Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Elizabeth Rosenberg is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Elizabeth Rosenberg.


Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | 2012

Odanacatib in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: five years of continued therapy in a phase 2 study.

Bente Langdahl; Neil Binkley; Henry G. Bone; Nigel Gilchrist; Heinrich Resch; José Adolfo Rodríguez Portales; Andrew Denker; Antonio Lombardi; Celine Le Bailly De Tilleghem; Carolyn DaSilva; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Albert Leung

Odanacatib (ODN) is a selective inhibitor of the collagenase cathepsin K that is highly expressed by osteoclasts. In this 2‐year, phase 2, dose‐ranging trial, postmenopausal women with bone mineral density (BMD) T‐scores −2.0 to −3.5 at spine or hip were randomized to weekly placebo or ODN 3, 10, 25, or 50 mg plus vitamin D3 and calcium. Prespecified trial‐extensions continued through 5 years. In year 3, all women were re‐randomized to ODN 50 mg or placebo. For years 4 and 5, women who received placebo or ODN 3 mg in years 1 and 2 and placebo in year 3 received ODN 50 mg; others continued year 3 treatments. Endpoints included lumbar spine (primary), hip, 1/3 radius, and total body BMD; markers of bone metabolism; and safety. Women in the year 4 to 5 extension receiving placebo (n = 41) or ODN 50 mg (n = 100) had similar baseline characteristics. For women who received ODN (10–50 mg) for 5 years, spine and hip BMD increased over time. With ODN 50 mg continually for 5 years (n = 13), mean lumbar spine BMD percent change from baseline (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 11.9% (7.2% to 16.5%) versus −0.4% (−3.1% to 2.3%) for women who were switched from ODN 50 mg to placebo after 2 years (n = 14). In pooled results of women receiving continuous ODN (10–50 mg, n = 26–29), year 5 geometric mean percent changes from baseline in bone resorption markers cross‐linked N‐telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX)/creatinine and cross‐linked C‐telopeptide (CTX) were approximately −55%, but near baseline for bone formation markers bone‐specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) and amino‐terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP). In women switched from ODN 10 to 50 mg to placebo after 2 years (n = 25), bone turnover markers were near baseline. In summary, women receiving combinations of ODN (10–50 mg) for 5 years had gains in spine and hip BMD and showed larger reductions in bone resorption than bone formation markers. Discontinuation of ODN resulted in reversal of treatment effects. Treatment with ODN for up to 5 years was generally well‐tolerated.


The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2013

Bone Density, Turnover, and Estimated Strength in Postmenopausal Women Treated With Odanacatib: A Randomized Trial

Kim Brixen; Roland Chapurlat; Angela M. Cheung; Tony M. Keaveny; Thomas Fuerst; Klaus Engelke; Robert R. Recker; Bernard J. Dardzinski; Nadia Verbruggen; Shabana Ather; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Anne E. de Papp

CONTEXT Odanacatib, a cathepsin K inhibitor, increases spine and hip areal bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with low BMD and cortical thickness in ovariectomized monkeys. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to examine the impact of odanacatib on the trabecular and cortical bone compartments and estimated strength at the hip and spine. DESIGN This was a randomized, double-blind, 2-year trial. SETTING The study was conducted at a private or institutional practice. PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPANTS included 214 postmenopausal women with low areal BMD. INTERVENTION The intervention included odanacatib 50 mg or placebo weekly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Changes in areal BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (primary end point, 1 year areal BMD change at lumbar spine), bone turnover markers, volumetric BMD by quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and bone strength estimated by finite element analysis were measured. RESULTS Year 1 lumbar spine areal BMD percent change from baseline was 3.5% greater with odanacatib than placebo (P < .001). Bone-resorption marker C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen was significantly lower with odanacatib vs placebo at 6 months and 2 years (P < .001). Bone-formation marker procollagen I N-terminal peptide initially decreased with odanacatib but by 2 years did not differ from placebo. After 6 months, odanacatib-treated women had greater increases in trabecular volumetric BMD and estimated compressive strength at the spine and integral and trabecular volumetric BMD and estimated strength at the hip (P < .001). At the cortical envelope of the femoral neck, bone mineral content, thickness, volume, and cross-sectional area also increased from baseline with odanacatib vs placebo (P < .001 at 24 months). Adverse experiences were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Over 2 years, odanacatib decreased bone resorption, maintained bone formation, increased areal and volumetric BMD, and increased estimated bone strength at both the hip and spine.


European Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2012

The osteoclast, bone remodelling and treatment of metabolic bone disease

Brendan F. Boyce; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Anne E. de Papp; Le T. Duong

Eur J Clin Invest 2012; 42 (12): 1332–1341


The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2010

Once-weekly dose of 8400 IU vitamin D3 compared with placebo: effects on neuromuscular function and tolerability in older adults with vitamin D insufficiency

Paul Lips; Neil Binkley; Michael Pfeifer; Robert R. Recker; Suvajit Samanta; Dosinda A Cohn; Julie Chandler; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Dimitris Papanicolaou

BACKGROUND Vitamin D insufficiency, which is prevalent in older individuals, is associated with bone and muscle weakness and falls. OBJECTIVE We examined the effects of a weekly dose of 8400 IU vitamin D(3) on postural stability, muscle strength, and safety. DESIGN In this double-blind trial, subjects aged > or =70 y with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations < or =20 but > or =6 ng/mL were randomly assigned to receive a weekly dose of 8400 IU vitamin D(3) (n = 114) or a placebo (n = 112). Mediolateral body sway with eyes open (assessed with the AccuSway(PLUS) platform; Advanced Medical Technology Inc, Watertown, MA) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included the short physical performance battery (SPPB) and serum 25(OH)D concentrations. An analysis of covariance model was used for treatment comparisons. Safety and tolerability were monitored. RESULTS Serum 25(OH)D concentrations rose significantly (from 13.9 to 26.2 ng/mL, P < 0.001) in patients treated with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) but not in patients treated with the placebo. After 16 wk, neither mediolateral sway nor SPPB differed significantly between treatment groups. However, in the post hoc analysis of patients subgrouped by baseline sway (> or = 0.46 compared with <0.46 cm), treatment with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) significantly reduced sway compared with treatment with placebo (P = 0.047) in patients with elevated baseline sway but not in patients with normal baseline sway. Adverse experiences and incidences of hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, and elevated creatinine were similar with both treatments. In patients treated with 8400 IU vitamin D(3), but not in placebo-treated patients, parathyroid hormone decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS Weekly treatment with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) raised 25(OH)D concentrations in elderly, vitamin D-insufficient individuals. Treatment with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) did not reduce mediolateral sway significantly compared with treatment with placebo in this population, although in post hoc analysis, treatment with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) reduced sway in the subgroup of patients who had elevated sway at baseline. Weekly treatment with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) was well tolerated. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00242476.


American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 2015

CXCR2 Antagonist MK-7123. A Phase 2 Proof-of-Concept Trial for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Stephen I. Rennard; David C. Dale; James F. Donohue; Frank Kanniess; Helgo Magnussen; E. Rand Sutherland; Henrik Watz; Susan Lu; Paul Stryszak; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Heribert Staudinger

RATIONALE An antagonist (MK-7123) of the cytokine receptor CXCR2 reduces neutrophil chemotaxis and thus may alleviate airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of three dose levels of MK-7123, compared with placebo, in patients with moderate to severe COPD. METHODS This 6-month, double-blind study randomized patients with moderate to severe COPD (already on standard therapy) to daily MK-7123 at 10, 30, or 50 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in post-bronchodilator FEV1. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A total of 616 patients (71% male; mean age, 63 yr; 45% current smokers; baseline FEV1 [SD], 1.43 L [0.45]; mean FEV1 percent predicted, 43.9%) were randomized. Only MK-7123 50 mg led to significant improvement in FEV1 over placebo (mean difference [SE], 67 ml [32]). Reduced sputum neutrophil count was observed among the 122 patients examined; P = 0.003 (3 mo) and P = 0.092 (6 mo) (MK-7123 50 mg vs. placebo). The stratum of current smokers, but not that of nonsmokers, showed significant improvement versus placebo in FEV1 (168 ml) and time-to-first exacerbation, and showed numerical improvement in St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD score. MK-7123 caused a dose-dependent decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and reduced inflammatory biomarkers matrix metallopeptidase-9 and myeloperoxidase in plasma and sputum; ANC lower than 1.5 × 10(9)/L led to discontinuations with higher doses of MK-7123 (18% in the MK-7123 50-mg group vs. 1% in placebo). Plasma C-reactive protein and fibrinogen increased with MK-7123 treatment. Rates of infections at 6 months were similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with MK-7123 50 mg versus placebo led to significant improvement in FEV1 in patients with COPD, suggesting clinically important antiinflammatory effects with CXCR2 antagonism, although dose-related discontinuations were observed because of ANC decreases with MK-7123. Greater response was observed in smokers versus ex-smokers. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01006616).


Current Osteoporosis Reports | 2012

Inhibition of Cathepsin K for Treatment of Osteoporosis

Steven Boonen; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Frank Claessens; Dirk Vanderschueren; Socrates E. Papapoulos

Cathepsin K is the protease that is primarily responsible for the degradation of bone matrix by osteoclasts. Inhibitors of cathepsin K are in development for treatment of osteoporosis. Currently available antiresorptive drugs interfere with osteoclast function. They inhibit both bone resorption and formation, due to the coupling between these processes. Cathepsin K inhibitors, conversely, target the resorption process itself and may not interfere with osteoclast stimulation of bone formation. In fact, when cathepsin K is absent or inhibited in mice, rabbits, or monkeys, bone formation is maintained or increased. In humans, inhibition of cathepsin K is associated with sustained reductions in bone resorption markers but with smaller and transient reductions in bone formation markers. The usefulness of cathepsin K inhibitors in osteoporosis is now being examined in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials of postmenopausal osteoporotic women.


American Journal of Cardiology | 2009

Pooled Analyses of Effects on C-Reactive Protein and Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Placebo-Controlled Trials of Ezetimibe Monotherapy or Ezetimibe Added to Baseline Statin Therapy

Thomas A. Pearson; Christie M. Ballantyne; Enrico P. Veltri; Arvind Shah; Steven R. Bird; Jianxin Lin; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Andrew M. Tershakovec

Inflammation is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD), and statins reduce the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP). The effects of ezetimibe, alone or in combination with statins, on CRP and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were examined in 2 pooled analyses of randomized, placebo-controlled trials of ezetimibe 10 mg/day in patients with hypercholesterolemia: 6 12-week trials as monotherapy (n = 1,372) and 7 6- to 8-week trials as add-on to baseline statin therapy (n = 3,899). Mean percentage changes from baseline in CRP and LDL cholesterol were examined using analysis of variance in patients with CRP < or =10 mg/L. Effects within subgroups (age, gender, race, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, CAD, baseline CRP or lipids, and statin potency) and correlations between CRP and LDL cholesterol were also examined. Reduction in CRP by ezetimibe monotherapy was numerically greater than with placebo (treatment difference 6%, p = 0.09). Added to statin therapy, ezetimibe was associated with a significant additional reduction in CRP (treatment difference 10%, p <0.001). Treatment effects were generally consistent across subgroups for the 2 analyses. With monotherapy and add-on to statin therapy, LDL cholesterol reduction with ezetimibe was significantly greater than with placebo (treatment differences -19% and -23%, respectively, p <0.001). Spearmans correlation coefficients among baseline values and percentage changes from baseline in CRP and LDL cholesterol ranged from -0.007% to 0.13%. In conclusion, the addition of ezetimibe to statin treatment provides significantly enhanced CRP reductions over and above those achieved with statin monotherapy. Correlations between changes in CRP and changes in LDL cholesterol were weakly positive and significant only when ezetimibe was added to statin treatment. The effects of ezetimibe monotherapy are not well defined. The effects of ezetimibe on CRP were consistent across patient subgroups.


Current Medical Research and Opinion | 2007

Treatment with alendronate plus calcium, alendronate alone, or calcium alone for postmenopausal low bone mineral density

Sydney Lou Bonnick; Susan Broy; Fran Kaiser; Carol Teutsch; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Paul DeLucca; Mary E. Melton

ABSTRACT Objective: Bisphosphonates such as alendronate are widely used for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Supplemental calcium is also generally recommended. This trial directly compares alendronate to supplemental calcium and examines the effect of calcium supplementation on alendronate treatment. Methods: This 2-year, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial enrolled healthy, postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD). Patients with a dietary calcium intake ≥ 800 mg/day received daily vitamin D 400 IU and alendronate 10 mg/calcium-placebo, alendronate 10 mg/elemental calcium 1000 mg, or alendronate-placebo/calcium 1000 mg (2:2:1). Endpoints included BMD, bone turnover markers (BTMs), and adverse events. Results: Randomized patients (N = 701) were an average of 20.4 years postmenopausal. After 24 months, increases in lumbar spine BMD differed significantly between patients receiving calcium alone (0.8%) and either alendronate alone (5.6%) or alendronate + calcium (6.0%) ( p < 0.001). Significant differences were also seen at the trochanter and femoral neck ( p < 0.001). BTMs were significantly lower with alendronate-containing treatments than calcium alone ( p < 0.001). Addition of calcium supplementation to alendronate did not significantly increase BMD compared to alendronate alone ( p = 0.29 to 0.97), but did result in a statistically significant, though small, additional reduction in urinary NTx. Adverse events were similar among treatment groups. Limitations include no assessment of vitamin D levels and a discontinuation rate of approximately 30%, although discontinuation rates were similar among treatment groups. Conclusions: In postmenopausal women with a daily intake of ≥ 800 mg calcium and 400 IU vitamin D, 24-month treatment with alendronate 10 mg daily with or without calcium 1000 mg resulted in significantly greater increases in BMD and reduction of bone turnover than supplemental calcium alone. Addition of supplemental calcium to alendronate treatment had no effect on BMD and resulted in a small, though statistically significant, additional reduction in NTx.


Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | 2014

Effects of Odanacatib on the Radius and Tibia of Postmenopausal Women: Improvements in Bone Geometry, Microarchitecture, and Estimated Bone Strength

Angela M. Cheung; Sharmila Majumdar; Kim Brixen; Roland Chapurlat; Thomas Fuerst; Klaus Engelke; Bernard J. Dardzinski; Antonio Cabal; Nadia Verbruggen; Shabana Ather; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Anne E. de Papp

The cathepsin K inhibitor odanacatib (ODN), currently in phase 3 development for postmenopausal osteoporosis, has a novel mechanism of action that reduces bone resorption while maintaining bone formation. In phase 2 studies, odanacatib increased areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the lumbar spine and total hip progressively over 5 years. To determine the effects of ODN on cortical and trabecular bone and estimate changes in bone strength, we conducted a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial, using both quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and high‐resolution peripheral (HR‐p)QCT. In previously published results, odanacatib was superior to placebo with respect to increases in trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) and estimated compressive strength at the spine, and integral and trabecular vBMD and estimated strength at the hip. Here, we report the results of HR‐pQCT assessment. A total of 214 postmenopausal women (mean age 64.0 ± 6.8 years and baseline lumbar spine T‐score –1.81 ± 0.83) were randomized to oral ODN 50 mg or placebo, weekly for 2 years. With ODN, significant increases from baseline in total vBMD occurred at the distal radius and tibia. Treatment differences from placebo were also significant (3.84% and 2.63% for radius and tibia, respectively). At both sites, significant differences from placebo were also found in trabecular vBMD, cortical vBMD, cortical thickness, cortical area, and strength (failure load) estimated using finite element analysis of HR‐pQCT scans (treatment differences at radius and tibia = 2.64% and 2.66%). At the distal radius, odanacatib significantly improved trabecular thickness and bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) versus placebo. At a more proximal radial site, odanacatib attenuated the increase in cortical porosity found with placebo (treatment difference = –7.7%, p = 0.066). At the distal tibia, odanacatib significantly improved trabecular number, separation, and BV/TV versus placebo. Safety and tolerability were similar between treatment groups. In conclusion, odanacatib increased cortical and trabecular density, cortical thickness, aspects of trabecular microarchitecture, and estimated strength at the distal radius and distal tibia compared with placebo.


The Journal of Urology | 2010

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial of a Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist for Overactive Bladder

Tara L. Frenkl; Haiyuan Zhu; Theodore F. Reiss; Olga Seltzer; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Stuart A. Green

PURPOSE Neurokinin-1 receptor dependent mechanisms may regulate urinary frequency and urgency. We conducted this study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist serlopitant vs placebo or tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS This randomized, double-blind, 69-center trial enrolled adults with overactive bladder (8 or more average daily micturitions and 1 or more daily urge incontinence episodes). After a 1-week placebo run-in the patients were randomized to 8 weeks of daily 0.25, 1 or 4 mg serlopitant, 4 mg tolterodine extended release or placebo. Patients kept 7-day voiding diaries. The primary end point was change from baseline in micturitions per day. Secondary end points included urgency, total incontinence, urge incontinence episodes and incidence of dry mouth. RESULTS Of 557 patients randomized 476 completed the trial and had valid efficacy data for analysis. Mean change from baseline in daily micturitions was significantly greater for 0.25 (-1.1) and 4 mg (-1.1) serlopitant, and for tolterodine (-1.5) than for placebo (-0.5), but not for 1 mg serlopitant (-0.8). No serlopitant dose response was demonstrated. Tolterodine was numerically superior to all doses of serlopitant in mean micturitions per day and secondary end points. The incidence of dry mouth on serlopitant (3.3%) was comparable to placebo (4.6%) and lower than tolterodine (8.8%). Serlopitant was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Serlopitant (0.25 and 4 mg) significantly decreased the primary end point of daily micturitions but not the secondary end points compared with placebo. Serlopitant was generally well tolerated. Thus, NK-1 receptor antagonists may have a role in the treatment of overactive bladder but this compound does not offer advantages in efficacy compared to tolterodine.

Collaboration


Dive into the Elizabeth Rosenberg's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil Binkley

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven Boonen

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas P. Kiel

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge