Eloisa Basile

Maximal hyperemia in the assessment of fractional flow reserve: intracoronary adenosine versus intracoronary sodium nitroprusside versus intravenous adenosine: the NASCI (Nitroprussiato versus Adenosina nelle Stenosi Coronariche Intermedie) study.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare increasing doses of intracoronary (i.c.) adenosine or i.c. sodium nitroprusside versus intravenous (i.v.) adenosine for fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment. BACKGROUND Maximal hyperemia is the critical prerequisite for FFR assessment. Despite i.v. adenosine currently representing the recommended approach, i.c. administration of adenosine or other coronary vasodilators constitutes a valuable alternative in everyday practice. However, it is surprisingly unclear which i.c. strategy allows the achievement of FFR values comparable to i.v. adenosine. METHODS Fifty intermediate coronary stenoses (n = 45) undergoing FFR measurement were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Hyperemia was sequentially induced by incremental boli of i.c. adenosine (ADN) (60 μg ADN60, 300 μg ADN300, 600 μg ADN600), by i.c. sodium nitroprusside (NTP) (0.6 μg/kg bolus) and by i.v. adenosine infusion (IVADN) (140 μg/kg/min). FFR values, symptoms, and development of atrioventricular block were recorded. RESULTS Incremental doses of i.c. adenosine and NTP were well tolerated and associated with fewer symptoms than IVADN. Intracoronary adenosine doses (0.881 ± 0.067, 0.871 ± 0.068, and 0.868 ± 0.070 with ADN60, ADN300, and ADN600, respectively) and NTP (0.892 ± 0.072) induced a significant decrease of FFR compared with baseline levels (p < 0.001). Notably, ADN600 only was associated with FFR values similar to IVADN (0.867 ± 0.072, p = 0.28). Among the 10 patients with FFR values ≤0.80 with IVADN, 5 were correctly identified also by ADN60, 6 by ADN300, 7 by ADN600, and 6 by NTP. CONCLUSIONS Intracoronary adenosine, at doses higher than currently suggested, allows obtaining FFR values similar to i.v. adenosine. Intravenous adenosine, which remains the gold standard, might thus be reserved for those lesions with equivocal FFR values after high (up to 600 μg) i.c. adenosine doses.

Influence of the Amount of Myocardium Subtended by a Stenosis on Fractional Flow Reserve

Background—Fractional flow reserve (FFR) specifically relates to the severity of a stenosis to the mass of tissue to be perfused. Accordingly, the larger the territory to be perfused, the greater the flow and the pressure gradient induced by maximal hyperemia. Although this notion may be considered intuitive, its unequivocal demonstration is still lacking. The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of the amount of myocardium subtended to an intermediate stenosis on FFR, especially in relation to quantitative coronary angiography. Methods and Results—The severity of each lesion was assessed by FFR and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography. The amount of jeopardized myocardium was evaluated using 3 validated scores specifically adapted to this aim: the Duke Jeopardy Score (DJS), the Myocardial Jeopardy Index (MJI), and the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Lesion Score (ALS). The presence of a concomitant collateralized chronic total occlusion was also reported. A total of 213 intermediate coronary stenoses in 184 patients were enrolled. FFR values were correlated to minimal lumen diameter (r=0.34; P<0.0001) and diameter stenosis (r=−0.28; P<0.0001). FFR was inversely correlated with DJS, MJI, and ALS (r=−0.28, P<0.0001; r=−0.40, P<0.0001; and r=−0.34, P<0.0001). Lesions localized on proximal left anterior descending were related to significantly lower FFR values and to a higher rate of a positive FFR compared with those in distal left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries (0.80±0.09 versus 0.84±0.08 versus 0.88±0.09 versus 0.91±0.04; P<0.0001). The presence of a collateralized chronic total occlusion was associated with significantly lower FFR values (0.80±0.07 versus 0.85±0.09; P<0.005). At multivariate analysis MJI, minimal lumen diameter, and presence of a collateralized chronic total occlusion were confirmed as significant predictors of FFR. Conclusions—A larger amount of perfused myocardium subtended by a stenosis is associated with a higher probability that an angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis is functionally significant.

Efficacy of contrast medium induced Pd/Pa ratio in predicting functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve: insights from the RINASCI study.

AIMS The need of adenosine administration for the achievement of maximal hyperaemia limits the widespread application of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the real world. We hypothesised that Pd/Pa ratio registered during submaximal reactive hyperaemia induced by conventional non-ionic radiographic contrast medium (contrast medium induced Pd/Pa ratio: CMR) can be sufficient for the assessment of physiological severity of stenosis in the vast majority of cases. The aim of the present study was to test the accuracy of CMR in comparison to FFR. METHODS AND RESULTS Eighty patients with 104 intermediate coronary stenoses were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. CMR was obtained after intracoronary injection of 6 ml of radiographic contrast medium, while FFR was measured after administration of adenosine. Despite the fact that CMR values were significantly higher than FFR values (0.88 [IR 0.80-0.92] vs. 0.87 [IR 0.83-0.94], p<0.001), a strong correlation between CMR and FFR values was observed (r=0.94, p<0.001) with a close agreement at Bland-Altman analysis (95% CI of disagreement: -0.029 to 0.072). ROC curve analysis showed an excellent accuracy of CMR cut-off of ≤0.83 in predicting FFR value ≤0.80 (AUC 0.97 [95% CI: 0.91-0.99, specificity 96.1, sensitivity 85.7]). Moreover, no FFR value ≤0.80 corresponded to a CMR ≥0.88. CONCLUSIONS CMR is accurate in predicting the functional significance of coronary stenosis. This could allow limiting the use of adenosine to obtain FFR to doubtful cases. In particular, we suggest considering a CMR value ≤0.83 to be significant, a CMR value ≥0.88 as not significant, and inducing maximal hyperaemia using adenosine for FFR assessment when CMR is between 0.84 and 0.87.

Effects of bariatric surgery on cardiac remodeling: Clinical and pathophysiologic implications

Purpose: To assess the effects of bariatric surgery (BS) on cardiac mass, volumes and function as compared to persistent morbid obesity. Although beneficial effects of weight loss on cardiac function have been reported, systematic studies on the effect of BS as compared to persistent morbid obesity are lacking. Methods: One-hundred morbidly obese patients (body mass index -BMI- 47.7±7 kg/m2) referred for BS prospectively underwent an echocardiogram: 65 underwent BS and 35 did not. Fifty-one operated and 29 non-operated patients underwent repeat imaging after 2 years. Results: Operated patients showed a significant decrease in weight and BMI paralleled by a significant reduction of left ventricular (LV) mass (from 222.9±52.2 to 207.7±50g) and LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LVEDV from 124.6±29.3 to 119.4±28.7 and LVESV from 55.3±16.5 to 49.4±15ml) and by a significant increase of LV ejection fraction (from 55.9±4.8 to 59.2±4.4%). In contrast, in non-operated patients LV mass (from 226.5±71.4 to 241.4±94.7g), volumes [LVEDV from 52.8±5.1 to 54.2±6.6 and LVESV from 32.1±3.5 to 34.9±6ml] significantly increased and ejection fraction deteriorated (from 57.1±5.1 to 54.7±7.4%). At multivariate analysis, BS was the only significant predictor of change in LV end-systolic volume while weight change predicted change in LV mass. Conclusions: In extreme obesity the sustained weight loss achieved with BS is associated to an improvement of cardiac structure and function, while persistent severe obesity is associated to progressive deterioration. These favorable cardiac effects associated to previously described positive metabolic effects make BS an attractive therapeutic option in this setting of patients.

Increased risk of myocardial infarction with dabigatran: fact or fiction?

Dabigatran is a direct, competitive inhibitor of thrombin recently approved for the prophylaxis of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In some of the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in different clinical settings [i.e., prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after orthopedic surgery, secondary prevention of VTE, and acute coronary syndromes (ACS)], a trend toward an increase in acute coronary events among patients receiving dabigatran has been reported, thus raising concerns of a possible relationship between dabigatran and myocardial infarction, especially in high-risk patients. However, as shown in our article, current evidence is inconclusive on this topic; more data are needed to detail this hypothetical association, and other considerations, such as the well-known protective effect of warfarin against ACS, should be taken into account as a possible explanation.

Statins Reduce Incidence of Early Perioperative Complications and Length of in-Hospital Stay after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with several perioperative complications that may significantly prolong length of in-hospital stay, increase costs and provide worse long term outcome. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, exert anti-inflammatory and vascular protective effects. We hypothesized that pre-operatory statin therapy may reduce incidence of early perioperative complications and length of in-hospital stay following CABG.Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 103 patients (age 67±3; 18 females), who underwent CABG. Patients were allocated into 2 groups: 57 patients on statin therapy prior to CABG (St Group) and 46 patients not on statin therapy (n-St group). Demographic and clinical features, pre-operative medications use and the incidence of early adverse postoperative events were collected. Pre-operative risk of death using the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) was also calculated. The primary end-point was the composite of early complications occurring after surgery, including infections, bleedings, sustained ventricular and supra-ventricular tachyarrhythmias, cardiogenic shock, myocardial infarction and mortality. As secondary end-points single perioperative complications were considered. In-hospital stay length was also evaluated.Results: Clinical features, cholesterol levels and EuroSCORE were similar between two groups. Statin therapy and EuroSCORE emerged as predictors of the composite adverse outcome. n-St patients had a significant higher rate of early complications if compared with St patients: the primary endpoint occurred in 18 St patients (31%) versus 25 (54%) non-St patients (p=0.019). Multivariate analysis confirmed pre-operative statin therapy and EuroSCORE as independent predictors of the primary endpoint (OR=0.307, 95% CI=0.123-0.766, p=0.011 and OR= 2.114, 95% CI= 1.213- 4.407, p= 0.002 respectively) showing a protective role of the statin therapy.The incidence of secondary end-points did not differ significantly between the groups, while in-hospital stay was longer in n-St group if compared with St group (7.7±3,9 days vs 5,6±1,8 days; p=0,001).Conclusion: Our data suggest that statin therapy may reduce early perioperative complications after coronary artery bypass grafting. This effect is independent from cholesterol basal levels, thus supporting pre-operative statin use in patients undergoing CABG.

Inflammatory markers in heart failure: hype or hope?

Heart failure is a growing global epidemic that involves in its pathophysiology a proinflammatory state. Since the first description of elevated cytokine levels in this setting, there has been increasing interest in understanding the role of these molecules in left-ventricular remodeling and function. Over the years, intense research on the ‘cytokine theory’ of heart failure has allowed evaluation of the role of inflammatory biomarkers not only as pathogenetic mediators, but also as potential tools in the diagnosis and risk stratification of heart failure patients. Whereas current evidence does not support the use of inflammatory biomarkers for the diagnosis of heart failure, the assessment of their levels and the connection between their changes and changes in clinical status and prognosis has been well validated. At present, the utility of anti-inflammatory therapies in heart failure is still debated, since trials of anti-inflammatory agents in this setting have pointed out controversial results. On the contrary, established treatments of heart failure, including &bgr;-blockers, renin–angiotensin system antagonists, and aldosterone-receptor blockers seem able to act by modulating cytokine expression, suggesting a new role for these molecules in guiding heart failure therapy. Therefore, the binomial topic of heart failure and inflammation still has a number of fields not completely explored: our aim is to update current knowledge and future perspectives.

Outcomes in Women Undergoing Electrophysiological Procedures.

The number of invasive electrophysiological procedures is steadily increasing in Western countries, as the age of the population increases and technologies advance. In recent years, gender-related differences in cardiac rhythm disorders have been increasingly appreciated, which can potentially have a great impact on the outcomes of invasive electrophysiological procedures. Among supraventricular arrhythmias, women have a higher incidence of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and a significantly lower incidence of atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia compared with males, and present to ablation procedures later and after having failed more antiarrhythmic drugs. The results of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in women have been reported worse than in men. This finding is possibly due to a later referral of females to ablation procedures, who present older and with a higher incidence of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. With regard to cardiac device implantation procedures, a smaller survival benefit from prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation has been shown in women, essentially due to gender-specific differences in the clinical course of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, with women dying predominantly from non-arrhythmic causes. On the other side, the clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronisation therapy seems to be more favourable in women, who experience a greater degree of reverse left ventricular remodelling and a striking decrease of heart failure events or mortality after biventricular pacing. This review will summarise the available evidence on gender-related differences in outcomes of invasive electrophysiological procedures.

Fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes and in stable ischemic heart disease: Clinical implications

BACKGROUND Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease (SIHD) is universally accepted, while in Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) is less established. Aims of this retrospective study were: to compare in patients undergoing FFR assessment the prognostic impact of ACS vs SIHD, to evaluate the clinical relevance of the modality of utilization and timing of FFR assessment and to assess the different outcomes associated with an FFR> or ≤0.80. METHODS Major cardiac adverse events were assessed at a follow up of 16.4 ± 10.5 months in 543 patients with SIHD and 231 with ACS needing functional evaluation. FFR was used for lesions of ambiguous significance in the absence of a clear culprit vessel (first intention, FI) and for incidental lesions in the presence of a clear culprit vessel (second intention, SI). The decision to perform FFR and the identification of the stenosis needing functional assessment were left to the operators discretion. Revascularization was performed when FFR was ≤0.80. RESULTS SIHD and ACS patients were not significantly different for principal clinical characteristics. ACS patients had significantly more events than SIHD, due to an excess of death and myocardial infarction. This was confirmed when FFR was used as FI, in particular if FFR was >0.80. On the contrary, when FFR was used as SI, event rates were similar between ACS and SIHD patients, regardless of FFR value. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that using FFR the risk of recurrent events in ACS is significantly higher than in SIHD. This different outcome is confined to those patients in whom FFR is utilized for lesions of ambiguous significance in the absence of a clear culprit vessel.

Three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and quantification of jeopardised myocardium to predict functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis

AIMS Despite the fact that fractional flow reserve (FFR) is better than angiography in guiding PCI, in the real world the choice to perform PCI is generally based on angiography. Three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) may increase the accuracy of angiography, especially in intermediate coronary artery stenosis (ICAS). The aim of the study was to assess the best cut-off values of area stenosis % (AS%) and the extent of jeopardised myocardium for predicting FFR and for excluding the need to perform FFR. METHODS AND RESULTS FFR, AS% and Myocardial Jeopardy Index (MJI) were assessed in 211 ICAS. MJI (=-0.36; p=0.001), AS% (=-0.35; p=0.001) and presence of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) (=-0.15; p=0.01) were independent predictors of FFR. In patients without CTO (174 lesions), the best cut-offs for the detection of FFR ≤0.80 for AS% and MJI were 61% (AUC=0.76; p<0.001) and 30% (AUC=0.71; p<0.001), respectively. More importantly, the cut-offs of AS% safely to exclude (100% sensitivity) an FFR ≤0.80 were 40% (AUC=0.85, p<0.001) for an MJI ≥30% and 50% (AUC=0.70, p<0.04) for an MJI <30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AS%, MJI and the presence of a CTO predicted FFR values. 3D-QCA in addition to MJI allows the safe exclusion of FFR ≤0.80, limiting FFR assessment to doubtful cases with considerable reduction of costs.