Ellen C. Keeley

Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.

BACKGROUND Many trials have been done to compare primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with thrombolytic therapy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (AMI). Our aim was to look at the combined results of these trials and to ascertain which reperfusion therapy is most effective. METHODS We did a search of published work and identified 23 trials, which together randomly assigned 7739 thrombolytic-eligible patients with ST-segment elevation AMI to primary PTCA (n=3872) or thrombolytic therapy (n=3867). Streptokinase was used in eight trials (n=1837), and fibrin-specific agents in 15 (n=5902). Most patients who received thrombolytic therapy (76%, n=2939) received a fibrin-specific agent. Stents were used in 12 trials, and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in eight. We identified short-term and long-term clinical outcomes of death, non-fatal reinfarction, and stroke, and did subgroup analyses to assess the effect of type of thrombolytic agent used and the strategy of emergent hospital transfer for primary PTCA. All analyses were done with and without inclusion of the SHOCK trial data. FINDINGS Primary PTCA was better than thrombolytic therapy at reducing overall short-term death (7% [n=270] vs 9% [360]; p=0.0002), death excluding the SHOCK trial data (5% [199] vs 7% [276]; p=0.0003), non-fatal reinfarction (3% [80] vs 7% [222]; p<0.0001), stroke (1% [30] vs 2% [64]; p=0.0004), and the combined endpoint of death, non-fatal reinfarction, and stroke (8% [253] vs 14% [442]; p<0.0001). The results seen with primary PTCA remained better than those seen with thrombolytic therapy during long-term follow-up, and were independent of both the type of thrombolytic agent used, and whether or not the patient was transferred for primary PTCA. INTERPRETATION Primary PTCA is more effective than thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of ST-segment elevation AMI.

Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials.

BACKGROUND Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is defined as the use of pharmacological substances before a planned immediate intervention, to improve coronary patency. We undertook a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (published and unpublished) to compare facilitated and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS We identified 17 trials of patients with STEMI assigned to facilitated (n=2237) or primary (n=2267) percutaneous coronary intervention. We identified short-term outcomes (up to 42 days) of death, stroke, non-fatal reinfarction, urgent target vessel revascularisation, and major bleeding. Grade 3 flow rates for prethrombolysis and post-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) were also analysed. FINDINGS The facilitated approach resulted in a greater than two-fold increase in the number of patients with initial TIMI grade 3 flow, compared with the primary approach (832 patients [37%] vs 342 [15%], odds ratio 3.18, 95% CI 2.22-4.55); however, final rates did not differ (1706 [89%] vs 1803 [88%]; 1.19, 0.86-1.64). Significantly more patients assigned to the facilitated approach than those assigned to the primary approach died (106 [5%] vs 78 [3%]; 1.38, 1.01-1.87), had higher non-fatal reinfarction rates (74 [3%] vs 41 [2%]; 1.71, 1.16-2.51), and had higher urgent target vessel revascularisation rates (66 [4%] vs 21 [1%]; 2.39, 1.23-4.66); the increased rates of adverse events seen with the facilitated approach were mainly seen in thrombolytic-therapy-based regimens. Facilitated intervention was associated with higher rates of major bleeding than primary intervention (159 [7%] vs 108 [5%]; 1.51, 1.10-2.08). Haemorrhagic stroke and total stroke rates were higher in thrombolytic-therapy-containing facilitated regimens than in primary intervention (haemorrhagic stroke 15 [0.7%] vs two [0.1%], p=0.0014; total stroke 24 [1.1%] vs six [0.3%], p=0.0008). INTERPRETATION Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention offers no benefit over primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI treatment and should not be used outside the context of randomised controlled trials. Furthermore, facilitated interventions with thrombolytic-based regimens should be avoided.

2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

L. David Hillis, MD, FACC, Chair†; Peter K. Smith, MD, FACC, Vice Chair*†; Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA*‡; John A. Bittl, MD, FACC§; Charles R. Bridges, MD, SCD, FACC, FAHA*†; John G. Byrne, MD, FACC†; Joaquin E. Cigarroa, MD, FACC†; Verdi J. DiSesa, MD, FACC†; Loren F. Hiratzka, MD, FACC, FAHA†; Adolph M. Hutter, Jr, MD, MACC, FAHA†; Michael E. Jessen, MD, FACC*†; Ellen C. Keeley, MD, MS†; Stephen J. Lahey, MD†; Richard A. Lange, MD, FACC, FAHA†§; Martin J. London, MD ; Michael J. Mack, MD, FACC*¶; Manesh R. Patel, MD, FACC†; John D. Puskas, MD, FACC*†; Joseph F. Sabik, MD, FACC*#; Ola Selnes, PhD†; David M. Shahian, MD, FACC, FAHA**; Jeffrey C. Trost, MD, FACC*†; Michael D. Winniford, MD, FACC†

2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect Nancy Albert, PhD, CCNS, CCRN, FAHA Mark A. Creager, MD, FACC, FAHA Steven M. Ettinger, MD, FACC Robert A. Guyton, MD, FACC Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA Judith S. Hochman, MD, FACC, FAHA

Scraping of aortic debris by coronary guiding catheters: A prospective evaluation of 1,000 cases

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to determine the incidence and to quantitate aortic debris retrieved during placement of guiding catheters in patients undergoing percutaneous interventions. BACKGROUND Studies have shown that atherosclerotic aortic debris predisposes patients to spontaneous or procedurally related ischemic events. METHODS In 1,000 consecutive percutaneous interventions, the amount of visible atheromatous material from large-lumen-guiding catheters was recorded. Clinical characteristics and in-hospital complications were prospectively collected and associated with debris production. RESULTS Visible aortic debris (1+ to 3+) occurred more frequently with the Judkins left (JL) catheter, followed by the multipurpose (Multi) catheter compared to any other type of guiding catheter (65%, p = 0.001 and 60%, p = 0.01, respectively). Large debris (2+ and 3+) was observed most frequently with the Multi (odds ratio 3.79, C.I. = 2.32 to 6.21, p = 0.001), JL (odds ratio 2.83, C.I. = 1.98 to 4.05, p = 0.001) and voda left (VL) (odds ratio 2.73, C.I. = 1.51 to 4.95, p = 0.001) catheters. The Judkins right (JR) catheter type was least likely to produce any debris (24%, p = 0.001). A history of unstable angina (p = 0.05) or myocardial infarction (p = 0.003) was associated with a decreased incidence of debris production. The presence of debris was not found to be associated with in-hospital ischemic complications. CONCLUSIONS Studies have shown that atherosclerosis of the aorta is a potential source of systemic embolism in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Our study shows that in more than 50% of percutaneous revascularization procedures, guiding catheter placement is associated with scraping debris from the aorta. Design characteristics of the JL, Multi and VL guiding catheters make them most likely to produce such debris. Meticulous attention to allow the debris to exit the back of the catheter is essential to prevent injecting atheromatous debris into the vascular bed.

Long-term clinical outcome and predictors of major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous interventions on saphenous vein grafts.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term clinical outcome after percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and to identify the predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). BACKGROUND Percutaneous interventions of SVGs have been associated with more procedural complications and higher restenosis rates compared with interventions on native vessels. METHODS From 1993 to 1997, 1,062 patients underwent percutaneous intervention on 1,142 SVG lesions. Procedural, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes were recorded in a database and analyzed. RESULTS In-hospital MACE occurred in 137 patients (13%) including death (8%), Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) (2%) and coronary artery bypass surgery (3%). Late MACE occurred in 565 patients (54%) including death (9%), Q-wave MI (9%) and target vessel revascularization (36%). Any MACE occurred in 457 (43%) patients. Follow-up was available in 1,056 (99%) patients at 3 +/- 1 year. Univariate predictors were restenotic lesion (odds ratio [OR]: 2.47, confidence interval [CI]: 1.13 to 3.85, p = 0.0003), unstable angina (OR: 1.99, CI: 1.27 to 2.91, p = 0.04) and congestive heart failure (CHF) (OR: 1.97, CI: 1.14 to 3.24, p = 0.02) for in-hospital MACE, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (OR: 2.18, CI: 1.34 to 3.44, p = 0.002), intra-aortic balloon pump placement (OR: 2.08, CI: 1.13 to 3.85, p = 0.02) and previous MI (OR: 1.97, CI: 1.14 to 3.25, p = 0.007) for late MACE. Independent multivariate predictors for late MACE were restenotic lesion (relative risk [RR] 1.33, p = 0.02), PVD (RR: 1.31, p = 0.01), CHF (RR: 1.42, p = 0.01) and multiple stents (RR: 1.47, p = 0.004). Angiographic follow-up was available for 422 patients. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 122 (29%) of stented SVGs and 181 (43%) of nonstented SVGs (p = 0.04). Stent implantation did not confer a survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS Despite the use of new interventional devices, SVG interventions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; SVG stenting is not associated with better three-year event-free survival. This may be due to progressive disease at nonstented sites.

The role of circulating mesenchymal progenitor cells (fibrocytes) in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis

Pulmonary fibrosis is associated with a number of disorders that affect the lung. Although there are several cellular types that are involved in the pathogenesis pulmonary fibrosis, the resident lung fibroblast has been viewed traditionally as the primary cell involved in promoting the deposition of ECM that culminates in pulmonary fibrosis. However, recent findings demonstrate that a circulating cell (i.e., the fibrocyte) can contribute to the evolution of pulmonary fibrosis. Fibrocytes are bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal progenitor cells that express a variety of cell‐surface markers related to leukocytes, hematopoietic progenitor cells, and fibroblasts. Fibrocytes are unique in that they are capable of differentiating into fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, as well as adipocytes. In this review, we present data supporting the critical role these cells play in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis.

Analysis of Long-Term Survival After Revascularization in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Ischemic heart disease is the most common cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with CKD who develop an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have a poor prognosis, with >70% mortality at 2 years. Despite this heavy burden of disease, the optimal management of ACS in this patient population is unknown. Our goal was to compare the effect of coronary revascularization or medical therapy alone on the long-term survival of patients with CKD presenting with ACS. From 1990 to 1998, data were prospectively collected on 4,758 patients admitted to a coronary care unit with the diagnosis of ACS. Of these, 3,104 had preserved renal function, and 1,654 had significant renal dysfunction, as defined by the National Kidney Foundation in the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative classification of kidney function as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Long-term survival was assessed and outcomes were compared according to whether patients were treated with medical therapy alone or if they underwent a percutaneous or surgical revascularization procedure. Follow-up information was available in 99% of the patients up to 8 years after the index hospitalization. Of the 1,654 patients with significant renal dysfunction, 64 underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, 232 underwent percutaneous coronary revascularization, 280 underwent a diagnostic cardiac catheterization and were subsequently treated medically, whereas 1,078 were treated with medical therapy alone. Percutaneous coronary revascularization was associated with superior long-term survival. In conclusion, patients with severe CKD and ACS had improved long-term survival when treated with percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Chemokines as Mediators of Neovascularization

Chemokines are a superfamily of homologous heparin-binding proteins, first described for their role in recruiting leukocytes to sites of inflammation. Chemokines have since been recognized as key factors mediating both physiological and pathological neovascularization in such diverse clinical settings as malignancy, wound repair, chronic fibroproliferative disorders, myocardial ischemia, and atherosclerosis. Members of the CXC chemokine family, structurally defined as containing the ELR amino acid motif, are potent inducers of angiogenesis, whereas another subset of the CXC chemokines inhibits angiogenesis. In addition, CCL2, a CC chemokine ligand, has been implicated in arteriogenesis. In this article, we review the current literature on the role of chemokines as mediators of neovascularization.

2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Executive summary

2011;58;2584-2614; originally published online Nov 7, 2011; J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Winniford Joseph F. Sabik, Ola Selnes, David M. Shahian, Jeffrey C. Trost, and Michael D. A. Lange, Martin J. London, Michael J. Mack, Manesh R. Patel, John D. Puskas, Adolph M. Hutter, Jr, Michael E. Jessen, Ellen C. Keeley, Stephen J. Lahey, Richard Bridges, John G. Byrne, Joaquin E. Cigarroa, Verdi J. DiSesa, Loren F. Hiratzka, L. David Hillis, Peter K. Smith, Jeffrey L. Anderson, John A. Bittl, Charles R. Surgeons Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: This information is current as of January 22, 2012 http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/full/58/24/2584 located on the World Wide Web at: The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is