Emily A Swanson
Boston Children's Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Emily A Swanson.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2016
Ramkumar Ramamirtham; James D. Akula; Garima Soni; Matthew J. Swanson; Jennifer N. Bush; Anne Moskowitz; Emily A Swanson; Tara L. Favazza; Jena Tavormina; Mircea Mujat; R. Daniel Ferguson; Ronald M. Hansen; Anne B. Fulton
Purpose To study the density and packing geometry of the extrafoveal cone photoreceptors in eyes with a history of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). We used a multimodal combination of adaptive optics (AO) scanning light ophthalmoscopy (SLO) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods Cones were identified in subjects (aged 14–26 years) with a history of ROP that was either severe and treated by laser ablation of avascular peripheral retina (TROP; n = 5) or mild and spontaneously resolved, untreated (UROP; n = 5), and in term-born controls (CT; n = 8). The AO-SLO images were obtained at temporal eccentricities 4.5°, 9°, 13.5°, and 18° using both confocal and offset apertures with simultaneous, colocal OCT images. Effects of group, eccentricity, and aperture were evaluated and the modalities compared. Results In the SLO images, cone density was lower and the packing pattern less regular in TROP, relative to CT and UROP retinae. Although SLO image quality appeared lower in TROP, root mean square (RMS) wavefront error did not differ among the groups. In TROP eyes, cone discrimination was easier in offset aperture images. There was no evidence of cone loss in the TROP OCT images. Conclusions Low cone density in TROP confocal SLO images may have resulted from lower image quality. Since AO correction in these eyes was equivalent to that of the control group, and OCT imaging showed no significant cone loss, the optical properties of the inner retina or properties of the cones themselves are likely altered in a way that affects photoreceptor imaging.
JAMA Ophthalmology | 2018
Aparna Raghuram; Sowjanya Gowrisankaran; Emily A Swanson; David Zurakowski; David G. Hunter; Deborah P. Waber
Importance Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a specific learning disability of neurobiological origin whose core cognitive deficit is widely believed to involve language (phonological) processing. Although reading is also a visual task, the potential role of vision in DD has been controversial, and little is known about the integrity of visual function in individuals with DD. Objective To assess the frequency of visual deficits (specifically vergence, accommodation, and ocular motor tracking) in children with DD compared with a control group of typically developing readers. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective, uncontrolled observational study was conducted from May 28 to October 17, 2016, in an outpatient ophthalmology ambulatory clinic among 29 children with DD and 33 typically developing (TD) children. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were frequencies of deficits in vergence (amplitude, fusional ranges, and facility), accommodation (amplitude, facility, and accuracy), and ocular motor tracking (Developmental Eye Movement test and Visagraph eye tracker). Results Among the children with DD (10 girls and 19 boys; mean [SD] age, 10.3 [1.2] years) and the TD group (21 girls and 12 boys; mean [SD] age, 9.4 [1.4] years), accommodation deficits were more frequent in the DD group than the TD group (16 [55%] vs 3 [9%]; difference = 46%; 95% CI, 25%-67%; P < .001). For ocular motor tracking, 18 children in the DD group (62%) had scores in the impaired range (in the Developmental Eye Movement test, Visagraph, or both) vs 5 children in the TD group (15%) (difference, 47%; 95% CI, 25%-69%; P < .001). Vergence deficits occurred in 10 children in the DD group (34%) and 5 children in the TD group (15%) (difference, 19%; 95% CI, –2.2% to 41%; P = .08). In all, 23 children in the DD group (79%) and 11 children in the TD group (33%) had deficits in 1 or more domain of visual function (difference, 46%; 95% CI, 23%-69%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that deficits in visual function are far more prevalent in school-aged children with DD than in TD readers, but the possible cause and clinical relevance of these deficits are uncertain. Further study is needed to determine the extent to which treating these deficits can improve visual symptoms and/or reading parameters.
Seminars in Pediatric Neurology | 2017
Pablo Altschwager; Lucia Ambrosio; Emily A Swanson; Anne Moskowitz; Anne B. Fulton
In this article, we review the following 3 common juvenile macular degenerations: Stargardt disease, X-linked retinoschisis, and Best vitelliform macular dystrophy. These are inherited disorders that typically present during childhood, when vision is still developing. They are sufficiently common that they should be included in the differential diagnosis of visual loss in pediatric patients. Diagnosis is secured by a combination of clinical findings, optical coherence tomography imaging, and genetic testing. Early diagnosis promotes optimal management. Although there is currently no definitive cure for these conditions, therapeutic modalities under investigation include pharmacologic treatment, gene therapy, and stem cell transplantation.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2014
Emily A Swanson; Jena Tavormina; Tara L. Favazza; Anne Moskowitz; Ronald M. Hansen; James D. Akula; Anne B. Fulton
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2017
Kathryn Hannis; Sowjanya Gowrisankaran; Emily A Swanson; Deborah P. Waber; Aparna Raghuram
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2017
Kristen L. Kerber; Sowjanya Gowrisankaran; Emily A Swanson; Deborah P. Waber; Aparna Raghuram
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2016
James D. Akula; Robert J Munro; Tara L. Favazza; Emily A Swanson; Anne Moskowitz; Ronald M. Hansen; Anne B. Fulton
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2016
Lucia Ambrosio; James D. Akula; Tara L. Favazza; Emily A Swanson; Robert J Munro; Matthew Swanson; Anne Moskowitz; Ronald M. Hansen; Anne B. Fulton
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2016
Emily A Swanson; Robert J Munro; Lucia Ambrosio; Theodore Bowe; Anne Moskowitz; Ronald M. Hansen; James D. Akula; Anne B. Fulton
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2016
Domenico Lepore; Emily A Swanson; Lorenzo Orazi; Fernando Molle; Antonio Baldascino; James D. Akula; Ronald M. Hansen; Anne B. Fulton