Els Brouwers

Malondialdehyde-modified low density lipoproteins in patients with atherosclerotic disease.

The murine monoclonal antibody mAb-1H11 raised against malondialdehyde (MDA)-modified LDL, was used to detect cross-reacting material in human atheromatous tissue and in plasma. MDA-modified LDL levels in plasma were 0.19 +/- 0.02 mg/dl (mean +/- SEM) in 44 control subjects, 0.24 +/- 0.02 mg/dl in 15 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris (P = NS vs LDL cholesterol matched controls), 1.4 +/- 0.1 mg/dl in 60 patients with acute myocardial infarction (P < 0.001 vs controls), and 0.86 +/- 0.11 mg/dl in 22 patients with carotid atherosclerosis (P < 0.001 vs controls). Modified LDL, isolated from pooled LDL of 10 patients, showed a higher electrophoretic mobility on agarose gels, a higher content of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, and a higher cholesterol/protein ratio than native LDL and had a similar reactivity (antigen/protein ratio) in the assay as the in vitro MDA-modified LDL used for calibration. Its apo B-100 moiety was not fragmented. Uptake of this modified LDL by macrophages resulted in foam cell generation. In conclusion, elevated plasma levels of atherogenic MDA-modified LDL may be a marker for unstable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Development of a Genotype 325–Specific proCPU/TAFI ELISA

Objective—A Thr/Ile polymorphism at position 325 in the coding region of proCPU has been reported. Immunological assays, fully characterized (including genotype dependency), are required for the quantitation of proCPU levels. Methods and Results—We have generated a panel of monoclonal antibodies against human, plasma-derived proCPU. Two combinations exhibiting distinct reactivities were selected for measurement of proCPU in plasma. T12D11/T28G6-HRP yielded values of 10.1±3.1 &mgr;g/mL (mean±SD, n=86; normal donors), and T32F6/T9G12-HRP yielded values of 5.4±3.0 &mgr;g/mL. Grouping according to the 325 genotype demonstrated that T12D11/T28G6-HRP was independent to this polymorphism whereas T32F6/T9G12-HRP revealed a complete lack of reactivity with the Ile/Ile genotype (ie, 0.0±0.0, 4.2±1.7, and 7.3±2.9 &mgr;g/mL for the Ile/Ile, Ile/Thr, and Thr/Thr isoforms, respectively). Commercially available antigen assays appeared to be partially dependent on the 325 genotype (eg, 44±8.9% and 100±30% for the Ile/Ile and Thr/Thr isoforms, respectively). Conclusions—Our data demonstrate that great care should be taken when evaluating proCPU antigen values as a putative causative agent or as a diagnostic risk marker for cardiovascular events.

Development of ELISAs Measuring the Extent of TAFI Activation

Objectives—To date, quantitation of TAFI antigen levels has been mainly focused on “total” antigen levels and has been shown to yield ambiguous results because of the existence of different isoforms and various degrees of activation. Our objective was to develop assays that allow measuring the extent of TAFI activation. Methods and Results—A variety of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were evaluated for their preferential reactivity toward TAFI before and after activation, and toward the recombinantly expressed activation peptide. Three ELISAs with distinct reactivities were selected: recognizing either exclusively nonactivated TAFI, the released activation peptide, or exclusively TAFIa (activated TAFI). Evaluation of TAFI activation during clot lysis revealed that decreases of TAFI levels are associated with increases of the released activation peptide and TAFIa levels. In addition, antigenic measurement of TAFIa parallels activity measured by chromogenic assay. Analyzing plasma samples revealed that subjects with hyperlipidemia had significantly higher plasma levels of both the activation peptide (109.2 versus 95.5; P<0.001) and TAFIa (112.1 versus 103.3; P=0.03), and not of TAFI antigen (92.5 versus 87.9; P=0.07) (results in % of plasma pooled from normolipidemic subjects). Conclusion—ELISAs that allow to measure the extent of TAFI activation were developed. These ELISAs constitute more sensitive markers in studies on the relationship between TAFI and cardiovascular diseases.

Development of a universal anti-adalimumab antibody standard for interlaboratory harmonization.

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab (ADM) has been introduced recently. When no detectable ADM serum concentrations can be found, the formation of antidrug antibodies (ADA) should be investigated. A variety of assays to measure the occurrence of ADA have been developed. Results are expressed as arbitrary units or as a titration value. The aim was to develop a monoclonal antibody (MA) that could serve as a universal calibrator to quantify the amount of ADA in ADM-treated patients. Methods: Hybridoma technology was used to generate a MA toward ADM. The functionality of the MA was tested in a bridging enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) setup and in a cell-based assay. Sera from 25 anti–tumor necrosis factor naive patients with inflammatory bowel disease were used to determine the cutoff values. Sera from 9 ADM-treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease, with undetectable serum concentrations of ADM were used to quantify the ADA response. Results: In this study, MA-ADM6A10, an IgG1 that can be used as a calibrator in both an ELISA to quantify the amount of binding antibodies and in a cell-based assay to quantify the amount of neutralizing antibodies, was generated. Combining the results of both assays showed that the sera with high concentrations of anti-ADM binding antibodies also had the highest neutralizing capacity. Conclusions: The availability of a universal calibrator could facilitate the interlaboratory harmonization of antibody titers in patients who develop anti-adalimumab antibodies.

Variability in Golimumab Exposure: A ‘Real-Life’ Observational Study in Active Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Golimumab has been approved recently to treat refractory moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis [UC]. To date it is not clear why a considerable fraction of patients do not respond, or lose initial response, to golimumab therapy. Our aim was to investigate whether a low golimumab serum concentration and/or a positive anti-golimumab antibody status reduces the efficacy of this drug in patients with UC. METHODS Serum samples of 21 patients with moderate-to-severe UC were collected during the first 14 weeks of golimumab therapy. For measurement of golimumab serum concentrations, both a tumour necrosis factor [TNF]-coated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and a sandwich-type ELISA were developed. Anti-golimumab antibodies were measured using a bridging ELISA and a newly-developed drug-tolerant immunoassay. Clinical response and mucosal healing were assessed 14 weeks after start of treatment. RESULTS Out of 21 patients, 10 [48%] reached partial clinical response at Week 14. Median [interquartile range] serum golimumab concentration was significantly higher in partial clinical responders than in non-responders: 10.0 [7.8-10.5] µg/ml versus 7.4 [4.8-8.3] µg/ml at Week 2 [p = 0.035] and 5.1 [4.0-7.9] µg/ml versus 2.1 [1.8-4.2] µg/ml at week 6 [p = 0.037]. Four out of 21 UC patients developed anti-golimumab antibodies, detectable only using a drug-tolerant immunoassay, and three had a partial clinical response at that time. Clinical non-responders had a significantly more severe colitis, indicated by a higher endoscopic Mayo score at baseline compared with partial clinical responders [p = 0.048]. CONCLUSION Adequate exposure to golimumab drives clinical response. A worse disease at baseline influences clinical response rate negatively.

Generation of a highly specific monoclonal anti-infliximab antibody for harmonization of TNF-coated infliximab assays

Background: Determination of infliximab (IFX) serum concentrations has been used for treatment optimization of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A wide range of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) exists to quantitate IFX. Most of these assays lack specificity and cross-react with other anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. The ability of these IFX assays to detect IFX in complex with antidrug antibodies is not known. The objective of our study was to develop an IFX-specific immunoassay to monitor IFX serum concentrations and to evaluate the impact of antidrug antibodies on the assay performance. Methods: A panel of monoclonal antibodies toward IFX (MA-IFX) was generated by hybridoma technology and evaluated to replace the polyclonal antibody in a TNF-coated IFX assay. The selected monoclonal antibody–based (MA-based) IFX ELISA was benchmarked to a clinically validated, reference polyclonal antibody–based (pAb-based) IFX ELISA using 209 inflammatory bowel disease serum samples. Results: Fifty-five MA-IFX were generated and grouped into 9 clusters. Of the 22 monoclonal antibodies tested, MA-IFX6B7 was selected for use in the IFX ELISA and the assay was further optimized. MA-IFX6B7 is a high-affinity (KD = 1.40E-09 mol/L), noninhibitory IgG1 antibody that binds to the Fab fragment of IFX and exhibits no cross-reactivity with other anti-TNF drugs. The linearity of an IFX dose–response curve was demonstrated in the range of 1.2–37.5 ng/mL (R2 = 0.988). The MA-based assay showed a good Pearson correlation (R = 0.986) and agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.985) with the pAb-based assay. The MA-based assay detects IFX in complex with nonneutralizing anti-IFX antibodies but not when complexed with neutralizing anti-IFX antibodies. Conclusions: In this study, a highly specific MA-IFX was developed as detection antibody in an ELISA to quantify IFX serum concentrations. The assay was benchmarked to the clinically validated reference pAb-based IFX ELISA.

An Optimized Anti-infliximab Bridging Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for Harmonization of Anti-infliximab Antibody Titers in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Background:The formation of anti-infliximab antibodies (ATI) is associated with loss of response and adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, leading to the introduction of ATI monitoring for guiding treatment adjustments. However, a lack of standardization among current available assays exists, hampering comparison of results from different studies. This study aimed to improve the harmonization of clinically validated ATI enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) by introducing a monoclonal anti-infliximab antibody (MA-IFX). Methods:A panel of MA-IFX was evaluated as calibrator in the first generation ATI ELISA. After selection of 1 MA-IFX, assay conditions were optimized and biotin-streptavidin-enhanced detection of bound infliximab was introduced. The novel second generation ELISA was used for reanalysis of 127 serum samples from a cohort of 12 patients with inflammatory bowel disease, previously identified as ATI positive. Results:Of 55 MA-IFX, MA-IFX10F9 was selected as calibrator in the ATI ELISA. After optimization of the assay conditions, a 4-fold improvement in sensitivity was obtained. Reanalysis of 127 serum samples revealed that in 5 of 12 patients (46%), ATI were detected at least 1 time point earlier with the second generation ELISA compared with the first generation ELISA. In 1 patient, the second generation ELISA allowed to detect ATI before the reinitiation of IFX after a drug holiday. Conclusions:In addition to the improved sensitivity and specificity of the second generation ATI ELISA, MA-IFX10F9 can serve as a universal calibrator to achieve assay harmonization. Moreover, the superiority of the second generation assay in analyzing serum of restarters was demonstrated.

Validation of a sample pretreatment protocol to convert a drug-sensitive into a drug-tolerant anti-infliximab antibody immunoassay

A meta-analysis revealed that up to 51% of patients treated with infliximab develop anti-drug Abs (ADA) which are associated with loss of response. Detection of ADA is strongly influenced by assay technique since drug-sensitive ADA assays are not able to detect ADA in the presence of drug and therefore underestimate ADA development. In addition, the lack of a calibrator antibody that can be used in a drug-sensitive and drug-tolerant assay hampers an adequate comparison among different assays. Here we present a sample pretreatment protocol to convert the bridging assay, originally developed as a drug-sensitive assay, into a drug-tolerant assay, allowing use of the same assay and calibrator antibody MA-IFX10F9. Using the sample pretreatment protocol, the bridging assay detects antibodies towards infliximab in samples containing up to 5-fold infliximab over anti-infliximab. Analysis of consecutive serum samples from infliximab treated patients revealed that the drug-tolerant assay detects ADA development up to 40 weeks earlier compared to the drug-sensitive assay. In conclusion, the sample pretreatment protocol can be implemented in various assay formats and allows determination of ADA in the presence of drug, providing the possibility for early treatment optimization. Copyright

Development and evaluation of monoclonal antibodies as probes to assess the differences between two tomato pectin methylesterase isoenzymes.

The enzyme pectin methylesterase (PME) was purified from red ripe tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) and through affinity chromatography two isoenzymes were fractionated (t1PME and t2PME). Further analysis of these two isoenzymes, both having a molar mass of 34.5kDa, revealed a difference in the N-terminal sequence and in amino acid composition. t1PME was identified as the major isoenzyme of PME in tomato fruit. In this study the aim was to develop a toolbox, consisting of monoclonal antibodies, that allows to gain insight into the in situ localization of PME in plant based food systems like tomatoes. A panel of six interesting monoclonal antibodies was raised against both isoenzymes, designated MA-TOM1-12E11, MA-TOM1-41B2, MA-TOM2-9H8, MA-TOM2-20G7, MA-TOM2-31H1 and MA-TOM2-38A11. The differences in epitopes between these monoclonal antibodies were determined using affinity tests towards denatured PME, cross-reactivity tests and inhibition tests. Characterization of these antibodies indicated an immunological difference between t1PME and t2PME, also revealing a conserved epitope on t2PME, carrot PME and strawberry PME. Different epitopes are recognized by the generated antibodies making them excellent probes for immunolocalization of PME by tissue printing. In tomato, t1PME and t2PME showed a pronounced co-localization, especially in the pericarp and the radial arms of the pericarp. Three of the generated antibodies could be used for immunolocalization of PME in carrots (Daucus carota L.), which was only present in the cortex and not in the vascular cylinder of carrots.

Generation and characterization of a unique panel of anti-adalimumab specific antibodies and their application in therapeutic drug monitoring assays.

A number of assays are currently available to support therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab. A complete characterization of the assays and comparison of different assays has not been performed. The aim of this study, therefore, is to generate and characterize of a panel of monoclonal antibodies towards adalimumab (MA-ADM); to use this panel to develop novel assays to determine adalimumab concentrations; to assess the impact of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and (non-)neutralizing antibodies on adalimumab detection and to compare the performance of assays. In total, ten specific MA-ADM were generated of which four revealed a neutralizing potency of >78%. At least six different clusters were identified using principal component analysis. MA-ADM40D8 was selected as detecting antibody to determine adalimumab in the TNF-coated ELISA (A) and the MA-ADM28B8/MA-ADM40D8 antibody pair was chosen for use in the MA-coated ELISA (B). The impact of TNF and (non-) neutralizing antibodies was similar in both ELISAs. Finally, serum samples of adalimumab-treated Crohns disease patients were collected and used for an external validation using the assay of Sanquin (C) and the apDia kit (D). All adalimumab assays showed excellent Pearson correlation: r=0.96 for A versus B, 0.96 for A versus C, 0.94 for A versus D, 0.97 for B versus C, 0.95 for B versus D and 0.94 for C and D. The excellent agreement with the two commercially available ELISAs allows harmonization of treatment algorithms in and between different hospitals/infusion centers.