Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Emily R. Cox is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Emily R. Cox.


Clinical Therapeutics | 1998

A review of cost-of-illness studies on obesity

Michael A. Kortt; Paul C. Langley; Emily R. Cox

This paper reviews the published cost-of-illness studies on obesity. The medical literature has demonstrated that obesity is an independent risk factor for a number of medical conditions, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary heart disease, elevated cholesterol levels, depression, musculoskeletal disorders, gallbladder disease, and several cancers. Since these conditions can be costly to treat, obesity clearly has a substantial economic impact. Epidemiologic estimates of the aggregate economic costs associated with specific obesity-related diseases in the United States indicate that the annual burden to society totals in the billions of dollars, representing 5.5% to 7.8% of total health-care expenditures. Although estimates of the costs attributable to obesity differ across studies, the one common finding is that these costs are substantial from a health-policy perspective. The objective of this paper is to identify and review the obesity cost-of-illness literature, address study limitations, and identify key areas for future economic research. This review indicates that the economic burden of obesity has been estimated using a prevalence-based cost-of-illness framework. Areas for future research include estimating the economic burden of obesity using an incidence-based cost-of-illness framework and modeling the association between health-care expenditure and level of obesity using individual-level data, such as medical and pharmacy claims data.


Pediatrics | 2008

Trends in the prevalence of chronic medication use in children: 2002-2005.

Emily R. Cox; Donna R. Halloran; Sharon M. Homan; Sherry Welliver; Douglas E. Mager

OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to estimate the quarterly prevalence of and evaluate trends for chronic medication use in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS. A cross-sectional study of ambulatory prescription claims data from 2002 to 2005 was conducted for a nationally representative sample of >3.5 million commercially insured children who were 5 to 19 years old. Prevalence of chronic medication use was measured quarterly for antihypertensives, antihyperlipidemics, type 2 antidiabetics, antidepressants, attention-deficit disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications, and asthma-controller therapy. RESULTS. First-quarter 2002 baseline prevalence of chronic medication use per 1000 child beneficiaries ranged from a high of 29.5 for antiasthmatics to a low of 0.27 for antihyperlipidemics. Except for asthma medication use, prevalence rates were higher for older teens aged 15 to 19 years. During the study period, the prevalence rate for type 2 antidiabetic agents doubled, driven by 166% and 135% increases in prevalence among females aged 10 to 14 and 15 to 19 years, respectively. Therapy classes with double-digit growth in prevalence of use were asthma medications (46.5%), attention-deficit disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications (40.4%), and antihyperlipidemics (15%). Prevalence of use growth was more moderate for antihypertensives and antidepressants (1.8%). Rates of growth were dramatically higher among girls than boys for type 2 antidiabetics (147% vs 39%), attention-deficit disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications (63% vs 33%), and antidepressants (7% vs −4%). CONCLUSIONS. Prevalence of chronic medication use in children increased across all therapy classes evaluated. Additional study is needed into the factors influencing these trends, including growth in chronic disease risk factors, greater awareness and screening, and greater affinity toward early use of drug therapy in children.


Medical Care | 2001

Medicare beneficiaries' management of capped prescription benefits.

Emily R. Cox; Cindy Jernigan; Stephen Joel Coons; JoLaine R. Draugalis

Background.Having annual dollar limits in prescription coverage is a type of benefit design unique to Medicare beneficiaries. This type of coverage is found predominantly within private Medigap policies and Medicare+Choice plans offering prescription coverage. Objectives.The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of capped prescription benefits on efforts to reduce out-of-pocket prescription e-penses by beneficiaries at risk for reaching their cap. Research Design.This design was quasi-e-perimental, with data obtained from self-administered questionnaires mailed to 600 Medicare HMO risk enrollees with capped prescription benefits. Results.Data were collected on 378 Medicare enrollees for a 63% response rate. Appro-imately half of all respondents participated in ≥1 strategy to reduce their out-of-pocket prescription e-penses. Participation in selected strategies included obtaining samples from physicians (39.2%), taking less than prescribed amounts (23.6%), and discontinuing prescribed medications (16.3%). Additionally, 15% of respondents indicated going without necessities, and 12% indicated borrowing money to pay for their prescriptions. Those who reached their prescription cap were more likely to participant in any one behavior (odds ratio [OR], 2.18), more likely to take less medication than prescribed (OR, 2.83), more likely to discontinue a medication (OR, 3.36), and more likely to obtain samples from their physician (OR, 2.02) compared with those who had not reached their prescription cap. Conclusions.Beneficiaries at risk for reaching their prescription cap are taking steps to reduce their out-of-pocket prescription costs. Although some behaviors would be considered prudent, other behaviors may be placing beneficiaries at risk for drug-related morbidity and mortality.


PharmacoEconomics | 1999

The Economics of Multiple Sclerosis: Distribution of Costs and Relationship to Disease Severity

Amy Nicole Grudzinski; Zafar Hakim; Emily R. Cox; J. Lyle Bootman

The introduction of expensive disease-modifying agents for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has created the potential for patients with MS to become higher contributors to healthcare spending. In an attempt to make formulary and reimbursement choices for these agents, decision-makers may look to the literature for guidance. This critical review attempts to decipher a consistent message from the available economic literature regarding the relationship between disease severity and cost in MS. In the 2 studies that have examined MS disease severity, a positive correlation with total (direct and indirect) cost, indirect cost and some, if not all, components of direct cost was reported. In studies taking the societal perspective, the majority of total costs were indirect. This paper documents the high burden of MS on society and serves to guide the decision-maker in interpreting the MS economic literature such that this information can be optimally utilised to make informed resource allocation decisions.


Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2007

Impact of Patient and Plan Design Factors on Switching to Preferred Statin Therapy

Emily R. Cox; Amit Kulkarni; Rochelle Henderson

Background: Changing formulary status is a common strategy to encourage greater use of lower-cost brand and generic drugs. Objective: To examine the relationship between patient and plan design factors and formulary adherence after the formulary status change of atorvastatin. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, cohort study of patients enrolled in one of 2139 commercial (no Medicare or Medicaid) plans that offer a 3-tier benefit design and changed atorvastatin from formulary to nonformulary status on January 1,2006. Adults on atorvastatin therapy who were receiving targeted communications in the fourth quarter of 2005 were included for analysis. We used bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to examine the relationship between covariates and formulary adherence for patients receiving atorvastatin through retail or home delivery (HD) pharmacies. Results: A total of 211,083 patients met the study inclusion criteria, and more than 42% switched from atorvastatin to a formulary statin (33.1% retail, 51.6% HD). Patient-related factors that consistently and positively predicted switching across retail and HD channels included female sex, prior statin switching, and member outreach to the pharmacy benefit manager through telephone or Web use. Plan design factors that positively influenced switching to the preferred agent included step therapy, brand preferred/nonpreferred copayment differential, and among retail users, receipt of a rapid response education letter. Adoption of step therapy and the rapid-response program in retail settings increased the odds of switching by 1.3. Compared with patients who were paying a differential of


Clinical Therapeutics | 2000

Analytic dimensions of a prescription-medication benefit in medicare

Ronald J. Vogel; Emily R. Cox

10 or less in retail channels, those who were paying


Value in Health | 1999

PID17: DETERMINATION OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF A TUBERCULOSIS PREVENTION PROGRAM ALONG THE US/ MEXICO BORDER USING MARKOV PROCESS MODELING WITHIN A PREVENTION EFFECTIVENESS FRAMEWORK

Me Borrego; JoLaine R. Draugalis; Marion K. Slack; Emily R. Cox

11–15,


JAMA Internal Medicine | 1997

The Health Care Cost of Drug-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Nursing Facilities

J. Lyle Bootman; Donald L. Harrison; Emily R. Cox

16–20, and


Pediatrics | 2003

Geographic variation in the prevalence of stimulant medication use among children 5 to 14 years old: Results from a commercially insured US sample

Emily R. Cox; Brenda R. Motheral; Rochelle Henderson; Doug Mager

21 and higher had increased odds of switching of 35% (95% CI 1.31 to 1.39), 41% (95% CI 1.37 to 1.46), and 80% (95% CI 1.74 to 1.86), respectively. In HD, compared with patients who were paying a differential of


Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy | 2015

Prescription Use Behavior Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Capped Prescription Benefits

Emily R. Cox; Rochelle Henderson

15 or less, those who were paying

Collaboration


Dive into the Emily R. Cox's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brenda R. Motheral

St. Louis College of Pharmacy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rochelle Henderson

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge