Elizabeth B. Haagsma

Factors associated with chronic hepatitis in patients with hepatitis E virus infection who have received solid organ transplants

BACKGROUND & AIMS Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection can cause chronic hepatitis in recipients of solid organ transplants. However, the factors that contribute to chronic infection and the outcomes of these patients are incompletely understood. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 17 centers from Europe and the United States that described the progression, outcomes, and factors associated with development of chronic HEV infection in recipients of transplanted solid organs. METHODS We studied data from 85 recipients of solid organ transplants who were infected with HEV. Chronic HEV infection was defined by the persistent increases in levels of liver enzymes and polymerase chain reaction evidence of HEV in the serum and/or stool for at least 6 months. RESULTS Fifty-six patients (65.9%) developed chronic hepatitis. Univariate analysis associated liver transplant, shorter times since transplant, lower levels of liver enzymes and serum creatinine, lower platelet counts, and tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy (rather than cyclosporin A) with chronic hepatitis. On multivariate analysis, the independent predictive factors associated with chronic HEV infection were the use of tacrolimus rather than cyclosporin A (odds ratio [OR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-1.97; P = .004) and a low platelet count at the time of diagnosis with HEV infection (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.001-1.1; P = .04). Of patients with chronic hepatitis, 18 (32.1%) achieved viral clearance after the dose of immunosuppressive therapy was reduced. No HEV reactivation was observed after HEV clearance. CONCLUSIONS HEV infection causes chronic hepatitis in more than 60% of recipients of solid organ transplants. Tacrolimus therapy is the main predictive factor for chronic hepatitis. Dose reductions of immunosuppressive therapy resulted in viral clearance in more than 30% of patients.

Chronic hepatitis E virus infection in liver transplant recipients

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is known to run a self‐limiting course. Sporadic cases of acute hepatitis due to infection with HEV genotype 3, present in pig populations, are increasingly recognized. Zoonotic transmission seems infrequent. The entity of unexplained chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation has been recognized. Detection of HEV in 2 liver transplant recipients triggered a review of these cases. Freeze‐stored sera were available for retrospective analysis. HEV antibodies were determined. For virus detection and identification, a fragment of the gene encoding the major capsid protein (open reading frame 2) was amplified by reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction and sequenced to identify the genotype. Two months after liver transplantation, case A developed unexplained chronic hepatitis, which developed into cirrhosis. Retransplantation followed 7 years later, after which chronic hepatitis recurred. In retrospect, HEV RNA was present in serum 3 weeks after the first transplantation and remained present afterwards. HEV RNA was also present in retransplant liver tissue. HEV antibodies appeared late after retransplantation. Case B developed unexplained chronic hepatitis 7 years after transplantation. Retransplantation was needed 5 years later, after which no signs of hepatitis recurred. In retrospect, the period of chronic hepatitis up to the retransplantation coincided with HEV RNA in serum. In case B, antibodies developed, the viral load was much lower than in case A, and the virus seemed to be cleared after retransplantation. Genotyping in both cases revealed 2 unique strains of genotype 3. In conclusion, chronic HEV infection may develop in immunosuppressed patients, who may then serve as long‐term carriers of the virus. We hypothesize that HEV may be the cause of chronic hepatitis in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl 14:547–553, 2008.

Increased cancer risk after liver transplantation: a population-based study

BACKGROUND/AIMS Development of de novo malignancies emerges as a serious long term complication after liver transplantation. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 174 adult one-year survivors for de novo malignancies. The observed cancer rates were compared with the expected cancer rates in the Dutch population. RESULTS Twenty-one of the 174 patients developed 23 malignancies (12%). Skin and lip cancer accounted for 12 of the 23 malignancies (52%). Only one patient had a B-cell lymphoma. The cumulative risk for de novo malignancy was 6, 20, and 55% at 5, 10, and 15 years after transplantation, respectively. The overall relative risk (RR) as compared with the general population was 4.3 (95% confidence interval 2.4-7.1). Significantly increased RRs were observed for non-melanoma skin cancer (RR 70.0), non-skin solid cancer (RR 2.7), renal cell cancer (RR 30.0), and colon cancer (RR 12.5). Multivariate analysis showed that an age > 40 years and pretransplant use of immunosuppression were significant risk factors. CONCLUSIONS An increased risk of cancer exists after liver transplantation, for both for skin/lip cancer, and other solid tumors. Older age and the use of immunosuppression are risk factors.

Determinants of survival and the effect of portosystemic shunting in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome

Budd‐Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare disorder that is characterized by hepatic venous outflow obstruction. The aim of this study was to assess determinants of survival and to evaluate the effect of portosystemic shunting. In this international multicenter study, 237 patients with BCS, diagnosed between 1984 and 2001, were investigated. Univariate, multivariate, and time‐dependent Cox regression analyses were performed. Overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 82% (95% CI, 77%–87%), 69% (95% CI, 62%–76%), and 62% (95% CI, 54%–70%), respectively. Encephalopathy, ascites, prothrombin time, and bilirubin were independent determinants of survival. A prognostic classification combining these factors could identify three classes of patients (classes I–III). The 5‐year survival rate was 89% (95% CI, 79%–99%) for class I, 74% (95% CI, 65%–83%) for class II, and 42% (95% CI, 28%–56%) for class III. Anticoagulants were administered to 72%; only for patients in class I was this associated with a trend toward improved survival (relative risk [RR], 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02–1.21). Portosystemic shunting was performed in 49% of the patients (n = 117); only for patients in class II, time‐dependent analyses suggested an improved survival (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.26–1.49). In conclusion, at the time of diagnosis, patients with BCS can be classified into good (I), intermediate (II), and poor (III) prognostic classes, according to simple baseline clinical and laboratory parameters. Our results suggest an improved survival after surgical portosystemic shunting for patients with an intermediate prognosis (class II). (HEPATOLOGY 2004;39:500–508.)

Anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: Causes and consequences

We retrospectively studied the prevalence, presentation, results of treatment, and graft and patient survival of grafts developing an anastomotic biliary stricture (AS) in 531 adult liver transplantations performed between 1979 and 2003. Clinical and laboratory information was obtained from the hospital files, and radiological studies were re‐evaluated. Twenty‐one possible risk factors for the development of AS (variables of donor, recipient, surgical procedure, and postoperative course) were analyzed in a univariate and stepwise multivariate model. Forty‐seven grafts showed an anastomotic stricture: 42 in duct‐to‐duct anastomoses, and 5 in hepaticojejunal Roux‐en‐Y anastomoses. The cumulative risk of AS after 1, 5, and 10 years was 6.6%, 10.6%, and 12.3% respectively. Postoperative bile leakage (P = 0.001), a female donor/male recipient combination (P = 0.010), and the era of transplantation (P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for the development of an AS. In 47% of cases, additional (radiologically minor) nonanastomotic strictures were diagnosed. All patients were successfully treated by 1 or more treatment modalities. As primary treatment, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) was successful in 24 of 36 (67%) cases and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in 4 of 11 (36%). In the end 15 patients (32%) were operated, all with long‐term success. AS presenting more than 6 months after transplantation needed more episodes of stenting by ERCP, and more stents per episode compared to those presenting within 6 months and recurred more often. Graft and patient survival were not impaired by AS. Liver Transpl 12:726–735, 2006.

Biliary complications after liver transplantation : A review

After liver transplantation, the prevalence of complications related to the biliary system is 6–35%. In recent years, the diagnosis and treatment of biliary problems has changed markedly. The two standard methods of biliary reconstruction in liver transplant recipients are the duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy and the Roux-en-Y-hepaticojejunostomy. Biliary leakage occurs in approximately 5–7% of transplant cases. Leakage from the site of anastomosis, the T-tube exit site and donor or recipient remnant cystic duct is well described. Symptomatic bile leakage should be treated by stenting of the duct by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTCD). Biliary strictures can occur at the site of the anastomosis (anastomotic stricture; AS) or at other locations in the biliary tree (non-anastomotic strictures; NAS). AS occur in 5–10% of cases and are due to fibrotic healing. Treatment by ERCP or PTCD with dilatation and progressive stenting is successful in the majority of cases. NAS can occur in the context of a hepatic artery thrombosis, or with an open hepatic artery (ischaemic type biliary lesions or ITBL). The incidence is 5–10%. NAS has been associated with various types of injury, e.g. macrovascular, microvascular, immunological and cytotoxic injury by bile salts. Treatment can be attempted with multiple sessions of dilatation and stenting of stenotic areas by ERCP or PTCD. In cases of localized diseased and good graft function, biliary reconstructive surgery is useful. However, a significant number of patients will need a re-transplant. When biliary strictures or ischaemia of the graft are present, stones, casts and sludge can develop.

Platelet Transfusion During Liver Transplantation Is Associated with Increased Postoperative Mortality Due to Acute Lung Injury

BACKGROUND: Platelet transfusions have been identified as an independent risk factor for survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In this study, we analyzed the specific causes of mortality and graft loss in relation to platelet transfusions during OLT. METHODS: In a series of 449 consecutive adult patients undergoing a first OLT, the causes of patient death and graft failure were studied in patients who did or did not receive perioperative platelet transfusions. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival were significantly reduced in patients who received platelet transfusions, compared with those who did not (74% vs 92%, and 69% vs 85%, respectively at 1 yr; P < 0.001). Lower survival rates in patients who received platelets were attributed to a significantly higher rate of early mortality because of acute lung injury (4.4% vs 0.4%; P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in other causes of mortality between the two groups. The main cause of graft loss in patients receiving platelets was patient death with a functioning graft. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that platelet transfusions are an important risk factor for mortality after OLT. The current study extends previous observations by identifying acute lung injury as the main determinant of increased mortality. The higher rate of graft loss in patients receiving platelets is related to the higher overall mortality rate and does not result from specific adverse effects of transfused platelets on the grafted liver.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease After Liver Transplantation: Risk Factors for Recurrence and De Novo Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and can recur or develop de novo after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and severity of IBD after liver transplantation and to perform a multivariate analysis for possible risk factors. In this retrospective study, 91 patients transplanted for PSC or AIH, without prior colectomy, were included. Sixty patients were transplanted for PSC, 31 for AIH. IBD activity before and after OLT and other possible risk factors were analysed in a multivariate model. Forty‐nine patients (54%) had IBD before OLT. Forty patients (44%) had active IBD after transplantation: recurrence in 32 and de novo in 8. Cumulative risk for IBD after OLT was 15, 39 and 54% after 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. In 59% of patients with IBD prior to OLT the disease was more active after transplantation. Risk factors for recurrent disease were: symptoms at time of OLT, short interval of IBD before OLT and use of tacrolimus. 5‐aminosalicylates were protective. A cytomegalovirus positive donor/negative recipient combination increased the risk for de novo IBD.

Nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation, part 1: Radiological features and risk factors for early vs. Late presentation

Nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) are a serious complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The exact pathogenesis is unclear. Purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of NAS after OLT. A total of 487 adult liver transplants with a median follow‐up of 7.9 years were studied. All imaging studies of the biliary tree were reviewed. Cholangiography was routinely performed between postoperative days 10‐14 and later on demand. Localization of NAS at first presentation was categorized into 4 anatomical zones of the biliary tree. Severity of NAS was semiquantified as mild, moderate, or severe. Donor, recipient, and surgical characteristics and variables were analyzed to identify risk factors for NAS. NAS developed in 81 livers (16.6%). Thirty‐seven (7.3%) were graded as moderate to severe. In 85% of the cases, anatomical localization of NAS was around or below the bifurcation of the common bile duct. A large variation was observed in the time interval between OLT and first presentation of NAS (median 4.1 months; range 0.3‐155 months). NAS presenting early (≤1 year) after OLT were associated with preservation‐related risk factors. Cold and warm ischemia times were significantly longer in patients with early NAS compared with NAS presenting late (>1 year) after OLT (694 minutes vs. 490 minutes, P = 0.01, and 57 minutes vs. 53 minutes, P < 0.05, respectively), and early NAS were more frequently located in the central bile ducts. NAS presenting late (>1 year) after OLT were found more frequently in the periphery of the liver and were more frequently associated with immunological factors, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, as the indication for OLT (24% vs. 45%, P < 0.05). By separating cases of NAS on the basis of the time of presentation after transplantation, we were able to identify differences in risk factors, indicating different pathogenic mechanisms depending on the time of initial presentation. Liver Transpl 13:708–718, 2007.

Identification of More than One Mutation in the Hepatitis B Virus Polymerase Gene Arising during Prolonged Lamivudine Treatment

Lamivudine has been shown to be a potent and nontoxic inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication in chronically infected patients. During prolonged treatment, drug resistance may develop, related to a mutation of Met to Val or Ile in the YM552DD motif of the HBV DNA polymerase gene. Analysis of the HBV DNA polymerase gene from 8 chronic hepatitis B patients with suspected resistance to lamivudine showed that in addition to a mutation in the YM552DD motif, a second mutation located in the B domain of this gene, a Leu528-to-Met528 change, was consistently and exclusively found in 4 patients showing the YV552DD motif. This suggests a functional or structural relationship between these domains. Since the presence of both the YI552DD and YV552DD motif sometimes preceded the exclusive presence of the YV552DD motif, we conclude that the YI552DD motif could occur as a temporal intermediate. After cessation of therapy, the wild type sequences reemerged.