Elzbieta Bylina

Validation of the Joensuu risk criteria for primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour - the impact of tumour rupture on patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND Approval of imatinib for adjuvant treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) raised discussion about accuracy of prognostic factors in GIST and the clinical significance of the available risk stratification criteria. METHODS We studied the influence of a new modification of the NIH Consensus Criteria (the Joensuu risk criteria), NCCN-AFIP criteria, and several clinicopathological factors, including tumour rupture, on relapse-free survival (RFS) in a prospectively collected tumour registry series consisting of 640 consecutive patients with primary, resectable, CD117-immunopositive GIST. The median follow-up time after tumour resection was 39 months. None of the patients received adjuvant imatinib. RESULTS The median RFS time after surgery was 50 months. In univariable analyses, high Joensuu risk group, tumour mitotic count >5/50 HPF, size >5 cm, non-gastric location, tumour rupture (7% of cases; P = 0.0014) and male gender had adverse influence on RFS. In a multivariable analysis mitotic count >5/50HPF, tumour size >5 cm and non-gastric location were independent adverse prognostic factors. Forty, 151, 86 and 348 patients were assigned according to the Joensuu criteria to very low, low, intermediate and high risk groups and had 5-year RFS of 94%, 94%, 86% and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSION The Joensuu criteria, which include 4 prognostic factors (tumour size, site, mitotic count and rupture) and 3 categories for the mitotic count, were found to be a reliable tool for assessing prognosis of operable GIST. The Joensuu criteria identified particularly well high risk patients, who are likely the proper candidates for adjuvant therapy.

Tumor Genotype Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of Gastric Origin: A European Multicenter Analysis Based on ConticaGIST

Purpose: Although the mutational status in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) can predict the response to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the role of tumor genotype as a prognostic factor remains controversial. The ConticaGIST study sought to determine the pathologic and molecular factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with operable, imatinib-naive GIST. Experimental Design: Clinicopathologic and molecular data from 1,056 patients with localized GIST who underwent surgery with curative intention (R0/R1) and were registered in the European ConticaGIST database were prospectively obtained and reviewed. Risk of tumor recurrence was stratified using the modified NIH criteria. The median follow-up was 52 months. Results: On testing for potential prognostic parameters, the following were associated with inferior DFS on multivariable Cox model analysis: primary nongastric site, size >10 cm, mitotic index >10 mitoses per 50 high power field, and the KIT exon 9 duplication [hazard ratio (HR), 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9–2.5; P = 0.037] and KIT exon 11 deletions involving codons 557 and/or 558 [KITdel-inc557/558; HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.0–2.2; P = 0.004]. Conversely, PDGFRA exon 18 mutations were indicators of better prognosis [HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.1–0.6; P = 0.002]. KITdel-inc557/558 were an adverse indicator only in GIST localized in the stomach (P < 0.001) but not in tumors with nongastric origin. In gastric GIST, all other mutations presented remarkably superior 5-year DFS. Conclusions: In conclusion, tumor genotype is an independent molecular prognostic variable associated with gastric GIST and should be used for optimizing tailored adjuvant imatinib treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 20(23); 6105–16. ©2014 AACR.

The outcome and predictive factors of sunitinib therapy in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after imatinib failure - one institution study

BackgroundGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) mutational status is recognized factor related to the results of tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy such as imatinib (IM) or sunitinib (SU). Arterial hypertension (AH) is common adverse event related to SU, reported as predictive factor in renal cell carcinoma. The aim of the study was to analyze the outcomes and factors predicting results of SU therapy in inoperable/metastatic CD117(+) GIST patients after IM failure.MethodsWe identified 137 consecutive patients with advanced inoperable/metastatic GIST treated in one center with SU (2nd line treatment). Median follow-up time was 23 months. Additionally, in 39 patients there were analyzed selected constitutive single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of VEGFA and VEGFR2 genes.ResultsOne year progression-free survival (PFS; calculated from the start of SU) rate was 42% and median PFS was 43 weeks. The estimated overall survival (OS, calculated both from start of SU or IM) was 74 weeks and 51 months, respectively. One-year PFS was 65% (median 74 weeks) in 55 patients with AH vs. 22% (median 17 weeks) in patients without AH. Patients with primary tumors carrying mutations in KIT exon 9 or wild-type had substantially better 1-year PFS (68% and 57%; median 65.5 and 50.5 weeks, respectively) than patients having tumors with KIT exon 11 or PDGFRA mutations (34% and 15%; median 36.8 and 9 weeks, respectively). We identified two independent factors with significant impact on PFS and OS in univariate and multivariate analysis: primary tumor genotype and presence of AH. The most common adverse events during therapy were: fatigue, AH, hypothyroidism, hand and foot syndrome, mucositis, skin reactions, dyspepsia, and diarrhea. Two deaths were assessed as related to tumor rupture caused by reaction to SU therapy. The presence of C-allele in rs833061 and the T-allele in rs3025039 polymorphism of VEGFA were associated with significantly higher risk of hypothyroidism (OR: 10.0 p = 0.041 and OR: 10.5; p = 0.015, respectively).ConclusionsWe confirmed that many advanced GIST patients benefit from SU therapy with OS > 1.5 year. Primary tumor KIT/PDGFRA genotype and SU-induced AH, as surrogate of its antiangiogenic activity are two independent factors influencing both PFS and OS.NoteThe preliminary data of this study were presented during Annual Meeting of American Society of Clinical Oncology, 4-8 June 2011 and Connective Tissue Oncology Society Meeting, 26-28 October 2011 in Chicago, IL.

The Megavoltage Radiation Therapy in Treatment of Patients With Advanced or Difficult Giant Cell Tumors of Bone

PURPOSE To assess the outcomes of radiotherapy, in terms of local control and treatment complications, of advanced or difficult giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) that could not be treated by surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS Among 122 consecutive patients with confirmed GCTB from 1985 to 2007, 77 patients were treated by megavoltage radiotherapy because they were inappropriate candidates for surgery. We have performed analysis of all data in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment morbidity. Median follow-up time was 58 months. RESULTS In the irradiated group, maximal tumor size ranged from 5 to 18 cm (median, 8.5). Anatomic distribution was as follows: femur, 27 cases; tibia, 19; radial/ulnar bone, 12; sacrum, 9; pelvic bones, 5; other, 5. Twenty-one patients (27%) were referred for local recurrence after ≥1 other treatment procedures. The radiation doses ranged from 26 to 89 Gy (median, 56; administered 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction with average total duration of treatment of 5-7 weeks); 8 patients (10%) received <50 Gy. All patients tolerated treatment well without acute or late complications. All patients except two are alive. Local control was achieved in 65 patients (84%; bone recalcification/restitution of joint functions), 12 patients showed signs of local progression, all within irradiated fields (9 were treated successfully with salvage surgery). Five- and 10-year local PFS were 83% and 73%, respectively. Three patients developed lungs metastases. Malignant transformation of GCTB occurred in two patients. CONCLUSIONS GCTB can be safely and effectively treated with megavoltage radiotherapy with local control rate >80% at 5 years. Our study confirms that radiotherapy of GCTB offers an alternative to difficult or complex surgery and may be an option of choice in the treatment of inoperable patients.

Melanoma without a Detectable Primary Site with Metastases to Lymph Nodes

OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes of patients with clinical nodal melanoma metastases that occurred without a detectable primary tumor (melanoma of unknown primary site; MUP) with those with a known primary site (KPM). METHODS We included data from 459 consecutive patients treated from 1994 to 2007 with radical therapeutic lymph node dissection (LND; stage IIIB, C) due to clinically palpable and pathologically confirmed lymph node metastases (229 axillary; 230 ilioinguinal). The median follow‐up was 49 months. RESULTS LND was performed in 59 cases (12.9%; 29 men, 30 women) due to MUP nodal metastases, including 33 axillary (14.4%) and 26 ilioinguinal (11.3%). In the MUP group, the 3‐ and 5‐year survival rates were 48% and 41%, respectively. Similar rates were observed in patients with KPM, even with matched‐pair analyses. Established prognostic factors (number of metastatic nodes, p=.005; extracapsular extension of metastases, p=.002) influenced survival in the MUP group. Relapses occurred in 31 (53%) and 299 (74.7%) cases in the MUP and KPM groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Survival rates in the MUP and KPM groups were similar, and the same prognostic factors affected both. Thus, all MUP cases should be treated as standard stage III melanomas. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.

The analysis of the outcomes and factors related to iliac–obturator involvement in cutaneous melanoma patients after lymph node dissection due to positive sentinel lymph node biopsy or clinically detected inguinal metastases

BACKGROUND We assessed clinical-pathological features and outcomes of cutaneous melanoma patients after ilio-inguinal lymph node dissection (LND) in relation to the presence of metastases in iliac-obturator nodes. METHODS We analyzed 390 consecutive patients who underwent ilio-inguinal therapeutic LND [TLND] (237) due to clinical/cytologically detected metastases or after completion LND [CLND] (153) due to positive SLN biopsy (in one cancer centre 1994-2009). Median follow-up time was 60 months. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 49% and median OS - 52 months in the entire group of patients. According to univariate analysis following factors had significant negative influence on OS: presence of metastases to iliac-obturator nodes (5-year OS for positive versus negative: 54.5% and 32%, respectively), macrometastases, higher Breslow thickness, ulceration, higher Clark level, male gender, number of metastatic lymph nodes, extracapsular extension, and, additionally in the CLND group - micrometastases size ≥ 0.1 mm according to the Rotterdam criteria and non-subcapsular location of micrometastases. Iliac-obturator involvement was also negative factor for OS in multivariate analysis. The presence of iliac-obturator nodal metastases correlated with the following factors: type of LND-CLND versus TLND (15% versus 27.5%) of iliac-obturator involvement, respectively), higher Breslow thickness, extracapsular extension of nodal metastases, male gender. We have not identified any metastases in iliac-obturator nodes in group of patients with micrometastases size ≤1.0 mm and primary tumour Breslow thickness <4.0 mm or no ulcerated primary tumours. CONCLUSIONS Metastases to iliac-obturator nodes have additional negative prognostic value for melanoma patients with inguinal basin involvement. We are able to identify the subgroup of patients after positive SLN biopsy without metastases to iliac-obturator nodes, probably requiring only inguinal LND.

Cutaneous melanoma with nodal metastases in elderly people

Background  The impact of age on melanoma patient outcomes is uncertain.

The Outcome of Targeted Therapy in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (Gist) with Non-Exon 11 Kit Mutations

UNLABELLED GIST is the most common mesenchymal tumour of gastrointestinal tract arising from mutation of KIT or PDGFRA gene. Surgery is the primary method of treatment, however a targeted therapy with imatinib is necessary due to recurrence. The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy of the targeted chemotherapy in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours with non-exon 11 KIT mutations. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 279 patients with advanced GIST treated with imatinib between 2001 and 2011 were analysed in the study. Exon 11 KIT mutation was found in 192 patients (68.7%), non-exon 11 KIT mutation was found in 87 patients (31.3%): this group included lack of mutation - wild-type, exon 9 KIT mutations, exon 18 PDGFRA D842V mutations, non-D842V PDGFRA mutations as well as non-exon 9 and 11 KIT mutations. Analysis of progression-free survival and overall survival were done for the entire group of patients and for patients with particular mutations, and then effects on progression-free survival and overall survival of such factors as sex, age, imatinib dose were evaluated. RESULTS Occurrence of non-exon 11 KIT mutation increases the risk of disease progression by 20% in comparison to the presence of exon 11 KIT mutation, however it does not increase the risk of patients death. Percentage of 5-year progression-free survivals is the greatest in the case of PDGFRA mutation other than D842V mutation. Percentage of 5-year survivals in case of the presence of D842V PDGFRA mutation is more than twice worse than in the case of the other mutations. Lesion location in the gastrointestinal tract affected the risk of death, with the greatest percentage of 5-year survival for lesions located in the stomach. Such factors as sex, age at diagnosis (<50, ≥50 years) and imatinib dose did not affect the risk of disease progression and the risk of patients death. CONCLUSIONS The ratio of overall survival of patients with advanced GIST with a mutation other than exon 11 KIT mutation treated with imatinib is similar to the ratio of overall survival of patients with GIST with exon 11 KIT mutation. An exception is the group of patients with GIST in whom the presence of D842V PDGFRA mutation was found. In general, longer survival has been found in patients with GIST located in the stomach in comparison to the small intestine or other less frequent locations. Percentage of 5-year progression-free survivals is the greatest in the case of PDGFRA mutation other than D842V mutation.

Blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with prognosis in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib

Introduction: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was shown to be prognostic in several solid malignancies. There are limited data about predictive/prognostic value of NLR during targeted therapy of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). The aim of this study was to asses a clinical value of this ratio in patients with advanced GIST. Methods: Between 2001 and 2016, 385 patients with metastatic/unresectable GIST treated initially with imatinib were included in the analysis. In all patients, the NLR was assessed at the baseline, after 3 months of treatment, and upon disease progression (or last observation). The cutoff values for NLR were set at 2.7 and 5.4. Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimation with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used for analysis. Results: Median progression-free survival (PFS) on imatinib treatment was 44.8 months, 5-year rate 43%; median overall survival (OS) 87.2 months, 10-year rate 36.3%. NLR >2.7 at baseline was significantly associated with poorer OS and PFS: median OS was 89.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 80.2-115) for NLR ratio ≤2.7 vs 59.4 months (95% CI 48.6-82) for NLR >2.7 (p < .001); median PFS was 59.4 vs 32.7 (p < .001), respectively. In multivariate model adjusted for mitotic index and driver mutation in the tumor (KIT exon 11 mutation versus other), NLR ratio was proven to be statistically significant (hazard ratio 1.09; 95% CI 1.01-1.19; p = .030). Among patients with disease progression, NLR >2.7 assessed at the third month of treatment was linked with significantly shorter median time to progression (7.5 vs 19 months). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the usefulness of NLR as a prognostic and predictive marker as well as a marker for treatment monitoring in patients with advanced GIST treated with imatinib.

Treatment outcomes in older patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to analyze the treatment results of advanced GIST in the largest, homogenous series of older patients. METHODS Between 2001 and 2016, 686 patients with metastatic/unresectable GIST were treated initially with imatinib and 656 were included in the analysis. Subsequently 232 patients were treated with sunitinib after imatinib failure. We have analyzed the outcomes of patients who have been treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor at the age ≥ 70 years and compared to control group of patients younger than 70 years old. RESULTS In the group of patients treated with imatinib, 139 (21%) started therapy at the age of at least 70 years (median age of the entire cohort: 60). Median progression-free survival (PFS) on 1st line imatinib did not differ between patients ≥70 yo (years old) and < 70yo (38.5 vs 44.9 months), but median overall survival (OS) was significantly better for younger patients (81 months vs. 50; p = 0.0001; although disease-specific survival - DSS was similar). Distribution of primary tumor mutational status was generally similar in older and younger patients. Permanent dose reduction (300-100 mg/day) was required for 23 patients (16.9%) in the older group and was significantly more frequent as compared to younger patients (5%). Drug-related adverse events were mainly of grades 1/2, but grade 3/4 toxicity occurred more frequently in older (14.7%) than in younger patients (3.8%). Similarly in group of patients treated with second-line sunitinib median PFS and DSS were comparable in groups of patients ≥70 yo (n = 55) and < 70yo (9.7 months vs 10.3 months; p = 0.7, and 21.5 vs 22.9 months). >40% of patients in both groups required dose adjustments to 37.5-25 mg daily. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms that current therapy of advanced GIST with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (both in 1st and 2nd line) in older patients enable to achieve the similar disease control rate and final outcomes as in younger patients, but it demands close cooperation of experienced oncologist with patients for dose modifications and side effects management. Limitation of our study is that the patients did not undergo a comprehensive geriatric assessment, what might be helpful for personalized management of patients. Nevertheless, we confirm that older patients with GIST should not receive less treatment irrespective of comorbidities.