rituximab from the Food and Drug Administration, the manufacturer, physicians, and a literature review from 1997 to 2008. Overall, 52 patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, 2 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, 1 patient with rheumatoid arthritis, 1 patient with an idiopathic autoimmune pancytopenia, and 1 patient with immune thrombocytopenia developed PML after treatment with rituximab and other agents. Other treatments included hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (7 patients), purine analogs (26 patients), or alkylating agents (39 patients). One patient with an autoimmune hemolytic anemia developed PML after treatment with corticosteroids and rituximab, and 1 patient with an autoimmune pancytopenia developed PML after treatment with corticosteroids, azathioprine, and rituximab. Median time from last rituximab dose to PML diagnosis was 5.5 months. Median time to death after PML diagnosis was 2.0 months. The case-fatality rate was 90%. Awareness is needed of the potential for PML among rituximab-treated persons.


Lancet Oncology | 2009

Monoclonal antibody-associated progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy in patients treated with rituximab, natalizumab, and efalizumab: a Review from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) Project

Kenneth R. Carson; Daniele Focosi; Eugene O. Major; Mario Petrini; Elizabeth A. Richey; Dennis P. West; Charles L. Bennett

Progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy (PML) is a serious and usually fatal CNS infection caused by JC polyoma virus. CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphopenia, resulting from HIV infection, chemotherapy, or immunosuppressive therapy, are the primary risk factors. The immune modulatory monoclonal antibodies rituximab, natalizumab, and efalizumab have received regulatory approval in the USA and Europe for treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (Europe only); multiple sclerosis and Crohns disease; and psoriasis, respectively. Efalizumab and natalizumab administration is associated with CD4+ T lymphopenia and altered trafficking of T lymphocytes into the CNS, and rituximab leads to prolonged B-lymphocyte depletion. Unexpected cases of PML developing in people who receive these drugs have been reported, with many of the affected individuals dying from this disease. Herein, we review clinical findings, pathology, epidemiology, basic science, and risk-management issues associated with PML infection developing after treatment with these monoclonal antibodies.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009

Accelerated Approval of Cancer Drugs: Improved Access to Therapeutic Breakthroughs or Early Release of Unsafe and Ineffective Drugs?

Elizabeth A. Richey; E. Alison Lyons; Jonathan R. Nebeker; Veena Shankaran; June M. McKoy; Thanh Ha Luu; Narissa J. Nonzee; Steven Trifilio; Oliver Sartor; Al B. Benson; Kenneth R. Carson; Beatrice J. Edwards; Douglas Gilchrist-Scott; Timothy M. Kuzel; Dennis W. Raisch; Martin S. Tallman; Dennis P. West; Steven Hirschfeld; Antonio J. Grillo-Lopez; Charles L. Bennett

PURPOSE Accelerated approval (AA) was initiated by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to shorten development times of drugs for serious medical illnesses. Sponsors must confirm efficacy in postapproval trials. Confronted with several drugs that received AA on the basis of phase II trials and for which confirmatory trials were incomplete, FDA officials have encouraged sponsors to design AA applications on the basis of interim analyses of phase III trials. METHODS We reviewed data on orphan drug status, development time, safety, and status of confirmatory trials of AAs and regular FDA approvals of new molecular entities (NMEs) for oncology indications since 1995. RESULTS Median development times for AA NMEs (n = 19 drugs) and regular-approval oncology NMEs (n = 32 drugs) were 7.3 and 7.2 years, respectively. Phase III trials supported efficacy for 75% of regular-approval versus 26% of AA NMEs and for 73% of non-orphan versus 45% of orphan drug approvals. AA accounted for 78% of approvals for oncology NMEs between 2001 and 2003 but accounted for 32% in more recent years. Among AA NMEs, confirmatory trials were nine-fold less likely to be completed for orphan drug versus non-orphan drug indications. Postapproval, black box warnings were added to labels for four oncology NMEs (17%) that had received AA and for two oncology NMEs (9%) that had received regular approval. CONCLUSION AA oncology NMEs are safe and effective, although development times are not accelerated. A return to endorsing phase II trial designs for AA for oncology NMEs, particularly for orphan drug indications, may facilitate timely FDA approval of novel cancer drugs.


Kidney International | 2009

Ticlopidine- and clopidogrel-associated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP): review of clinical, laboratory, epidemiological, and pharmacovigilance findings (1989–2008)

Anaadriana Zakarija; Hau C. Kwaan; Joel L. Moake; Nicholas Bandarenko; Dilip K. Pandey; June M. McKoy; Paul R. Yarnold; Dennis W. Raisch; Jeffrey L. Winters; Thomas J. Raife; John F. Cursio; Thanh Ha Luu; Elizabeth A. Richey; Matthew J. Fisher; Thomas L. Ortel; Martin S. Tallman; X. Long Zheng; Masanori Matsumoto; Yoshihiro Fujimura; Charles L. Bennett

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a fulminant disease characterized by platelet aggregates, thrombocytopenia, renal insufficiency, neurologic changes, and mechanical injury to erythrocytes. Most idiopathic cases of TTP are characterized by a deficiency of ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease, with thrombospondin-1-like domains) metalloprotease activity. Ironically, use of anti-platelet agents, the thienopyridine derivates clopidogrel and ticlopidine, is associated with drug induced TTP. Data were abstracted from a systematic review of English-language literature for thienopyridine-associated TTP identified in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the public website of the Food and Drug Administration, and abstracts from national scientific conferences from 1991 to April 2008. Ticlopidine and clopidogrel are the two most common drugs associated with TTP in FDA safety databases. Epidemiological studies identify recent initiation of anti-platelet agents as the most common risk factor associated with risks of developing TTP. Laboratory studies indicate that most cases of thienopyridine-associated TTP involve an antibody to ADAMTS13 metalloprotease, present with severe thrombocytopenia, and respond to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE); a minority of thienopyridine-associated TTP presents with severe renal insufficiency, involves direct endothelial cell damage, and is less responsive to TPE. The evaluation of this potentially fatal drug toxicity can serve as a template for future efforts to comprehensively characterize other severe adverse drug reactions.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009

Costs and Cost Effectiveness of a Health Care Provider–Directed Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening

Veena Shankaran; Thanh Ha Luu; Narissa J. Nonzee; Elizabeth A. Richey; June M. McKoy; Joshua Graff Zivin; Alfred R. Ashford; Rafael Lantigua; Harold Frucht; Marc Scoppettone; Charles L. Bennett; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin

PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains underutilized in the United States. Prior studies reporting the cost effectiveness of randomized interventions to improve CRC screening have not been replicated in the setting of small physician practices. We recently conducted a randomized trial evaluating an academic detailing intervention in 264 small practices in geographically diverse New York City communities. The objective of this secondary analysis is to assess the cost effectiveness of this intervention. METHODS A total of 264 physician offices were randomly assigned to usual care or to a series of visits from trained physician educators. CRC screening rates were measured at baseline and 12 months. The intervention costs were measured and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was derived. Sensitivity analyses were based on varying cost and effectiveness estimates. RESULTS Academic detailing was associated with a 7% increase in CRC screening with colonoscopy. The total intervention cost was


BMC Health Services Research | 2012

Design of a prostate cancer patient navigation intervention for a Veterans Affairs hospital

Narissa J. Nonzee; June M. McKoy; Alfred Rademaker; Peter Byer; Thanh Ha Luu; Dachao Liu; Elizabeth A. Richey; Athena T. Samaras; Genna Panucci; XinQi Dong; Melissa A. Simon

147,865, and the ICER was


Current Infectious Disease Reports | 2014

Quality Improvement in Hospital Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Focus on New Strategies and Current Challenges

Elizabeth A. Richey; Lauren Dudley; Stephen K. Liu

21,124 per percentage point increase in CRC screening rate. Sensitivity analyses that varied the costs of the intervention and the average medical practice size were associated with ICERs ranging from


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2008

Economic impact associated with the management of dermatologic adverse drug reactions (dADRs) induced by EGFR inhibitors (EGFRIs) in lung cancer

T. Abraham; Alfred Rademaker; S. Ortiz; Charles L. Bennett; Elizabeth A. Richey; Narissa J. Nonzee; Dennis P. West; Jyoti D. Patel; Mario E. Lacouture

13,631 to


BMC Health Services Research | 2013

Navigating veterans with an abnormal prostate cancer screening test: a quasi-experimental study

Melissa A. Simon; Narissa J. Nonzee; June M. McKoy; Dachao Liu; Thanh Ha Luu; Peter Byer; Elizabeth A. Eklund; Elizabeth A. Richey; Zhigang Wu; XinQi Dong; Alfred Rademaker

36,109 per percentage point increase in CRC screening rates. CONCLUSION A comprehensive, multicomponent academic detailing intervention conducted in small practices in metropolitan New York was clinically effective in improving CRC screening rates, but was not cost effective.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2008

Rituximab and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: A report of 35 cases

Kenneth R. Carson; Andrew M. Evens; Leo I. Gordon; John F. Seymour; Steven T. Rosen; N. Gottardi-Littell; Kenji Muro; Elizabeth A. Richey; Charles L. Bennett

BackgroundPatient navigation programs have been launched nationwide in an attempt to reduce racial/ethnic and socio-demographic disparities in cancer care, but few have evaluated outcomes in the prostate cancer setting. The National Cancer Institute-funded Chicago Patient Navigation Research Program (C-PNRP) aims to implement and evaluate the efficacy of a patient navigation intervention for predominantly low-income minority patients with an abnormal prostate cancer screening test at a Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital in Chicago.Methods/DesignFrom 2006 through 2010, C-PNRP implemented a quasi-experimental intervention whereby trained social worker and lay health navigators worked with veterans with an abnormal prostate screen to proactively identify and resolve personal and systems barriers to care. Men were enrolled at a VA urology clinic and were selected to receive navigated versus usual care based on clinic day. Patient navigators performed activities to facilitate timely follow-up such as appointment reminders, transportation coordination, cancer education, scheduling assistance, and social support as needed. Primary outcome measures included time (days) from abnormal screening to diagnosis and time from diagnosis to treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included psychosocial and demographic predictors of non-compliance and patient satisfaction. Dates of screening, follow-up visits, and treatment were obtained through chart audit, and questionnaires were administered at baseline, after diagnosis, and after treatment initiation. At the VA, 546 patients were enrolled in the study (245 in the navigated arm, 245 in the records-based control arm, and 56 in a subsample of surveyed control subjects).DiscussionGiven increasing concerns about balancing better health outcomes with lower costs, careful examination of interventions aimed at reducing healthcare disparities attain critical importance. While analysis of the C-PNRP data is underway, the design of this patient navigation intervention will inform other patient navigation programs addressing strategies to improve prostate cancer outcomes among vulnerable populations.

Collaboration


Dive into the Elizabeth A. Richey's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles L. Bennett

University of South Carolina

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thanh Ha Luu

Northwestern University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth R. Carson

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew M. Evens

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge