Emily Durden
Truven Health Analytics
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Emily Durden.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 2013
Siva Narayanan; Kathleen Wilson; Alan Ogelsby; Paul Juneau; Emily Durden
Objective: To estimate the medical and productivity-related cost burden of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares and comorbidities in a commercially insured population. Methods: Using administrative data, annual medical costs and indirect costs because of work loss were calculated for adult SLE patients, including flare severity and SLE-related comorbidity subsets, and a matched control group without SLE. Results: Adjusted annualized medical costs were
Clinical Therapeutics | 2016
Philip Levin; Steve Zhou; Emily Durden; Amanda M. Farr; Jasvinder Gill; Wenhui Wei
18,952,
Journal of Medical Economics | 2016
Emily Durden; Greg Lenhart; Lorena Lopez-Gonzalez; Mette Hammer; Jakob Langer
4305,
Neurourology and Urodynamics | 2018
Emily Durden; David Walker; Stephani Gray; Robert Fowler; Paul Juneau; Katherine Gooch
914, and
Gynecologic Oncology | 2018
Rahul Shenolikar; Emily Durden; Nicole Meyer; G.M. Lenhart; Kathleen N. Moore
441 greater for SLE patients with severe, moderate, mild, and no flares, respectively, during follow-up than those of the matched controls. Medical costs also varied by SLE-related comorbidity. Adjusted annualized indirect costs of work loss because of absence and short-term disability were
The Journal of Urology | 2017
Emily Durden; David Walker; Stephani Gray; Robert Fowler; Paul Juneau; Katherine Gooch
1867 and
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy | 2015
Lung-I Cheng; Emily Durden; Brendan Limone; Larry Radbill; Paul Juneau; Leslie Spangler; Faisal M. Mirza; Bradley S. Stolshek
1602 greater, respectively, for SLE patients than for controls. Conclusions: SLE imposes a substantial cost burden to both patients and their employers.
Archives of Osteoporosis | 2017
Emily Durden; Lionel Pinto; Lorena Lopez-Gonzalez; Paul Juneau; Richard Barron
PURPOSE In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) not achieving glycemic targets using oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs), studies suggest that timely insulin initiation has clinical benefits. Insulin initiation at the early versus late stage of disease progression has not been explored in detail. This retrospective database analysis investigated clinical and economic outcomes associated with the timing of insulin initiation in patients with T2DM treated with ≥1 OAD in a real-world US setting. METHODS This study linked data from the Truven Health MarketScan(®) Commercial database, Medicare Supplemental database, and Quintiles Electronic Medical Records database. A total of 1830 patients with T2DM were included. Patients were grouped according to their OAD use before basal insulin initiation (1, 2, or ≥3 OADs) as a proxy for the timing of insulin initiation. Clinical and economic outcomes were evaluated over 1 year of follow-up. FINDINGS During follow-up the 1 OAD group, compared with the 2 and ≥3 OADs groups, had a greater reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (-1.7% vs -1.0% vs -0.9%, respectively; P < 0.0001), greater achievement of glycemic target (38.2% vs 26.7% vs 19.6%, respectively; P < 0.0001), and a lower incidence of hypoglycemia (2.7% vs 6.6% vs 5.0%, respectively; P = 0.0002), with no difference in total health care costs (
Vaccine | 2014
Sachiko Ozawa; Lois Privor-Dumm; Angeline Nanni; Emily Durden; B.A. Maiese; Chizoba Nwankwo; Kimberly G. Brodovicz; Camilo J. Acosta; K. Foley
21,167 vs
BMC Pediatrics | 2010
Antoine C. El Khoury; Emily Durden; Larry Ma; Leona E. Markson; Andrew W. Lee; Yinghui Duan; Kathleen Foley
21,060 vs