Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Elizabeth M. Wolkovich is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Elizabeth M. Wolkovich.


Nature | 2012

Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change

Elizabeth M. Wolkovich; Benjamin I. Cook; Jenica M. Allen; Theresa M. Crimmins; Julio L. Betancourt; Steven E. Travers; Stephanie Pau; Jim Regetz; T. J. Davies; Nathan J. B. Kraft; Toby R. Ault; Kjell Bolmgren; Susan J. Mazer; Gregory J. McCabe; Brian J. McGill; C. Parmesan; Nicolas Salamin; Mark D. Schwartz; Elsa E. Cleland

Warming experiments are increasingly relied on to estimate plant responses to global climate change. For experiments to provide meaningful predictions of future responses, they should reflect the empirical record of responses to temperature variability and recent warming, including advances in the timing of flowering and leafing. We compared phenology (the timing of recurring life history events) in observational studies and warming experiments spanning four continents and 1,634 plant species using a common measure of temperature sensitivity (change in days per degree Celsius). We show that warming experiments underpredict advances in the timing of flowering and leafing by 8.5-fold and 4.0-fold, respectively, compared with long-term observations. For species that were common to both study types, the experimental results did not match the observational data in sign or magnitude. The observational data also showed that species that flower earliest in the spring have the highest temperature sensitivities, but this trend was not reflected in the experimental data. These significant mismatches seem to be unrelated to the study length or to the degree of manipulated warming in experiments. The discrepancy between experiments and observations, however, could arise from complex interactions among multiple drivers in the observational data, or it could arise from remediable artefacts in the experiments that result in lower irradiance and drier soils, thus dampening the phenological responses to manipulated warming. Our results introduce uncertainty into ecosystem models that are informed solely by experiments and suggest that responses to climate change that are predicted using such models should be re-evaluated.


Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment | 2011

The phenology of plant invasions: a community ecology perspective

Elizabeth M. Wolkovich; Elsa E. Cleland

Community ecologists have long recognized the importance of phenology (the timing of periodic life-history events) in structuring communities. Phenological differences between exotic and native species may contribute to the success of invaders, yet a general theory for how phenology may shape invasions has not been developed. Shifts toward longer growing seasons, tracked by plant and animal species worldwide, heighten the need for this analysis. The concurrent availability of extensive citizen-science and long-term datasets has created tremendous opportunities to test the relationship between phenology and invasion. Here, we (1) extend major theories within community and invasion biology to include phenology, (2) develop a predictive framework to test these theories, and (3) outline available data resources to test predictions. By creating an integrated framework, we show how new analyses of long-term datasets could advance the fields of community ecology and invasion biology, while developing novel strategies for invasive species management. Although we focus here on terrestrial plants, our framework has clear extensions to animal communities and aquatic ecosystems as well.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2012

Divergent responses to spring and winter warming drive community level flowering trends

Benjamin I. Cook; Elizabeth M. Wolkovich; Camille Parmesan

Analyses of datasets throughout the temperate midlatitude regions show a widespread tendency for species to advance their springtime phenology, consistent with warming trends over the past 20–50 y. Within these general trends toward earlier spring, however, are species that either have insignificant trends or have delayed their timing. Various explanations have been offered to explain this apparent nonresponsiveness to warming, including the influence of other abiotic cues (e.g., photoperiod) or reductions in fall/winter chilling (vernalization). Few studies, however, have explicitly attributed the historical trends of nonresponding species to any specific factor. Here, we analyzed long-term data on phenology and seasonal temperatures from 490 species on two continents and demonstrate that (i) apparent nonresponders are indeed responding to warming, but their responses to fall/winter and spring warming are opposite in sign and of similar magnitude; (ii) observed trends in first flowering date depend strongly on the magnitude of a given species’ response to fall/winter vs. spring warming; and (iii) inclusion of fall/winter temperature cues strongly improves hindcast model predictions of long-term flowering trends compared with models with spring warming only. With a few notable exceptions, climate change research has focused on the overall mean trend toward phenological advance, minimizing discussion of apparently nonresponding species. Our results illuminate an understudied source of complexity in wild species responses and support the need for models incorporating diverse environmental cues to improve predictability of community level responses to anthropogenic climate change.


Journal of Ecology | 2013

Phylogenetic conservatism in plant phenology

T. Jonathan Davies; Elizabeth M. Wolkovich; Nathan J. B. Kraft; Nicolas Salamin; Jenica M. Allen; Toby R. Ault; Julio L. Betancourt; Kjell Bolmgren; Elsa E. Cleland; Benjamin I. Cook; Theresa M. Crimmins; Susan J. Mazer; Gregory J. McCabe; Stephanie Pau; Jim Regetz; Mark D. Schwartz; Steven E. Travers

Summary 1. Phenological events – defined points in the life cycle of a plant or animal – have been regarded as highly plastic traits, reflecting flexible responses to various environmental cues. 2. The ability of a species to track, via shifts in phenological events, the abiotic environment through time might dictate its vulnerability to future climate change. Understanding the predictors and drivers of phenological change is therefore critical. 3. Here, we evaluated evidence for phylogenetic conservatism – the tendency for closely related species to share similar ecological and biological attributes – in phenological traits across flowering plants. We aggregated published and unpublished data on timing of first flower and first leaf, encompassing ~4000 species at 23 sites across the Northern Hemisphere. We reconstructed the phylogeny for the set of included species, first, using the software program Phylomatic, and second, from DNA data. We then quantified phylogenetic conservatism in plant phenology within and across sites. 4. We show that more closely related species tend to flower and leaf at similar times. By contrasting mean flowering times within and across sites, however, we illustrate that it is not the time of year that is conserved, but rather the phenological responses to a common set of abiotic cues. 5. Our findings suggest that species cannot be treated as statistically independent when modelling phenological responses. 6. Synthesis. Closely related species tend to resemble each other in the timing of their life-history events, a likely product of evolutionarily conserved responses to environmental cues. The search for the underlying drivers of phenology must therefore account for species’ shared evolutionary histories.


Ecology Letters | 2011

Abundance of introduced species at home predicts abundance away in herbaceous communities

Jennifer Firn; Joslin L. Moore; Andrew S. MacDougall; Elizabeth T. Borer; Eric W. Seabloom; Janneke HilleRisLambers; W. Stanley Harpole; Elsa E. Cleland; Cynthia S. Brown; Johannes M. H. Knops; Suzanne M. Prober; David A. Pyke; Kelly A. Farrell; John D. Bakker; Lydia R. O’Halloran; Peter B. Adler; Scott L. Collins; Carla M. D’Antonio; Michael J. Crawley; Elizabeth M. Wolkovich; Kimberly J. La Pierre; Brett A. Melbourne; Yann Hautier; John W. Morgan; Andrew D. B. Leakey; Adam D. Kay; Rebecca L. McCulley; Kendi F. Davies; Carly J. Stevens; Chengjin Chu

Many ecosystems worldwide are dominated by introduced plant species, leading to loss of biodiversity and ecosystem function. A common but rarely tested assumption is that these plants are more abundant in introduced vs. native communities, because ecological or evolutionary-based shifts in populations underlie invasion success. Here, data for 26 herbaceous species at 39 sites, within eight countries, revealed that species abundances were similar at native (home) and introduced (away) sites - grass species were generally abundant home and away, while forbs were low in abundance, but more abundant at home. Sites with six or more of these species had similar community abundance hierarchies, suggesting that suites of introduced species are assembling similarly on different continents. Overall, we found that substantial changes to populations are not necessarily a pre-condition for invasion success and that increases in species abundance are unusual. Instead, abundance at home predicts abundance away, a potentially useful additional criterion for biosecurity programmes.


Archive | 2011

Species abundance at home predicts abundance away in grasslands

Jennifer Firn; Joslin L. Moore; Andrew S. MacDougall; Elizabeth T. Borer; Eric W. Seabloom; Janneke HilleRisLambers; W. Stanley Harpole; Elsa E. Cleland; Cindy S. Brown; Johannes M. H. Knops; Suzanne M. Prober; David A. Pyke; Kelly A. Farrell; John D. Bakker; Lydia R. O'Halloran; Peter B. Adler; Scott L. Collins; Carla M. D'Antonio; Michael J. Crawley; Elizabeth M. Wolkovich; Kimberley La Pierre; Brett A. Melbourne; Yann Hautier; John W. Morgan; Andrew D. B. Leakey; Adam D. Kay; Rebecca L. McCulley; Kendi F. Davies; Carly J. Stevens; Chengjin Chu

Many ecosystems worldwide are dominated by introduced plant species, leading to loss of biodiversity and ecosystem function. A common but rarely tested assumption is that these plants are more abundant in introduced vs. native communities, because ecological or evolutionary-based shifts in populations underlie invasion success. Here, data for 26 herbaceous species at 39 sites, within eight countries, revealed that species abundances were similar at native (home) and introduced (away) sites - grass species were generally abundant home and away, while forbs were low in abundance, but more abundant at home. Sites with six or more of these species had similar community abundance hierarchies, suggesting that suites of introduced species are assembling similarly on different continents. Overall, we found that substantial changes to populations are not necessarily a pre-condition for invasion success and that increases in species abundance are unusual. Instead, abundance at home predicts abundance away, a potentially useful additional criterion for biosecurity programmes.


Ecology Letters | 2014

Temporal Ecology in the Anthropocene

Elizabeth M. Wolkovich; B. I. Cook; K. K. McLauchlan; T. J. Davies

Two fundamental axes - space and time - shape ecological systems. Over the last 30 years spatial ecology has developed as an integrative, multidisciplinary science that has improved our understanding of the ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation and loss. We argue that accelerating climate change - the effective manipulation of time by humans - has generated a current need to build an equivalent framework for temporal ecology. Climate change has at once pressed ecologists to understand and predict ecological dynamics in non-stationary environments, while also challenged fundamental assumptions of many concepts, models and approaches. However, similarities between space and time, especially related issues of scaling, provide an outline for improving ecological models and forecasting of temporal dynamics, while the unique attributes of time, particularly its emphasis on events and its singular direction, highlight where new approaches are needed. We emphasise how a renewed, interdisciplinary focus on time would coalesce related concepts, help develop new theories and methods and guide further data collection. The next challenge will be to unite predictive frameworks from spatial and temporal ecology to build robust forecasts of when and where environmental change will pose the largest threats to species and ecosystems, as well as identifying the best opportunities for conservation.


Ecology | 2012

Incompletely resolved phylogenetic trees inflate estimates of phylogenetic conservatism

T. Jonathan Davies; Nathan J. B. Kraft; Nicolas Salamin; Elizabeth M. Wolkovich

The tendency for more closely related species to share similar traits and ecological strategies can be explained by their longer shared evolutionary histories and represents phylogenetic conservatism. How strongly species traits co-vary with phylogeny can significantly impact how we analyze cross-species data and can influence our interpretation of assembly rules in the rapidly expanding field of community phylogenetics. Phylogenetic conservatism is typically quantified by analyzing the distribution of species values on the phylogenetic tree that connects them. Many phylogenetic approaches, however, assume a completely sampled phylogeny: while we have good estimates of deeper phylogenetic relationships for many species-rich groups, such as birds and flowering plants, we often lack information on more recent interspecific relationships (i.e., within a genus). A common solution has been to represent these relationships as polytomies on trees using taxonomy as a guide. Here we show that such trees can dramatically inflate estimates of phylogenetic conservatism quantified using S. P. Blomberg et al.s K statistic. Using simulations, we show that even randomly generated traits can appear to be phylogenetically conserved on poorly resolved trees. We provide a simple rarefaction-based solution that can reliably retrieve unbiased estimates of K, and we illustrate our method using data on first flowering times from Thoreaus woods (Concord, Massachusetts, USA).


Ecosystems | 2012

Sensitivity of Spring Phenology to Warming Across Temporal and Spatial Climate Gradients in Two Independent Databases

Benjamin I. Cook; Elizabeth M. Wolkovich; T. Jonathan Davies; Toby R. Ault; Julio L. Betancourt; Jenica M. Allen; Kjell Bolmgren; Elsa E. Cleland; Theresa M. Crimmins; Nathan J. B. Kraft; Lesley T. Lancaster; Susan J. Mazer; Gregory J. McCabe; Brian J. McGill; Camille Parmesan; Stephanie Pau; James Regetz; Nicolas Salamin; Mark D. Schwartz; Steven E. Travers

Disparate ecological datasets are often organized into databases post hoc and then analyzed and interpreted in ways that may diverge from the purposes of the original data collections. Few studies, however, have attempted to quantify how biases inherent in these data (for example, species richness, replication, climate) affect their suitability for addressing broad scientific questions, especially in under-represented systems (for example, deserts, tropical forests) and wild communities. Here, we quantitatively compare the sensitivity of species first flowering and leafing dates to spring warmth in two phenological databases from the Northern Hemisphere. One—PEP725—has high replication within and across sites, but has low species diversity and spans a limited climate gradient. The other—NECTAR—includes many more species and a wider range of climates, but has fewer sites and low replication of species across sites. PEP725, despite low species diversity and relatively low seasonality, accurately captures the magnitude and seasonality of warming responses at climatically similar NECTAR sites, with most species showing earlier phenological events in response to warming. In NECTAR, the prevalence of temperature responders significantly declines with increasing mean annual temperature, a pattern that cannot be detected across the limited climate gradient spanned by the PEP725 flowering and leafing data. Our results showcase broad areas of agreement between the two databases, despite significant differences in species richness and geographic coverage, while also noting areas where including data across broader climate gradients may provide added value. Such comparisons help to identify gaps in our observations and knowledge base that can be addressed by ongoing monitoring and research efforts. Resolving these issues will be critical for improving predictions in understudied and under-sampled systems outside of the temperature seasonal mid-latitudes.


New Phytologist | 2012

Flowering phenology as a functional trait in a tallgrass prairie

Joseph M. Craine; Elizabeth M. Wolkovich; E. Gene Towne; Steven W. Kembel

• The timing of flowering is a critical component of the ecology of plants and has the potential to structure plant communities. Yet, we know little about how the timing of flowering relates to other functional traits, species abundance, and average environmental conditions. • Here, we assessed first flowering dates (FFDs) in a North American tallgrass prairie (Konza Prairie) for 431 herbaceous species and compared them with a series of other functional traits, environmental metrics, and species abundance across ecological contrasts. • The pattern of FFDs among the species of the Konza grassland was shaped by local climate, can be linked to resource use by species, and patterns of species abundance across the landscape. Peak FFD for the community occurred when soils were typically both warm and wet, while relatively few species began flowering when soils tended to be the driest. Compared with late-flowering species, species that flowered early had lower leaf tissue density and were more abundant on uplands than lowlands. • Flowering phenology can contribute to the structuring of grassland communities, but was largely independent of most functional traits. Therefore, selection for flowering phenology may be independent of general resource strategies.

Collaboration


Dive into the Elizabeth M. Wolkovich's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin I. Cook

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephanie Pau

Florida State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jenica M. Allen

University of Connecticut

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven E. Travers

North Dakota State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge