Emily M. Webb

Medical Student Radiology Education: Summary and Recommendations From a National Survey of Medical School and Radiology Department Leadership

The ACR Task Force on Medical Student Education in Radiology, in partnership with the Alliance of Medical Student Educators in Radiology, investigated the current status of how and to what extent medical imaging was being taught in medical schools. The task force executed a 3-part survey of medical school deans, radiology department chairs, and intern physicians. The results provided an updated understanding of the status of radiology education in medical schools in the United States. This summary includes recommendations about how individual radiology departments and ACR members can assist in advancing the specialty of diagnostic radiology through medical student education.

CT and MRI of Congenital Anomalies of the Seminal Vesicles

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to provide a current review of the spectrum of CT and MRI findings seen in common congenital anomalies of the seminal vesicles. CONCLUSION CT and MRI can both accurately show renal and seminal vesicle anomalies. Seminal vesicle anomalies often occur concurrently with renal and vasal defects. MRI is a better tool for accurately defining anatomic relationships when one is planning to excise a seminal vesicle cyst or if one is considering a difficult differential diagnosis.

Prostate Cancer: Role of Pretreatment MR in Predicting Outcome after External-Beam Radiation Therapy—Initial Experience

PURPOSE To retrospectively determine if pretreatment endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings are predictive of outcome in patients who undergo external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Committee on Human Research approval, with waiver of the requirement for informed consent, was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Eighty men with biopsy-proved prostate cancer (mean age, 59 years; range, 47-75 years) who underwent endorectal MR imaging of the prostate prior to external-beam radiation therapy were retrospectively identified; details of baseline tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcome were recorded. Two experienced readers independently reviewed all MR imaging studies and recorded tumor T stage and the radial diameter of extracapsular extension (if present). Univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the relationship between baseline imaging and clinical predictive variables and the end point of metastatic failure. RESULTS At MR imaging, readers 1 and 2, respectively, considered 50 and 60 patients to have T1 or T2 disease (ie, organ-confined disease) and 30 and 20 patients to have T3 disease. After a mean follow-up of 43 months, four patients developed metastases. Univariate Cox analysis revealed that baseline serum prostate-specific antigen level, presence of extracapsular extension at MR imaging (according to either reader), and degree of extracapsular extension (according to either reader) were all significantly (P < .05) related to the development of metastases. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the sole independent predictive variable was mean diameter of extracapsular extension (relative hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.22, 3.48; P = .007). In particular, three of five patients with extracapsular extension of more than 5 mm at pretreatment MR imaging developed metastases 24, 43, and 63 months after therapy. CONCLUSION The presence and degree of extracapsular extension at MR imaging prior to external-beam radiation therapy are important predictors of posttreatment metastatic recurrence.

Role of IV Iodinated Contrast Material in 18F-FDG PET/CT of Liver Metastases

OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to investigate the role of IV iodinated contrast material in the evaluation of hepatic metastases at (18)F-FDG PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified 39 patients (25 men and 14 women) with suspected isolated hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent FDG PET/CT. The CT protocol included acquisition of unenhanced and multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images through the liver. At two separate sittings, four readers (two radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians) noted and characterized all hepatic lesions in consensus, first based on PET and unenhanced CT images and later based on PET and contrast-enhanced CT images. The nature of detected lesions was established by histopathologic or clinicoradiologic correlation. RESULTS A total of 178 hepatic lesions were identified, consisting of 137 metastases and 41 benign lesions. Using lesion-based analyses with Obuchowskis method for paired observations, 172 of 178 lesions (97%) were detected at PET/contrast-enhanced CT compared with only 135 of 178 (76%) at PET/unenhanced CT (p = 0.0004). Specifically, 114 of 137 (83%) hepatic metastases were detected on PET/contrast-enhanced CT compared with 92 of 137 (67%) on PET/unenhanced CT (p = 0.012). One hundred thirty-one of 178 lesions (73%) were accurately characterized at PET/contrast-enhanced CT compared with 101 of 178 (57%) at PET/unenhanced CT (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION IV iodinated contrast material administration improves the detection of hepatic metastases and the characterization of focal hepatic lesions at PET/CT.

The Negative Appendectomy Rate: Who Benefits From Preoperative CT?

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to determine the negative appendectomy rates of patients who did and did not undergo preoperative CT and to determine, more specifically, whether men benefit from preoperative CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 512 patients who had a nonincidental appendectomy between July 1, 2002, and June 30, 2007. Pathology records were compared with a radiology records search to determine which patients underwent preoperative CT. Proportions of patients were compared between groups using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS Of 512 patients who had a nonincidental appendectomy, 465 (91%) underwent preoperative CT, and 47 (9%) underwent appendectomy only on the basis of clinical findings. Overall, 22 of 465 patients (4.7%) who underwent preoperative CT had a negative appendectomy compared with six of 47 patients who did not undergo preoperative imaging (negative appendectomy rate, 12.7%; p = 0.03). Among men, six of 237 (2.5%) with preoperative CT had a negative appendectomy, versus five of 42 without imaging (negative appendectomy rate, 11.9%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION The negative appendectomy rate was decreased for adult patients who underwent preoperative CT compared with patients who did not undergo preoperative imaging. Although most prior studies have suggested that CT is efficacious only in decreasing the negative appendectomy rate among women, we found that men benefit from CT as well.

Strategies for incorporating radiology into early medical school curricula

Clinically oriented material is being incorporated increasingly early into medical school curricula. Traditional models of incorporating radiology early on, mainly as an adjunct to pathology or anatomy instruction, are not focused on learning important aspects of clinical radiology. Medical students can be better served by an integrated curriculum that focuses on appropriate ordering of radiology studies, an intuitive understanding of imaging modalities, and understanding the patient experience.

Acute Appendicitis: Clinical Outcome in Patients with an Initial False-Positive CT Diagnosis

PURPOSE To investigate the clinical outcome in patients with a diagnosis of appendicitis at computed tomography (CT) in whom treatment is deemed unnecessary after clinical evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS After institutional review board approval, 2283 patients (856 men, 1427 women; mean age, 46 years; age range, 18-99 years) who underwent CT because they were suspected of having appendicitis between 2002 and 2007 were retrospectively identified. CT reports were reviewed, and the likelihood of appendicitis was assigned a score on a five-point scale: score 1, definitely absent; score 2, nonvisualized appendix with no secondary signs of inflammation; score 3, equivocal; score 4, probable; and score 5, definitely present. Diagnosis of appendicitis at CT was considered a false-positive result if the CT report was classified as probable or definite appendicitis but the patient was not treated within 4 days. Cases with false-positive results were reviewed by two readers blinded to patient outcome, supporting clinical data, and prospective scan interpretation, and a grade was assigned by using the same scale. Medical records were reviewed to determine outcomes. Descriptional statistics were used. RESULTS Overall, 516 (23%) of 2283 patients had CT findings of probable or definite appendicitis. Thirteen (3%) of 516 patients did not receive immediate treatment for appendicitis. Of these, five (38%; 95% confidence interval: 18%, 65%) underwent later appendectomy with proved appendicitis after a mean interval of 118 days (range, 5-443 days). Seven (54%) of 13 patients never developed appendicitis across a mean follow-up of 583 days (range, 14-1460 days). One (8%) of 13 had a normal appendix at eventual surgery. CONCLUSION Five of 13 patients with CT findings of appendicitis and reassuring clinical evaluation results in whom immediate treatment was deferred ultimately returned with appendicitis. In patients with CT results positive for appendicitis and benign or atypical clinical findings, a diagnosis of chronic or recurrent appendicitis may be considered.

Correctly Using Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values in Clinical Practice: How to Avoid Three Common Pitfalls

OBJECTIVE Radiology is the specialty of imaging-based diagnostic tests. Understanding the science behind evaluating diagnostic test performance is essential for radiologists because we provide care to patients and interact with our colleagues. CONCLUSION Here, we review the key terminology used and common pitfalls encountered in the literature and in day-to-day discussions of diagnostic test performance.

CT Cholangiography in Potential Liver Donors: Effect of Premedication with Intravenous Morphine on Biliary Caliber and Visualization

PURPOSE To retrospectively determine whether premedication with intravenously administered morphine improves bile duct caliber and visualization in potential liver donors undergoing computed tomographic (CT) cholangiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective single institution study approved by the institutional review board and compliant with requirements of the HIPAA. Multidetector CT cholangiography was performed after slow infusion of 20 mL of iodipamide meglumine 52% diluted in 80 mL of normal saline in 143 consecutive potential liver donors (81 men and 62 women; mean age, 37 years); 43 received premedication with intravenous morphine sulfate (0.04 mg per kilogram of body weight) and 100 did not. Two independent readers recorded common bile duct diameter and area on axial CT images. Readers also scored bile duct visualization, including all second-order biliary branches, on a four-point scale (0, not seen; 3, excellent visualization). RESULTS For scans obtained without and those obtained with morphine, there was no significant difference in the mean common bile duct diameter (4.1 vs 4.3 mm for reader 1 and 4.4 vs 4.6 mm for reader 2, respectively; P > .39 for both readers), in common bile duct area (20.7 vs 21.5 mm(2), for reader 1 and 21.3 vs 20.2 mm(2) for reader 2, respectively, P > .60 for both), or in second-order bile duct visualization score (2.34 vs 2.36 for reader 1 and 2.58 vs 2.50 for reader 2, respectively; P > .5 for both). CONCLUSION The results suggest that premedication with intravenous morphine prior to CT cholangiography in potential liver donors does not increase bile duct caliber or improve biliary visualization.

Learning Objectives in Radiology Education. Why You Need Them and How to Write Them.

Learning objectives are a critical step in the creation and implementation of a radiology curriculum. Their use is mandated by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education, and the Accreditation Council on Continuing Medical Education, but more importantly they can have a significant beneficial impact on quality of radiology education programs. Learning objectives guide student learning, help clarify our teaching goals, and simplify learner testing and evaluation. This article will review the components of a proper learning objective and provide a simple, straightforward approach to writing them effectively.