Ellen L. Goode
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ellen L. Goode.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 1999
Mark Gibbs; Janet L. Stanford; Richard A. McIndoe; Gail P. Jarvik; Suzanne Kolb; Ellen L. Goode; Lisa Chakrabarti; Eugene F. Schuster; Valerie A. Buckley; Elizabeth L. Miller; Susan Brandzel; Sarah Li; Leroy Hood; Elaine A. Ostrander
Combining data from a genomic screen in 70 families with a high risk for prostate cancer (PC) with data from candidate-region mapping in these families and an additional 71 families, we have localized a potential hereditary PC-susceptibility locus to chromosome 1p36. Because an excess of cases of primary brain cancer (BC) have been observed in some studies of families with a high risk for PC, and because loss of heterozygosity at 1p36 is frequently observed in BC, we further evaluated 12 families with both a history of PC and a blood relative with primary BC. The overall LOD score in these 12 families was 3.22 at a recombination fraction (theta) of .06, with marker D1S507. On the basis of an a priori hypothesis, this group was stratified by age at diagnosis of PC. In the younger age group (mean age at diagnosis <66 years), a maximum two-point LOD score of 3.65 at straight theta = .0 was observed, with D1S407. This linkage was rejected in both early- and late-onset families without a history of BC (LOD scores -7.12 and -6.03, respectively, at straight theta = .0). After exclusion of 3 of the 12 families that had better evidence of linkage to previously described PC-susceptibility loci, linkage to the 1p36 region was suggested by a two-point LOD score of 4.74 at straight theta = .0, with marker D1S407. We conclude that a significant proportion of these families with both a high risk for PC and a family member with BC show linkage to the 1p36 region.
Molecular Carcinogenesis | 2005
Jocelyn M. Weiss; Ellen L. Goode; W. C. Ladiges; Cornelia M. Ulrich
The gene encoding human 8‐oxoguanine glycosylase 1 (hOGG1) is involved in DNA base excision repair. The encoded DNA glycosylase excises 7,8‐dihydro‐8‐oxoguanine (8‐OHdG), a highly mutagenic base produced in DNA as a result of exposure to reactive oxygen species (ROS). Polymorphisms in this gene may alter glycosylase function and an individuals ability to repair damaged DNA, possibly resulting in genetic instability that can foster carcinogenesis. In order to elucidate the possible impact of polymorphisms in hOGG1, we performed a literature review of both functional and epidemiologic studies that assessed the effects of these polymorphisms on repair function, levels of oxidative DNA damage, or associations with cancer risk. Fourteen functional studies and 19 epidemiologic studies of breast, colon, esophageal, head and neck, lung, nasopharyngeal, orolaryngeal, prostate, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), and stomach cancers were identified. Although the larger functional studies suggest reduced repair function with variant alleles in hOGG1, the evidence is generally inconclusive. There is some epidemiologic evidence that risk for esophageal, lung, nasopharyngeal, orolaryngeal, and prostate is related to hOGG1 genotype, whereas risk of breast cancer does not appear related. In studies that explored potential interactions with environmental factors, cancer risk for hOGG1 genotypes differed depending on exposure, especially for colon cancer. In summary, there is limited evidence that polymorphisms in hOGG1 affect repair function and carcinogenesis. Larger, well‐designed functional and epidemiologic studies are needed to clarify these relationships, especially with respect to interactions with other DNA repair enzymes and interactions with environmental factors that increase carcinogenic load.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 1997
Richard A. McIndoe; Janet L. Stanford; Mark Gibbs; Gail P. Jarvik; Susan Brandzel; Cassandra L. Neal; Sarah Li; Jason T. Gammack; Ellen L. Goode; Leroy Hood; Elaine A. Ostrander
Summary Linkage of a putative prostate cancer—susceptibility locus (HPC1) to chromosome 1q24-25 has recently been reported. Confirmation of this linkage in independent data sets is essential because of the complex nature of this disease. Here we report the results of a linkage analysis using 10 polymorphic markers spanning ∼37 cM in the region of the putative HPC1 locus in 49 high-risk prostate cancer families. Data were analyzed by use of two parametric models and a nonparametric method. For the parametric LOD-score method, the first model was identical to the original report by Smith and co-workers (Hopkins), and the second was based on a segregation analysis previously reported by Carter and coworkers (Seattle). In both cases, our results do not confirm the linkage reported for this region. Calculated LOD scores from the two-point analysis for each marker were highly negative at small recombination fractions. Multipoint LOD scores for this linkage group were also highly negative. Additionally, we were unable to demonstrate heterogeneity within the data set, using HOMOG. Although these data do not formally exclude linkage of a prostate cancer—susceptibility locus at HPC1, it is likely that other prostate cancer—susceptibility loci play a more critical role in the families that we studied.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 2000
Mark Gibbs; Janet L. Stanford; Gail P. Jarvik; Marta Janer; Michael Badzioch; Mette A. Peters; Ellen L. Goode; Suzanne Kolb; Lisa Chakrabarti; Morgan Shook; Ryan Basom; Elaine A. Ostrander; L Hood
A 10-cM genomewide scan of 94 families with hereditary prostate cancer, including 432 affected men, was used to identify regions of putative prostate cancer-susceptibility loci. There was an average of 3.6 affected, genotyped men per family, and an overall mean age at diagnosis of 65.4 years. A total of 50 families were classified as early onset (mean age at diagnosis <66 years), and 44 families were classified as later onset (mean age at diagnosis > or =66 years). When the entire data set is considered, regions of interest (LOD score > or =1.5) were identified on chromosomes 10, 12, and 14, with a dominant model of inheritance. Under a recessive model LOD scores > or =1.5 were found on chromosomes 1, 8, 10, and 16. Stratification by age at diagnosis highlighted a putative susceptibility locus on chromosome 11, among the later-onset families, with a LOD score of 3. 02 (recombination fraction 0) at marker ATA34E08. Overall, this genomic scan suggests that there are multiple prostate cancer loci responsible for the hereditary form of this common and complex disease and that stratification by a variety of factors will be required for identification of all relevant genes.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 1999
Mark Gibbs; Lisa Chakrabarti; Janet L. Stanford; Ellen L. Goode; Suzanne Kolb; Eugene F. Schuster; Valerie A. Buckley; Morgan Shook; Leroy Hood; Gail P. Jarvik; Elaine A. Ostrander
One hundred fifty-two families with prostate cancer were analyzed for linkage to markers spanning a 20-cM region of 1q42.2-43, the location of a putative prostate cancer-susceptibility locus (PCAP). No significant evidence for linkage was found, by use of both parametric and nonparametric tests, in our total data set, which included 522 genotyped affected men. Rejection of linkage may reflect locus heterogeneity or the confounding effects of sporadic disease in older-onset cases; therefore, pedigrees were stratified into homogeneous subsets based on mean age at diagnosis of prostate cancer and number of affected men. Analyses of these subsets also detected no significant evidence for linkage, although LOD scores were positive at higher recombination fractions, which is consistent with the presence of a small proportion of families with linkage. The most suggestive evidence of linkage was in families with at least five affected men (nonparametric linkage score of 1.2; P=.1). If heterogeneity is assumed, an estimated 4%-9% of these 152 families may show linkage in this region. We conclude that the putative PCAP locus does not account for a large proportion of these families with prostate cancer, although the linkage of a small subset is compatible with these data.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 1997
Gail P. Jarvik; Ellen L. Goode; Melissa A. Austin; Johan Auwerx; Samir S. Deeb; Gerard D. Schellenberg; Terry Reed
We previously reported that change, with age, in plasma levels of total cholesterol (TC) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) differed between apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes epsilon 3 epsilon 3 and epsilon 3 epsilon 4, in a sample of 77 older, unrelated males. By use of a larger sample from that cohort, followed longitudinally during 1969-87, the change in TC and in LDL-C, between the epsilon 3 epsilon 3 and epsilon 3 epsilon 4 APOE genotypes, over three exams, was reanalyzed. Additionally, the change in triglycerides (TG) and in HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), between the epsilon 3 epsilon 3 and epsilon 3 epsilon 4 APOE genotypes-as well as the differences between the epsilon 3 epsilon 3 and epsilon 3 epsilon 2 genotypes, for TC, LDL-C, TG, and HDL-C-were contrasted over the three exams. At exam 1 TG was higher in the epsilon 3 epsilon 4 group than in the epsilon 3 epsilon 3 group (mean age 48 years), and at exams 2 and exam 3 (mean ages 58 and 63 years, respectively) it was similar (P = .009 for the exam-by-genotype-interaction effect in the repeated-measures analysis). A similar trend was seen for TC (P = .03), yet previously detected LDL-C effects were not apparent (P = .46). Those with the epsilon 3 epsilon 2 genotype had higher TG and lower LDL-C and TC at each exam than were seen in those with the epsilon 3 epsilon 3 genotype, although the differences in the values were not always statistically significant. Differences in TC, LDL-C, and TG, between the epsilon 3 epsilon 2-genotype and epsilon 3 epsilon 3-genotype groups, did not significantly change over the three exams. HDL-C levels were relatively stable over the exams; however, the exam-by-genotype interaction was significant for the epsilon 3 epsilon 2 genotype versus the epsilon 3 epsilon 3 genotype (P = .02). The epsilon 4 allele effects on TG and TC changed between longitudinal exams and may be age dependent. Changes, with age, in the effect of the epsilon 3 epsilon 4 genotype on lipids may impact the risk of developing atherosclerotic disease.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2004
Ellen L. Goode; John D. Potter; Jeannette Bigler; Cornelia M. Ulrich
Methionine synthase [5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine S-methyltransferase (MTR)] is involved in folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism, a pathway known to play a role in colorectal carcinogenesis. We investigated whether the MTR D919G polymorphism was associated with risk of colorectal adenoma in a colonoscopy-based study of 513 cases and 609 controls from Minneapolis, MN. Adenoma risk appeared nonsignificantly increased among women with DG or GG genotype [adjusted odds ratio (OR) versus DD, 1.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9–2.1] but not men (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7–1.5). An interaction with methionine intake was observed among women, such that low versus high intake was associated with a 2.3-fold increased risk only among those with DG or GG genotype (95% CI, 1.1–4.9; P for interaction = 0.05). Similarly, risk associated with alcohol intake was not elevated among women with the DD genotype; however, consumption of >7 g of alcohol/day versus none was associated with an increased risk among women with DG or GG genotype (adjusted OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4–4.4; P for interaction = 0.03). An interaction between MTR D919G and the thymidylate synthase (TS or TYMS) 3′-untranslated region polymorphism 1494del6 was also observed among women (P for interaction = 0.007). No evidence of interaction with intake of folate, vitamin B12, or vitamin B6 or with genotype at MTHFR C677T or the TS enhancer region 28-bp repeat polymorphism was seen. These findings add to what is known about the complexities of genetic variations in one-carbon-metabolizing enzymes in relation to colorectal carcinogenesis.
BMC Genetics | 2003
Ellen L. Goode; Michael Badzioch; Helen Kim; Laura S. Rozek; Karen L. Edwards; Gail P. Jarvik
BackgroundCigarette smoking behavior may have a genetic basis. We assessed evidence for quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting the maximum number of cigarettes smoked per day, a trait meant to quantify this behavior, using data collected over 40 years as part of the Framingham Heart Studys original and offspring cohorts.ResultsHeritability was estimated to be approximately 21% using variance components (VC) methods (SOLAR), while oligogenic linkage and segregation analysis based on Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods (LOKI) estimated a mean of two large QTLs contributing approximately 28% and 20%, respectively, to the traits variance. Genome-wide parametric (FASTLINK) and VC linkage analyses (SOLAR) revealed several LOD scores greater than 1.0, with peak LOD scores using both methods on chromosomes 2, 17, and 20; multi-point MCMC methods followed up on these chromosomes. The most robust linkage results were for a QTL between 65 and 84 cM on chromosome 20 with signals from multiple sex- and age-adjusted analyses including two-point LOD scores of 1.30 (parametric) and 1.07 (heritability = 0.17, VC) at 70.51 cM, a multi-point LOD score of 1.50 (heritability = 0.20, VC) at 84 cM, and an intensity ratio of 12.0 (MCMC) at 65 cM.ConclusionFamilial aggregation of the maximum number of cigarettes smoked per day was consistent with a genetic component to this behavior, and oligogenic segregation analyses using MCMC suggested two important QTLs. Linkage signals on chromosome 20 between 65 and 84 cM were seen using multiple analytical methods. No linkage result, however, met genome-wide statistical significance criteria, and the true relationship between these regions and smoking behavior remains unclear.
Genetic Epidemiology | 2000
Ellen L. Goode; Janet L. Stanford; Lisa Chakrabarti; Mark Gibbs; Suzanne Kolb; Richard A. McIndoe; Valerie A. Buckley; Eugene F. Schuster; Cassandra L. Neal; Elizabeth L. Miller; Susan Brandzel; Leroy Hood; Elaine A. Ostrander; Gail P. Jarvik
Confirmation of linkage and estimation of the proportion of families who are linked in large independent datasets is essential to understanding the significance of cancer susceptibility genes. We report here on an analysis of 150 high‐risk prostate cancer families (2,176 individuals) for potential linkage to the HPC1 prostate cancer susceptibility locus at 1q24‐25. This dataset includes 640 affected men with an average age at prostate cancer diagnosis of 66.8 years (range, 39–94), representing the largest collection of high‐risk families analyzed for linkage in this region to date. Linkage to multiple 1q24‐25 markers was strongly rejected for the sample as a whole (lod scores at theta = 0 ranged from –30.83 to –18.42). Assuming heterogeneity, the estimated proportion of families linked (alpha) at HPC1 in the entire dataset was 2.6%, using multipoint analysis. Because locus heterogeneity may lead to false rejection of linkage, data were stratified based on homogeneous subsets. When restricted to 21 Caucasian families with five or more affected family members and mean age at diagnosis < = 65 years, the lod scores at theta = 0 remained less than –4.0. These results indicate that the overall portion of hereditary prostate cancer families whose disease is due to inherited variation in HPC1 may be less than originally estimated. Genet. Epidemiol. 18:251–275, 2000.
Human Heredity | 2001
Mette A. Peters; Gail P. Jarvik; Marta Janer; Lisa Chakrabarti; Suzanne Kolb; Ellen L. Goode; Mark Gibbs; Charles C. DuBois; Eugene F. Schuster; Leroy Hood; Elaine A. Ostrander; Janet L. Stanford
Objectives: A recent linkage analysis of 360 families at high risk for prostate cancer identified the q27–28 region on chromosome X as the potential location of a gene involved in prostate cancer susceptibility. Here we report on linkage analysis at this putative HPCX locus in an independent set of 186 prostate cancer families participating in the Prostate Cancer Genetic Research Study (PROGRESS). Methods: DNA samples from these families were genotyped at 8 polymorphic markers spanning 14.3 cM of the HPCX region. Results: Two-point parametric analysis of the total data set resulted in positive lod scores at only two markers, DXS984 and DXS1193, with scores of 0.628 at a recombination fraction (θ) of 0.36 and 0.012 at θ = 0.48, respectively. The stratification of pedigrees according to the assumed mode of transmission increased the evidence of linkage at DXS984 in 81 families with no evidence of male-to-male transmission (lod = 1.062 at θ = 0.28). Conclusions: Although this analysis did not show statistically significant evidence for the linkage of prostate cancer susceptibility to Xq27–28, the results are consistent with a small percentage of families being linked to this region. The analysis further highlights difficulties in replicating linkage results in an etiologically heterogeneous, complexly inherited disease.