Elpidio García

A DNA polymerase from maize axes: its purification and possible role.

Three different DNA polymerase activities can be resolved by passing a protein extract from 24 h imbibed maize axes through DEAE-cellulose. These activities have been numbered 1, 2 and 3, according to their elution order. One of them, DNA polymerase 2, elutes at 100–120 mM phosphates. This enzyme was further purified by passing it through Heparin-Sepharose, Sephacryl S-300 and DNA cellulose. Purification was nearly 5000-fold. The enzyme needs Mg2+, is stimulated by K+, has an optimum pH of 7.0 and its optimum temperature is 30–37 °C. Specific inhibitors for different types of polymerases, such as aphidicolin, dideoxythymidine triphosphate and N-ethyl maleimide, gave intermediate values of inhibition, making impossible the definition of the type of enzyme purified by its inhibitory pattern. SDS-PAGE indicated the presence of several bands of molecular masses of 28–40, 56 and 15 kDa. Most of these bands could be visualized when proteins from crude extracts were analyzed by western blot, using an antibody against calf thymus DNA polymerase α. A high molecular mass (around 500 kDa) was calculated by western blot of native gels using the same antibody. Finally, specific activity of this enzyme increased 100-fold during maize germination whereas polymerase 3 virtually did not increase. Furthermore, immunoprecipitation experiments with the antipolymerase α-antibody showed a decrease in DNA polymerase activity by 70%. The possibility that polymerase 2 is a replicative enzyme is discussed.

COMPARISON AMONG DNA POLYMERASES 1, 2 AND 3 FROM MAIZE EMBRYO AXES. A DNA PRIMASE ACTIVITY COPURIFIES WITH DNA POLYMERASE 2

Three DNA polymerase activities, named 1, 2 and 3 were purified from maize embryo axes and were compared in terms of ion requirements, optimal pH, temperature and KCl for activity, response to specific inhibitors and use of templates. All three enzymes require a divalent cation for activity, but main differences were observed in sensitivity to inhibitors and template usage: while DNA polymerases 1 and 2 were inhibited by N-ethyl maleimide and aphidicolin, inhibitors of replicative-type enzymes, DNA polymerase 3 was only marginally or not affected at all. In contrast, DNA polymerase 3 was highly inhibited by very low concentrations of ddTTP, an inhibitor of repair-type enzymes, and a 100-fold higher concentration of the drug was needed to inhibit DNA polymerases 1 and 2. Additionally, DNA polymerases 1 and 2 used equally or more efficiently the synthetic template polydA-oligodT, as compared to activated DNA, while polymerase 3 used it very poorly. Whereas DNA polymerases 1 and 2 shared properties of replicative-type enzymes, DNA polymerase 3 could be a repair-type enzyme. Moreover, a DNA primase activity copurified with the 8000-fold purified DNA polymerase 2, strenghtening the suggestion that polymerase 2 is a replicative enzyme, of the α-type. This DNA primase activity was also partially characterized. The results are discussed in terms of relevant data about other plant DNA polymerases and primases reported in the literature.

The family of maize D-type cyclins: genomic organization, phylogeny and expression patterns

Cyclin proteins, associated to cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), play fundamental roles in cell cycle control as they constitute a very important driving force to allow cell cycle progression. D-type cyclins (CycDs) are important both for interpreting external mitogenic signals and in the control of the G1 phase. The maize (Zea mays) genome appears to contain at least 17 different CycD genes, and they fall into the subgroups previously described for other plants. Maize CycDs have been named according to identity percentages of the corresponding orthologs in rice and Arabidopsis. In silico analysis confirmed the presence of characteristic cyclin domains in each maize CycD gene and showed that their genomic organization is similar to their orthologs in rice and Arabidopsis. The expression of maize CycD genes was followed in seeds, during germination in the presence/absence of exogenously added hormones, and also in different plantlet tissues (mesocotyl, root tips and first leaf). Most cyclins were expressed in germinating seeds and at least in one of the plantlet tissues tested; almost all of the detected cyclins show an accumulating pattern of mRNA along germination (0-24 h) and higher levels in root tissue. Interestingly, some cyclins show high levels in non-proliferating tissues as leaf. Addition of auxins or cytokinins does not seem to importantly modify transcript levels; on the other hand, addition of abscisic acid repressed the expression of several cyclins. The role of each CycD during germination and plant growth and its interaction with other cell cycle proteins becomes a topic of the highest interest.

Complexes of D-type cyclins with CDKs during maize germination

The importance of cell proliferation in plant growth and development has been well documented. The majority of studies on basic cell cycle mechanisms in plants have been at the level of gene expression and much less knowledge has accumulated in terms of protein interactions and activation. Two key proteins, cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are fundamental for cell cycle regulation and advancement. Our aim has been to understand the role of D-type cyclins and type A and B CDKs in the cell cycle taking place during a developmental process such as maize seed germination. Results indicate that three maize D-type cyclins—D2;2, D4;2, and D5;3—(G1-S cyclins by definition) bind and activate two different types of CDK—A and B1;1—in a differential way during germination. Whereas CDKA–D-type cyclin complexes are more active at early germination times than at later times, it was surprising to observe that CDKB1;1, a supposedly G2-M kinase, bound in a differential way to all D-type cyclins tested during germination. Binding to cyclin D2;2 was detectable at all germination times, forming a complex with kinase activity, whereas binding to D4;2 and D5;3 was more variable; in particular, D5;3 was only detected at late germination times. Results are discussed in terms of cell cycle advancement and its importance for seed germination.

Chemical Tools of Octopus maya during Crab Predation Are Also Active on Conspecifics.

Octopus maya is a major socio-economic resource from the Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico. In this study we report for the first time the chemical composition of the saliva of O. maya and its effect on natural prey, i.e. the blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), the crown conch snail (Melongena corona bispinosa), as well as conspecifics. Salivary posterior glands were collected from octopus caught by local fishers and extracted with water; this extract paralyzed and predigested crabs when it was injected into the third pereiopod. The water extract was fractionated by membrane ultrafiltration with a molecular weight cut-off of 3kDa leading to a metabolic phase (>3kDa) and a neurotoxic fraction (<3kDa). The neurotoxic fraction injected in the crabs caused paralysis and postural changes. Crabs recovered to their initial condition within two hours, which suggests that the effects of the neurotoxic fraction were reversible. The neurotoxic fraction was also active on O. maya conspecifics, partly paralyzing and sedating them; this suggests that octopus saliva might be used among conspecifics for defense and for reduction of competition. Bioguided separation of the neurotoxic fraction by chromatography led to a paralysis fraction and a relaxing fraction. The paralyzing activity of the saliva was exerted by amino acids, while the relaxing activity was due to the presence of serotonin. Prey-handling studies revealed that O. maya punctures the eye or arthrodial membrane when predating blue crabs and uses the radula to bore through crown conch shells; these differing strategies may help O. maya to reduce the time needed to handle its prey.

Regulation of an α-Type DNA Polymerase Activity During Maize Germination

Three DNA polymerases can be separated by fractionation of crude protein extracts from maize embryonic axes through DEAE-cellulose. One of them, DNA polymerase 2 (DNA pol 2) has been purified 5000-fold and characterized. According to biochemical, immunological and physiological criteria, DNA pol 2 is an α-type enzyme. In support of this conclusion, we have found a DNA primase closely associated to DNA pol 2 along the entire purification procedure. With the help of antibodies developed against maize DNA pol 2, we have been able to determine its putative subunit composition. This enzyme is the only one, among DNA polymerases in embryonic axes, to increase in activity as the germination process is established. Since there is no increase in the amount of the different proteins that form DNA pol 2 during germination, the higher activity presented might be due to enzyme modification. We have found that DNA pol 2 is a phosphoprotein and that phosphorylation is a cyclic event during the 0–48 h period of germination. The implication of this is discussed. Finally, we show that pol 2 is a labile enzyme in seed deterioration and that it may be responsible, at least partially, for the decrease in vigour/viability of deteriorated seeds.