Emili Diaz

Community-acquired respiratory coinfection in critically ill patients with pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus.

BACKGROUNDnLittle is known about the impact of community-acquired respiratory coinfection in patients with pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus infection.nnnMETHODSnThis was a prospective, observational, multicenter study conducted in 148 Spanish ICUs.nnnRESULTSnSevere respiratory syndrome was present in 645 ICU patients. Coinfection occurred in 113 (17.5%) of patients. Streptococcus pneumoniae (in 62 patients [54.8%]) was identified as the most prevalent bacteria. Patients with coinfection at ICU admission were older (47.5±15.7 vs 43.8±14.2 years, P<.05) and presented a higher APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II score (16.1±7.3 vs 13.3±7.1, P<.05) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (7.0±3.8 vs 5.2±3.5, P<.05). No differences in comorbidities were observed. Patients who had coinfection required vasopressors (63.7% vs 39.3%, P<.05) and invasive mechanical ventilation (69% vs 58.5%, P<.05) more frequently. ICU length of stay was 3 days longer in patients who had coinfection than in patients who did not (11 [interquartile range, 5-23] vs 8 [interquartile range 4-17], P=.01). Coinfection was associated with increased ICU mortality (26.2% vs 15.5%; OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.21-3.09), but Cox regression analysis adjusted by potential confounders did not confirm a significant association between coinfection and ICU mortality.nnnCONCLUSIONSnDuring the 2009 pandemics, the role played by bacterial coinfection in bringing patients to the ICU was not clear, S pneumoniae being the most common pathogen. This work provides clear evidence that bacterial coinfection is a contributor to increased consumption of health resources by critical patients infected with the virus and is the virus that causes critical illness in the vast majority of cases.

Why Mortality Is Increased in Health-Care-Associated Pneumonia: Lessons From Pneumococcal Bacteremic Pneumonia

BACKGROUNDnA cohort of patients with bacteremic Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia was reviewed to assess why mortality is higher in health-care-associated pneumonia (HCAP) than in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).nnnMETHODSnA prospective cohort of all adult patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia attended at the ED was used.nnnRESULTSnOne hundred eighty-four cases were classified as CAP and 44 (19%) as HCAP. Fifty-two (23%) were admitted to the ICU. Three (1.5%) isolates were resistant to beta-lactams, and only two patients received inappropriate therapy. The CAP cohort was significantly younger (median age 68 years, interquartile range [IQR] 42-78 vs 77 years, IQR 67-82, P < .001). The HCAP cohort presented a higher Charlson index (2.81 +/- 1.9 vs 1.23 +/- 1.42, P < .001) and had higher severity of illness at admission (altered mental status, respiratory rate > 30/min, Pao(2)/Fio(2) < 250, and multilobar involvement). HCAP patients had a lower rate of ICU admission (11.3% vs 25.5%, P < .05), and a trend toward lower mechanical ventilation (9% vs 19%, P = .17) and vasopressor use (9% vs 18.4%, P = .17) were documented. More patients in the HCAP cohort presented with a pneumonia severity index score > 90 (class IV-V, 95% vs 65%, P < .001), and 30-day mortality was significantly higher (29.5% vs 7.6%, P < .001). A multivariable regression logistic analysis adjusting for underlying conditions and variables related to severity of illness confirmed that HCAP is an independent variable associated with increased mortality (odds ratio = 5.56; 95% CI, 1.86-16.5).nnnCONCLUSIONSnPneumococcal HCAP presents excess mortality, which is independent of bacterial susceptibility. Differences in outcomes were probably due to differences in age, comorbidities, and criteria for ICU admission rather than to therapeutic decisions.

Associations between empirical antimicrobial therapy at the hospital and mortality in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia

AbstractAbstractn Introduction. The aim of the study was to examine different antibiotic choices and their relation to outcomes.n Methods. We reviewed patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) from two multicenter studies. Empirical antimicrobial regimens were classified as: macrolides alone (group M); macrolides plus betalactams (group MB); macrolides plus betalactam/betalactamase inhibitor (group MBI); every regimen including aminoglycosides (group A); non-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporins alone (group C); another betalactam alone (first- and second-generation cephalosporins, or betalactam/betalactamase inhibitor) (group B); fluoroquinolones (group F); and other regimens (group Misc).n Results. Initial distribution of regimens was: group MB: 261 patients; group A: 65 patients; group C: 31 patients; group B: 23 patients; group M: 18 patients; group MBI: 13 patients; group F: 11 patients; group Misc: 38 patients. The lowest overall mortality was associated with initial treatment with a macrolide plus other agent (or alone). No deaths were documented among the 13 patients receiving amoxicillin/clavulanate plus a macrolide. The excess mortality for initial treatment with group A was significantly higher (14.2%; CI 95% 27.3–1.1) than the overall mortality rate between patients receiving a macrolide plus other agents. No significant differences were documented when mortality was adjusted for intubated patients.n Conclusion. Clinicians select the empirical antibiotic regimen after classifying patients according to likely pathogens and prognosis. The inclusion of a macrolide as part of the initial therapeutic regimen for SCAP appears to be as safe and effective as alternative options. Addition of a macrolide agent to a betalactam/betalactamase inhibitor or using a macrolide alone was a marker for less severe disease.

Bacteremia is an independent risk factor for mortality in nosocomial pneumonia: a prospective and observational multicenter study

IntroductionSince positive blood cultures are uncommon in patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP), the responsible pathogens are usually isolated from respiratory samples. Studies on bacteremia associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) have reported fatality rates of up to 50%. The purpose of the study is to compare risk factors, pathogens and outcomes between bacteremic nosocomial pneumonia (B-NP) and nonbacteremic nosocomial pneumonia (NB-NP) episodes.MethodsThis is a prospective, observational and multicenter study (27 intensive care units in nine European countries). Consecutive patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for an admission diagnosis of pneumonia or on mechanical ventilation for > 48 hours irrespective of admission diagnosis were recruited.ResultsA total of 2,436 patients were evaluated; 689 intubated patients presented with NP, 224 of them developed HAP and 465 developed ventilation-acquired pneumonia. Blood samples were extracted in 479 (69.5%) patients, 70 (14.6%) being positive. B-NP patients had higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II score (51.5 ± 19.8 vs. 46.6 ± 17.5, P = 0.03) and were more frequently medical patients (77.1% vs. 60.4%, P = 0.01). Mortality in the intensive care unit was higher in B-NP patients compared with NB-NP patients (57.1% vs. 33%, P < 0.001). B-NP patients had a more prolonged mean intensive care unit length of stay after pneumonia onset than NB-NP patients (28.5 ± 30.6 vs. 20.5 ± 17.1 days, P = 0.03). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that medical patients (odds ratio (OR) = 5.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.93 to 16.99, P = 0.002), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) etiology (OR = 3.42, 95% CI = 1.57 to 5.81, P = 0.01), Acinetobacter baumannii etiology (OR = 4.78, 95% CI = 2.46 to 9.29, P < 0.001) and days of mechanical ventilation (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.03, P < 0.001) were independently associated with B-NP episodes. Bacteremia (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.22 to 3.55, P = 0.008), diagnostic category (medical patients (OR = 3.71, 95% CI = 2.01 to 6.95, P = 0.02) and surgical patients (OR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.10 to 4.97, P = 0.03)) and higher SAPS II score (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.03, P = 0.008) were independent risk factors for mortality.ConclusionsB-NP episodes are more frequent in patients with medical admission, MRSA and A. baumannii etiology and prolonged mechanical ventilation, and are independently associated with higher mortality rates.

Resistance patterns and outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired pneumonia. Validation of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification of multidrug resistant organisms

INTRODUCTIONnBacterial resistance has become a major public health problem.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo validate the definition of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) based on the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification.nnnMATERIALnProspective, observational study in six medical and surgical Intensive-Care-Units (ICU) of a University hospital.nnnRESULTSnThree-hundred-and-forty-three patients with ICU-acquired pneumonia (ICUAP) were prospectively enrolled, 140 patients had no microbiological confirmation (41%), 82 patients (24%) developed ICUAP for non-MDRO, whereas 121 (35%) were MDROs. Non-MDRO, MDRO and no microbiological confirmation patients did not present either a significant different previous antibiotic use (p 0.18) or previous hospital admission (p 0.17). Appropriate antibiotic therapy was associated with better ICU survival (105 [92.9%] vs. 74 [82.2%]; pxa0=xa00.03). An adjusted multivariate regression logistic analysis identified that only MDRO had a higher ICU-mortality than non-MDRO and no microbiological confirmation patients (OR 2.89; pxa0<xa00.05; 95% CI for Exp [β]. 1.02-8.21); Patients with MDRO ICUAP remained in ICU for a longer period than MDRO and no microbiological confirmation respectively (pxa0<xa00.01) however no microbiological confirmation patients had more often antibiotic consumption than culture positive ones.nnnCONCLUSIONSnPatients who developed ICUAP due to MDRO showed a higher ICU-mortality than non-MDRO ones and use of ICU resources. No microbiological confirmation patients had more often antibiotic consumption than culture positive patients. Risk factors for MDRO may be important for the selection of initial antimicrobial therapy, in addition to local epidemiology.

Neumonía asociada a la ventilación mecánica

The second most important infectious complication in hospitalized patients is pneumonia, this occupying the first place in the Intensive Care Units (ICU). Approximately 80% of the episodes of nosocomial pneumonia occur in patients with an artificial airway, which is called ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP). VAP is the most frequent cause of mortality among nosocomial infections in the ICU, mainly if they are caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). It also increases days of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the ICU and hospital. In spite of the available diagnostic procedures, the diagnosis of VAP continues to be a clinical one. The presence of X-ray infiltrates and purulent endotracheal secretions are the essential conditions for the diagnosis. We should also evaluate the patients condition and the risk factors for difficult-to-treat pathogens. If the VAP is early and there are no risk factors, most of the empiric antibiotic strategies will provide correct coverage of the flora found. However, if the diagnosis of VAP is made in a patient who has been receiving mechanical ventilation for more than one week, under antibiotic use, with risk factors for multi-resistant pathogens, we should individualize the empiric antibiotic treatment.

Management of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit: does trauma make a difference?

ObjectiveAntibiotic exposure and timing of pneumonia onset influence ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) isolates. The first goal of this investigation was to evaluate whether trauma also influences prevalence of microorganisms.DesignAxa0retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study.SettingMultidisciplinary teaching ICU.PatientsAdult patients requiring mechanical ventilation identified as having VAP.InterventionsRetrospective evaluation of axa0prospective manual database.Measurements and main resultsVAP isolates in axa0multidisciplinary ICU documented by quantitative respiratory cultures and recorded in axa042-month database were compared, based on the presence or absence of trauma. Causative microorganisms were classified in four groups, based on mechanical ventilation duration (>u202f5 days), and previous antibiotic exposure. One hundred eighty-three patients developed 196 episodes of VAP (98 trauma). Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was more frequent (34.5% vs. 11.5%, pu202f<u202f0.01) in trauma, whereas methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was more frequent (2% vs. 11.5%, pu202f<u202f0.01) in non-trauma. No significant differences were found between trauma and non-trauma patients regarding prevalence of other microorganisms. In trauma patients, MSSA episodes were equally distributed between early- and late-onset VAP (51% vs. 49%), but no MRSA episode occurred in the early-onset group.ConclusionsTrauma influences the microbiology of pneumonia and it should be considered in the initial antibiotic regimen choice. Our data demonstrate that patients with trauma had axa0higher prevalence of MSSA, but the overall prevalence was sufficiently high to warrant S. aureus coverage for both groups. On the other hand, since no MRSA was isolated during the first 10 days of mechanical ventilation on trauma patients, MRSA coverage in these patients becomes necessary only 10 days after admission.

Epidemiology, antibiotic therapy and clinical outcomes of healthcare-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients: a Spanish cohort study

PurposeInformation about healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) in critically ill patients is scarce.MethodsThis prospective study compared clinical presentation, outcomes, microbial etiology, and treatment of HCAP, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), and immunocompromised patients (ICP) with severe pneumonia admitted to 34 Spanish ICUs.ResultsA total of 726 patients with pneumonia (449 CAP, 133 HCAP, and 144 ICP) were recruited during 1xa0year from April 2011. HCAP patients had more comorbidities and worse clinical status (Barthel score). HCAP and ICP patients needed mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy more frequently than CAP patients. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most frequent pathogen in all three groups (CAP, 34.2xa0%; HCAP, 19.5xa0%; ICP, 23.4xa0%; pxa0=xa00.001). The overall incidence of Gram-negative pathogens, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was low, but higher in HCAP and ICP patients than CAP. Empirical treatment was in line with CAP guidelines in 73.5xa0% of patients with CAP, in 45.5xa0% of those with HCAP, and in 40xa0% of those with ICP. The incidence of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy was 6.5xa0% in CAP, 14.4xa0% in HCAP, and 21.8xa0% in ICP (pxa0<xa00.001). Mortality was highest in ICP (38.6xa0%) and did not differ between CAP (18.4xa0%) and HCAP (21.2xa0%).ConclusionsHCAP accounts for one-fifth of cases of severe pneumonia in patients admitted to Spanish ICUs. The empirical antibiotic therapy recommended for CAP would be appropriate for 90xa0% of patients with HCAP in our population, and consequently the decision to include coverage of multidrug-resistant pathogens for HCAP should be cautiously judged in order to prevent the overuse of antimicrobials.

Severe pandemic (H1N1)v influenza A infection: Report on the first deaths in Spain

Background and objective:u2003 The impact of pandemic influenza A (H1N1)v infection is still unknown but it is associated with a high case‐fatality rate.

Acute kidney injury in critical ill patients affected by influenza A (H1N1) virus infection.

IntroductionLittle information exists about the impact of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients with the pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infection.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, observational, multicenter study in 148 Spanish intensive care units (ICUs). Patients with chronic renal failure were excluded. AKI was defined according to Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria.ResultsA total of 661 patients were analyzed. One hundred eighteen (17.7%) patients developed AKI; of these, 37 (31.4%) of the patients with AKI were classified as AKI I, 15 (12.7%) were classified as AKI II and 66 (55.9%) were classified as AKI III, among the latter of whom 50 (75.7%) required continuous renal replacement therapy. Patients with AKI had a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (19.2 ± 8.3 versus 12.6 ± 5.9; P < 0.001), a higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (8.7 ± 4.2 versus 4.8 ± 2.9; P < 0.001), more need for mechanical ventilation (MV) (87.3% versus 56.2%; P < 0.01, odds ratio (OR) 5.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0 to 9.4), a greater incidence of shock (75.4% versus 38.3%; P < 0.01, OR 4.9, 95% CI, 3.1 to 7.7), a greater incidence of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (92.4% versus 54.7%; P < 0.01, OR 10.0, 95% CI, 4.9 to 20.21) and a greater incidence of coinfection (23.7% versus 14.4%; P < 0.01, OR 1.8, 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.0). In survivors, patients with AKI remained on MV longer and ICU and hospital length of stay were longer than in patients without AKI. The overall mortality was 18.8% and was significantly higher for AKI patients (44.1% versus 13.3%; P < 0.01, OR 5.1, 95% CI, 3.3 to 7.9). Logistic regression analysis was performed with AKIN criteria, and it demonstrated that among patients with AKI, only AKI III was independently associated with higher ICU mortality (P < 0.001, OR 4.81, 95% CI 2.17 to 10.62).ConclusionsIn our cohort of patients with H1N1 virus infection, only those cases in the AKI III category were independently associated with mortality.