Elly S.M. de Lange-de Klerk

Do Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Predict Dementia at 1- and 2-Year Follow-Up? Findings from the Development of Screening Guidelines and Diagnostic Criteria for Predementia Alzheimer's Disease Study

To investigate whether problems in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) can add to conventionally used clinical measurements in helping to predict a diagnosis of dementia at 1‐ and 2‐year follow‐up.

Open surgical repair of ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysms with and without renal cooling: Observations regarding morbidity and mortality

OBJECTIVES Little is known about the outcome of ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysm (RJAA) repair. Surgical treatment of RJAAs requires suprarenal aortic cross-clamping, which causes additional renal ischemia-reperfusion injury on top of the pre-existing hypovolemic shock syndrome. As endovascular alternatives rarely exist in this situation, open repair continues to be the gold standard. We analyzed our results of open RJAA repair during an 11-year period. DESIGN Retrospective observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between July 1997 and December 2008, all consecutive patients with RJAAs were included in the study. Part of these patients received cold perfusion of the kidneys during suprarenal aortic cross-clamping. Perioperative variables, morbidity, and 30-day or in-hospital mortality were assessed. Renal insufficiency was defined as an acute rise of >or=0.5 mg/dL in serum creatinine level. Multiple organ failure (MOF) was scored using the sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA score). RESULTS A total of 29 consecutive patients with an RJAA, confirmed by computed tomography-scanning, presented to our hospital. In eight patients, the operation was aborted before the start of aortic repair, because no blood pressure could be regained in spite of maximal resuscitation measures. They were excluded from further analysis. Of the remaining 21 patients, 10 died during hospital stay. Renal insufficiency occurred in 11 out of 21 of the patients. Eleven out of 21 patients developed MOF postoperatively. In a subgroup of patients who received renal cooling during suprarenal aortic clamping, the 30-day or in-hospital mortality was two of 10 vs eight of 11 in patients who did not receive renal cooling (P = .03); renal insufficiency occurred in one out of 10 patients in the subgroup with renal cooling vs 10 out of 11 without renal cooling (P < .001) and MOF in two of 10 vs nine of 11, respectively (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS Open surgical repair of RJAAs is still associated with high mortality and morbidity. To our knowledge, this is the first report of cold perfusion of the kidneys during RJAA repair. Although numbers are small, a beneficial effect of renal cooling on the outcome of RJAA repair is suggested, warranting further research with this technique.

Prehospital fluid resuscitation in hypotensive trauma patients: Do we need a tailored approach?

AIM The ideal strategy for prehospital intravenous fluid resuscitation in trauma remains unclear. Fluid resuscitation may reverse shock but aggravate bleeding by raising blood pressure and haemodilution. We examined the effect of prehospital i.v. fluid on the physiologic status and need for blood transfusion in hypotensive trauma patients after their arrival in the emergency department (ED). METHODS Retrospective analysis of trauma patients (n=941) with field hypotension presenting to a level 1 trauma centre. Regression models were used to investigate associations between prehospital fluid volumes and shock index and blood transfusion respectively in the emergency department and mortality at 24h. RESULTS A 1L increase of prehospital i.v. fluid was associated with a 7% decrease of shock index in the emergency department (p<0.001). Volumes of 0.5-1L and 1-2L were associated with reduced likelihood of shock as compared to volumes of 0-0.5L: OR 0.61 (p=0.03) and OR 0.54 (p=0.02), respectively. Volumes of 1-2L were also associated with an increased likelihood of receiving blood transfusion in ED: OR 3.27 (p<0.001). Patients who had received volumes of >2L have a much greater likelihood of receiving blood transfusion in ED: OR 9.92 (p<0.001). Mortality at 24h was not associated with prehospital i.v. fluids. CONCLUSION In hypotensive trauma patients, prehospital i.v. fluids were associated with a reduction of likelihood of shock upon arrival in ED. However, volumes of >1L were associated with a markedly increased likelihood of receiving blood transfusion in ED. Therefore, decision making regarding prehospital i.v. fluid resuscitation is critical and may need to be tailored to the individual situation. Further research is needed to clarify whether a causal relationship exists between prehospital i.v. fluid volume and blood transfusion. Also, prospective trials on prehospital i.v. fluid resuscitation strategies in specific patient subgroups (e.g. traumatic brain injury and concomitant haemorrhage) are warranted.

Assessment of instrumental activities of daily living in dementia: diagnostic value of the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire.

Background: Measuring impairments in “instrumental activities of daily living” (IADL) is important in dementia, but challenging due to the lack of reliable and valid instruments. We recently developed the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (A-IADL-Q; note 1). We aim to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the A-IADL-Q for dementia in a memory clinic setting. Methods: Patients visiting the Alzheimer Center of the VU University Medical Center with their informants between 2009 and 2011 were included (N = 278). Diagnoses were established in a multidisciplinary consensus meeting, independent of the A-IADL-Q scores. An optimal A-IADL-Q cutoff point was determined, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Area under the curves (AUCs) were compared between A-IADL-Q and “disability assessment of dementia” (DAD). The additional diagnostic value of the A-IADL-Q to Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was examined using logistic regression analyses. Results: Dementia prevalence was 50.5%. Overall diagnostic accuracy based on the AUC was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.81) for the A-IADL-Q and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.63-0.77) for the DAD, which did not differ significantly. The optimal cutoff score for the A-IADL-Q was 51.4, resulting in sensitivity of 0.74 and specificity of 0.64. Combining the A-IADL-Q with the MMSE improved specificity (0.94), with a decline in sensitivity (0.55). Logistic regression models showed that adding A-IADL-Q improved the diagnostic accuracy (Z = 2.55, P = .011), whereas the DAD did not. Conclusions: In this study, we showed a fair diagnostic accuracy for A-IADL-Q and an additional value in the diagnosis of dementia. These results support the role of A-IADL-Q as a valuable diagnostic tool.

Criteria for cancelling helicopter emergency medical Services (HEMS) dispatches

Introduction In The Netherlands there is no consensus about criteria for cancelling helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) dispatches. This study assessed the ability of the primary HEMS dispatch criteria to identify major trauma patients. The predictive power of other early prehospital parameters was evaluated to design a safe triage model for HEMS dispatch cancellations. Methods All trauma-related dispatches of HEMS during a period of 6 months were included. Data concerning prehospital information and inhospital treatment were collected. Patients were divided into two groups (major and minor trauma) according to the following criteria: injury severity score 16 or greater, emergency intervention, intensive care unit admission, or inhospital death. Logistic regression analysis was used to design a prediction model for the early identification of major trauma patients. Results In total, 420 trauma-related dispatches were evaluated, of which 155 concerned major trauma patients. HEMS was more often cancelled for minor trauma patients than for major trauma patients (57.7% vs 20.6%). Overall, HEMS dispatch criteria had a sensitivity of 87.7% and a specificity of 45.3% for identifying major trauma patients. Significant differences were found for vital sign abnormalities, anatomical components and several parameters of the mechanism of injury. A triage model designed for cancelling HEMS correctly identified major trauma patients (sensitivity 99.4%). Conclusion The accuracy of the current HEMS dispatch criteria is relatively low, resulting in high cancellation rates and low predictability for major trauma. The new HEMS cancellation triage model identified all major trauma patients with an acceptable overtriage and will probably reduce unjustified HEMS dispatches.

Hospital Cost-Analysis of Complications after Major Abdominal Surgery

Background: Complications after major abdominal surgery (MAS) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Rising costs in health care are of increasing interest and a major factor affecting hospital costs are postoperative complications. In this study, the costs associated with complications are assessed. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 399 consecutive patients that underwent MAS. Analysis of total costs for hospital stay, complications and treatment was performed, including bootstrapping; allowing for subtraction of data with 95% confidence intervals. Results: For a single patient who underwent MAS the average costs, adjusted for ASA-classification and surgery type, adds up to EUR 8,584.81 (95% CI EUR 8,332.51 - EUR 8,860.81) in patients without complications. EUR 15,412.96 (95% CI EUR 14,250.22 - EUR 16,708.82) after minor complications, and EUR 29,198.23 (95% CI EUR 27,187.13 - EUR 31,295.78) after major complications (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results provide an insight into the scope of hospital costs associated with complications. Major complications occur in 20% of patients undergoing MAS and account for 50% of the total costs of care. Implementation of a protocol aimed at early diagnosis and treatment of complications might lead to a decrease in morbidity and mortality, but also prove to be cost effective.

Improving the false-negative rate of CT in acute appendicitis—Reassessment of CT images by body imaging radiologists: A blinded prospective study

PURPOSE To compare the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) analyzed by individual radiology staff members and body imaging radiologists in a non-academic teaching hospital for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a prospective study 199 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were examined with unenhanced CT. CT images were pre-operatively analyzed by one of the 12 members of the radiology staff. In a later stage two body imaging radiologist reassessed all CT images without knowledge of the surgical findings and without knowledge of the primary CT diagnosis. The results, independently reported, were correlated with surgical and histopathologic findings. RESULTS In 132 patients (66%) acute appendicitis was found at surgery, in 67 patients (34%) a normal appendix was found. The sensitivity of the primary CT analysis and of the reassessment was 76% and 88%, respectively; the specificity was 84% and 87%; the positive predictive value was 90% and 93%; the negative predictive value was 64% and 78%; and the accuracy was 78% and 87%. CONCLUSION Reassessment of CT images for acute appendicitis by body imaging radiologists results in a significant improvement of sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy. To prevent false-negative interpretation of CT images in acute appendicitis the expertise of the attending radiologist should be considered.

Ultrasonography and Clinical Observation in Women with Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Cohort Study

Backgrounds/Aims: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the role of ultrasonography (US) and clinical observation in non-pregnant women of reproductive age with suspected appendicitis. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, US was performed in 234 women with suspected appendicitis. Based on US findings and clinical assessment, 3 patient categories were established. Group A: unequivocal signs – laparoscopy (regardless of US results); group B: equivocalsigns – positive US – laparoscopy; group C: equivocal signs – negative US – observation. US results were compared with surgery, observation and follow-up as the reference standard. Results: The percentages of macroscopically infected appendices at laparoscopy in groups A, B and C were 76, 55 and 5%, respectively. Group A: US was false negative in 27 of 128 women (21%) and false positive in 12 of 40 women (30%). Group B plus C: US was false negative in 3 of 9 women (33%) and false positive in 5 of 57 women (9%). Forty-six of 55 patients (84%) completed observation. Conclusion: Because of a high false-negative rate, US as a sole imaging tool is of limited value both in women with unequivocal and equivocal signs of appendicitis. Observation is safe in women with equivocal signs of appendicitis.

Is a maximum Revised Trauma Score a safe triage tool for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services cancellations

Introduction The Revised Trauma Score is used worldwide in the prehospital setting and provides a snapshot of patients physiological state. Several studies have shown that the reliability of the RTS is high in trauma outcomes. In the Netherlands, Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) are mostly used for delivery of specialized trauma teams on-scene and occasionally for patient transportation. In our trauma system, the Emergency Medical Services crew performs triage after arrival on-scene and cancels the HEMS-dispatch if deemed unnecessary. In this study we assessed the ability of a maximum on-scene Revised Trauma Score (RTS=12) to be used as a triage tool for HEMS cancellation. Methods All patients with a maximum on-scene RTS after blunt trauma (with or without receiving HEMS care) who were presented in the trauma resuscitation room of two Level-1 trauma centers during a period of 6 months, were included. Information concerning prehospital and in-hospital vital parameters, severity and localization of the injuries, and the in-hospital course were analyzed. Major trauma patients were classified using the following parameters: Injury Severity Score of at least 16, emergency intervention, Intensive Care Unit admission, and in-hospital death. Results Four-hundred and forty blunt trauma patients having a maximum RTS were included between 1 July and 31 December 2006. Eighty patients received on-scene HEMS care. Almost 16% of the total population concerned major trauma patients, of which only 25 (36%) received HEMS care. In 17 patients (3.9%), the RTS deteriorated during transportation. Major trauma patients sustained more injuries to the chest, abdomen, and lower extremities. Conclusion The RTS alone is not a reliable triage tool for HEMS cancellations in our trauma system and will lead to a considerable rate of undertriage with one in every six cancellations being incorrect. Other criteria based on patients vital signs, combined with anatomical and mechanism of injury parameters should be developed to safely minimize triage errors.

Long-Term Survival After Complications Following Major Abdominal Surgery

IntroductionPostoperative complications have been associated with decreased long-term survival in cardiac, orthopedic, and vascular surgery. For major abdominal surgery research, conflicting evidence is reported in smaller studies. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of complications on long-term survival in major abdominal surgery.Material and MethodsAn observational cohort study was conducted of 861 consecutive patients that underwent major abdominal surgery between January 2009 and March 2014, with prospective assessment of the survival status. The effect of postoperative complications on survival was assessed.ResultsPostoperative complications were associated with decreased survival, even after applying correction for 30-day mortality (p < 0.001). Stratified Cox regression analysis depicted postoperative complications to be an important predictor for survival in upper gastrointestinal and female hepatopancreaticobiliary patients. Correction was applied for age, gender, BMI, ASA classification, radicality, and positive lymph node status.ConclusionThese results further indicate the importance of prevention and early diagnosis and treatment of complications. Etiological factors are believed to be both sustained levels of inflammatory markers, as well as attenuated immune response in malignancy with subsequent cancer cell seeding. Future research should aim to prevent and early diagnose postoperative complications to prevent morbidity and mortality not only in the early postoperative phase, but also in the long term.