Emily Carter Paulson

HER-2/neu Overexpression as a Predictor for the Transition from In situ to Invasive Breast Cancer

The clinical implications of HER-2/neu (HER2) expression in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions have yet to be clearly elucidated; this despite the more frequent expression of HER2 in high-grade DCIS lesions compared with invasive cancers. We hypothesized that HER2 overexpression in DCIS is associated with more rapid progression to invasive disease. Immunohistochemical staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 was done on DCIS specimens. Univariate analysis and a multivariate logistic regression were done to determine whether estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, or HER2 status, comedo necrosis, nuclear grade, lesion size, or patient age predicted the presence of associated invasive disease in patients with DCIS. Invasive foci were found in association with HER2 overexpressing DCIS at a higher frequency than with DCIS that did not overexpress HER2. Although high nuclear grade, large lesion size, and HER2 overexpression were all associated with the presence of invasive disease on univariate analysis, HER2 was the only significant predictor for the presence of invasive disease after multivariate adjustment (odds ratio, 6.4; P = 0.01). These data indicate that HER2 overexpression in DCIS lesions predicts the presence of invasive foci in patients with DCIS and suggest that targeting of HER2 in an early disease setting may forestall or prevent disease progression. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(5):1386–9)

National Cancer Institute designation predicts improved outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery.

Background:Although National Cancer Institute (NCI) designation as a cancer center is based almost solely on research activities, it is often viewed, by patients and referring providers, as an indication of clinical excellence. Objective:To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of colon and rectal cancer surgery performed at NCI-designated centers to the outcomes after resection at non–NCI-designated hospitals. Methods:We performed a retrospective cohort study of Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database patients undergoing segmental colectomy (n = 33,969) or proctectomy (n = 8591) for cancer from 1996–2003. Multivariate logistic regression, with and without propensity scores, and matched conditional regression were performed to evaluate the relationship between NCI status and postoperative mortality (in-hospital or 30-day death). The log-rank test, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox regression compared survival between hospital types. Results:We evaluated 33,969 colectomy and 8591 proctectomy patients. Postoperative mortality after colectomy was 6.7% at non-NCI and 3.2% at NCI centers. Mortality after proctectomy was 5.0% and 1.9%, respectively. These differences were significant when adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. For both colon and rectal cancer patients, long-term mortality was significantly improved after resection at NCI centers (HR 0.84, P < 0.001; HR 0.85, P = 0.02, respectively). Conclusion:NCI designation is associated with lower risk of postoperative death and improved long-term survival. Possible factors responsible for these benefits include surgeon training, multidisciplinary care, and adherence to treatment guidelines. Studies are underway to elucidate the factors leading to improved patient outcomes.

Revisiting the rotating call schedule in less than 80 hours per week

PURPOSE The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) work-hour restrictions have prompted many surgical training programs to adopt a night-float resident coverage system (NF). Dissatisfaction with NF prompted us to transition to a rotating junior resident call model (Q4) with 24-hour call shifts at the outset of the 2007-2008 academic year. We performed a prospective study to determine the influence of this transition on resident education, morale, and quality of life, as well as on ACGME work rule compliance and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores. METHODS Residents were surveyed after 1 year of NF and again 1 year after the introduction of Q4. Responses to a series of statements about the influence of the call model (NF or Q4) on educational opportunities and morale were solicited. The survey used a 5-point Likert response scale (1 = complete disagreement to 5 = complete agreement). Median values of participant responses were calculated and compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Compliance with ACGME work rules, ABSITE scores, and operative case logs from the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 academic years were also compared. RESULTS Residents were significantly more enthusiastic about Q4 compared with NF, particularly when asked about the influence these systems had on morale (median response = 4.0 [Q4] compared with 2.0 [NF]; p = 0.001) and engagement of residents by the teaching faculty (median response = 4.0 [Q4] compared with 1.0 [NF]; p = 0.001). Case logs revealed a similar operative experience for first-year residents irrespective of the call schedule (p = 0.51). Excellent compliance with ACGME work rules was maintained as reflected by the percentage of monthly 80-hour violations per resident months worked (3% [Q4] compared with 0.7% [NF]). No difference was observed in the ABSITE scores of first-year residents (a mean percentile point increase of 1 was found after the introduction of Q4). CONCLUSIONS Educational opportunities, compliance with ACGME work rules, and ABSITE scores can be preserved despite a transition from NF to Q4. Residents greatly prefer a rotating call schedule.

A Nomogram to Predict Lymph Node Positivity Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer typically receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by total mesorectal excision. Other treatment approaches, including transanal techniques and close surveillance, are becoming increasingly common following positive responses to chemoradiation. Lack of pathologic lymph node staging is one major disadvantage of these novel strategies. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to determine clinicopathologic factors associated with positive lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer and to create a nomogram using these factors to predict rates of lymph node positivity. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort analysis. SETTINGS: This study used the National Cancer Database. PATIENTS: Patients aged 18 to 90 with clinical stage T3/T4, N0, M0 or Tany, N1-2, M0 adenocarcinoma of the rectum who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation before total mesorectal excision from 2010 to 2012 were identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was lymph node positivity after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the associations of clinicopathologic variables with lymph node positivity. RESULTS: Eight thousand nine hundred eighty-four patients were included. Young age, lower Charlson score, mucinous histology, poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumors, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, elevated CEA level, and clinical lymph node positivity were significantly predictive of pathologic lymph node positivity following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram is 70.9%, with a c index of 0.71. There was minimal deviation between the predicted and observed outcomes. LIMITATIONS: This study is retrospective, and it cannot be determined when in the course of treatment the data were collected. CONCLUSIONS: We created a nomogram to predict lymph node positivity following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer that can serve as a valuable complement to imaging to aid clinicians and patients in determining the best treatment strategy.

Local excision for early stage rectal cancer in patients over age 65 years: 2000-2009.

BACKGROUND: Local excision of rectal cancer is an attractive option because it avoids the morbidity of radical resection. Concerns have arisen during the past decade, however, regarding substandard oncologic results. OBJECTIVE: Using the most recent Survey of Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data, we examined the change in the use of local excision for rectal cancer from 2000 to 2009 and examined patient, surgeon, and hospital factors related to its use. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary care medical center using Survey of Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data. PATIENTS: Patients with pathologic Tis, T1, or T2 rectal cancer who were >65 years of age and underwent primary radical resection or local excision between 2000 and 2009 were included in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The change in the use of local excision for rectal cancer from 2000 to 2009 was the main outcome measured. RESULTS: A total of 8966 patients were identified. The use of local excision decreased significantly between 2000 and 2009. Women and patients who were older and had more comorbidities were significantly more likely to undergo local excision. Having a colorectal surgeon perform the surgery increased the odds of local excision by 1.5 times (p < 0.001). Similar trends were seen in patients operated on at the National Cancer Institute (OR, 1.7; p <0.001) and teaching hospitals (OR, 1.2; p = 0.003). Younger surgeons were more likely to perform local excisions. For surgeons graduating in 1980–1989 or 1990 and after, the odds of local excision were 1.40 (p = 0.001) and 2.1 (p <0.001) compared with surgeons graduating before 1970. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by the retrospective design, and the data were collected by multiple healthcare officials in their representative institutions. CONCLUSIONS: In patient >65 years of age, the odds of undergoing local excision for early stage rectal cancer decreased significantly between 2000 and 2009, coincident with evidence of oncologic inferiority. However, there was still significant variation in its use. More studies are needed to better understand these variations in an attempt to bring more uniformity to the use of local excision in early stage rectal cancer.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Alcohol-based Preparations for Surgical Site Antisepsis in Colorectal Surgery

Objective: To compare 2 alcohol-based, dual-action skin preparations for surgical site infection (SSI) prevention in elective colorectal surgery. Background: Colorectal surgery is associated with the highest SSI rate among elective surgical procedures. Although evidence indicates that alcohol-based skin preparations are superior in SSI prevention, it is not clear if different alcohol-based preparations are equivalent in clean-contaminated colorectal procedures. Methods: We performed a blinded, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing iodine povacrylex-alcohol (IPA) and chlorhexidine-alcohol for elective, clean-contaminated colorectal surgery. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of SSI, defined as superficial or deep SSI, within 30 days postdischarge. A 6.6% noninferiority margin was chosen. Results: Between January 2011 and January 2015, 802 patients were randomized with 788 patients included in the intent to treat analysis (396 IPA and 392 chlorhexidine-alcohol). The difference in overall SSI rate between IPA (18.7%) and chlorhexidine-alcohol (15.9%) was 2.8% (P = 0.30). The upper bound of the 2.5% confidence interval of this difference was 8.9%, which is greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin of 6.6%. Other endpoints, including individual SSI types, time to SSI diagnosis, and length of stay were not different between the 2 arms. Conclusions: In patients undergoing elective, clean contaminated colorectal surgery, the use of IPA failed to meet criterion for noninferiority for overall SSI prevention compared with chlorhexidine-alcohol. Photodocumentation of wounds and rigorous tracking of outcomes up to 30 days postdischarge contributed to high fidelity to current standard SSI descriptions and wound classifications.

Colorectal specialization and survival in colorectal cancer

It is recognized that higher surgeon volume is associated with improved survival in colorectal cancer. However, there is a paucity of national studies that have evaluated the relationship between surgical specialization and survival.

Lymph node identification following neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: A stage-stratified analysis using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER)-medicare database

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) for rectal adenocarcinoma reduces lymph node (LN) identification following surgical resection. We sought to evaluate the relationship between LN identification following nCRT and disease‐specific survival (DSS), stratified by pathologic stage.

Segmental resection is a safe oncologic alternative to total proctocolectomy in elderly patients with ulcerative colitis and malignancy

The standard approach for the surgical management of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the setting of ulcerative colitis (UC) involves total proctocolectomy (TPC). However, some patients also undergo a partial resection (PR). This may be an attractive option in older patients with a high risk for surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of metachronous cancer after PR or TPC for CRC in the setting of UC.

Quality Improvement: Preventing Readmission After Ileostomy Formation

Readmission after surgery is a problem that is increasingly recognized by surgeons, patients, insurers, and hospitals. It exposes patients to additional risk and increases expense in a variety of predictable ways. Readmission can occur for a number of reasons but in colorectal surgery it falls into a few broad categories: complications related to the operative procedure, functional complications as a result of the procedure, and medical complications unrelated to the procedure but related to hospitalization, anesthesia, or patient comorbidities. Relatively common reasons for readmission following discharge after elective colorectal operation include surgical site infection (wound infection and anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess), high ileostomy output and dehydration, and symptomatic venous thrombosis events. In recent years, a focus on quality metrics has highlighted deficiencies that are possible to target by planned interventions resulting in improvement in patient clinical outcomes as well as health system resource allocation. Surgical site infection and venous thrombosis prevention have been the subject of numerous studies. There are evidence-based guidelines and recommendations focused on creating pathways and specific interventions for these issues already and a chapter on evidence and recommendations could easily be written on each of these problems. Acceptable interventions for ileostomy dehydration are not as well studied and therefore consensus is more difficult.