Elizabeth J. Natalle
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Elizabeth J. Natalle.
Western Journal of Speech Communication | 1989
Michael J. Papa; Elizabeth J. Natalle
The effect of gender on strategy selection and satisfaction with conflict was investigated in a field study of 108 employees from a large corporation. Subjects were grouped into dyads and discussed a topic of personal relevance. Results indicated that the gender composition of the dyad had a significant effect on the selection of influence strategies over three time periods. Male‐male dyads used assertiveness and reason consistently over time, while female‐female dyads shifted from high levels of assertiveness and reason to bargaining. Male‐female dyads used reason and bargaining throughout their interactions. Friendliness was a strategy selected frequently across time by all of the dyads. There were no reported satisfaction differences among the three dyad types.
Communication Education | 2013
Elizabeth J. Natalle; Kathryn Crowe
This report offers an interdisciplinary approach for conducting assessment on learning outcomes in undergraduate communication research skills where information literacy is embedded in the expected outcome. A Communication Studies department and the University Library piloted a two-year program to develop strategies for coordinated assessment that give feedback to both the Department and the Library. This collaborative model could be applied to any type of communication learning outcome that is related to information literacy.
Women's Studies in Communication | 2015
Elizabeth J. Natalle
FEMEN is a site for transnational debate over the effectiveness of a ‘‘Ukrainian form of pop feminism,’’ as core members describe their activities in a newly released historiography (Ackerman 133). Clearly situated in the hyperreality of postmodern feminism, FEMEN’s four core members, all in their twenties, admit to using media as a primary tool for discovering issues that might serve as a call to action in their quest to ‘‘kill patriarchy.’’ Using the street technique of ‘‘sextremism,’’ where ‘‘female nudity is a grave-digger of the system,’’ FEMEN claims a form of ‘‘peaceful terrorism’’ (FEMEN). Such a claim sets up a strange oxymoron that leaves one wondering whether extreme acts such as disrupting public meetings with bare breasts emblazoned with protest slogans and burning flags are rhetorically effective and in the best interests of feminist social change aims. Political scientist Valerie Sperling questions the extent to which FEMEN is actually a feminist group, given that normative gender patterns of masculinity, femininity, and heteronormativity support and legitimize the macho politics of Vladimir Putin in particular and Russian politics in general. FEMEN’s topless hallmark is clearly a parody of Putin’s shirtlessness, but their choice to use the naked female body to gain attention often loses political impact in a Russian context and in other countries where FEMEN has staged protests. Moreover, the FEMEN Web site is blocked in Russia, leaving little impact or opportunity for Russian feminists to follow their actions (N. Kukarenko, personal communication). FEMEN makes good theatre, but American interpretations are somewhat jaded after fifty years of street protest using the body in a variety of performative styles to raise consciousness about topics ranging from the Guerrilla Girls’ outrage over inequality in the world of art to SlutWalks’ demand to end police brutality of rape victims. In this case, a judgment on persuasive efficacy is actually more complicated for two reasons: FEMEN’s relationship to the context of sex and politics in Russia (Sperling), and the extensive exposure FEMEN has in global media. These two complications open their actions and ideology to debates on ethics, politics, the semantics of the body, as well as on feminism itself. FEMEN is sometimes immature and often borders on reckless when it comes to thinking through their actions, but this is unsurprising given the impulsive nature of their protests. Their decision to protest the niqab in Paris and again later in response to the case of 19-year-old Tunisian Amina Saboui (Tyler) sparked unprecedented
Archive | 1985
Elizabeth J. Natalle
Management Communication Quarterly | 1997
Katherine B. Knott; Elizabeth J. Natalle
Archive | 2003
Elizabeth J. Natalle; Fritzi R. Bodenheimer
Women's Studies in Communication | 1993
Elizabeth J. Natalle
The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education | 2012
Elizabeth J. Natalle
Archive | 2008
Elizabeth J. Natalle
Archive | 2018
Elizabeth J. Natalle