Elizabeth Sparkes

A systematic literature review of psychological characteristics as determinants of outcome for spinal cord stimulation therapy

&NA; Psychological factors are deemed important when considering patients for suitability for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS). However, there is to date no consensus on which psychological characteristics or tests to undertake. This review analyses the literature to determine findings concerning the psychological characteristics observed and their impact on SCS efficacy for chronic pain. A search in the databases Cochrane, EBSCOhost (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and PsycARTICLES) and a hand search of reference lists from selected articles were performed, resulting in nine relevant articles. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory was the most commonly used tool for assessing psychological factors. Only one study used a semi‐structured interview instead of questionnaires. Studies lacked long term followup. Depression was identified in six studies as a factor that reduces efficacy, also as a characteristic that can improve after successful SCS by two studies. One study did not include patients with depression, due to previous research indicating depression as a contra‐indication. Hypochondriasis and hysteria had conflicting results for prediction of efficacy. Mania was predicted by only two studies as a positive indicator for success. Further long term studies of psychological factors on outcome from SCS are needed.

Long-term intrathecal drug administration for chronic nonmalignant pain.

Background: Chronic pain of nonmalignant origin requires effective long-term treatments, as for many patients pain management will be necessary throughout the rest of their lives. Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) have become a recognized therapy for the management of severe and otherwise intractable chronic pain. However, it is still not clear whether this treatment can be effective for periods up to 10 years or longer, given the paucity of long-term follow-up. This study sought to examine the effectiveness of IDDS following an average of 13 years postimplantation. Methods: Twenty patients participated in a longitudinal study with an average follow-up of 13.5 years (range: 10.4 to 17.9) after IDDS implantation. Investigation was carried out by means of a questionnaire before IDDS and after an average of 4 and 13 years of IDDS therapy. Assessment of pharmacological data and complications/side effects was performed. Results: Statistically significant improvements between baseline and 4-year assessment were observed for the following sensory and psychosocial variables: pain intensity, pain relief, coping, self-efficacy, depression, quality of life, housework, mobility, sleep, and social life (all P<0.001). No statistically significant changes were detected between assessments at averages of 4 and 13.5 years. Conclusions: This study, with one of the longest follow-up intervals reported in the IDDS literature, shows that IDDS has the potential to be a life-long pain management solution in appropriately selected patients with chronic nonmalignant pain.

Qualitative exploration of psychological factors associated with spinal cord stimulation outcome

Background and aim: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a last resort treatment for chronic pain consisting of an implantable pulse generator connected to leads placed in the epidural space of the spinal cord. Effective in reducing chronic pain, however, efficacy has been found to decrease over time. Psychological factors affecting outcome of SCS have been investigated through quantitative methods, but these have failed to provide confident predictors. We aimed to investigate via a qualitative approach, the experience of SCS following 1 year of therapy. Methods: Thirteen chronic non-cancer pain participants were interviewed. All participants had been trialled with SCS. The majority had gone on to full implantation with varying degrees of pain relief. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the data from the interviews. Results: Interviews resulted in findings that previous quantitative studies had failed to uncover. Two emergent core themes surfaced: ‘coping with pain’ and ‘SCS treatment’. The effect of emotion upon coping was recurrent. Participants divided the SCS experience into information provision, independence and unexpected experiences. Conclusion: The findings provide context for the patients’ experience of SCS. This research suggests that improved preparation prior to SCS including information provision, CBT and contact with expert patients may be of value.

A thematic analysis of causes attributed to weight gain: a female slimmer’s perspective

BACKGROUND Obesity prevalence has shown a marked increase in recent years. Strategies designed to manage the trend are not always effective in the long term. This qualitative study investigated perceived causes of weight gain in a group of female slimmers. Understanding beliefs about the causes of a problem can help explain behaviour and find solutions. It is therefore justified and timely to explore beliefs about causes of weight gain. METHODS A group of 11 (adult) slimmers were interviewed using a semi-structured approach, and the data obtained were analysed thematically. RESULTS Four main themes were identified; importance of habits, influence of learning early models about the world through food, eating beyond feeling full and use of food as therapy. CONCLUSIONS Behavioural causes were given to explain weight gain, perceived to be mediated by modern lifestyles or changes in circumstances. In addition, beliefs about food and its function related to personal history or childhood experience, which subsequently were used negatively in adulthood. The potential contributions of these findings for practice are explored.

Attrition with spinal cord stimulation

The aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) significantly reduces pain intensity for up to 18-month follow-up in patients with chronic neuropathic pain. Forty-eight patients were recruited. Patients rated their pain using a Visual analog scale (VAS) and pain-related disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline (1 week prior to SCS surgery) and at 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up. Pain intensity significantly decreased from baseline to all 3 time points [F (3,135) = 16.264, p < 0.001]. The greatest difference in the reduction of pain intensity was observed between baseline (M = 7.20, SD = 1.34) and 6-month follow-up (M = 4.60, SD = 2.20), [t(47) = 6.741, p < 0.001]. However, when looking at differences between the 6-month follow-up and subsequent assessments, statistically significant increases in pain intensity from the 6-month to the 12-month follow-up [t(47) = −2.788, p = 0.008], and from the 6-month to the 18-month follow-up [t(47) = −3.339, p = 0.002] could be observed. Statistically significant changes were also observed for clinical changes in pain scores [F (2,94) = 4.972, p = 0.009. There was a significant decrease in the percentage of clinical change obtained from the 6-month (M = 33.19, SD = 35.63) to the 12-month follow-up (M = 23.76, SD = 33.62), [t(47) = 2.347, p = 0.025], and from the 6-month to the 18-month follow-up (M = 18.34, SD = 33.51), [t(47) = 3.072, p = 0.004]. A number of patients also reported higher levels of pain intensity at the 12-and 18-month follow-up than at baseline. Pain-related disability scores significantly decreased from baseline (M = 55.04, SD = 16.43) to the 6-month follow up (M = 46.98, SD = 19.05), [t(47) = 3.464, p = 0.001] and from baseline to the 12-month follow up (M = 48.49, SD = 20.94), [t(47) = 2.918, p = 0.005], but not during the 18-month follow up (M = 51.75, SD = 20.92), [t(47) = 1.330, p = .190]. There was a significant increase in pain-related disability between the 6- and the 18-month follow up [t(47) = −2.188. p = 0.034]. These findings suggest that the beneficial effect of SCS on pain intensity may diminish over time, and that the 6-month follow-up scores may reflect a placebo effect.

Mindfulness-Based Interventions During Pregnancy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This systematic review aims to assess the effect of mindfulness-based interventions carried out during pregnancy exploring mindfulness and mental health outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to appraise the current literature on the subject area. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were agreed and after reviewing titles, abstracts and full papers, 14 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The quality of included articles was checked using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Pooled results of the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes on anxiety, depression and perceived stress indicated no differences between the mindfulness intervention group and the control group. Pooled results of the non-RCTs reporting anxiety, depression and perceived stress showed a significant benefit for the mindfulness group. Mindfulness as an outcome was assessed in four RCTs for which the pooled results show a significant difference in favour of the mindfulness intervention when compared to a control group. The pooled results of the four non-RCTs also indicate a significant difference following mindfulness intervention. Results suggest that mindfulness-based interventions can be beneficial for outcomes such as anxiety, depression, perceived stress and levels of mindfulness during the perinatal period. Further research would be useful to explore if such benefits are sustained during the post-natal period.