Ellen Manzullo

The burdens of cancer therapy: Clinical and economic outcomes of chemotherapy-induced mucositis

Mucositis is a common but poorly studied problem among patients with solid tumors. The authors examined the clinical and economic outcomes of oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis among patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Outpatient Treatment of Febrile Episodes in Low-Risk Neutropenic Patients with Cancer

Background. Hospitalization and intravenous (IV) broad‐spectrum antibiotics are the standard of care for all febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. Recent work suggests that a low‐risk population exists who might benefit from an alternate approach.

Mississippi mud in the 1990s: Risks and outcomes of vancomycin- associated toxicity in general oncology practice

Discrepancies between the severity of toxicities reported in early clinical trials and recent clinical experience with vancomycin have led to confusion regarding the need for routine serum vancomycin level monitoring and discontinuation of vancomycin when toxicities occur. Therefore, the authors examined the incidence, outcomes, and predictive factors of vancomycin‐associated toxicities in general oncology practice with the goal of developing clinically relevant prediction rules and guidelines.

Dyspnea in cancer patients: Etiology, resource utilization, and survival-Implications in a managed care world

Dyspnea is the fourth most common symptom of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and may, in some patients with advanced cancer, represent a clinical marker for the terminal phase of their disease. This retrospective study describes the clinical characteristics of these patients, the resource utilization associated with the management of dyspnea, and the survival of patients with this symptom.

Cancer-Related Fatigue: The Approach and Treatment

As the volume of cancer survivors continues to increase, clinicians are being faced with a growing number of patients with cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Survivors with a variety of malignancies may experience fatigue. Many potential barriers to the identification of this symptom in a cancer survivor may exist, due in part to both the patient and the clinician. Assessment of patients for fatigue is important because it can profoundly effect their daily lives. Many factors contribute to CRF. Hence, the clinician may face a daunting challenge in attempting to alleviate CRF. Treatment modalities for CRF include nonpharmacologic interventions, such as psychosocial interventions, exercise, sleep therapy, and acupuncture. Pharmacologic interventions include stimulants, namely modafinil and methylphenidate. In some patients antidepressants may be beneficial. Clinicians should assess cancer survivors for the presence of fatigue and focus on its treatment in an attempt to ensure that these patients have the best possible symptom control.As the volume of cancer survivors continues to increase, clinicians are being faced with a growing number of patients with cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Survivors with a variety of malignancies may experience fatigue. Many potential barriers to the identification of this symptom in a cancer survivor may exist, due in part to both the patient and the clinician. Assessment of patients for fatigue is important because it can profoundly effect their daily lives. Many factors contribute to CRF. Hence, the clinician may face a daunting challenge in attempting to alleviate CRF. Treatment modalities for CRF include nonpharmacologic interventions, such as psychosocial interventions, exercise, sleep therapy, and acupuncture. Pharmacologic interventions include stimulants, namely modafinil and methylphenidate. In some patients antidepressants may be beneficial. Clinicians should assess cancer survivors for the presence of fatigue and focus on its treatment in an attempt to ensure that these patients have the best possible symptom control.

Once daily, oral, outpatient quinolone monotherapy for low-risk cancer patients with fever and neutropenia : A pilot study of 40 patients based on validated risk-prediction rules

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of empiric, oral, outpatient quinolone monotherapy in 40 adult patients with fever and neutropenia who were at low risk for serious medical complications.

Outcomes of a Cancer-Related Fatigue Clinic in a Comprehensive Cancer Center

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a significant issue for cancer patients and frequently precipitates increased stress and anxiety for patients and caregivers alike. CRF may present well after the initial phase of cancer diagnosis and treatment, regardless of whether the cancer is in remission, widely metastatic, or somewhere in between. Determining whether the etiology of fatigue is potentially reversible and whether it is an effect of treatment or another unrelated cause is often perplexing. Because of the significant impact of CRF on patients at our institution, we organized a CRF clinic and began evaluating patients for fatigue in 1998. Our goal has been to initiate a more focused and, at the same time, more comprehensive effort in educating, evaluating, and treating CRF. The purpose of this report was to present a retrospective review of patients treated in our CRF clinic between 1998 and 2005, to examine the outcomes of our patients, and to briefly describe some of the challenges encountered in treating these patients. This information may help reassess and improve approaches in addressing CRF and subsequently improve fatigue in these patients.

Identifying risk factors for imminent death in cancer patients with acute dyspnea.

A substantial proportion of cancer patients presenting to an emergency center (EC) or clinic with acute dyspnea survives fewer than 2 weeks. If these patients could be identified at the time of admission, physicians and patients would have additional information on which to base decisions to continue therapy to extend life or to refocus treatment efforts on palliation and/or hospice care alone. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for imminent death (survival </= 2 weeks) and short-term survival (1, 3, or 6 months) in cancer patients presenting to an EC with acute dyspnea and to combine these factors into a model to help clinicians identify patients with short life expectancies. A random sample of 122 patients presenting to an EC with acute dyspnea was selected for a retrospective analysis. Data that were available to physicians during the initial EC visit included patient histories, triage and discharge vital signs, chest radiographs, and laboratory results. These variables were used in univariate and logistic regression models to develop predictive models for imminent death and short-term survival. Variables and interactions meeting a univariate criterion of P < 0.10 were included in stepwise regression by using forward and backward stepping. Models were compared with the use of Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics and receiver operating characteristics curves. Underlying cancers were 30% breast, 37% lung, and 34% other cancers. Triage respiration greater than 28/min., triage pulse greater than or equal to 110 bpm, uncontrolled progressive disease, and history of metastasis were found to be statistically significant predictors (alpha </= 0.05) of imminent death. Patients with uncontrolled progressive disease had a relative risk of imminent death of 21.93. Relative risks for triage respiration, pulse, and metastases were 12.72, 4.92, and 3.85, respectively. Cancer diagnosis was not predictive of imminent death but was predictive when longer time periods were modeled. It may be possible to identify patients whose death is imminent from a group of cancer patients with acute dyspnea. Some factors that predict imminent death (triage pulse and respiration) differ from those (cancer diagnosis) that predict short-term survival. Extent of disease/response to treatment is common to all models. These factors need further examination and validation. If these findings are confirmed, this quantified information can help physicians in making difficult end-of-life decisions.

A Randomized, Double-blind, 2-Period, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial of a Sustained-Release Methylphenidate in the Treatment of Fatigue in Cancer Patients

PurposeThis study assessed the efficacy of methylphenidate versus placebo for cancer-related fatigue reduction. Other objectives were to analyze cytokine levels and to determine the effects of methylphenidate on other symptoms, cognitive function, work yield, and patients’ perceptions and preferences. MethodsPatients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive methylphenidate-placebo or placebo-methylphenidate for 4 weeks. Patients crossed over after 2 weeks. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and McNemar tests were used to assess continuous and categorical variables. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in the level of worst fatigue on the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) at the end of each 2-week period. ResultsThe mean baseline BFI score was moderate (5.7). Methylphenidate treatment did not affect patients’ worst level of fatigue or other symptoms. Results from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Digit Symbol Test and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test with BFI interference questions and BFI activity questions showed significant improvement in the methylphenidate-treated patients’ verbal learning, memory, visual perception, analysis, and scanning speed. Patients treated with methylphenidate missed significantly fewer work hours owing to health reasons and worked significantly more hours. After 4 weeks, 64% of patients reported that methylphenidate improved their cancer-related fatigue, and 58% wanted to continue treatment. Significant difference in interleukin 6R (positive), interleukin 10 (negative), and tumor necrosis factor &agr; (positive) was noted between the methylphenidate and the placebo group. ConclusionsLow-dose methylphenidate did not improve cancer-related fatigue. Patients taking methylphenidate had better cognition and were able to work more hours. Patients tolerated methylphenidate well, and the majority felt better and wanted to continue treatment.

Treatment for cancer-related fatigue: an update

Cancer-related fatigue is now a recognized phenomenon with an established diagnosis. Fatigue is the most common symptom experienced by cancer patients and in many cases, the challenge of alleviating its severity is daunting for the clinician. Occasionally, the clinician may be fortunate and discover a reversible cause of fatigue for which there is a readily available treatment. Most of the time, however, the etiology of cancer-related fatigue is multifactorial or treatment-related with unknown pathophysiologic abnormalities and the clinician must resort to a variety of modalities to attempt to relieve the fatigue. Research of cancer-related fatigue treatment is in its infancy and future clinical trials examining the effects of various pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for cancer-related fatigue are needed. The development of effective therapies for the treatment of cancer-related fatigue could profoundly affect the lives of many cancer patients.