Ellen Hoffmann

Defibrillator Implantation Early after Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND The rate of death, including sudden cardiac death, is highest early after a myocardial infarction. Yet current guidelines do not recommend the use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) within 40 days after a myocardial infarction for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. We tested the hypothesis that patients at increased risk who are treated early with an ICD will live longer than those who receive optimal medical therapy alone. METHODS This randomized, prospective, open-label, investigator-initiated, multicenter trial registered 62,944 unselected patients with myocardial infarction. Of this total, 898 patients were enrolled 5 to 31 days after the event if they met certain clinical criteria: a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (< or = 40%) and a heart rate of 90 or more beats per minute on the first available electrocardiogram (ECG) (criterion 1: 602 patients), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (> or = 150 beats per minute) during Holter monitoring (criterion 2: 208 patients), or both criteria (88 patients). Of the 898 patients, 445 were randomly assigned to treatment with an ICD and 453 to medical therapy alone. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 37 months, 233 patients died: 116 patients in the ICD group and 117 patients in the control group. Overall mortality was not reduced in the ICD group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.35; P=0.78). There were fewer sudden cardiac deaths in the ICD group than in the control group (27 vs. 60; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.00; P=0.049), but the number of nonsudden cardiac deaths was higher (68 vs. 39; hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.84; P=0.001). Hazard ratios were similar among the three groups of patients categorized according to the enrollment criteria they met (criterion 1, criterion 2, or both). CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic ICD therapy did not reduce overall mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and clinical features that placed them at increased risk. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00157768.)

A Comparison of Electrophysiologically Guided Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy with Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients with Symptomatic, Sustained Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

BACKGROUND Antiarrhythmic drug therapy guided by invasive electrophysiologic testing is now widely used in patients with symptomatic, sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. METHODS We conducted a prospective, randomized trial in 170 patients to investigate whether this approach would improve long-term outcome. Patients whose arrhythmia was inducible by programmed electrical stimulation were assigned to treatment with electrophysiologically guided drug therapy based on serial testing (61 patients) or with metoprolol (54 patients). Electrophysiologically guided therapy consisted of serial testing of antiarrhythmic agents to identify the first one that rendered the arrhythmia noninducible. The 55 patients whose arrhythmia was noninducible during the initial electrophysiologic test were also treated with metoprolol. RESULTS During a mean (+/- SD) follow-up period of 23 +/- 17 months, recurrent, nonfatal arrhythmia occurred in 44 patients and sudden death due to cardiac factors in 27. The incidence of symptomatic arrhythmia and sudden death combined was virtually the same in the two groups with inducible arrhythmia after two years of observation (electrophysiologically guided therapy vs. metoprolol therapy, 46 percent vs. 48 percent). The outcome was more favorable in the patients with noninducible arrhythmia at base line (75 percent had neither adverse event) than in those with inducible arrhythmia who were assigned to metoprolol therapy (P = 0.009 by log-rank test). Only 6 of the 29 patients (21 percent) with inducible arrhythmia that became noninducible during drug therapy had recurrent arrhythmia or sudden death, as compared with 21 of the 32 patients (66 percent) with arrhythmia that continued to be inducible (P less than 0.001). A multivariate regression analysis identified continued inducibility of the arrhythmia as an independent predictor of recurrent arrhythmia or sudden death (relative risk, 7.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.3 to 23.2; P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS As compared with metoprolol therapy, electrophysiologically guided antiarrhythmic drug therapy did not improve the overall outcome of patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, effective suppression of inducible arrhythmia by antiarrhythmic drugs was associated with a better outcome than was lack of suppression.

Recommendations for participation in leisure-time physical activity and competitive sports of patients with arrhythmias and potentially arrhythmogenic conditions Part II: Ventricular arrhythmias, channelopathies and implantable defibrillators

This consensus paper on behalf of the Study Group on Sports Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology follows a previous one on guidelines for sports participation in competitive and recreational athletes with supraventricular arrhythmias and pacemakers. The question of imminent life-threatening arrhythmias is especially relevant when some form of ventricular rhythm disorder is documented, or when the patient is diagnosed to have inherited a pro-arrhythmogenic disorder. Frequent ventricular premature beats or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia may be a hallmark of underlying pathology and increased risk. Their finding should prompt a thorough cardiac evaluation, including both imaging modalities and electrophysiological techniques. This should allow distinguishing idiopathic rhythm disorders from underlying disease that carries a more ominous prognosis. Recommendations on sports participation in inherited arrhythmogenic conditions and asymptomatic gene carriers are also discussed: congenital and acquired long QT syndrome, short QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and other familial electrical disease of unknown origin. If an implantable cardioverter defibrillator is indicated, it is no substitute for the guidelines relating to the underlying pathology. Moreover, some particular recommendations for patients/athletes with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator are to be observed.

Transvenous defibrillation leads: high incidence of failure during long-term follow-up

Implantable Defibrillator Lead Failure. Introduction: Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) critically depend on correct functioning of their system. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and clinical presentation of transvenous ICD lead failures during long‐term follow‐up.

Recommendations for participation in leisure-time physical activity and competitive sports in patients with arrhythmias and potentially arrhythmogenic conditions Part I: Supraventricular arrhythmias and pacemakers.

This document by the Study Group on Sports Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology extends on previous recommendations for sports participation for competitive athletes by also incorporating guidelines for those who want to perform recreational physical activity. For different supraventricular arrhythmias and arrhythmogenic conditions, a description of the relationship between the condition and physical activity is given, stressing how arrhythmias can be influenced by exertion or can be a reflection of the (patho)physiological cardiac adaptation to sports participation itself. The following topics are covered in this text: sinus bradycardia; atrioventricular nodal condition disturbances; pacemakers; atrial premature beats; paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia without pre-excitation; pre-excitation, asymptomatic or with associated arrhythmias (i.e. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome); atrial fibrillation; and atrial flutter. A related document discusses ventricular arrhythmias, channelopathies and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation: different cooled and noncooled electrode systems induce specific lesion geometries and adverse effects profiles.

The success and safety of standard catheter radiofrequency ablation may be limited for ablation of atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. The aim of this study was to characterize and compare different cooled and noncooled catheter systems in terms of their specific lesion geometry, incidence of impedance rise, and crater and coagulum formation to facilitate appropriate catheter selection for special indications. The study investigated myocardial lesion generation of three cooled catheter systems (7 Fr, 4‐mm tip): two saline irrigation catheters with a showerhead‐type electrode tip (sprinkler) and a porous metal tip and an internally cooled catheter. Noncooled catheters (7 Fr) had a large tip electrode (8 mm) and a standard tip electrode (4 mm). RF energy was delivered on isolated porcine myocardium superfused with heparinized pig blood (37°C) at power settings of 10–40 W. Both irrigated systems were characterized by a large lesion depth ( 8.1 ± 1.6 mm ) and a large lesion diameter ( 13.8 ± 1.6 mm ). In comparison, internally cooled lesions showed a similar lesion depth ( 8.0 ± 1.0 mm ), but a significantly smaller lesion diameter ( 12.3 ± 1.2 mm , P = 0.04 ). Large tip lesions had a similar lesion diameter ( 14.5 ± 1.6 mm ), but a significantly smaller lesion depth ( 6.3 ± 1.0 mm , P = 0.002 ) compared to irrigated lesions. However, lesion volume was not significantly different between the three cooled and the large tip catheter. To induce maximum lesion size, power requirements were three times higher for the irrigation systems and two times higher for the internally cooled and the large tip catheter compared to the standard catheter. Impedance rise was rarest with irrigated and large tip ablation. In case of impedance rise crater formation was a frequent observation (61–93%). Irrigated catheters prevented coagulum formation most effectively. Irrigated rather than internally cooled ablation appears to be most adequate for the induction of deep and long lesions at a low rate of impedance rise and thrombus formation. Large tip ablation may be feasible for the creation of long linear lesions, however, with an increased risk of thrombus formation. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. I]:1438–1445)

Heart Rate Dynamics at the Onset of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias as Retrieved From Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND The recent availability of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) that record 1024 R-R intervals preceding a ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) provides a unique opportunity to analyze heart rate variability (HRV) before the onset of VTA. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifty-eight post-myocardial infarction patients with an implanted ICD for recurrent VTA provided 2 sets of 98 heart rate recordings in sinus rhythm: (1) before a VTA and (2) during control conditions. Three subgroups were considered according to the antiarrhythmic (AA) drug regimen. A state of sympathoexcitation was suggested by the significant reduction in HRV before VTA onset compared with control conditions. beta-Blockers and dl-sotalol enhanced HRV in control recordings; nevertheless, HRV declined before VTA independent of AA drugs. A gradual increase in heart rate and decrease in sinus arrhythmia at VTA onset were specific findings of patients who received dl-sotalol. CONCLUSIONS The peculiar heart rate dynamics observed before VTA onset are suggestive of a state of sympathoexcitation that is independent of AA drugs.

Cryoballoon versus RF ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the German Ablation Registry.

Catheter ablation is used extensively with curative intention in atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation has long been a standard of care, while cryoballoon technology has emerged as a feasible approach with promising results. Prospective multicenter registry data referring to both ablation technologies in AF ablation therapy are lacking.

Myocardium: Dynamic versus Single-Shot CT Perfusion Imaging

PURPOSE To determine the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic computed tomographic (CT) perfusion imaging of the myocardium for the detection of hemodynamically relevant coronary artery stenosis compared with the accuracy of coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was approved by the institutional review board and the Federal Radiation Safety Council (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz). All patients provided written informed consent. Thirty-two consecutive patients in adenosine stress conditions underwent dynamic CT perfusion imaging (14 consecutive data sets) performed by using a 256-section scanner with an 8-cm detector and without table movement. Time to peak, area under the curve, upslope, and peak enhancement were determined after calculation of time-attenuation curves. In addition, myocardial blood flow (MBF) was determined quantitatively. Results were compared with those of coronary angiography and FFR measurement by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In addition, threshold values based on the Youden index and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS Area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively, were 0.67, 41.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.5%, 61.1%), and 86.6% (95% CI: 76.0%, 93.7%) for time to peak; 0.74, 58.6% (95% CI: 38.9%, 76.5%), and 83.6% (95% CI: 72.5%, 91.5%) for area under the curve; 0.87, 82.8% (95% CI: 64.2%, 94.1%), and 88.1% (95% CI: 77.8%, 94.7%) for upslope; 0.83, 82.8% (95% CI: 64.2%, 94.1%), and 89.6% (95% CI: 79.6%, 95.7%) for peak enhancement; and 0.86, 75.9% (95% CI: 56.5%, 89.7%), and 100% (95% CI: 94.6%, 100%) for MBF. The thresholds determined by using the Youden index were 148.5 HU · sec for area under the curve, 12 seconds for time to peak, 2.5 HU/sec for upslope, 34 HU for peak enhancement, and 1.64 mL/g/min for MBF. CONCLUSION The semiquantitative parameters upslope and peak enhancement and the quantitative parameter MBF showed similar high diagnostic accuracy. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.13121441/-/DC1.

Hemodynamic deterioration during ICD implant: Predictors of high-risk patients

Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing during implantation of the cardioverter defibrillator is associated with hemodynamic deterioration and pump failure in many patients. We investigated the influence of DFT testing on cardiac function intraoperatively using a balloon-tipped catheter. In 13 consecutive patients with a nonthoracotomy approach, a mean of 3.4 +/- 1.4 episodes of ventricular fibrillation were induced with an overall ischemic time of 87 +/- 54 seconds. At the end of DFT testing, patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of < 30% had significant impairment of cardiac index (1.6 +/- 0.5 L/min/m2 after testing vs 2.2 +/- 0.6 L/min/m2 before the procedure). One patient with severely comprised ventricular function needed prolonged positive inotropic support. The left ventricular function of patients with a preoperative EF > or = 30%, however, was not changed (2.2 +/- 0.5 L/min/m2 after testing and 2.2 +/- 0.5 L/min/m2 before testing). The two groups did not differ with respect to the number of testing episodes, ischemic time, or DFT. Thus patients with a low preoperative EF (< 30%) are threatened by a severe left ventricular deterioration during ICD implantation. Close hemodynamic monitoring with a balloon-tipped catheter is recommended in these patients.