Elved Roberts

A comparison of the transradial and the transfemoral approach in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention

Background: Transradial coronary intervention is a safe and effective method of percutaneous revascularization. Furthermore, the indications for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are expanding. However, there is limited data on the efficacy and the safety of the transradial approach for chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI. Methods: We examined 468 patients who underwent CTO PCI between January 2003 and December 2005, and compared the radial (318 patients) and the femoral (150 patients) approach. Results: Baseline demographics, lesion location, and the vessel treated were similar in both groups. Angiographic success was 82% in radial versus 86% in femoral group, P = 0.28, similar in both groups. Total fluoroscopy time (24.49 ± 13.18 vs. 24.07 ± 14.12 min, P = 0.36), total procedure time (54.22 ± 25.35 vs. 60.23 ± 28.15 min, P = 0.23), and the use of total contrast volume (395.54 ± 180.25 vs. 406.15 ± 173.98 ml, P = 0.27) were similar in radial and femoral group, respectively. In hospital MACE [radial: 12 MI (3.8%) vs. femoral: 1 death (0.7%) and 5 MI (3.5%), P = 0.26] were similar in both groups. Access site vascular complications [radial: 11 (3.5%) vs. femoral: 17 (11.3%), P ≤ 0.001] were significantly less in radial group. Conclusions: The radial approach in CTO PCI is as fast and successful as the femoral approach with comparable in hospital MACE. However, there are far less access site complications with radial approach.

The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route.

BACKGROUND Transradial PCI is rapidly expanding and is effective in complex lesion subset due to miniaturization of devices and accumulated clinical experience. However, the femoral route still remains the usual vascular route used for SVG PCI in most catheterization laboratories. METHODS We examined 115 consecutive patients undergoing SVG PCI between January 2003 and December 2005 and compared the radial (51 patients) and femoral (64 patients) approaches. RESULTS Baseline demographics, lesion location, and clinical indication were similar in both groups. GpIIbIIIa inhibitor usage was high in the radial group (78.4% vs. 53.1%, P < 0.01). Angiographic success was similar in both groups, 96% in the radial group vs. 96.8 in the femoral. Total fluoroscopy time (18.59 +/- 12.23 vs. 20.45 +/- 12.9), total procedure time (52.1 +/- 29.5 vs. 43.90 +/- 23.31 min), and the use of total contrast volume (357.0 +/- 174.0 vs. 346.0 +/- 157.0 ml) were similar in the radial and femoral groups, respectively. In-hospital MACE (radial: 2 MI [4.0%] vs. femoral: 1 death [1.6%] and 7 MI [11.0%], P < 0.01) were similar in both groups. Access site vascular complications (radial: 2 [4.0%] vs. femoral: 10 [11.0%], P < 0.001) were significantly less in the radial group. CONCLUSIONS The transradial approach for SVG PCI is feasible, safe, and as quick as the femoral approach. Procedural success is high with similar radiation and contrast exposure. In-hospital MI in the femoral group is high because of more-unstable patients. However, there are significantly lower vascular complications despite high use of platelet inhibitors in the radial approach.

Lesion Complexity and Angiographic Outcomes in Radial Access Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly performed from the radial arterial (RA) access site. Few studies have examined the interaction between a default radial approach, lesion complexity, and angiographic outcome. This study investigates lesion complexity, arterial access route, and angiographic outcome in routine clinical practice by default radial operators. METHODS All cases of PCI over a 12-month period (Jan 2005 to Jan 2006) at our regional cardiac center were prospectively entered into a database detailing arterial access route, target vessel and lesion characteristics, and lesion-specific angiographic outcome. Angiographic success was defined as residual stenosis <50% for balloon angioplasty alone or <20% for a stented lesion in the presence of TIMI 3 flow in the target vessel. All procedures carried out by default radial operators were selected for further retrospective analysis. Reasons for not completing a case via the radial route were recorded. Radial and femoral cases by default radial operators were evaluated on grounds of lesion complexity and angiographic outcome for each treated lesion. RESULTS RA was the intended route in 91.5% of 1,324 procedures (91.5% of 2,239 lesions), and the final route in 90.1% of procedures (90.2% of lesions). There were 19 crossover procedures (30 lesions), all from radial to femoral access (FA). Crossovers were due to failed radial artery cannulation or sheath placement (9 procedures), inability to advance the guide catheter into the aortic root (7 procedures), and other guide catheter handling or support issues (3 procedures). Counting crossovers as failures, angiographic success rate was 96% among lesions for which RA was the primary intention. Complexity of cases was high (80.1% of RA lesions ACC/AHA type B2 or C). CONCLUSIONS A default radial approach is compatible with successful treatment of a wide range of coronary lesions, with a low incidence of crossover to femoral access. When the radial approach fails, it is usually due to access problems rather than issues of guide catheter handling and support.

Management of radial artery perforation during coronary angiography and angioplasty--a report of two cases.

Perforation and disruption of the artery used for access is a recognized complication of coronary angiography. There is an increasing trend toward use of the radial artery for angiography and angioplasty, particularly in the primary angioplasty setting, because of the reduced risk of hemorrhagic complications. On the rare occasions when radial artery perforation occurs, operators have had a tendency to switch to a second arterial access route. This article describes a technique for managing peri‐procedural perforation which does not require use of a second artery for access. We show two cases where this technique was used successfully, demonstrating an angiographically normal radial artery at the end of the procedure.

Use of a single Q guide catheter for complete assessment and treatment of both coronary arteries via radial access during acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: a review of 40 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND It is normally necessary to use more than 1 coronary catheter in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We explored the utility of a single guide catheter (Q) strategy for complete coronary assessment and treatment in PPCI. METHODS Fifty-seven consecutive STEMI cases undergoing invasive management were included. Radial access was the default route (6 cases via femoral access). Among radial cases, a TIG catheter was used first on 6 occasions (perceived low likelihood of subsequent PCI) and a Judkins right followed by an EBU catheter on three occasions (stock issue). A Q guide was used as initial default in the remaining 42 cases. Two anterior STEMI cases had recently undergone angiography and did not require right coronary reinspection. Procedural and outcomes data were recorded prospectively. RESULTS The Q catheter allowed complete assessment and treatment in 33 cases, 6 cases requiring a second catheter and one patient dying prior to right coronary imaging. Territories of infarction were: anterior (n = 18), inferior (n = 14), inferoposterior (n = 3), lateral (n = 1), inferolateral (n = 2), inferoposterolateral (n = 2). Sixty-three out of 65 lesions were treated successfully. Median catheterization laboratory door to balloon time was 18 minutes (IQR 15-21 minutes). There were no catheter-related complications. CONCLUSIONS A default Q guide catheter allows rapid effective imaging and treatment of both left and right coronaries in the majority of STEMI cases suitable for radial access PPCI. 

The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Two-Year Mortality Following Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications for Revascularization Practice

OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of diabetes on 2-year mortality in current PCI practice. BACKGROUND In patients with coronary artery disease undergoing revascularization, diabetes mellitus is associated with higher mortality. METHODS A retrospective analysis was done of all patients undergoing PCI at our tertiary center between January 2000 and December 2004. There were 6,160 PCI procedures performed in 5,759 patients who received at least one stent. Of these patients, 801 (13.9%) were diabetic and 4,958 (86.1%) were nondiabetic. The primary outcome measure of the study was all-cause mortality. All patients were followed up for a period of 2 years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to test for a potential independent association between diabetic status and follow-up mortality. RESULTS Before adjustment, a trend toward higher mortality was observed in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetics at 1 year (3.2% vs 2.4%) and 2 years (5.1% vs 3.8%), P = 0.12. Independent predictors for mortality were increasing age, renal dysfunction, peripheral vascular disease, NYHA class >2, urgent PCI, treating left main stem lesions, vessel diameter < or = 2.5 mm, and 3-vessel disease. The use of drug-eluting stent was associated with a reduction in mortality. Diabetes was found to have no independent impact on mortality following PCI (odds ratio = 1.08; 95% confidence intervals = 0.73-1.60; P = 0.71). CONCLUSION The presence of diabetes was not an independent predictor of mortality following PCI. A diabetic patient that does not require insulin treatment and has no evidence of macro- or microvascular diabetic disease could enjoy a PCI outcome similar to nondiabetic subjects.

Predicting angiographic outcome in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: a lesion-specific logistic model.

BACKGROUND Previous angiographic lesion classification systems were derived from analysis of outcomes and lesion complexity in the early stent era. Advances in equipment design and techniques have altered the association between lesion and target vessel characteristics and procedural outcome in modern percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated the precise relationship between lesion characteristics and technical outcome on a lesion by lesion basis in a large dataset. We developed a multivariate model to predict technical failure in PCI. METHODS Analysis of prospectively collected data on 10,800 lesions in 6,719 consecutive PCI cases between January 2000 and December 2004. Multivariate logistic regression was undertaken to identify predictors of angiographic outcome at each treated lesion (success/failure). Statistical model validation was carried out using data from a further 3,340 treated lesions in 1,940 consecutive cases. RESULTS Independent variables associated with an increased risk of technical failure included total occlusion, severe calcification, proximal vessel tortuosity >90 degrees, lesion in a degenerate vein graft, and lesion angulation > or =90 degrees. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the predicted probability of technical failure was 0.85. Failure occurred in 2.2% of treated lesions in the validation set (ROC curve 0.82, model predicted 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS We have re-evaluated the association between lesion characteristics and technical outcome in modern PCI. We have thereby developed a contemporary prediction model for angiographic outcome at each treated lesion.

GRACE risk recommendations in NICE CG94 are not appropriate

To the Editor The article by Gray et al is a succinct and useful summary of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical guidance 94 (CG94) on the management of unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.1 The NICE document is itself a major piece of work that synthesises vast bodies of evidence.2 The majority of the document and the resulting summary to which we respond are …

Adverse events following percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularisation: Analysis of non-MACE outcomes in the Stent or Surgery (SoS) Trial

OBJECTIVES To analyse adverse events requiring or prolonging hospitalisation in the Stent or Surgery (SoS) trial. BACKGROUND Many adverse events following coronary revascularisation are non-major adverse cardiovascular events (non-MACE). Trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) have reported rates of mortality and MACE only. MATERIAL AND METHODS Comparisons between PCI and CABG groups in the SOS trial were by intention to treat. For patients with non-fatal/non-MACE, number of events per 100 patient years follow-up and duration of hospital stay were assessed. Competing risk analysis was used to illustrate temporal pattern of adverse outcomes. RESULTS During 2 y median follow up, 1 one or more adverse event occurred in 47.3% (231) of the PCI group and 53% (265) of the CABG group (p=0.086). Non-fatal/non-MACE occurred in 11.9% of the PCI group and 38.6% of the CABG group (p<0.001). Non-fatal/non-MACE per 100 patient years follow-up was 17.49 (PCI) and 35.04 (CABG), rate ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.7 to 2.4, p<0.001. Cumulative non-fatal/non-MACE associated hospital stays were 1387 and 3287 days in PCI and CABG groups respectively. Median duration of hospitalisation per non-fatal/non-MACE was 5 days (interquartile range 2 to 11.75 days) in the PCI group and 6 days (interquartile range 2 to 12 days) in the CABG group, p=0.245. CONCLUSIONS CABG had lower cumulative incidence of fatal or MACE outcomes, higher cumulative incidence of non-fatal/non-MACE outcomes, and longer cumulative hospitalisation periods compared to the PCI group.

Unusual complication and mechanical murmur following mitral valve clip insertion in a patient with a CRT-D

A 71-year-old man underwent cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillators cardiac resynchronisation therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) insertion for severe heart failure. A week after device insertion, the patient was on a cruise when he suddenly became short of breath. He was in cardiogenic shock requiring intubation and was airlifted to a Spanish hospital. Severe mitral regurgitation secondary to chordae rupture was detected on echocardiography. He was considered high risk for surgery and therefore the decision was made to insert two percutaneous mitral valve clips. He spent several days in Spain and when stabilised was transferred back to …