Elsa Solà

Prevalence and risk factors of infections by multiresistant bacteria in cirrhosis: A prospective study†

Epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical effect of infections by multiresistant bacteria in cirrhosis are poorly known. This work was a prospective evaluation in two series of cirrhotic patients admitted with infection or developing infection during hospitalization. The first series was studied between 2005 and 2007 (507 bacterial infections in 223 patients) and the second between 2010 and 2011 (162 bacterial infections in 110 patients). In the first series, 32% of infections were community acquired (CA), 32% healthcare associated (HCA), and 36% nosocomial. Multiresistant bacteria (92 infections; 18%) were isolated in 4%, 14%, and 35% of these infections, respectively (P < 0.001). Extended‐spectrum β‐lactamase‐producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL‐E; n = 43) was the main multiresistant organism identified, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 17), methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 14), and Enterococcus faecium (n = 14). The efficacy of currently recommended empirical antibiotic therapy was very low in nosocomial infections (40%), compared to HCA and CA episodes (73% and 83%, respectively; P < 0.0001), particularly in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia (26%, 29%, and 44%, respectively). Septic shock (26% versus 10%; P < 0.0001) and mortality rate (25% versus 12%; P = 0.001) were significantly higher in infections caused by multiresistant strains. Nosocomial origin of infection (hazard ratio [HR], 4.43), long‐term norfloxacin prophylaxis (HR, 2.69), recent infection by multiresistant bacteria (HR, 2.45), and recent use of β‐lactams (HR, 2.39) were independently associated with the development of multiresistant infections. Results in the second series were similar to those observed in the first series. Conclusions: Multiresistant bacteria, especially ESBL‐producing Enterobacteriaceae, are frequently isolated in nosocomial and, to a lesser extent, HCA infections in cirrhosis, rendering third‐generation cephalosporins clinically ineffective. New antibiotic strategies tailored according to the local epidemiological patterns are needed for the empirical treatment of nosocomial infections in cirrhosis. (HEPATOLOGY 2012)

Prognostic importance of the cause of renal failure in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS The prognostic value of the different causes of renal failure in cirrhosis is not well established. This study investigated the predictive value of the cause of renal failure in cirrhosis. METHODS Five hundred sixty-two consecutive patients with cirrhosis and renal failure (as defined by serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL on 2 successive determinations within 48 hours) hospitalized over a 6-year period in a single institution were included in a prospective study. The cause of renal failure was classified into 4 groups: renal failure associated with bacterial infections, renal failure associated with volume depletion, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), and parenchymal nephropathy. The primary end point was survival at 3 months. RESULTS Four hundred sixty-three patients (82.4%) had renal failure that could be classified in 1 of 4 groups. The most frequent was renal failure associated with infections (213 cases; 46%), followed by hypovolemia-associated renal failure (149; 32%), HRS (60; 13%), and parenchymal nephropathy (41; 9%). The remaining patients had a combination of causes or miscellaneous conditions. Prognosis was markedly different according to cause of renal failure, 3-month probability of survival being 73% for parenchymal nephropathy, 46% for hypovolemia-associated renal failure, 31% for renal failure associated with infections, and 15% for HRS (P < .0005). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for potentially confounding variables, cause of renal failure was independently associated with prognosis, together with MELD score, serum sodium, and hepatic encephalopathy at time of diagnosis of renal failure. CONCLUSIONS A simple classification of patients with cirrhosis according to cause of renal failure is useful in assessment of prognosis and may help in decision making in liver transplantation.

Predictors of response to therapy with terlipressin and albumin in patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome

Terlipressin plus albumin is an effective treatment for type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), but approximately only half of the patients respond to this therapy. The aim of this study was to assess predictive factors of response to treatment with terlipressin and albumin in patients with type 1 HRS. Thirty‐nine patients with cirrhosis and type 1 HRS were treated prospectively with terlipressin and albumin. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables obtained before the initiation of treatment as well as changes in arterial pressure during treatment were analyzed for their predictive value. Response to therapy (reduction in serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dL at the end of treatment) was observed in 18 patients (46%) and was associated with an improvement in circulatory function. Independent predictive factors of response to therapy were baseline serum bilirubin and an increase in mean arterial pressure of ≥5 mm Hg at day 3 of treatment. The cutoff level of serum bilirubin that best predicted response to treatment was 10 mg/dL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77; P < 0.0001; sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 61%). Response rates in patients with serum bilirubin <10 mg/dL or ≥10 mg/dL were 67% and 13%, respectively (P = 0.001). Corresponding values in patients with an increase in mean arterial pressure ≥5 mm Hg or <5 mm Hg at day 3 were 73% and 36%, respectively (P = 0.037). Conclusion: Serum bilirubin and an early increase in arterial pressure predict response to treatment with terlipressin and albumin in type 1 HRS. Alternative treatment strategies to terlipressin and albumin should be investigated for patients with type 1 HRS and low likelihood of response to vasoconstrictor therapy. (HEPATOLOGY 2009.)

A modified acute kidney injury classification for diagnosis and risk stratification of impairment of kidney function in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS The Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria are widely used in nephrology, but information on cirrhosis is limited. We aimed at evaluating the AKIN criteria and their relationship with the cause of kidney impairment and survival. METHODS We performed a prospective study of 375 consecutive patients hospitalized for complications of cirrhosis. One-hundred and seventy-seven (47%) patients fulfilled the criteria of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) during hospitalization, the causes being hypovolemia, infections, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), nephrotoxicity, and miscellaneous (62, 54, 32, 8, and 21 cases, respectively). RESULTS At diagnosis, most patients had AKI stage 1 (77%). Both the occurrence of AKI and its stage were associated with 3-month survival. However, survival difference between stages 2 and 3 was not statistically significant. Moreover, if stage 1 patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the level of serum creatinine used in the classical definition of kidney impairment (1.5mg/dl), the two groups had a significantly different outcome. Combining AKIN criteria and maximum serum creatinine, 3 risk groups were identified: (A) patients with AKI stage 1 with peak creatinine ≤ 1.5mg/dl; (B) patients with stage 1 with peak creatinine >1.5mg/dl; and (C) patients with stages 2-3 (survival 84%, 68%, and 36%, respectively; p<0.001). Survival was independently related to the cause of kidney impairment, patients with HRS or infection-related having the worst prognosis. CONCLUSIONS A classification that combines the AKIN criteria and classical criteria of kidney failure in cirrhosis provides a better risk stratification than AKIN criteria alone. The cause of impairment in kidney function is key in assessing prognosis in cirrhosis.

Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as biomarker in the differential diagnosis of impairment of kidney function in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS Impairment of kidney function is common in cirrhosis but differential diagnosis remains a challenge. We aimed at assessing the usefulness of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), a biomarker of tubular damage, in the differential diagnosis of impairment of kidney function in cirrhosis. METHODS Two-hundred and forty-one patients with cirrhosis, 72 without ascites, 85 with ascites, and 84 with impaired kidney function, were studied. Urinary levels of NGAL were measured by ELISA. RESULTS Patients with impaired kidney function had higher urinary NGAL levels compared to patients with and without ascites. Patients with urinary tract infection (n=25) had higher uNGAL values than non-infected patients. Patients with acute tubular necrosis (ATN) had uNGAL levels markedly higher (417μg/g creatinine (239-2242) median and IQ range) compared to those of patients with pre-renal azotemia due to volume depletion 30 (20-59), chronic kidney disease (CKD) 82 (34-152), and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) 76 (43-263) μg/g creatinine (p<0.001 for all). Among HRS patients, the highest values were found in HRS-associated with infections, followed by classical (non-associated with active infections) type-1 and type-2 HRS (391 (72-523), 147 (83-263), and 43 (31-74) μg/g creatinine, respectively; p<0.001). Differences in uNGAL levels between classical type 1 HRS and ATN on the one hand and classical type 1 HRS and CKD and pre-renal azotemia on the other were statistically significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS uNGAL levels may be useful in the differential diagnosis of impairment of kidney function in cirrhosis. Urinary tract infections should be ruled out because they may increase uNGAL excretion.

Albumin for bacterial infections other than spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis. A randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND & AIMS Treatment with albumin in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) prevents renal failure and improves survival. Whether albumin has similar beneficial effects in patients with infections other than SBP is unknown. METHODS One hundred and ten patients with cirrhosis hospitalized for infections other than SBP were randomly assigned to receive antibiotics plus albumin (1.5 g/kgbw at diagnosis and 1 g/kgbw at day 3) (albumin group; n=56) or antibiotics alone (control group; n=54). The primary end point was survival at 3 months. Secondary end points were effects on renal and circulatory function. RESULTS The renal function, as evaluated by differences in changes in serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate between the two groups, improved in patients treated with albumin. The circulatory function improved significantly in patients treated with albumin, but not in those from the control group. There was a trend for a lower frequency of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome in the albumin group compared to the control group (1 vs. 4 patients, respectively; p=n.s.). Probability of survival at 3 months was not significantly different among the two groups. However, when adjusted for factors with independent prognostic value, treatment with albumin was an independent predictive factor of survival. CONCLUSIONS As compared with standard antibiotic therapy alone, treatment with albumin together with antibiotics has beneficial effects on the renal and circulatory function and shows a potential survival benefit. Further studies with large sample sizes should be performed to confirm these findings.

LEFT ventricular function assessed by echocardiography in cirrhosis: Relationship to systemic hemodynamics and renal dysfunction

BACKGROUND & AIMS The current study aimed at assessing the potential role of cardiac abnormalities in the pathogenesis of circulatory and renal dysfunction in cirrhosis. METHODS One hundred and fifty-two patients (34 without ascites, 95 with ascites without renal failure and 21 with hepatorenal syndrome) were evaluated using Doppler echocardiography. In 102 patients, diastolic function was assessed by measuring parameters related to ventricular filling velocity, mitral annulus velocity and left atrial dimensions. Cardiopulmonary pressures were also measured by cardiac catheterization in 54 patients. In 50 additional patients, left ventricular myocardial strain was performed to estimate myocardial contractility and systolic function. RESULTS Grade 1 and 2 diastolic dysfunction was present in 41% and 16% of the patients, respectively. There was no patient with severe grade 3 diastolic dysfunction. Grade 2 diastolic dysfunction was associated with higher cardiopulmonary pressures but values were within the normal limits in all cases. Diastolic dysfunction directly correlated with liver failure but not with the degree of impairment in circulatory and renal function. The proportion of patients without or with grade 1 or 2 diastolic dysfunction was similar in patients with compensated cirrhosis, with ascites without renal failure or with hepatorenal syndrome despite marked differences in the degree of circulatory dysfunction, as indicated by plasma renin activity and noradrenaline concentration. The heart rate and systolic function were normal in all cases. There were no differences between patients without ascites, with ascites without renal failure or with HRS, despite marked differences in the activity of the renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system. These features indicate an impaired response of cardiac chronotropic and inotropic function to changes in systemic hemodynamics. CONCLUSIONS These data indicates that: (1) diastolic dysfunction is frequent in cirrhosis but in most cases it is of mild degree and does not increase the cardiopulmonary pressure to abnormal levels. This feature, which may be due to the central hypovolemia of cirrhosis, probably accounts for the lack of symptoms associated with this condition. (2) Diastolic dysfunction in cirrhosis is unrelated to circulatory dysfunction, ascites and HRS. (3) In cirrhosis, there is a lack of response of the left ventricular systolic and chronotropic function to peripheral arterial vasodilation and activation of the sympathetic nervous system and this feature is an important contributory factor to the progression of circulatory dysfunction and the pathogenesis of ascites and HRS.

Factors related to quality of life in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: Relevance of serum sodium concentration and leg edema

BACKGROUND & AIMS Hyponatremia is common in patients with cirrhosis and ascites and is associated with significant neurological disturbances. However, its potential effect on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in cirrhosis has not been investigated. We aimed at assessing the relationship between serum sodium concentration and other clinical and analytical parameters on HRQL in cirrhosis with ascites. METHODS A total of 523 patients with cirrhosis and ascites were prospectively investigated. Assessment of HRQL was done with the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire, which is divided into 8 domains, summarized in two components: physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). Demographic, clinical, and analytical data at baseline were analyzed for their relationship with HRQL. RESULTS In multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors associated with an impaired PCS were non-alcoholic etiology of cirrhosis, severe ascites, history of previous episodes of hepatic encephalopathy and falls, presence of leg edema, and low serum sodium concentration. With respect to MCS, only two factors were associated with the independent predictive value: low serum sodium concentration and treatment with lactulose or lactitol. In both components, the scores decreased in parallel with the reduction in serum sodium concentration. Variables more commonly associated with the independent predictive value in the individual 8 domains of PCS and MCS were presence of leg edema and serum sodium concentration, 7 and 6 domains, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Serum sodium concentration and presence of leg edema are major factors of the impaired HRQL in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.

Renal and circulatory dysfunction in cirrhosis: Current management and future perspectives

Chronic liver diseases are amongst the top leading causes of death in Europe as well as in other areas of the world. Chronic liver diseases are characterized by unrelenting progression of liver inflammation and fibrosis over a prolonged period of time, usually more than 20 years, which may eventually lead to cirrhosis. Advanced cirrhosis leads to a complex syndrome of chronic liver failure which involves many different organs besides the liver, including the brain, heart and systemic circulation, adrenal glands, lungs, and kidneys. The high morbidity and mortality secondary to chronic liver failure is due to complications related to the dysfunction of these organs, either alone or, more frequently, in combination. Understanding the mechanisms leading to organ dysfunction is crucial to the development of strategies for treatment and prevention of complications of cirrhosis. This article reviews our current knowledge, as well as future perspectives, on the management of circulatory and renal dysfunction in chronic liver failure.

Terlipressin and albumin for type-1 hepatorenal syndrome associated with sepsis

BACKGROUND & AIMS Terlipressin and albumin is the standard of care for classical type-1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) not associated with active infections. However, there is no information on efficacy and safety of this treatment in patients with type-1 HRS associated with sepsis. Study aim was to investigate the effects of early treatment with terlipressin and albumin on circulatory and kidney function in patients with type-1 HRS and sepsis and assess factors predictive of response to therapy. METHODS Prospective study in 18 consecutive patients with type-1 HRS associated with sepsis. RESULTS Treatment was associated with marked improvement in arterial pressure and suppression of the high levels of plasma renin activity and norepinephrine. Response to therapy (serum creatinine <1.5mg/dl) was achieved in 12/18 patients (67%) and was associated with improved 3-month survival compared to patients without response. Non-responders had significantly lower baseline heart rate, poor liver function tests, slightly higher serum creatinine, and higher Child-Pugh and MELD scores compared to responders. Interestingly, non-responders had higher values of CLIF-SOFA score compared to responders (14±3 vs. 8±1, respectively p<0.001), indicating greater severity of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). A CLIF-SOFA score ⩾11 had 92% sensitivity and 100% specificity in predicting no response to therapy. No significant differences were observed between responders and non-responders in baseline urinary kidney biomarkers. Treatment was safe and no patient required withdrawal of terlipressin. CONCLUSIONS Early treatment with terlipressin and albumin in patients with type-1 HRS associated with sepsis is effective and safe. Patients with associated severe ACLF are unlikely to respond to treatment.