Emily A. Carter
United States Forest Service
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Emily A. Carter.
Biomass & Bioenergy | 2003
Felipe G. Sanchez; Emily A. Carter; John Klepac
A study was installed in the upper Coastal Plains of South Carolina, USA that sought to examine the impact of incorporating downed slash materials into subsoil layers on soil chemical and physical properties as compared with the effect of slash materials left on the soil surface. Two sites were examined which differed in soil textural composition: sandy vs. clay.
International Journal of Forest Engineering | 2018
Brian M. Parkhurst; W. Michael Aust; M. Chad Bolding; Scott M. Barrett; Emily A. Carter
ABSTRACT Ground-based timber harvesting systems are common in the United States. Harvesting machinery can negatively influence soils by increasing erosion and decreasing site productivity. Skid trails can become compacted and erosive. Slash applications to skid trails are effective for erosion control, yet few investigations have examined effects of slash on soil physical properties influenced by compaction. This research project has two objectives: (1) to compare and contrast the impacts of traffic resulting from a rubber-tired grapple skidder and a dozer using a variety of soil compaction indices, and (2) to compare effects of slash versus bare soil on skid trails trafficked by a rubber-tired grapple skidder and a dozer. The project was conducted within an upland hardwood/pine stand in the Ridge and Valley region. Skidder traffic changed both visual appearance and soil physical properties. The heavier skidder resulted in deeper visible ruts, greater increases in bulk density, and greater decreases in macro porosity when compared to the lighter dozer. This project also served as a pilot test for the AgTech sensor for forest trails. Results from sensors are briefly compared with traditional soil compaction indices. While no major relationships were found, the technology is promising for future research applications. Using slash as a means of ameliorating soil disturbance was not entirely conclusive as variation in cover had no effect on bulk density or porosity and mechanical resistance data were contradictory. Slash reduced increases in soil strength, and despite difference in sizes, the skidder and dozer resulted in similar changes in soil strength.
Southern Journal of Applied Forestry | 2004
Masato Miwa; W. Michael Aust; James A. Burger; Steve C. Patterson; Emily A. Carter
SJAF 22(4) 1998 | 1998
W. Michael Aust; James A. Burger; Emily A. Carter; David P. Preston; Steven C Patterson
Soil Biology & Biochemistry | 2009
Matt D. Busse; Felipe G. Sanchez; Alice W. Ratcliff; John R. Butnor; Emily A. Carter; Robert F. Powers
Forest Ecology and Management | 2007
M. Chad Lincoln; Rodney E. Will; Lawrence A. Morris; Emily A. Carter; Daniel Markewitz; John R. Britt; Ben Cazell; Vic Ford
Forest Ecology and Management | 2007
Emily A. Carter; W. Michael Aust; James A. Burger
Forest Ecology and Management | 2006
Lawrence A. Morris; Kim H. Ludovici; Scott J. Torreano; Emily A. Carter; M.C. Lincoln; Rodney E. Will
Forest Ecology and Management | 2010
Marco A. Galang; Lawrence A. Morris; Daniel Markewitz; C. Rhett Jackson; Emily A. Carter
Biomass & Bioenergy | 2006
Emily A. Carter; Robert B. Rummer; Bryce J. Stokes