Ellen McErlean

Effects of the CETP Inhibitor Evacetrapib Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination With Statins on HDL and LDL Cholesterol: A Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT Interest remains high in cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors as cardioprotective agents. Few studies have documented the efficacy and safety of CETP inhibitors in combination with commonly used statins. OBJECTIVE To examine the biochemical effects, safety, and tolerability of evacetrapib, as monotherapy and in combination with statins, in patients with dyslipidemia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized controlled trial conducted among 398 patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels from April 2010 to January 2011 at community and academic centers in the United States and Europe. INTERVENTIONS Following dietary lead-in, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 38); evacetrapib monotherapy, 30 mg/d (n = 40), 100 mg/d (n = 39), or 500 mg/d (n = 42); or statin therapy (n = 239) (simvastatin, 40 mg/d; atorvastatin, 20 mg/d; or rosuvastatin, 10 mg/d) with or without evacetrapib, 100 mg/d, for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The co-primary end points were percentage changes from baseline in HDL-C and LDL-C after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS The mean baseline HDL-C level was 55.1 (SD, 15.3) mg/dL and the mean baseline LDL-C level was 144.3 (SD, 26.6) mg/dL. As monotherapy, evacetrapib produced dose-dependent increases in HDL-C of 30.0 to 66.0 mg/dL (53.6% to 128.8%) compared with a decrease with placebo of -0.7 mg/dL (-3.0%; P < .001 for all compared with placebo) and decreases in LDL-C of -20.5 to -51.4 mg/dL (-13.6% to -35.9%) compared with an increase with placebo of 7.2 mg/dL (3.9%; P < .001 for all compared with placebo). In combination with statin therapy, evacetrapib, 100 mg/d, produced increases in HDL-C of 42.1 to 50.5 mg/dL (78.5% to 88.5%; P < .001 for all compared with statin monotherapy) and decreases in LDL-C of -67.1 to -75.8 mg/dL (-11.2% to -13.9%; P < .001 for all compared with statin monotherapy). Compared with evacetrapib monotherapy, the combination of statins and evacetrapib resulted in greater reductions in LDL-C (P <.001) but no greater increase in HDL-C (P =.39). Although the study was underpowered, no adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS Compared with placebo or statin monotherapy, evacetrapib as monotherapy or in combination with statins increased HDL-C levels and decreased LDL-C levels. The effects on cardiovascular outcomes require further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01105975.

Ability of Troponins to Predict Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Renal Insufficiency and Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Case-Matched Study

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of cardiac troponin T and troponin I for predicting outcomes in patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndromes and renal insufficiency relative to that observed in similar patients without renal disease. BACKGROUND Cardiac troponin T and troponin I have shown promise as tools for risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, there is uncertainty regarding their cardiac specificity and utility in patients with renal disease. METHODS We measured troponin T, troponin I and creatine kinase MB in 51 patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndromes and renal insufficiency and in 102 patients without evidence of renal disease matched for the same peak troponin T or I value, selected from a larger patient cohort. Blood samples were obtained at presentation to an emergency room 4 hours, 8 hours and 16 hours later. The ability of biochemical markers to predict adverse outcomes in both groups including infarction, recurrent ischemia, bypass surgery, heart failure, stroke, death or positive angiography/angioplasty during hospitalization and at six months was assessed by receiver-operator curve analysis. The performance of both troponins was compared between groups. RESULTS Thirty-five percent of patients in the renal group and 45% of patients in the nonrenal group experienced an adverse initial outcome; over 50% of patients in all groups had experienced an adverse outcome by 6 months, but these differences were not significant. The area under the curve (AUC) for the ROC curve for troponin T as predictor of initial outcomes was significantly lower in the renal group than in the nonrenal group: 0.56+/-0.07 and 0.75+/-0.07, respectively. The area under the curve was also significantly lower in the renal group compared with the nonrenal group for troponin T as predictor of six month outcomes: 0.59+/-0.07 and 0.74+/-0.07, respectively. The area under the curve was also significantly lower in the renal group compared to the nonrenal group for troponin I as predictor of both initial and six month outcomes: 0.54+/-0.06 vs. 0.71+/-0.07 and 0.53+/- 0.06 vs. 0.65+/-0.07, respectively. The sensitivity of troponin T for both initial and six month adverse outcomes was significantly lower in the renal group than in the nonrenal group at a similar level of specificity (0.87): 0.29 vs. 0.60 and 0.45 vs. 0.56, respectively. Troponin I also exhibited similar differences in sensitivity in the renal group (0.29 vs. 0.50 and 0.33 vs. 0.40, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The ability of cardiac troponin T and troponin I to predict risk for subsequent adverse outcomes in patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndromes is reduced in the presence of renal insufficiency.

Evacetrapib and Cardiovascular Outcomes in High-Risk Vascular Disease

BACKGROUND The cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor evacetrapib substantially raises the high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, reduces the low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level, and enhances cellular cholesterol efflux capacity. We sought to determine the effect of evacetrapib on major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with high‐risk vascular disease. METHODS In a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 3 trial, we enrolled 12,092 patients who had at least one of the following conditions: an acute coronary syndrome within the previous 30 to 365 days, cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, peripheral vascular arterial disease, or diabetes mellitus with coronary artery disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either evacetrapib at a dose of 130 mg or matching placebo, administered daily, in addition to standard medical therapy. The primary efficacy end point was the first occurrence of any component of the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina. RESULTS At 3 months, a 31.1% decrease in the mean LDL cholesterol level was observed with evacetrapib versus a 6.0% increase with placebo, and a 133.2% increase in the mean HDL cholesterol level was seen with evacetrapib versus a 1.6% increase with placebo. After 1363 of the planned 1670 primary end‐point events had occurred, the data and safety monitoring board recommended that the trial be terminated early because of a lack of efficacy. After a median of 26 months of evacetrapib or placebo, a primary end‐point event occurred in 12.9% of the patients in the evacetrapib group and in 12.8% of those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.11; P=0.91). CONCLUSIONS Although the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor evacetrapib had favorable effects on established lipid biomarkers, treatment with evacetrapib did not result in a lower rate of cardiovascular events than placebo among patients with high‐risk vascular disease. (Funded by Eli Lilly; ACCELERATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01687998.)

Assessment of the clinical effects of cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition with evacetrapib in patients at high-risk for vascular outcomes: Rationale and design of the ACCELERATE trial

BACKGROUND Potent pharmacologic inhibition of cholesteryl ester transferase protein by the investigational agent evacetrapib increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 54% to 129%, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 14% to 36%, and enhances cellular cholesterol efflux capacity. The ACCELERATE trial examines whether the addition of evacetrapib to standard medical therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in patients with high-risk vascular disease. STUDY DESIGN ACCELERATE is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients qualified for enrollment if they have experienced an acute coronary syndrome within the prior 30 to 365 days, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack; if they have peripheral vascular disease; or they have diabetes with coronary artery disease. A total of 12,092 patients were randomized to evacetrapib 130 mg or placebo daily in addition to standard medical therapy. The primary efficacy end point is time to first event of CV death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization. Treatment will continue until 1,670 patients reached the primary end point; at least 700 patients reach the key secondary efficacy end point of CV death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, and the last patient randomized has been followed up for at least 1.5 years. CONCLUSIONS ACCELERATE will establish whether the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition by evacetrapib improves CV outcomes in patients with high-risk vascular disease.

Inhibition of delta-protein kinase C by delcasertib as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the PROTECTION AMI Randomized Controlled Trial

AIMS Delcasertib is a selective inhibitor of delta-protein kinase C (delta-PKC), which reduced infarct size during ischaemia/reperfusion in animal models and diminished myocardial necrosis and improved reperfusion in a pilot study during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS A multicentre, double-blind trial was performed in patients presenting within 6 h and undergoing primary PCI for anterior (the primary analysis cohort, n = 1010 patients) or inferior (an exploratory cohort, capped at 166 patients) STEMI. Patients with anterior STEMI were randomized to placebo or one of three doses of delcasertib (50, 150, or 450 mg/h) by intravenous infusion initiated before PCI and continued for ∼2.5 h. There were no differences between treatment groups in the primary efficacy endpoint of infarct size measured by creatine kinase MB fraction area under the curve (AUC) (median 5156, 5043, 4419, and 5253 ng h/mL in the placebo, delcasertib 50, 150, and 450 mg/mL groups, respectively) in the anterior STEMI cohort. No treatment-related differences were seen in secondary endpoints of infarct size, electrocardiographic ST-segment recovery AUC or time to stable ST recovery, or left ventricular ejection fraction at 3 months. No differences in rates of adjudicated clinical endpoints (death, heart failure, or serious ventricular arrhythmias) were observed. CONCLUSIONS Selective inhibition of delta-PKC with intravenous infusion of delcasertib during PCI for acute STEMI in a population of patients treated according to contemporary standard of care did not reduce biomarkers of myocardial injury.

Comparison of troponin T versus creatine kinase-MB in suspected acute coronary syndromes

Limitations of creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) have led to alternative biochemical markers, including troponin T (TnT), to detect myocardial necrosis. Limited data are available regarding the predictive value of this new marker in patients with chest pain of uncertain etiology. Therefore, we prospectively compared CK-MB and TnT in a broad population with suspected acute coronary syndromes, including those admitted to a short-stay chest pain unit. CK-MB, quantitative TnT levels, and a rapid bedside assay were performed at 0, 4, 8, and 16 hours. Adverse events, including infarction, recurrent ischemia, coronary surgery, need for catheterization and/or intervention, stroke, congestive heart failure, or death, were identified by chart review and by follow-up phone call at 6 months. Of 707 patients, 104 were excluded for creatinine >2 mg/dl or incomplete data, leaving a total cohort of 603 patients. Coronary Care Unit admissions were 18%, intermediate care admissions were 14%, telemetry admissions is 21%, and admissions to 24-hour short-stay area were 47%. TnT (at 0.1 ng/ml) and CK-MB were positive in a similar proportion of patients (20.4% and 19.7%, respectively); however, the patients identified by TnT and CK-MB were not identical. In-hospital adverse events occurred in 37.1% with no differences in positive predictive value for the markers (p = NS). If CK-MB and TnT were negative, the early adverse event rate was 27%. No cardiac marker was positive by 16 hours in 54.9% of patients with an adverse event. Six-month follow-up was obtained in 576 of the 603 patients (95.5%). One hundred fifty-five late adverse events occurred in 134 patients (23.3%) at an average of 3.3+/-2.5 months after discharge. If both markers were negative, the late event rate was 20.2% and did not increase in patients with positive CK-MB or TnT >0.2 ng/ml. However, the late event rate was substantially higher (52.9%) in those with intermediate TnT levels of 0.1 to 0.2 ng/ml (p = 0.002). Thus, TnT is a suitable alternative to CK-MB in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. The rapid bedside assay is comparable to quantitative TnT and may enable early diagnosis and triage. A negative cardiac marker value (TnT or CK-MB) does not necessarily confer a low risk of complication in patients presenting with acute chest pain to an emergency department.

What is the metabolic syndrome? Prediabetes and cardiovascular risk.

The metabolic syndrome has been referred to as a clustering of cardiovascular risk factors, including abdominal obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia, increased blood pressure, insulin resistance, proinflammatory state, and a prothrombotic state. The metabolic syndrome has become one of the leading clinical issues discussed by physicians and the media, leading to increased public awareness to this potentially catastrophic multiplex risk factor for cardiovascular disease. With increasing prevalence in the United States, the metabolic syndrome has been equated to cigarette smoking as a contributing factor to premature cardiovascular heart disease and one of the underlying causes of type 2 diabetes. The identification and modification of the root causes, overweight/obesity, physical inactivity, and the closely associated condition, insulin resistance, needs to be one of the initial strategies that are addressed by the clinician.

The vulnerable coronary plaque

Vulnerable coronary plaques are asymptomatic atherosclerotic lesions with the tendency to rupture. Plaque rupture is the initiating event in most acute coronary syndromes including sudden cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, and unstable angina. Vulnerable plaques are commonly found in coronary arteries at autopsy but are virtually undetectable by standard diagnostic techniques such as stress testing and coronary angiography. Using new imaging techniques, in particular intravascular ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), scientists are now able to identify these plaques in vivo. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of plaque vulnerability and rupture will eventually lead to the therapeutic goal of plaque stabilization in the prevention of acute coronary syndromes. This article reviews the role of plaque vulnerability in coronary artery disease. The anatomy and pathophysiology of vulnerable plaques as well as diagnostic and therapeutic implication will be described.

Normal CK, elevated MB predicts complications in acute coronary syndromes.

The implications of an elevated Creatine kinase (CK)-MB isoenzyme (MB) in suspected acute coronary syndromes, with a normal total CK, is not well established. Despite many guidelines on managing patients with acute coronary ischemia, none indicates strategies for patients with elevated MB and with a normal CK. The outcome consequence of this result is not firmly established. Our objective was to prospectively evaluate outcomes in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes, normal initial total CK, and increased MB. All Emergency Department patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes and creatinine < 2.0 mg/dL were eligible for study entry. Serial CK and MB fractions were measured on arrival in the Emergency Department, then 8 and 16 h postpresentation. A composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or revascularization was defined at the index visit and 6 months later. Outcomes were determined by blinded record review and by telephone contact. In the 698 patients entered, the acute composite outcome rate was 25% (175) and 6.3% (44) at 6 months. Acute and 6 month adverse outcome rates were statistically the same for all patients with an elevated MB fraction, regardless of the total CK level. An elevated MB conferred a higher event rate than did a normal MB. We conclude that the adverse event rate for patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes and an elevated MB is the same whether or not the total CK is elevated. These patients should be considered as having had an acute coronary syndrome.

Troponin T in elders with suspected acute coronary syndromes.

Troponin T (TnT) elevations (> or =0.1 ng/mL) indicate an increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). There is little data on the prognostic significance of TnT in elders with ACS. We sought to define the ability of TnT to predict adverse outcomes in elders with suspected ACS compared with the younger cohort. This is a nested cohort study of patients aged <65 and > or =65 years with suspected ACS. Serial ECGs, CKMB and TnT assays were obtained at presentation and 4, 8, and 16 hours later. Adverse outcomes at hospital discharge included death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, and positive cardiac catheterization. A total of 695 patients were enrolled. A total of 301 (48%) were aged 65 or older. Although there was no difference in TnT sensitivity between the younger and older cohorts, there was a difference in specificity, 94% versus 83% (P <.01), respectively. In both cohorts, renal insufficiency was associated with a significantly lower TnT specificity. In both elders and younger patients with abnormal renal function, low TnT specificity warrants careful consideration of this marker as the sole criterion for aggressive medical management.