Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg.


Lancet Oncology | 2010

Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial

Ilfet Songun; Hein Putter; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Mitsuru Sasako; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde

BACKGROUND Historical data and recent studies show that standardised extended (D2) lymphadenectomy leads to better results than standardised limited (D1) lymphadenectomy. Based on these findings, the Dutch D1D2 trial, a nationwide prospectively randomised clinical trial, was undertaken to compare D2 with D1 lymphadenectomy in patients with resectable primary adenocarcinoma of the stomach. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of D2 compared with D1 surgery on disease recurrence and survival in patients treated with curative intent. METHODS Between August, 1989, and July, 1993, patients were entered and randomised at 80 participating hospitals by means of a telephone call to the central data centre of the trial. The sequence of randomisation was in blocks of six with stratification for the participating centre. Eligibility criteria were a histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach without evidence of distance metastasis, age younger than 85 years, and adequate physical condition for D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy. Patients were excluded if they had previous or coexisting cancer or had undergone gastrectomy for benign tumours. Strict quality control measures for pathological assessment were implemented and monitored. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with the NCI trial register, as DUT-KWF-CKVO-8905, EU-90003. FINDINGS A total of 1078 patients were entered in the study, of whom 996 were eligible. 711 patients underwent the randomly assigned treatment with curative intent (380 in the D1 group and 331 in the D2 group) and 285 had palliative treatment. Data were collected prospectively and all patients were followed up for a median time of 15.2 years (range 6.9-17.9 years). Analyses were done for the 711 patients treated with curative intent and were according to the allocated treatment group. Of the 711 patients, 174 (25%) were alive, all but one without recurrence. Overall 15-year survival was 21% (82 patients) for the D1 group and 29% (92 patients) for the D2 group (p=0.34). Gastric-cancer-related death rate was significantly higher in the D1 group (48%, 182 patients) compared with the D2 group (37%, 123 patients), whereas death due to other diseases was similar in both groups. Local recurrence was 22% (82 patients) in the D1 group versus 12% (40 patients) in D2, and regional recurrence was 19% (73 patients) in D1 versus 13% (43 patients) in D2. Patients who had the D2 procedure had a significantly higher operative mortality rate than those who had D1 (n=32 [10%] vs n=15 [4%]; 95% CI for the difference 2-9; p=0.004), higher complication rate (n=142 [43%] vs n=94 [25%]; 11-25; p<0.0001), and higher reoperation rate (n=59 [18%] vs n=30 [8%]; 5-15; p=0.00016). INTERPRETATION After a median follow-up of 15 years, D2 lymphadenectomy is associated with lower locoregional recurrence and gastric-cancer-related death rates than D1 surgery. The D2 procedure was also associated with significantly higher postoperative mortality, morbidity, and reoperation rates. Because a safer, spleen-preserving D2 resection technique is currently available in high-volume centres, D2 lymphadenectomy is the recommended surgical approach for patients with resectable (curable) gastric cancer. FUNDING Dutch Health Insurance Funds Council and The Netherlands Cancer Foundation.


Lancet Oncology | 2007

A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study

Marcel den Dulk; Marije Smit; Koen C.M.J. Peeters; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Harm Rutten; Theo Wiggers; Hein Putter; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde

BACKGROUND In many patients with rectal cancer, defunctioning stomas are created to limit the consequences of anastomotic leakage. Although intended to be temporary, a substantial proportion of these stomas might never be reversed for various reasons. We aimed to describe stoma policy by use of data from the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial in patients with rectal cancer and to identify factors that limit stoma reversal. METHODS 924 Dutch patients with rectal cancer who underwent a low anterior resection were selected from the TME trial, a prospective, randomised multicentre trial studying the effects of short-term preoperative radiotherapy in 1861 patients who underwent TME. Creation of stomas and time to stoma reversal were analysed retrospectively by use of multivariate analysis. FINDINGS In 523 of 924 (57%) patients, a primary stoma (defined as a stoma created at the time of TME) was constructed after a low anterior resection. Geographical differences in the number of primary stomas constructed were reported throughout the Netherlands. 19% of stomas that were created were never reversed. Postoperative complications and secondary constructed stomas (defined as a stoma created during a second or subsequent procedure after TME) were associated with a high likelihood of a permanent stoma. However, perioperative complications were not a limiting factor for stoma closure. INTERPRETATION Postoperative complications are an important limiting factor for stoma reversal because, after occurrence of these complications, patients and surgeons might be reluctant to reverse the stoma, so a substantial proportion of these stomas are never closed. Future guidelines for stoma creation and closure should consider these factors.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2010

Impact of the Extent of Surgery and Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy on Recurrence Patterns in Gastric Cancer

Johan L. Dikken; Edwin P.M. Jansen; Annemieke Cats; Berdine Bakker; Henk H. Hartgrink; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Henk Boot; Hein Putter; Koen C.M.J. Peeters; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde; Marcel Verheij

PURPOSE The Intergroup 0116 trial has demonstrated that postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves survival in gastric cancer. We retrospectively compared survival and recurrence patterns in two phase I/II studies evaluating more intensified postoperative CRT with those from the Dutch Gastric Cancer Group Trial (DGCT) that randomly assigned patients between D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Survival and recurrence patterns of 91 patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach who had received surgery followed by radiotherapy combined with fluorouracil and leucovorin (n = 5), capecitabine (n = 39), or capecitabine and cisplatin (n = 47) were analyzed and compared with survival and recurrence patterns of 694 patients from the DGCT (D1, n = 369; D2, n = 325). For both groups, the Maruyama Index of Unresected Disease (MI) was calculated and correlated with survival and recurrence patterns. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 19 months in the CRT group, local recurrence rate after 2 years was significantly higher in the surgery only (DGCT) group (17% v 5%; P = .0015). Separate analysis of CRT patients who underwent a D1 dissection (n = 39) versus DGCT-D1 (n = 369) showed fewer local recurrences after chemoradiotherapy (2% v 8%; P = .001), whereas comparison of CRT-D2 (n = 25) versus DGCT-D2 (n = 325) demonstrated no significant difference. CRT significantly improved survival after a microscopically irradical (R1) resection. The MI was found to be a strong independent predictor of survival. CONCLUSION After D1 surgery, the addition of postoperative CRT had a major impact on local recurrence in resectable gastric cancer.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2011

Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor As Predictive Biomarkers of Response to Endocrine Therapy: A Prospectively Powered Pathology Study in the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational Trial

John M.S. Bartlett; Cassandra Brookes; Tammy Robson; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde; Lucinda Billingham; Fiona Campbell; Margaret Grant; Annette Hasenburg; Elysée T.M. Hille; Charlene Kay; Dirk G. Kieback; Hein Putter; Christos Markopoulos; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Elizabeth Mallon; Luc Dirix; Caroline Seynaeve; Daniel Rea

PURPOSE The Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial included a prospectively planned pathology substudy testing the predictive value of progesterone receptor (PgR) expression for outcome of estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) early breast cancer treated with exemestane versus tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pathology blocks from 4,781 TEAM patients randomly assigned to exemestane versus tamoxifen followed by exemestane for 5 years of total therapy were collected centrally, and tissue microarrays were constructed from samples from 4,598 patients. Quantitative analysis of hormone receptors (ER and PgR) was performed by using image analysis and immunohistochemistry, and the results were linked to outcome data from the main TEAM trial and analyzed relative to disease-free survival and treatment. RESULTS Of 4,325 eligible ER-positive patients, 23% were PgR-poor (Allred < 4) and 77% were PgR- rich (Allred ≥ 5). No treatment-by-marker effect for PgR was observed for exemestane versus tamoxifen (PgR-rich hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.05; PgR-poor HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.19; P = .88 for interaction). Both PgR and ER expression were associated with patient prognosis in univariate (PgR HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.65; P < .001; ER HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.86; P = .002), and multivariate analyses (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). A trend toward a treatment-by-marker effect for ER-rich patients was observed. CONCLUSION Preferential exemestane versus tamoxifen treatment benefit was not predicted by PgR expression; conversely, patients with ER-rich tumors may derive additional benefit from exemestane. Quantitative analysis of ER and PgR expression provides highly significant information on risk of early relapse (within 1 to 3 years) during treatment.


European Journal of Cancer | 2008

Improved overall survival for patients with rectal cancer since 1990: the effects of TME surgery and pre-operative radiotherapy.

Marcel den Dulk; P. Krijnen; Corrie A.M. Marijnen; Harm Rutten; Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse; Hein Putter; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; M.L.E.A. Jansen-Landheer; Jan Willem Coebergh; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde

AIM The aim was to study the effects of the introduction of TME surgery and pre-operative radiotherapy on overall survival (OS) by comparing patients treated in the period before (1990-1995), during (1996-1999) and after (2000-2002) the TME trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with rectal carcinoma in the region of Comprehensive Cancer Centres South and West were used (n=3179). RESULTS Five-year OS was, respectively, 56%, 62% and 65% in the pre-trial, trial and post-trial periods (p<0.001). Pre-operative RT was increasingly used over time and significantly related to OS in the post-trial period (p=0.002), but not in the pre-trial and trial periods. CONCLUSIONS Population-based OS improved markedly since the introduction of TME surgery. With standardised TME surgery, pre-operative RT improved OS, whereas withholding pre-operative RT was associated with a poorer prognosis. The present study supports that pre-operative RT was correctly introduced as a standard treatment before TME surgery in our national guideline.


European Journal of Cancer | 2014

Health-related quality of life 14 years after preoperative short-term radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Report of a multicenter randomised trial

Lisette M. Wiltink; Tina Yen-Ting Chen; Remi A. Nout; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Marta Fiocco; Søren Laurberg; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde; Corrie A.M. Marijnen

BACKGROUND Preoperative short-term radiotherapy (PRT) in combination with total mesorectal excision (TME) has shown to improve local control in rectal cancer treatment, however without a survival benefit and at the cost of increased morbidity. The current study investigates the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients 14 years after treatment in the Dutch TME trial. METHODS In the TME trial (1996-1999) 1530 Dutch patients with rectal cancer were treated with TME and randomly assigned to PRT (5 × 5 Gy). In 2012 HRQL was evaluated in surviving patients (n=606) using a questionnaire combining EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-CR29 and additional questions. FINDINGS Results were obtained from 478 patients (82%), with a median follow up of 14 years. PRT+TME patients without stoma reported more faecal leakage and higher stool frequency, resulting in increased need of pads. Furthermore, irradiated males reported more erection problems. However, radiotherapy did not have negative effects on overall functioning. Compared with Dutch population, patients in both treatment arms reported a small decrease in overall functioning and males reported less sexual activity, interest and enjoyment and more erection difficulties. Irradiated females reported more vaginal dryness and more pain at intercourse compared with Dutch population. INTERPRETATION Long-term HRQL evaluation shows that treatment-related symptoms are still present 14 years after treatment for rectal cancer. Radiotherapy increased bowel dysfunction in patients without stoma. Compared with the Dutch population, both groups reported increased sexual dysfunction. Despite these treatment-related symptoms, there was no difference in overall functioning and global health between TME and PRT+TME.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013

Specific Adverse Events Predict Survival Benefit in Patients Treated With Tamoxifen or Aromatase Inhibitors: An International Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational Trial Analysis

Caroline Seynaeve; Peyman Hadji; Willemien van de Water; Hein Putter; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Annette Hasenburg; Robert Paridaens; J.M. Vannetzel; Christos Markopoulos; Yasuo Hozumi; Stephen E. Jones; William Rea

PURPOSE Specific adverse events (AEs) associated with endocrine therapy and related to depletion or blocking of circulating estrogens may be related to treatment efficacy. We investigated the relationship between survival outcomes and specific AEs including vasomotor symptoms (VMSs), musculoskeletal adverse events (MSAEs), and vulvovaginal symptoms (VVSs) in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer participating in the international Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary efficacy end points were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and distant metastases (DM). VMSs, MSAEs, and VVSs arising in the first year of endocrine treatment were considered. Patients who did not start or who discontinued their allocated therapy and/or had an event (recurrence/death) within 1 year after randomization were excluded. Landmark analyses and time-dependent multivariate Cox proportional hazards models assessed survival differences up to 5 years from the start of treatment. RESULTS A total of 9,325 patients were included. Patients with specific AEs (v nonspecific or no AEs) had better DFS and OS (multivariate hazard ratio [HR] for DFS: VMSs, 0.731 [95% CI, 0.618 to 0.866]; MSAEs, 0.826 [95% CI, 0.694 to 0.982]; VVSs, 0.769 [95% CI, 0.585 to 1.01]; multivariate HR for OS: VMSs, 0.583 [95% CI, 0.424 to 0.803]; MSAEs, 0.811 [95% CI, 0.654 to 1.005]; VVSs, 0.570 [95% CI, 0.391 to 0.831]) and fewer DM (VMSs, 0.813 [95% CI, 0.664 to 0.996]; MSAEs, 0.749 [95% CI, 0.601 to 0.934]; VVSs, 0.687 [95% CI, 0.436 to 1.085]) than patients not reporting these symptoms. Increasing numbers of specific AEs were also associated with better survival outcomes. Outcomes were unrelated to treatment allocation. CONCLUSION Certain specific AEs are associated with superior survival outcomes and may therefore be useful in predicting treatment responses in patients with breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015

No Increased Risk of Second Cancer After Radiotherapy in Patients Treated for Rectal or Endometrial Cancer in the Randomized TME, PORTEC-1, and PORTEC-2 Trials

Lisette M. Wiltink; Remi A. Nout; Marta Fiocco; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Ina M. Jürgenliemk-Schulz; Jan J. Jobsen; Iris D. Nagtegaal; Harm Rutten; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde; Carien L. Creutzberg; Corrie A.M. Marijnen

PURPOSE This study investigated the long-term probability of developing a second cancer in a large pooled cohort of patients treated with surgery with or without radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS All second cancers diagnosed in patients included in the TME, PORTEC-1, and PORTEC-2 trials were analyzed. In the TME trial, patients with rectal cancer (n = 1,530) were randomly allocated to preoperative external-beam RT (EBRT; 25 Gy in five fractions) or no RT. In the PORTEC trials, patients with endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to postoperative EBRT (46 Gy in 2-Gy fractions) versus no RT (PORTEC-1; n = 714) or EBRT versus vaginal brachytherapy (VBT; PORTEC-2; n = 427). RESULTS A total of 2,554 patients were analyzed (median follow-up, 13.0 years; range 1.8 to 21.2 years). No differences were found in second cancer probability between patients who were treated without RT (10- and 15-year rates, 15.8% and 26.5%, respectively) and those treated with EBRT (10- and 15-year rates, 15.4% and 25.6%, respectively) or VBT (10-year rate, 14.9%). In the individual trials, no significant differences were found between treatment arms. All cancer survivors had a higher risk of developing a second cancer compared with an age- and sex-matched general population. The standardized incidence ratio for any second cancer was 2.98 (95% CI, 2.82 to 3.14). CONCLUSION In this pooled trial cohort of > 2,500 patients with pelvic cancers, those who underwent EBRT or VBT had no higher probability of developing a second cancer than patients who were treated with surgery alone. However, patients with rectal or endometrial cancer had an increased probability of developing a second cancer compared with the general population.


Oncologist | 2012

Age-Specific Nonpersistence of Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Patients Diagnosed with Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: A TEAM Study Analysis

Willemien van de Water; E. Bastiaannet; Elysée T.M. Hille; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Hein Putter; Caroline M. Seynaeve; Robert Paridaens; Anton J. M. de Craen; Rudi G. J. Westendorp; Gerrit-Jan Liefers; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde

BACKGROUND Early discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy may affect the outcome of treatment in breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to assess age-specific persistence and age-specific survival outcome based on persistence status. METHODS Patients enrolled in the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational trial were included. Nonpersistence was defined as discontinuing the assigned endocrine treatment within 1 year of follow-up because of adverse events, intercurrent illness, patient refusal, or other reasons. Endpoints were the breast cancer-specific and overall survival times. Analyses were stratified by age at diagnosis (<65 years, 65-74 years, ≥75 years). RESULTS Overall, 3,142 postmenopausal breast cancer patients were included: 1,682 were aged <65 years, 951 were aged 65-74 years, and 509 were aged ≥75 years. Older age was associated with a higher proportion of nonpersistence within 1 year of follow-up. In patients aged <65 years, nonpersistent patients had lower breast cancer-specific and overall survival probabilities. In patients aged 65-74 years and patients aged ≥75 years, the survival times of persistent and nonpersistent patients were similar. CONCLUSION Nonpersistence within 1 year of follow-up was associated with lower breast cancer-specific and overall survival probabilities in patients aged <65 years, but it was not associated with survival outcomes in patients aged 65-74 years or in patients aged ≥75 years. These results suggest that extrapolation of outcomes from a young to an elderly breast cancer population may be insufficient and urge age-specific breast cancer studies.


European Journal of Cancer | 2014

Efficacy of six month neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients – A phase II trial

D.B.Y. Fontein; Ayoub Charehbili; Johan W.R. Nortier; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Judith R. Kroep; Hein Putter; Yvonne van Riet; G.A.P. Nieuwenhuijzen; Bart de Valk; Jetske M. Meerum Terwogt; Gijs D. Algie; Gerrit-Jan Liefers; Sabine C. Linn; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde

BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) is playing an increasing role in the clinical management of breast cancer (BC) and may improve surgical outcomes for postmenopausal, oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC patients. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal duration of NHT before surgery. Here, we present the outcomes of the TEAM IIA trial, a multicentre, phase II trial investigating the efficacy of six months of neoadjuvant exemestane in postmenopausal, strong ER-positive (ER+, ⩾50%) BC patients. METHODS 102 patients (stage T2-T4ac) were included in the study after exclusion of ineligible patients. Primary end-point was clinical response at 3 and 6 months as measured by palpation. Secondary end-point was radiological response as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mammography and/or ultrasound. Linear mixed models (95% confidence interval (CI)) were used to compare changes in mean tumour size (in mm) between baseline, 3 and 6 months after the start of endocrine therapy. Conversion rates from mastectomy to breast conserving surgery (BCS) were evaluated. RESULTS Median age of all patients was 72 years (range 53-88). Overall response rate by clinical palpation was 64.5% in all patients with a final palpation measurement. Four patients had clinically progressive disease. 63 patients had both 3-month and >3-month palpation measurements. Overall response was 58.7% at 3 months and 68.3% at final palpation (>3 months). Mean tumour size by clinical palpation at T=0 was 39.1mm (95% CI 34.8-43.4mm), and decreased to 23.0mm (95% CI 18.7-27.2mm) and 16.7 mm (95% CI 12.6-20.8) at T=3 and T>3 months, respectively (p=0.001). Final radiological response rates at the end of treatment for MRI (n=37), ultrasound (n=77) and mammography (n=56) were 70.3%, 41.6% and 48.2%, respectively. Feasibility of BCS improved from 61.8% to 70.6% (McNemar p=0.012). CONCLUSION 6 months of neoadjuvant exemestane therapy helps reduce mean tumour size further in strongly ER-positive BC patients without significant side-effects compared to 3 months. Nevertheless, some patients still experience disease progression under exemestane. Feasibility of breast conservation rates improved by almost 10%.

Collaboration


Dive into the Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hein Putter

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Corrie A.M. Marijnen

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerrit-Jan Liefers

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johan W.R. Nortier

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Caroline Seynaeve

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Henk H. Hartgrink

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Judith R. Kroep

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisette M. Wiltink

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Remi A. Nout

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge