Emiliano Buitrago

Local and Systemic Toxicity of Intravitreal Melphalan for Vitreous Seeding in Retinoblastoma: A Preclinical and Clinical Study

PURPOSE Intravitreal melphalan is emerging as an effective treatment for refractory vitreous seeds in retinoblastoma, but there is limited understanding regarding its toxicity. This study evaluates the retinal and systemic toxicity of intravitreal melphalan in retinoblastoma patients, with preclinical validation in a rabbit model. DESIGN Clinical and preclinical, prospective, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS In the clinical study, 16 patient eyes received 107 intravitreal injections of 30 μg melphalan given weekly, a median of 6.5 times (range, 5-8). In the animal study, 12 New Zealand/Dutch Belt pigmented rabbits were given 3 weekly injections of 15 μg of intravitreal melphalan or vehicle to the right eye. METHODS Electroretinogram (ERG) responses were recorded in both humans and rabbits. For the clinical study, ERG responses were recorded at baseline, immediately before each injection, and at each follow-up visit; 82 of these studies were deemed evaluable. Median follow-up time was 5.2 months (range, 1-11). Complete blood counts (CBCs) were obtained on the day of injection at 46 patient visits. In the animal study, ERG responses were obtained along with fluorescein angiography, CBCs, and melphalan plasma concentration. After humane killing, the histopathology of the eyes was evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES For the clinical study, we measured peak-to-peak ERG amplitudes in response to 30-Hz photopic flicker stimulation with comparisons between ERG studies before and after intravitreal melphalan. For the animal study, we collected ERG parameters before and after intravitreal melphalan injections with histopathologic findings. RESULTS By linear regression analysis, over the course of weekly intravitreal injections in retinoblastoma patients, for every additional injection, the ERG amplitude decreased by approximately 5.8 μV. The ERG remained stable once the treatment course was completed. In retinoblastoma patients, there were no grade 3 or 4 hematologic events. One week after the second injection in rabbits, the a- and b-wave amplitude declined significantly in the melphalan treated eyes compared with vehicle-treated eyes (P<0.05). Histopathology revealed severely atrophic retina. CONCLUSIONS Weekly injections of 30 μg of melphalan can result in a decreased ERG response, which is indicative of retinal toxicity. These findings are confirmed at an equivalent dose in rabbit eyes by ERG measurements and by histopathologic evidence of severe retinal damage. Systemic toxicity with intravitreal melphalan at these doses in humans or rabbits was not detected.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of melphalan after superselective ophthalmic artery infusion in preclinical models and retinoblastoma patients.

PURPOSE To characterize melphalan pharmacokinetics after superselective ophthalmic artery infusion (SSOAI) in animals and children with retinoblastoma. METHODS Vitreous and plasma samples of five Landrace pigs were obtained over a 4-hour period after SSOAI of melphalan (7 mg). Melphalan cytotoxicity was evaluated in retinoblastoma cell lines with and without topotecan. Plasma samples were obtained from 17 retinoblastoma patients after SSOAI of 3 to 6 mg of melphalan to one (n=14) or two eyes (n=3). Correlation between plasma pharmacokinetics and age, dosage, and systemic toxicity was studied in patients. RESULTS In animals, melphalan peak vitreous levels were greater than its IC50 and resulted in 3-fold vitreous-to-plasma exposure. In patients, a large variability in pharmacokinetic parameters was observed and it was explained mainly by body weight (P<0.05). A significantly higher systemic area under the curve was obtained in children receiving more than 0.48 mg/kg for bilateral tandem infusions (P<0.05). These children had 50% probability of grades 3-4 neutropenia. Plasma concentrations after 2 and 4 hours of SSOAI were significantly higher in these children (P<0.05). A synergistic cytotoxic effect of melphalan and topotecan was evident in cell lines. CONCLUSIONS Potentially active levels of melphalan after SSOAI were achieved in the vitreous of animals. Low systemic exposure was found in animals and children. Doses greater than 0.48 mg/kg, given for bilateral tandem infusions, were associated with significantly higher plasma levels and increased risk of neutropenia. Synergistic in vitro cytotoxicity between melphalan and topotecan favors combination treatment.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of topotecan after intra-vitreal injection. Implications for retinoblastoma treatment.

Topotecan is a promising drug with activity against retinoblastoma, however, attaining therapeutic concentrations in the vitreous humor is still a challenge for the treatment of vitreous seeds in retinoblastoma. Our aim was to characterize topotecan pharmacokinetics in vitreous and aqueous humor, and to assess the systemic exposure after intra-vitreal injection in rabbits as an alternative route for maximizing local drug exposure. Anesthetized rabbits were administered intra-vitreal injections of 5 microg of topotecan. Vitreous, aqueous, and blood samples were collected at pre-defined time points. A validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay was used to quantitate topotecan (lactone and carboxylate) concentrations. Topotecan pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in vitreous, aqueous and plasma using a compartmental analysis. Topotecan lactone concentrations in the vitreous of the injected eye were about 8 ng/mL 48 h after drug administration. The median maximum vitreous, aqueous and plasma total topotecan concentrations (C(max)) were 5.3, 0.68 and 0.21 microg/mL, respectively. The C(max) vitreous/aqueous of treated eyes and the C(max) vitreous/plasma were approximately 8 and 254, respectively. Total topotecan exposure (AUC) in the vitreous of the injected eye was 50 times greater than the total systemic exposure. These findings suggest that intra-vitreal administration of only 5 microg of topotecan reaches significant local levels over an extended period of time while minimizing systemic exposure in the rabbit. Intra-vitreal topotecan administration offers a promising alternative route for enhanced drug exposure in the vitreous humor with potential application for treatment of vitreal seeds in retinoblastoma while avoiding systemic toxicities.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis Of Topotecan After Superselective Ophthalmic Artery Infusion And Periocular Administration In A Porcine Model

Purpose To characterize the vitreous and plasma pharmacokinetics of topotecan after ophthalmic artery infusion (OAI) subsequent to superselective artery catheterization and to compare it with periocular injection (POI). Methods The ophthalmic artery of 4 pigs was catheterized and 1 mg of topotecan infused over a period of 30 minutes. The contralateral eye was subsequently used for administering topotecan by POI. Serial vitreous specimens were obtained by microdialysis and plasma samples collected and assayed for total and lactone topotecan. Results Maximum total topotecan concentration in the vitreous (median, range) was significantly higher after OAI compared with POI (131.8 ng/mL [112.9–138.7] vs. 13.6 ng/mL [5.5–15.3], respectively; P < 0.005). Median vitreous exposure calculated as area under the curve for total topotecan attained after OAI was significantly higher than after POI (299.8 ng·hour/mL [247.6–347.2] and 48.9 ng·hour/mL [11.8–63.4], respectively; P < 0.05). The vitreous to plasma exposure ratio was 29 after OAI and 3.4 after POI. Systemic exposure for total topotecan was low after both modalities of administration, with a trend to be lower after OAI compared with POI (10.6 ng·hour/mL [6.8–13.4] vs. 18.7 ng·hour/mL [6.3–21.7]; P = 0.54). Conclusion Superselective OAI resulted in significantly higher vitreous concentrations and exposure and a trend toward lower systemic exposure than POI.

Ocular pharmacology of topotecan and its activity in retinoblastoma

Purpose: To review the ocular pharmacology and antitumor activity of topotecan for the treatment of retinoblastoma by an evaluation of different routes of administration. Methods: Systematic review of studies available at PubMed using the keywords retinoblastoma, topotecan, and camptothecins, including preclinical data such as cell lines and animal models, as well as clinical studies in patients with retinoblastoma. Results: Forty-two available studies were reviewed. Evidence of antitumor activity against retinoblastoma as a single agent is based on data on cell lines and a limited number of affected patients with intraocular and extraocular disease when given in a protracted schedule. Evidence of additive or synergistic activity in combination with other agents such as carboplatin, melphalan, and vincristine was reported in preclinical and clinical models. In animal models, pharmacokinetic evaluation of topotecan administered by the periocular route shows that most of the drug reaches the vitreous through the systemic circulation. Topotecan administered by intravitreal injection shows high and sustained vitreal concentrations with limited systemic exposure and lack of retinal toxicity at a dose of up to 5 &mgr;g. Topotecan administered intraophthalmic artery shows higher passage to the vitreous compared with periocular administration in a swine model. Conclusion: Topotecan alone or in combination is active against retinoblastoma. It shows a favorable passage to the vitreous when given intravenously and intraarterially, and ocular toxicity is minimal by all routes of administration. However, its clinical role, optimal dose, and route of administration for the treatment of retinoblastoma are to be determined.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Intra-arterial Melphalan and Topotecan Combination in Patients with Retinoblastoma

PURPOSE To assess the antitumor activity, toxicity, and plasma pharmacokinetics of the combination of melphalan and topotecan for superselective ophthalmic artery infusion (SSOAI) treatment of children with retinoblastoma. DESIGN Single-center, prospective, clinical pharmacokinetic study. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-six patients (27 eyes) with intraocular retinoblastoma. METHODS Patients with an indication for SSOAI received melphalan (3-6 mg) and topotecan (0.5-1 mg; doses calculated by age and weight). Plasma samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic studies, and a population approach via nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used. Safety and efficacy were assessed and compared with historical cohorts of patients treated with melphalan single-agent SSOAI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Melphalan and topotecan pharmacokinetic parameters and efficacy and safety parameters. RESULTS Twenty-seven eyes from 26 consecutive patients received 66 cycles of SSOAI melphalan and topotecan in combination. All 5 eyes treated as primary therapy responded to the combination chemotherapy and were preserved. Sixteen of the 22 eyes with relapsed or resistant tumors responded, but 3 of them ultimately underwent enucleation at a median of 8 months (range, 7.9-9.1 months). The incidence of grade III and IV neutropenia was 10.6% and 1.5%, respectively, which was comparable with historical controls of single-agent SSOAI melphalan. No episode of fever neutropenia was observed, and no patient required transfusion of blood products. The large variability in melphalan pharmacokinetics was explained by body weight (P <0.05). Concomitant topotecan administration did not influence melphalan pharmacokinetic parameters. There was no effect of the sequence of melphalan and topotecan administration in plasma pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS A regimen combining melphalan and topotecan for SSOAI treatment of retinoblastoma is active and well tolerated. This combination chemotherapy previously showed synergistic pharmacologic activity, and we herein provide evidence of not increasing the hematologic toxicity compared with single-agent melphalan.

Preischemic efferent vagal stimulation increases the size of myocardial infarction in rabbits. Role of the sympathetic nervous system

rabbits. Role of the sympathetic nervous system Bruno Buchholz , Martin Donato , Virginia Perez , Flavio C. Ivalde , Christian Hocht , Emiliano Buitrago , Manuel Rodriguez , Ricardo J. Gelpi a,⁎,2 a Institute of Cardiovascular Physiopathology and Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina b Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Stability of Melphalan Solution for Intravitreal Injection for Retinoblastoma

Stability of Melphalan Solution for Intravitreal Injection for Retinoblastoma Intravitreal injections for the treatment of retinoblastoma have been gaining relevance among ophthalmologists, supported by reports on outcome and improvement of the administration technique.1 Currently, doses up to 30 μg per injection are used according to an extensively described technique for intravitreal injection that minimizes the risk of extraocular dissemination of tumor cells.2 The commercial form of melphalan (Alkeran) contains 50 mg of melphalan to be reconstituted in 10 mL of vehicle,3 but each intravitreal injection consists of 30 μg of melphalan (its 1667th part). The rest of the vial is discarded. Specifically in countries with limited resources, this procedure may be optimized to prevent disposal of active agent and preserve it for future patients. The package insert states that after dilution (<0.45 mg/mL) of the reconstituted commercial formulation with sterile saline, the administration should be completed within 60 minutes of reconstitution because of the instability of melphalan.3 This degradation corresponds to a spontaneous hydrolysis to monohydroximelphalan and dihydroximelphalan.3,4 A solution of 400 μg/mL of melphalan in saline at 20°C lost 10% of its content in 4.5 hours; the same loss was attained after 2.4 hours at 25°C, a common room temperature in many clinical centers.4 We evaluated the stability of melphalan solution after reconstitution of the commercial product and serial dilution with saline to a final concentration of 300 μg/mL. This concentration was chosen because in our practice we administer 0.1 mL, the volume that contains the most common clinical dose of 30 μg.