Elizabeth Burke

Use of Rapamycin Slows Progression of Cardiac Transplantation Vasculopathy

Background Cardiac transplantation vasculopathy is the leading cause of late death in heart transplantation recipients. Rapamycin is an immunosuppressant drug with potent antiproliferative and antimigratory effects. We investigated whether rapamycin could prevent progression of graft vasculopathy in 46 patients (age, 54± 10 years; 4.3±2.3 years after transplantation) with severe disease. Methods and Results At annual cardiac catheterization, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with rapamycin (n=22) versus continued current immunosuppression (n=24). Clinical characteristics including recipient age and sex, underlying cause of congestive heart failure, donor age and sex, and ischemic time were recorded. Cardiac catheterization was graded with the use of a semiquantitative scale and repeated annually. Clinically significant adverse events were defined as death, need for angioplasty or bypass surgery, myocardial infarction, and a >25% worsening of the catheterization score. These events were monitored as primary study end points. Anti‐HLA class I and II antibody production and lymphocyte growth assays were measured with each biopsy. Patients selected for rapamycin had azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil discontinued and were given rapamycin. Outcomes were compared by means of log‐rank analysis. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Duration of follow‐up was comparable (rapamycin, 689±261; control, 630±207 days; NS). In the rapamycin group, 3 patients reached primary end points versus 14 patients in the control group (P<0.001). There was no difference in baseline or subsequent anti‐HLA class I or II antibody production. Conclusions In this patient cohort with cardiac vasculopathy, treatment with rapamycin slowed disease progression probably by its antiproliferative and antimigratory effects. (Circulation. 2003;108:48‐53.)

Prevention of rejection in cardiac transplantation by blockade of the interleukin-2 receptor with a monoclonal antibody.

BACKGROUND Alloantigen-activated T cells express the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor. Specific blockade of this receptor with the human IgG1 monoclonal antibody daclizumab may prevent rejection of allografts after cardiac transplantation without inducing global immunosuppression. METHODS We randomly assigned 55 nonsensitized patients undergoing a first cardiac transplantation to receive either induction therapy with daclizumab (1.0 mg per kilogram of body weight), given intravenously within 24 hours after cardiac-transplantation surgery and every two weeks thereafter, for a total of five doses, or generalized immunosuppressive therapy. Concomitant immunosuppression was achieved in both groups with cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. The primary end points were the incidence and severity of acute rejection, and the length of time to a first episode of biopsy-confirmed rejection. RESULTS Of the 55 patients in the study, 28 were randomly assigned to receive daclizumab and 27 served as the control group. During induction therapy, the mean frequency of acute rejection episodes (defined as a histologic grade of 2 or higher according to the classification of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplants) was 0.64 per patient in the control group and 0.19 per patient in the daclizumab group (P=0.02). Acute rejection developed in 17 of 27 patients in the control group (63 percent), as compared with 5 of 28 patients in the daclizumab group (18 percent; relative risk, 2.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 7.4; P=0.04). Throughout follow-up, there were nine patients with episodes of acute rejection of histologic grade 3 in the control group, as compared with two in the daclizumab group (P= 0.03), and the time to a first episode of rejection was significantly longer in the daclizumab group (P=0.04). There were no adverse reactions to daclizumab and no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of infection or cancer during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Induction therapy with daclizumab safely reduces the frequency and severity of cardiac-allograft rejection during the induction period.

Activation-induced T-cell death and immune dysfunction after implantation of left-ventricular assist de vice

BACKGROUND Cardiac transplantation is a limited option for end-stage heart failure because of the shortage of donor organs. Left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are currently under investigation as permanent therapy for end-stage heart failure, but long-term successful device implantation is limited because of a high rate of serious infections. To examine the relation between LVAD-related infection and host immunity, we investigated immune responses in LVAD recipients. METHODS We compared the rate of candidal infection in 78 patients with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure who received either an LVAD (n=40) or medical management (controls, n=38). Fluorochrome-labelled monoclonal antibodies were used in analyses of T-cell phenotype. Analysis of T-cell function included intradermal responses to recall antigens and proliferative responses after stimulation by phytohaemagglutinin, monoclonal antibodies to CD3, and mixed lymphocyte culture. We measured T-cell apoptosis in vivo by annexin V binding, and confirmed the result by assessment of DNA fragmentation. Activation-induced T-cell death was measured after T-cell stimulation with antibodies to CD3. All immunological tests were done at least 1 month after LVAD implantation. Between-group comparisons were by Kaplan-Meier actuarial analysis and Students t test. FINDINGS By 3 months after implantation of LVAD, the risk of developing candidal infection was 28% in LVAD recipients, compared with 3% in controls (p=0.003). LVAD recipients had cutaneous anergy to recall antigens and lower (<70%) T-cell proliferative responses than controls after activation via the T-cell receptor complex (p<0.001). T cells from LVAD recipients had higher surface expression of CD95 (Fas) (p<0.001) and a higher rate of spontaneous apoptosis (p<0.001) than controls. Moreover, after stimulation with antibodies to CD3, CD4 T-cell death increased by 3.2-fold in LVAD recipients compared with only 1.2-fold in controls (p<0.05). INTERPRETATION LVAD implantation results in an aberrant state of T-cell activation, heightened susceptibility of CD4 T cells to activation-induced cell death, progressive defects in cellular immunity, and increased risk of opportunistic infection.

Preformed IgG Antibodies Against Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Antigens Are Major Risk Factors for High-grade Cellular Rejection in Recipients of Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND Preformed anti-HLA antibodies reacting specifically with donor lymphocytes have been associated with acute vascular rejection and early cardiac allograft failure. However, the effect of preformed anti-HLA antibodies directed against allogeneic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or II antigens of a donor panel on heart transplantation outcome has not been extensively studied. METHODS AND RESULTS The study group consisted of 68 patients who received cardiac transplants between 1989 and 1996 and who were at high risk for developing anti-HLA antibodies before transplantation. The effect of preformed antibodies against allogeneic MHC class I or class II antigens on the development of early high-grade cellular rejection and on cumulative annual rejection frequency was determined. Both patients with left ventricular assist devices and retransplantation candidates had a similar increase in the frequency of IgG anti-MHC class II antibodies (IgG anti-II) compared with control subjects (P<0.0001), whereas the frequency of IgG anti-MHC class I antibodies (IgG anti-I) was elevated only in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Pretransplantation IgG anti-II predicted early development of high-grade cellular rejection (P=0.006) and higher cumulative annual rejection frequency (P<0.001) in both of these sensitized patient groups. Among retransplantation recipients, a match between donors 1 and 2 at HLA-A additionally predicted an earlier time to a high-grade cellular rejection. CONCLUSIONS These results emphasize the importance of specifically screening heart transplantation candidates for the presence of IgG antibodies directed against MHC class II molecules and suggest that strategies aimed at their reduction may have an impact on the onset and frequency of high-grade cellular rejections after transplantation.

An immunological algorithm to predict risk of high-grade rejection in cardiac transplant recipients

BACKGROUND Transplant-related coronary-artery disease (TCAD) develops frequently in cardiac-allograft recipients, and limits long-term survival. We examined the relation between this disorder and cumulative frequency of high-grade rejection, and investigated whether concomitant use of three immunological factors at the time of a low-grade endomyocardial biopsy can predict progression to high-grade rejection. METHODS We investigated the relation between the cumulative annual frequency of high-grade rejection and TCAD in 198 recipients of cardiac transplantation between 1992 and 1996 by means of Kaplan-Meier actuarial life-tables. Endomyocardial biopsy, lymphocyte-growth assays, and anti-HLA antibody measurements were compiled over 12 months in 102 patients during their first post-transplant year. We calculated predictive values for high-grade rejection within 90 days by chi2, Kaplan Meier survival curves, and by multivariable logistic regression analyses. FINDINGS We found a direct correlation between cumulative annual frequency of rejection and TCAD onset with highest risk in those with more than 0.75 rejections per year (p=0.0002). After a low-grade endomyocardial biopsy (0 or 1A), one or more donor-recipient HLA-DR matches protected against high-grade rejections (p<0.001). Among individuals with one or two DR matches, the negative predictive value for progression from a low-grade biopsy to a high-grade rejection was 87% in the presence of a negative lymphocyte-growth assay. Among individuals with no DR matches, the presence of either a positive lymphocyte-growth assay or IgG anti-major-histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II antibodies was independently associated with high probability of progression to rejection (64% and 66%, respectively, p<0.0005). When both assays were positive, concomitantly with a low-grade endomyocardial biopsy, the positive predictive value for progression to a high-grade rejection was 86% (p<0.0001). For endomyocardial-biopsy grades 1B or 2, a positive lymphocyte-growth assay alone was associated with high-grade rejection in 100% of cases. INTERPRETATION Use of an algorithm combining three immunological factors at the time of a low-grade endomyocardial biopsy enables prospective stratification of cardiac transplant recipients into risk categories for progression to high-grade rejection. Low-risk individuals require fewer biopsies, moderate-risk individuals require an ongoing schedule of surveillance biopsies, and high-risk individuals require rational organisation of interventional strategies aimed at preventing rejection. Additional predictive factors are needed to identify moderate-risk individuals who will progress to rejection. Ultimately, successful intervention may have an impact on the subsequent complication of TCAD.

Association of device surface and biomaterials with immunologic sensitization after mechanical support

OBJECTIVE Biomaterials and textured surfaces in early pulsatile left ventricular assist devices (HeartMate I; Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif) may increase immunologic risk through allosensitization. We hypothesized that axial-flow devices without biologic membranes or textured surfaces (HeartMate II; Thoratec; and DeBakey; MicroMed Cardiovascular, Inc, Houston, Tex) would cause less allosensitization than devices with such membranes and surfaces. METHODS HeartMate II and DeBakey (n = 24) and HeartMate I (n = 36) devices were implanted from 1999 to 2006 in patients with severe heart failure cohort-matched for age, etiology, and support duration. Serum samples reacting with more than 10% of the HLA reference panel were considered positive for anti-HLA antibodies. Endomyocardial biopsy samples were collected after transplant. RESULTS There were no significant cohort differences in age, etiology, sex, blood transfusion, or support duration. Anti-HLA antibodies were not detected at implantation of either HeartMate II and DeBakey or HeartMate I devices; however, significant increases in anti-HLA antibodies were present within 1 and 3 months of support with HeartMate I but not HeartMate II and DeBakey devices. Overall, fewer patients with HeartMate II and DeBakey devices demonstrated positive anti-HLA antibodies during support (8% vs 28%, P = .02), and fewer episodes of acute rejection per patient were seen within the first 9 posttransplant months(0.31 vs 0.69, P = .052). Long-term posttransplant survival was not different between groups. CONCLUSION Hemodynamic support with HeartMate II and DeBakey devices produced less allosensitization than did HeartMate I devices. Device selection may improve clinical outcomes for high-risk patients.

The changing pattern of humoral rejection in cardiac transplant recipients.

Background. Most humoral rejection (HR) episodes occur early after cardiac transplantation and are associated with hemodynamic compromise and poor prognosis. Late cases of HR (>6 months after transplant) have been reported. We examined the differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients presenting with HR in the early (<6 months) and late transplant periods. Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed of all cases of HR at a single large transplant center from January 1, 1995 to March 1, 2006. Results. A total of 37 adult transplants had biopsy-proven HR; 13 patients had early HR and 24 patients had HR a mean of 5 yr after transplantation (range, 7 months to 17 yrs). Treatment for HR included plasmapheresis, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. The age of the early and late humoral rejecters was similar (58±14 vs. 50±14 yrs; P=0.12). There was a trend toward more women in the early HR group (54% vs. 33%). Use of left ventricular assist devices was similar (38% vs. 33%). Early rejecters were more likely to have positive cross-matches (46% vs. 8%; P<0.01). Patients with late HR had a coexistent diagnosis of malignancy, or significant recent infection in 50% vs. 8% for early HR, suggesting an activation of a nonhuman leukocyte antigen antibody-mediated immune response to an acute illness. One-year survival after the diagnosis of HR was 78% for the both groups (P=NS). Conclusions. Humoral rejection occurs now more frequently in patients with remote transplants and is commonly associated with the presence of malignancy or infection.

Immunobiologic consequences of assist devices

The aberrant state of monocyte and T-cell activation resulting from these host-device interaction is accompanied by two parallel processes: (1) selective loss of Th1 cytokine-producing CD4 T cells through activation-induced cell death, and (2) unopposed activation of Th2 cytokine-producing CD4 T cells resulting in B-cell hyperreactivity and dysregulated immunoglobulin synthesis via Th2 cytokines and heightened CD40 ligand-CD40 interactions. The net result of these events is that on one hand the VAD recipient develops progressive defects in cellular immunity and is at increased risk of serious infection, and on the other hand the VAD recipient is more likely to develop allosensitization, posing a significant risk to successful transplant outcome.

New-onset graft dysfunction after heart transplantation—incidence and mechanism-related outcomes

BACKGROUND Graft dysfunction (GD) after heart transplantation (HTx) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The impact of different pathophysiologic mechanisms on outcome is unknown. In this large, single-center study we aimed to assess the incidence of GD and compare the outcomes with different histopathologic mechanisms of rejection. METHODS We analyzed a data set of 1,099 consecutive patients after their HTx at Columbia University Medical Center between January 1994 and March 2008, and identified all patients hospitalized with new-onset GD. Based on the histopathologic data, patients were divided into GD-unexplained (Group-GD-U), GD-antibody-mediated rejection (Group-GD-AMR), GD-cardiac allograft vasculopathy (Group-GD-CAV) and GD-acute cellular rejection (Group-GD-ACR) groups. We compared the in-hospital and 3-, 6- and 12-month mortality across these groups using the chi-square test. We also compared the 3-, 6- and 12-month survival curves across groups using the log-rank test. RESULTS Of 126 patients (12%) identified with GD, complete histology data were available for 100 patients. There were 21, 20, 27 and 32 patients identified in Group-GD-U, Group-GD-AMR, Group-GD-CAV and Group-GD-ACR, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rates were 52%, 20%, 15% and 6%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in Group-GD-U compared with all other groups (p = 0.0006). The 3-, 6- and 12-month survival rate was also significantly lower in Group-GD-U compared with all other groups. CONCLUSION A significant proportion of patients presenting with new-onset GD have unexplained histopathology. Unexplained GD is associated with a significantly higher mortality rate. New diagnostic tools are necessary to better understand and detect/predict this malignant phenotype.

Interleukin-2 receptor blockade in cardiac transplantation: Influence of HLA-DR locus incompatibility on treatment efficacy

Background. Because allograft rejection results from specific T-cell activation by donor human leukocyte antigens (HLA), new immunomodulatory therapies for organ-transplant recipients are used to selectively block T-cell activity without global immunosuppression. We investigated whether blockade of the high-affinity interleukin (IL)-2 receptor effectively prevented T-cell alloreactivity in cardiac transplantation. Methods and Results. A study of a humanized monoclonal antibody against the high-affinity IL-2 receptor (daclizumab) was performed in 70 adult, cardiac-transplant recipients. Patients were stratified based on the degree of donor-recipient HLA-DR matches. Primary and secondary endpoints were incidence and frequency of high-grade allograft rejections, IL-2-dependent, T-cell outgrowth from biopsy sites as measured by lymphocyte growth assay, and production of anti-HLA antibodies. Treatment with daclizumab significantly prevented development of high-grade acute rejection in recipients with at least one donor HLA-DR locus match during the first 3 months posttransplantation; in this group 0 of 13 (0%) treated with daclizumab experienced at least one high-grade rejection versus 3 of 13 (23%) controls (P =0.05). In addition, 1 of 12 (9%) daclizumab-treated patients experienced one or more episodes of IL-2-dependent, T-cell outgrowth versus 5 of 12 (42%) patients in the untreated group (P =0.05). In contrast, daclizumab used at the same dose and schedule was not as effective in fully HLA–DR-mismatched recipients. After cessation of daclizumab, allograft rejection increased to levels seen in controls. Conclusions. IL-2-receptor blockade is effective for preventing alloreactivity and high-grade rejection in cardiac transplantation; however, its efficacy seemed to be influenced by the degree of donor-recipient, HLA-DR locus mismatching.