Ellen L. Poleshuck
University of Rochester
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ellen L. Poleshuck.
Pain | 2005
Jennifer Katz; Ellen L. Poleshuck; Carl H. Andrus; Laura A. Hogan; Beth F. Jung; Dale I. Kulick; Robert H. Dworkin
Abstract Although more severe acute postoperative pain increases the risk of chronic pain following breast cancer surgery, few studies have examined the characteristics of patients who develop greater acute pain. To identify risk factors for acute pain and its persistence one month following breast cancer surgery, a sample of 114 women scheduled for breast cancer surgery was assessed preoperatively for demographic, clinical, and emotional functioning variables that were hypothesized to be associated with acute pain severity. Clinically meaningful postoperative pain was assessed at follow‐up interviews 2, 10, and 30 days after surgery. In univariate analyses, the risk of clinically meaningful acute pain was increased among women who were younger, unmarried, had more invasive surgeries, and had greater preoperative emotional distress. In multiple logistic regression analyses, greater preoperative anxiety was the only variable that made an independent contribution to predicting clinically meaningful acute pain at 2 days after surgery whereas younger age, being unmarried, and preoperative anxiety each made an independent contribution to predicting clinically meaningful acute pain that persisted from 2 to 30 days after surgery. These results increase understanding of neurobiologic mechanisms and psychosocial processes that contribute to the development of acute pain following breast cancer surgery and have implications for the development of interventions to prevent it.
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2010
David C. Foster; Merrill Beth Kotok; Li-Shan Huang; Arthur Watts; David Oakes; Fred M. Howard; Ellen L. Poleshuck; Christopher J. Stodgell; Robert H. Dworkin
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy of common treatments for vulvodynia: topical lidocaine monotherapy, oral desipramine monotherapy, and lidocaine-desipramine combined therapy. METHODS: A 12-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 133 vulvodynia-afflicted women assigned to four treatment arms: placebo tablets–placebo cream, desipramine tablets–placebo cream, placebo tablets–lidocaine cream, and desipramine tablets–lidocaine cream. The tampon test was selected as primary end point using a modified intention-to-treat analysis. Twelve secondary end points were also examined. At completion of the 12-week randomized phase, women were examined “open label” through 52 weeks postrandomization. RESULTS: All treatment arms reported substantial tampon-test pain reduction: 33% reduction placebo cream–placebo tablet, 20% reduction lidocaine cream–placebo tablet, 24% reduction placebo cream–desipramine tablet, and 36% reduction lidocaine cream–desipramine tablet. Compared with placebo, we found no significant difference in tampon-test pain reduction with desipramine (t=0.90; P=.37) or lidocaine (t=1.27; P=.21). Of the remaining 12 outcome measures, only the Index of Sexual Satisfaction, improved with desipramine compared with placebo (t=-2.81; P=.006). During the open-label phase, women undergoing vestibulectomy surgery reported significantly improved pain as measured by cotton swab test and the McGill Pain Scale compared with nonsurgical alternatives. CONCLUSION: Oral desipramine and topical lidocaine, as monotherapy or in combination, failed to reduce vulvodynia pain more than placebo. Placebo or placebo-independent effects are behind the substantial pain improvement seen in all treatment allocations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00276068. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I
Pain | 2008
Ellen L. Poleshuck; Carmen R. Green
Socioeconomic disadvantage (SED) and its contribution to the pain experience is of growing interest and relevance. This review will provide a brief overview of definitional and measurement issues related to SED. Selected literature considering the relationships between SED and pain will then be summarized, and several possible mechanisms to explain the relationships will be considered. Last, future directions for research and practice will be discussed.
General Hospital Psychiatry | 2009
Ellen L. Poleshuck; Matthew J. Bair; Kurt Kroenke; Teresa M. Damush; Wanzhu Tu; Jingwei Wu; Erin Krebs; Donna E. Giles
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine if psychosocial stress and anxiety were associated with depression severity in primary care patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS A cross-sectional sample of 500 primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain (250 with depression and 250 without depression) was assessed for anxiety, psychosocial stress, depression severity and demographics. The depressed and nondepressed participants were compared using t test and chi(2) analyses. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the respective associations of psychosocial stressors and anxiety with depression severity based on the 20-item Symptoms Check List across all 500 participants. RESULTS Compared with nondepressed patients, the depressed patients reported significantly more psychosocial stressors and more severe anxiety. Depressed patients reported a higher frequency of difficulties with every psychosocial stressor assessed. After controlling for covariates, both anxiety and psychosocial stressors were found to be associated with depression severity. CONCLUSIONS Both anxiety and psychosocial stress should be considered in the assessment and treatment of patients with musculoskeletal pain and depression. Psychosocial stressors among patients with pain may have an impact on depression beyond that of anxiety. Tailored, integrated treatments that target the psychosocial needs of patients with pain and depression are needed. In addition to pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy and other behavioral treatments may be especially important for depression complicated by anxiety or psychosocial stress.
The Clinical Journal of Pain | 2013
Matthew J. Bair; Ellen L. Poleshuck; Jingwei Wu; Erin Krebs; Teresa M. Damush; Wanzhu Tu; Kurt Kroenke
Objectives:To determine whether baseline anxiety and social stressors as well their early change (first 3 months) predict 12-month depression and pain severity. Methods:We analyzed data from the Stepped Care for Affective Disorders and Musculoskeletal Pain study, a randomized clinical trial of a combined medication-behavioral intervention for primary care patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression. Using multivariable linear regression modeling, we examined the independent association of baseline anxiety and social stressors with depression and pain severity at 12 months. In addition, we modeled whether changes in anxiety and social stressors predicted 12-month depression and pain severity. Results:Overall, the sample (N=250) was 52.8% women with a mean age of 55.5 years, and a racial distribution of 60.4% white, 36.4% black, and 3.2% other. Depression and pain were moderately severe at baseline (mean SCL-20 depression=1.9 and Brief Pain Inventory pain severity=6.15) and similar across intervention and usual care arms. Baseline anxiety symptoms predicted both depression (t score=2.13, P=0.034) and pain severity (t score=2.75, P=0.007) at 12 months. Also, early change in anxiety predicted 12-month depression (t score=−2.47, P=0.014), but not pain. Neither baseline nor early change in social stressors predicted depression or pain severity. Conclusions:Anxiety, but not social stressors predict 12-month depression and pain severity. The presence of comorbid anxiety should be considered in the assessment and treatment of patients with musculoskeletal pain and depression, particularly as a factor that may adversely affect treatment response.
Psychosomatics | 2009
Ellen L. Poleshuck; Matthew J. Bair; Kurt Kroenke; Arthur Watts; Xin Tu; Donna E. Giles
BACKGROUND The prevalence and consequences of comorbid pain and depression in gynecology patients are understudied. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of pain, depression, and their co-occurrence among gynecology patients, and to examine how pain and depression are associated with additional comorbid mental disorders. METHOD Self-reported pain, depressive symptoms, other mental-disorder symptoms, functional status, interpersonal distress, and abuse were assessed in 1,647 gynecology patients by use of the Patient Health Questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes Study (SF-20). RESULTS Moderate-to-severe pain was reported by 29% of patients; depression, by 21%; with both present in 10.3%. Comorbid pain and depression was associated with anxiety, suicidal or death ideation, functional impairment, interpersonal distress, and physical or sexual abuse. DISCUSSION Innovative approaches are needed to assess and treat gynecology patients with comorbid pain and depression, given the degree of overlap between them.
Journal of Family Violence | 2012
Catherine Cerulli; Ellen L. Poleshuck; Christina Raimondi; Stephanie Veale; Nancy P. Chin
Traditionally, professionals working with intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors view a victim through a disciplinary lens, examining health and safety in isolation. Using focus groups with survivors, this study explored the need to address IPV consequences with an integrated model and begin to understand the interconnectedness between violence, health, and safety. Focus group findings revealed that the inscription of pain on the body serves as a reminder of abuse, in turn triggering emotional and psychological pain and disrupting social relationships. In many cases, the physical abuse had stopped but the abuser was relentless by reminding and retraumatizing the victim repeatedly through shared parenting, prolonged court cases, etc. This increased participants’ exhaustion and frustration, making the act of daily living overwhelming.
Comprehensive Psychiatry | 2009
Ellen L. Poleshuck; Nancy L. Talbot; Haiyan Su; Xin Tu; Linda H. Chaudron; Stephanie A. Gamble; Donna E. Giles
OBJECTIVES Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) increases risk for both depression and pain in women. Pain is associated with worse depression treatment response. The contribution of pain to depression treatment outcomes in women with histories of CSA is unknown. This study examined whether clinically significant pain would be associated with worse depression and functioning outcomes among women with CSA histories treated with interpersonal psychotherapy. METHOD Participants were 66 women with major depression and CSA who presented to a community mental health center. An interpersonal psychotherapy protocol planned for 14 weekly sessions followed by 2 biweekly sessions. Patients were classified as experiencing high pain or low pain based on reported pain severity and interference with functioning. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess change over time in intent-to-treat analyses. RESULTS High pain patients entered treatment with greater depression symptom severity than low pain patients. Although both high and low pain patients demonstrated improvement in mood, high-pain patients continued to report more depressive symptoms posttreatment. Furthermore, high pain patients demonstrated less change in their emotion-related role functioning over the course of treatment than low pain patients. LIMITATIONS Small sample size, secondary analyses, lack of a control group, and limited assessment of pain all limit confidence in the findings of this study. CONCLUSION Findings support the evidence that depression is particularly severe and difficult to treat in patients with CSA and pain. Clinicians should evaluate pain in depressed patients with CSA histories. Role functioning may prove to be a particularly important target in the treatment of patients with pain.
Community Mental Health Journal | 2013
Ellen L. Poleshuck; Beth Cerrito; Nicole Leshoure; Gillian Finocan-Kaag; Margaret H. Kearney
Low-income and African American patients in women’s health clinics are at risk for depression and under-treatment of their depression. This study aimed to understand women’s health patients’ experiences of depressive symptoms and perspectives on the low uptake of psychotherapy. Twenty-three women with depressive symptoms from a women’s health clinic completed individual qualitative interviews. Women reported risk of harm in the therapeutic relationship as the primary barrier; physical and mental health symptoms and doubt that psychotherapy will help were also described. Women also reported psychotherapy can be helpful by allowing women to express their feelings, gain insight, and make life changes.
Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease | 2010
Ellen L. Poleshuck; Nancy E. Talbot; Caron Zlotnick; Stephanie A. Gamble; Xiang Liu; Xin Tu; Donna E. Giles
Chronic pain is prevalent among patients with depression and a risk factor for poor depression treatment outcomes. No known psychotherapy approaches have been developed to target the needs of patients with comorbid depression and chronic pain. This studys goals were to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and initial effects of interpersonal psychotherapy adapted for women with depression and chronic pain. Seventeen women with major depression and chronic pelvic pain were offered 8 sessions of individual treatment, interpersonal psychotherapy for depression and pain (IPT-P). Participants were recruited from a womens health clinic, were predominantly low-income and minority, and generally did not initially self-identify as depressed. Large effect sizes with significant improvements were found for depression severity and social adjustment; pain interference remained unchanged. Most enrolled patients reported a high level of satisfaction with IPT-P. This pilot study provides preliminary support for the use of IPT-P for patients with comorbid depression and chronic pain.