Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Elizabeth Weiland is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Elizabeth Weiland.


Journal of Molecular Biology | 2015

Intrinsically Disordered C-Terminal Tails of E. coli Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein Regulate Cooperative Binding to Single-Stranded DNA

Alexander G. Kozlov; Elizabeth Weiland; Anuradha Mittal; Vince Waldman; Edwin Antony; Nicole T. Fazio; Rohit V. Pappu; Timothy M. Lohman

The homotetrameric Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) plays a central role in DNA replication, repair and recombination. E. coli SSB can bind to long single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in multiple binding modes using all four subunits [(SSB)65 mode] or only two subunits [(SSB)35 binding mode], with the binding mode preference regulated by salt concentration and SSB binding density. These binding modes display very different ssDNA binding properties with the (SSB)35 mode displaying highly cooperative binding to ssDNA. SSB tetramers also bind an array of partner proteins, recruiting them to their sites of action. This is achieved through interactions with the last 9 amino acids (acidic tip) of the intrinsically disordered linkers (IDLs) within the four C-terminal tails connected to the ssDNA binding domains. Here, we show that the amino acid composition and length of the IDL affects the ssDNA binding mode preferences of SSB protein. Surprisingly, the number of IDLs and the lengths of individual IDLs together with the acidic tip contribute to highly cooperative binding in the (SSB)35 binding mode. Hydrodynamic studies and atomistic simulations suggest that the E. coli SSB IDLs show a preference for forming an ensemble of globular conformations, whereas the IDL from Plasmodium falciparum SSB forms an ensemble of more extended random coils. The more globular conformations correlate with cooperative binding.


Nano Letters | 2016

Defining Single Molecular Forces Required for Notch Activation Using Nano Yoyo.

Farhan Chowdhury; Isaac T. S. Li; Thuy T.M. Ngo; Benjamin J. Leslie; Byoung Choul Kim; Joshua E. Sokoloski; Elizabeth Weiland; Xuefeng Wang; Yann R. Chemla; Timothy M. Lohman; Taekjip Ha

Notch signaling, involved in development and tissue homeostasis, is activated at the cell-cell interface through ligand-receptor interactions. Previous studies have implicated mechanical forces in the activation of Notch receptor upon binding to its ligand. Here we aimed to determine the single molecular force required for Notch activation by developing a novel low tension gauge tether (LTGT). LTGT utilizes the low unbinding force between single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and Escherichia coli ssDNA binding protein (SSB) (∼4 pN dissociation force at 500 nm/s pulling rate). The ssDNA wraps around SSB and, upon application of force, unspools from SSB, much like the unspooling of a yoyo. One end of this nano yoyo is attached to the surface though SSB, while the other end presents a ligand. A Notch receptor, upon binding to its ligand, is believed to undergo force-induced conformational changes required for activating downstream signaling. If the required force for such activation is larger than 4 pN, ssDNA will unspool from SSB, and downstream signaling will not be activated. Using these LTGTs, in combination with the previously reported TGTs that rupture double-stranded DNA at defined forces, we demonstrate that Notch activation requires forces between 4 and 12 pN, assuming an in vivo loading rate of 60 pN/s. Taken together, our study provides a direct link between single-molecular forces and Notch activation.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2013

Asymmetric Regulation of Bipolar Single-stranded DNA Translocation by the Two Motors within Escherichia coli RecBCD Helicase

Fuqian Xie; Colin G. Wu; Elizabeth Weiland; Timothy M. Lohman

Background: RecBCD helicase is involved in repair of double-stranded DNA breaks. Results: The 5′ to 3′ ssDNA translocation rate of RecBCD is faster than the 3′ to 5′ rate in the absence of a CHI site, and the rates are coupled asymmetrically. Conclusion: RecBC controls 3′ to 5′ and 5′ to 3′ translocation, but RecD controls only 5′ to 3′ translocation. Significance: Asymmetric regulation may explain how RecBCD is regulated after CHI recognition. Repair of double-stranded DNA breaks in Escherichia coli is initiated by the RecBCD helicase that possesses two superfamily-1 motors, RecB (3′ to 5′ translocase) and RecD (5′ to 3′ translocase), that operate on the complementary DNA strands to unwind duplex DNA. However, it is not known whether the RecB and RecD motors act independently or are functionally coupled. Here we show by directly monitoring ATP-driven single-stranded DNA translocation of RecBCD that the 5′ to 3′ rate is always faster than the 3′ to 5′ rate on DNA without a crossover hotspot instigator site and that the translocation rates are coupled asymmetrically. That is, RecB regulates both 3′ to 5′ and 5′ to 3′ translocation, whereas RecD only regulates 5′ to 3′ translocation. We show that the recently identified RecBC secondary translocase activity functions within RecBCD and that this contributes to the coupling. This coupling has implications for how RecBCD activity is regulated after it recognizes a crossover hotspot instigator sequence during DNA unwinding.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2017

Large domain movements upon UvrD dimerization and helicase activation

Binh Nguyen; Yerdos Ordabayev; Joshua E. Sokoloski; Elizabeth Weiland; Timothy M. Lohman

Significance UvrD helicase plays essential roles in multiple DNA metabolic processes. Although UvrD monomers can translocate along single-stranded DNA, processive DNA unwinding in vitro requires self-assembly to form at least a UvrD dimer. However, the mechanism of activation by dimerization is not known. Using single-molecule fluorescence approaches, we show that the 2B subdomain of UvrD can freely rotate among at least four substates. Binding of a DNA substrate to a UvrD monomer induces an open conformation that does not activate its helicase activity. UvrD dimerization on DNA is accompanied by closing of the 2B subdomain conformation and helicase activation. The results emphasize the important role of the 2B subdomain in regulating helicase activity. Escherichia coli UvrD DNA helicase functions in several DNA repair processes. As a monomer, UvrD can translocate rapidly and processively along ssDNA; however, the monomer is a poor helicase. To unwind duplex DNA in vitro, UvrD needs to be activated either by self-assembly to form a dimer or by interaction with an accessory protein. However, the mechanism of activation is not understood. UvrD can exist in multiple conformations associated with the rotational conformational state of its 2B subdomain, and its helicase activity has been correlated with a closed 2B conformation. Using single-molecule total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, we examined the rotational conformational states of the 2B subdomain of fluorescently labeled UvrD and their rates of interconversion. We find that the 2B subdomain of the UvrD monomer can rotate between an open and closed conformation as well as two highly populated intermediate states. The binding of a DNA substrate shifts the 2B conformation of a labeled UvrD monomer to a more open state that shows no helicase activity. The binding of a second unlabeled UvrD shifts the 2B conformation of the labeled UvrD to a more closed state resulting in activation of helicase activity. Binding of a monomer of the structurally similar Escherichia coli Rep helicase does not elicit this effect. This indicates that the helicase activity of a UvrD dimer is promoted via direct interactions between UvrD subunits that affect the rotational conformational state of its 2B subdomain.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2016

Is a fully wrapped SSB–DNA complex essential for Escherichia coli survival?

Vincent M. Waldman; Elizabeth Weiland; Alexander G. Kozlov; Timothy M. Lohman

Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) is an essential homotetramer that binds ssDNA and recruits multiple proteins to their sites of action during genomic maintenance. Each SSB subunit contains an N-terminal globular oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding fold (OB-fold) and an intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain. SSB binds ssDNA in multiple modes in vitro, including the fully wrapped (SSB)65 and (SSB)56 modes, in which ssDNA contacts all four OB-folds, and the highly cooperative (SSB)35 mode, in which ssDNA contacts an average of only two OB-folds. These modes can both be populated under physiological conditions. While these different modes might be used for different functions, this has been difficult to assess. Here we used a dimeric SSB construct with two covalently linked OB-folds to disable ssDNA binding in two of the four OB-folds thus preventing formation of fully wrapped DNA complexes in vitro, although they retain a wild-type-like, salt-dependent shift in cooperative binding to ssDNA. These variants complement wild-type SSB in vivo indicating that a fully wrapped mode is not essential for function. These results do not preclude a normal function for a fully wrapped mode, but do indicate that E. coli tolerates some flexibility with regards to its SSB binding modes.


Biophysical Journal | 2015

The Intrinsically Disordered C-Terminal Tails of E. coli Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein Regulate Cooperative Binding to Single-Stranded DNA

Alexander G. Kozlov; Elizabeth Weiland; Anuradha Mittal; Vince Waldman; Rohit V. Pappu; Lohman M. Timothy

E. coli single strand DNA binding protein (SSB) is one of the key proteins in DNA replication, recombination and repair. SSB functions as a homotetramer and binds ssDNA in different modes using either all four subunits ((SSB)65 mode) or two subunits ((SSB)35 mode), which are regulated by salt concentration and SSB binding density. These binding modes display very different ssDNA binding properties with (SSB)35 mode showing highly cooperative binding. Each SSB subunit (177 amino acids) consists of two domains: an N-terminal DNA binding core containing an oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding (OB) fold (residues 1-112) and an intrinsically disordered (ID) C-terminal tail (65 residues). While the conserved last nine amino acids of the C-terminal tail (“the tip”) provide the site for interaction with more than a dozen metabolic proteins the role of the ID linker (56 amino acids) remains unclear. Here we show that the amino acid composition and length of the IDL affects the ssDNA binding mode preferences of SSB protein. Surprisingly the number of IDLs and the lengths of individual IDLs together with the acidic tip contribute to highly cooperative binding in the (SSB)35 binding mode. Atomistic simulations suggest that cooperative binding correlates with preference of IDLs for globular conformations (supported by NIH grant GM030498 (TML) and NSF MCB 1121867 (RVP)).


Journal of Molecular Biology | 2013

Multiple C-terminal tails within a single E. coli SSB homotetramer coordinate DNA replication and repair.

Edwin Antony; Elizabeth Weiland; Quan Yuan; Carol M. Manhart; Binh Nguyen; Alexander G. Kozlov; Charles S. McHenry; Timothy M. Lohman


Journal of Molecular Biology | 2012

Plasmodium falciparum SSB Tetramer Wraps Single-Stranded DNA with Similar Topology but Opposite Polarity to E. coli SSB.

Edwin Antony; Elizabeth Weiland; Sergey Korolev; Timothy M. Lohman


Journal of Molecular Biology | 2017

Glutamate promotes SSB protein–protein Interactions via intrinsically disordered regions

Alexander G. Kozlov; Min Kyung Shinn; Elizabeth Weiland; Timothy M. Lohman


Journal of Molecular Biology | 2016

Processive DNA Unwinding by RecBCD Helicase in the Absence of Canonical Motor Translocation

Michael J. Simon; Joshua E. Sokoloski; Linxuan Hao; Elizabeth Weiland; Timothy M. Lohman

Collaboration


Dive into the Elizabeth Weiland's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy M. Lohman

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander G. Kozlov

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joshua E. Sokoloski

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Binh Nguyen

Georgia State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edwin Antony

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anuradha Mittal

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rohit V. Pappu

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vince Waldman

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yerdos Ordabayev

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin J. Leslie

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge