Emma Carduff

Use of serial qualitative interviews to understand patients’ evolving experiences and needs

Interviewing patients over the course of their illness can give a much better picture of their experience than single interviews, but the approach is rarely used. Scott Murray and colleagues explain how to get the most from it

Use of multiperspective qualitative interviews to understand patients’ and carers’ beliefs, experiences, and needs

A better understanding of the needs of patients and their carers can help improve services. Marilyn Kendall and colleagues describe how to conduct multiperspective studies

Understanding the barriers to identifying carers of people with advanced illness in primary care: triangulating three data sources

BackgroundApproximately 10% of the UK population have an unpaid caring role for a family member or friend. Many of these carers make a significant contribution to supporting patients at the end of life. Carers can experience poor physical and psychosocial wellbeing, yet they remain largely unsupported by health and social care services. Despite initiatives for general practices to identify carers and their needs, many remain unidentified. Neither are carers self-identifying and requesting support. This study set out to explore the barriers to, and consider strategies for, identifying carers in primary care.MethodsWe integrated findings from three data sources – a review of the caregiving literature; a workshop with researchers who have undertaken research with those caring at the end of life, and focus groups with carers and health professionals.ResultsThree categories of barrier emerged. 1) Taking on the care of another person is often a gradual process, carers did not immediately identify with being a ‘carer’ – preferring to think of themselves in relational terms to the patient e.g. spouse, sibling, son or daughter. Often it was health and social care professionals who encouraged carers to consider themselves as an unpaid carer. 2) As the cared-for person’s condition deteriorated, the caring role often became all-encompassing so that carers were managing competing demands, and felt unable to look after their own needs as well as those of the cared-for person. 3) There was ambiguity about the legitimacy of carer needs and about the role of the primary health care team in supporting carers, from both the perspective of the carers and the health professionals. GPs were thought to be reactive rather than proactive which discouraged carers from asking for help.ConclusionsThe needs of carers have to be legitimised to ensure primary care staff are proactive in their approach and carers are empowered to utilise the support available. Strategies to identify carers have to be sensitive to the complex dynamics of a caring relationship as well as the primary care context. Identification is a key factor in improving support for carers themselves and to enable them to support the patient.

Different Experiences and Goals in Different Advanced Diseases: Comparing Serial Interviews with Patients with Cancer, Organ Failure or Frailty and Their Family and Professional Carers

CONTEXT Quality care for people living with life-limiting illnesses is a global priority. A detailed understanding of the varied experiences of people living and dying with different conditions and their family and professional caregivers should help policymakers and clinicians design and deliver more appropriate and person-centered care. OBJECTIVES To understand how patients with different advanced conditions and their family and professional caregivers perceive their deteriorating health and the services they need. METHODS We used a narrative framework to synthesize eight methodologically comparable, longitudinal, and multiperspective interview studies. We compared the end-of-life experiences of people dying from cancer (lung, glioma, and colorectal cancer), organ failure (heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and liver failure), and physical frailty and those of their family and professional caregivers in socioeconomically and ethnically diverse populations in Scotland. RESULTS The data set comprised 828 in-depth interviews with 156 patients, 114 family caregivers, and 170 health professionals. Narratives about cancer typically had a clear beginning, middle, and an anticipated end. Cancer patients gave a well-rehearsed account of their illness, hoping for recovery alongside fear of dying. In contrast, people with organ failure and their family caregivers struggled to pinpoint when their illness began, or to speak openly about death, hoping instead to avoid further deterioration. Frail older people tended to be frustrated by their progressive loss of independence, fearing dementia or nursing home admission more than dying. CONCLUSION These contrasting illness narratives affect and shape the experiences, thoughts, and fears of patients and their carers in the last months of life. Palliative care offered by generalists or specialists should be provided more flexibly and equitably, responding to the varied concerns and needs of people with different advanced conditions.

Methodological developments in qualitative longitudinal research: the advantages and challenges of regular telephone contact with participants in a qualitative longitudinal interview study

BackgroundQualitative longitudinal research is an evolving methodology, particularly within health care research. It facilitates a nuanced understanding of how phenomena change over time and is ripe for innovative approaches. However, methodological reflections which are tailored to health care research are scarce. This article provides a synthesised and practical account of the advantages and challenges of maintaining regular telephone contact between interviews with participants in a qualitative longitudinal study.MethodsParticipants with metastatic colorectal cancer were interviewed at 3 time points over the course of a year. Half the group also received monthly telephone calls to explore the added value and the feasibility of capturing change as close to when it was occurring as possible.ResultsThe data gathered from the telephone calls added context to the participants’ overall narrative and informed subsequent interviews. The telephone calls meant we were able to capture change close to when it happened and there was a more evolved, and involved, relationship between the researcher and the participants who were called on a monthly basis. However, ethical challenges were amplified, boundaries of the participant/researcher relationship questioned, and there was the added analytical burden.ConclusionsThe telephone calls facilitated a more nuanced understanding of the illness experience to emerge, when compared with the interview only group. The findings suggest that intensive telephone contact may be justified if retention is an issue, when the phenomena being studied is unpredictable and when participants feel disempowered or lack control. These are potential issues for research involving participants with long-term illness.

Living and dying with metastatic bowel cancer: Serial in-depth interviews with patients.

Colorectal cancer is the second highest cause of cancer deaths. There are significant physical and psycho‐social effects on quality of life with advanced disease. Despite this, there are few accounts of the patient experience from advanced illness through to dying. We elicited the longitudinal experiences of living and dying with incurable metastatic colorectal cancer by conducting serial interviews with patients for 12 months or until they died. The interviews were analysed, using a narrative approach, longitudinally as case studies and then together. Thirty‐six interviews with 16 patients were conducted. Patients experience metastatic colorectal cancer in three phases; (1) Diagnosis and initial treatment; (2) Deterioration and social isolation and (3) Death and dying. Many patients initially said they hoped to survive, but, as “private” and in‐depth accounts of the experience emerged in further interviews, so did the understanding that this hope co‐existed with the knowledge that death was near. Palliative chemotherapy and the challenge of accessing private accounts of patient experience can inhibit care planning and prevent patients benefitting from an active holistic palliative care approach earlier in the disease trajectory. This study has immediate clinical relevance for health care professionals in oncology, palliative care and primary care.

DANCING TO A DIFFERENT TUNE: LIVING AND DYING WITH CANCER, ORGAN FAILURE AND PHYSICAL FRAILTY

Introduction The “danse macabre” has been depicted in Europe since medieval times. Providing good end-of-life care for all patients, whatever form their last dance takes, is a global challenge. Aim(s) and method(s) To explore typical narratives of living with and dying from advanced illnesses, to provide insights into providing effective care. Secondary analysis of data from 8 qualitative longitudinal studies: 3 cancer; 3 organ failure; 1 frailty; 1 with South Asian participants from all 3 trajectories. Patients were interviewed up to 4 times over 18 months. Researchers from each study reviewed the data using a narrative analytic framework. The narratives were initially synthesised by illness trajectory, then compared and discussed at analysis workshops. Results The dataset was 828 in-depth interviews with 156 patients. Cancer narratives had a well-rehearsed beginning, middle and anticipated end, with dual themes of hope for recovery alongside fear of dying. People with organ failure struggled to tell their story, being unclear when the illness began, or how one event linked to another. Fewer spoke about death, hoping instead to avoid further deterioration. Frail older peoples narratives often began with a specific event in combination with ageing, yet lost salience amidst increasing losses and future fears. Death was only fully anticipated very near the end, and feared less than nursing homes or dementia. Conclusion(s) Patients from different illness groups gave very different accounts. Consequently the cancer-based model of end-of-life care seems poorly suited to the needs of those dying in other ways. Understanding how different patient groups perceive their deteriorating health and approaching death will inform appropriate future palliative care for all.

DIFFERENT DYINGS: LIVING AND DYING WITH CANCER, ORGAN FAILURE AND PHYSICAL FRAILTY

Background Recent controversy around the Liverpool Care Pathway has highlighted the need to listen to patient and carer perspectives. Better understanding of how different patient groups perceive their deteriorating health and approaching death can inform palliative care developments for all conditions. Aim To establish whether there are typical narratives of living with and dying from a variety of progressive conditions, that might provide insights into how best to provide effective, patient-centred care. Methods We used a narrative framework to synthesise eight methodologically comparable, longitudinal, interview studies undertaken by our research group. We examined the narratives of people dying from cancer (lung, glioma and colorectal cancer), organ failure (heart, liver and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and physical frailty, in socioeconomically and racially diverse populations in Scotland. Results The dataset comprised 828 in-depth interviews with 156 patients, 114 family caregivers and 170 health professionals. The cancer narratives typically had a clear beginning, middle and anticipated end. They gave a well-rehearsed account of the illness, with the dual themes of hope for recovery alongside fear of dying. In contrast, people with organ failure struggled to pinpoint when their illness began, or see meaningful patterns between acute events. Fewer spoke about death, hoping instead to avoid further deterioration. Some attributed their poor health to ‘old age’, others struggled to identify any specific illness. Frail older people were frustrated by their progressive loss of independence, fearing dementia or nursing home admission more than dying. Conclusions The typical cancer narrative is very different from those in frailty or organ failure. Palliative care as a concept may be too inextricably linked to imminent death to be acceptable and appropriate for these patients. We must diversify palliative care provision to meet the range of holistic needs of all patients approaching the end of life.

Assessment and management of constipation for patients receiving palliative care in specialist palliative care settings: A systematic review of the literature:

Background: Constipation is an important issue for patients receiving palliative care within specialist palliative care settings. Questions and ambiguity, however, persist about international best practice and management. Aim: To synthesise the current evidence base on the assessment and management of constipation for palliative care patients within a specialist palliative care setting. Design: This is a systematic review. Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane databases were systematically searched in April 2017 for empirical studies, written in English, on the assessment and management of constipation in specialist palliative care settings, published between 2007 and 2017. Two researchers independently reviewed and critically appraised all studies, conducted data extraction, and undertook a thematic analysis. Results: In total, 13 studies were included in the review comprising randomised trials (n = 3), observational (n = 4) and descriptive studies (n = 6). Most research was conducted in specialist palliative care units, targeting either healthcare professionals or patients. The analysis highlighted a lack of standard definition of constipation, raising questions on the existence and comparability of baseline prevalence figures, the physical and psychological impact on patients, resource impact on staff and service, the subjective and objective methods of assessing constipation, and key aspects of constipation management, including a lack of focus on non-pharmacological management in this setting. Conclusion: The results of this review are being used to inform the development of an educational intervention targeting healthcare professionals. Gaps in the evidence base include lack of consistent definition of constipation, constipation prevention, non-pharmacological management, and the consideration of the management of constipation for the dying patient.

Palliative radiotherapy and holistic palliative care together

We were delighted to read Spencer and colleagues’ excellent review of palliative radiotherapy aimed at general practitioners.1 But its last learning point, that “holistic palliative care may be more appropriate” in the final weeks of life, may mislead readers that they must choose one or the …