Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Emma Chaplin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Emma Chaplin.


BMJ | 2014

An early rehabilitation intervention to enhance recovery during hospital admission for an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease: randomised controlled trial

Neil Greening; Johanna Williams; Syed Fayyaz Hussain; Theresa Harvey-Dunstan; M John Bankart; Emma Chaplin; Emma Vincent; Rudo Chimera; Mike Morgan; Sally Singh; Michael Steiner

Objective To investigate whether an early rehabilitation intervention initiated during acute admission for exacerbations of chronic respiratory disease reduces the risk of readmission over 12 months and ameliorates the negative effects of the episode on physical performance and health status. Design Prospective, randomised controlled trial. Setting An acute cardiorespiratory unit in a teaching hospital and an acute medical unit in an affiliated teaching district general hospital, United Kingdom. Participants 389 patients aged between 45 and 93 who within 48 hours of admission to hospital with an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease were randomised to an early rehabilitation intervention (n=196) or to usual care (n=193). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was readmission rate at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included number of hospital days, mortality, physical performance, and health status. The primary analysis was by intention to treat, with prespecified per protocol analysis as a secondary outcome. Interventions Participants in the early rehabilitation group received a six week intervention, started within 48 hours of admission. The intervention comprised prescribed, progressive aerobic, resistance, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation training. Patients also received a self management and education package. Results Of the 389 participants, 320 (82%) had a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 233 (60%) were readmitted at least once in the following year (62% in the intervention group and 58% in the control group). No significant difference between groups was found (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.43, P=0.4). An increase in mortality was seen in the intervention group at one year (odds ratio 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.88, P=0.03). Significant recovery in physical performance and health status was seen after discharge in both groups, with no significant difference between groups at one year. Conclusion Early rehabilitation during hospital admission for chronic respiratory disease did not reduce the risk of subsequent readmission or enhance recovery of physical function following the event over 12 months. Mortality at 12 months was higher in the intervention group. The results suggest that beyond current standard physiotherapy practice, progressive exercise rehabilitation should not be started during the early stages of the acute illness. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN05557928.


American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 2015

Bedside assessment of quadriceps muscle by ultrasound after admission for acute exacerbations of chronic respiratory disease

Neil Greening; Theresa Harvey-Dunstan; Emma Chaplin; Emma Vincent; Mike Morgan; Sally Singh; Michael Steiner

RATIONALE Hospitalization represents a major event for the patient with chronic respiratory disease. There is a high risk of readmission, which over the longer term may be related more closely to the underlying condition of the patient, such as skeletal muscle dysfunction. OBJECTIVES We assessed the risk of hospital readmission at 1 year, including measures of lower limb muscle as part of a larger clinical trial. METHODS Patients hospitalized with an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease underwent measures of muscle function including quadriceps ultrasound. Independent factors influencing time to hospital readmission or death were identified. Patients were classified into four quartiles based on quadriceps size and compared. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS One hundred and ninety-one patients (mean age, 71.6 [SD, 9.1] yr) were recruited. One hundred and thirty (68%) were either readmitted or died. Factors associated with readmission or death were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.08; P = 0.015), Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea grade (OR, 4.57; 95% CI, 2.62-7.95; P < 0.001), home oxygen use (OR, 12.4; 95% CI, 4.53-33.77; P < 0.001), quadriceps (rectus femoris) cross-sectional area (Qcsa) (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17-0.65; P = 0.001), and hospitalization in the previous year (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 2.42-9.58; P < 0.001). In the multivariate analyses, home oxygen use (OR, 4.80; 95% CI, 1.68-13.69; P = 0.003), MRC dyspnea grade (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.44-4.59; P = 0.001), Qcsa (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.95; P = 0.035), and previous hospitalization (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.47-6.29; P = 0.003) were independently associated with readmission or death. Patients with the smallest muscle spent more days in hospital than those with largest muscle (28.1 [SD, 33.9] vs. 12.2 [SD, 23.5] d; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Smaller quadriceps muscle size, as measured by ultrasound in the acute care setting, is an independent risk factor for unscheduled readmission or death, which may have value both in clinical practice and for risk stratification.


BMJ Open | 2017

Interactive web-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme: a randomised controlled feasibility trial

Emma Chaplin; Stacey Hewitt; Lindsay Apps; John Bankart; Ruth Pulikottil-Jacob; Sally Boyce; Mike Morgan; Johanna Williams; Sally Singh

Objectives The aim of this study was to determine if an interactive web-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programme is a feasible alternative to conventional PR. Design Randomised controlled feasibility trial. Setting Participants with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were recruited from PR assessments, primary care and community rehabilitation programmes. Patients randomised to conventional rehabilitation started the programme according to the standard care at their referred site on the next available date. Participants 103 patients were recruited to the study and randomised: 52 to conventional rehabilitation (mean (±SD) age 66 (±8) years, Medical Research Council (MRC) 3 (IQR2–4)); 51 to the web arm (mean (±SD) age 66 (±10) years, MRC 3 (IQR2–4)). Participants had to be willing to participate in either arm of the trial, have internet access and be web literate. Interventions Patients randomised to the web-based programme worked through the website, exercising and recording their progress as well as reading educational material. Conventional PR consisted of twice weekly, 2 hourly sessions (an hour for exercise training and an hour for education). Outcome measures Recruitment rates, eligibility, patient preference and dropout and completion rates for both programmes were collected. Standard outcomes for a PR assessment including measures of exercise capacity and quality of life questionnaires were also evaluated. Results A statistically significant improvement (p≤0.01) was observed within each group in the endurance shuttle walk test (WEB: mean change 189±211.1; PR classes: mean change 184.5±247.4 s) and Chronic Respiratory disease Questionnaire-Dyspnoea (CRQ-D; WEB: mean change 0.7±1.2; PR classes: mean change 0.8±1.0). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in any outcome. Dropout rates were higher in the web-based programme (57% vs 23%). Conclusions An interactive web-based PR programme is feasible and acceptable when compared with conventional PR. Future trials maybe around choice-based PR programmes for select patients enabling stratification of patient care. Trial registration number ISRCTN03142263; Results.


BMJ Open | 2015

The evaluation of an interactive web-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme: protocol for the WEB SPACE for COPD feasibility study.

Emma Chaplin; Stacey Hewitt; Lindsay Apps; Kelly Edwards; Chris Brough; Aga Glab; John Bankart; Ruth Jacobs; Sally Boyce; Johanna Williams; Sally Singh

Introduction Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is an evidence-based intervention that has been recommended in guidelines to be available to those who may benefit. However, not all patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have access to this service. Healthcare services have shown the need for the provision of PR in other forms to enable patient choice and service capacity. There is an increase in evidence for the use of the internet in the management of long-term conditions to provide education and promote self-management. The aim of this study is to see if an interactive web-based PR programme is a feasible alternative compared with conventional PR. Methods and analysis This is a feasibility study designed to evaluate the efficacy of providing a web-based PR programme to improve patients exercise capacity, quality of life and promote self-management in patients with moderate to severe COPD compared with conventional PR programmes. Eligible patients will be randomly allocated to receive either the web-based programme or conventional rehabilitation programme for 7 weeks using an internet-based randomisation system. Participants will be recruited from PR assessments, primary care and community rehabilitation programmes. Those randomised to the web-based programme work through the website which contains all the information that the patients receive in the PR classes. They receive weekly phone calls by a professional to help progress through the course on line. The outcome measures will be recruitment rates and eligibility as well as that standard for a PR assessment including measures of exercise capacity, quality of life questionnaires and physical activity. Ethics and dissemination The research ethics committee for Northampton has provided ethical approval for the conduct of the study. The results of the study will be disseminated through appropriate conference presentations and peer reviewed journals. Trial registration number ISRCTN03142263.


Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention | 2015

Response of the COPD Assessment Tool in Stable and Postexacerbation Pulmonary Rehabilitation Populations.

Emma Chaplin; Michelle Gibb; Louise Sewell; Sally Singh

PURPOSE: The COPD Assessment Tool (CAT) has previously been shown to be a sensitive outcome measure for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in a stable population, but its utility in a postexacerbation PR population is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate any differences in response to the CAT between stable and postexacerbation patients undertaking PR. METHODS: Patients attending a 7-week outpatient PR program completed a CAT questionnaire pre- and postrehabilitation. Patients referred for elective outpatient PR were compared with those who had been referred to PR following a hospital admission for an exacerbation. RESULTS: Two hundred consecutive patients completed the CAT questionnaire: 125 stable patients (74 male, mean age 71.1 ± 8.9 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] 1.39 L ± 0.6, and body mass index [BMI] 28.5 ± 6.7 kg/m2) and 75 postexacerbation patients (23 male, mean age 70.6 ± 8.6 years, FEV1 1.16 L ± 0.5, and BMI 25.8 ± 7.3 kg/m2). A statistically significant difference between the stable and postexacerbation patient groups pre-PR CAT score (P = .05) was observed. There was no significant difference in post-PR CAT scores or change in CAT scores between the stable and postexacerbation groups. There was a significant difference in pre- and post-PR walking test results between the groups. The improvement in the Endurance Shuttle Walking Test (ESWT) in the stable group was greater (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Postexacerbation PR patients had a worse CAT score prior to PR when compared with a stable PR population, but both groups made improvements in CAT following completion of PR.


Chronic Respiratory Disease | 2017

Experiences of patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation during an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease

Emma Vincent; Emma Chaplin; Johanna Williams; Theresa Harvey-Dunstan; Neil Greening; Michael Steiner; Mike Morgan; Sally Singh

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized in the later stages by acute exacerbations that often require hospitalization. Pulmonary rehabilitation is recommended for patients with COPD to aid symptom control, improve quality of life and increase physical activity. We have previously reported a large intervention trial commenced during a hospital admission. The aim of this sub-study was to evaluate the patients’ experiences of discharge following the hospitalization for an acute exacerbation of COPD. During a programme of early rehabilitation (ER) patient perceptions, experiences and healthcare use were collated during the month that followed their discharge. ER (started during their admission) was comprised of exercise training techniques that were modified to suit the environment of acute illness, together with an education and self-management programme. Each patient was then supported on the programme by telephone contact, following their discharge home, at 48 hours, 2 weeks and 4 weeks. We collected information in relation to the walking and exercise progression; we monitored patient recall of healthcare use, compliance/understanding of medical therapy, as well as their wider perceptions that may have influenced the recovery process. Healthcare use was captured using GP records and data analysis. Of the 100 patients, 47 males, (mean (standard deviation)) 71 (9.3) years, FEV1 1.14 L (0.6), BMI 26.6 (6.9), pack smoked years 45.8 (29.6), ethnicity White British 97%, were discharged home following an acute exacerbation of their respiratory symptoms, to an ER programme. At 48 hours following discharge, a minority (20%) of patients stated their symptoms were ‘feeling better’; 15% highlighted that they found the prescribed ‘exercise difficult’; 44% of patients felt at the end of the month that prescribed exercise programme had a ‘positive effect’ on their recovery from their exacerbation; 38% of patients felt their family had a positive effect on their recovery; 11% felt their family hindered. Patients reported a mean confidence score of 8.21 (2.1) for exercise that did not vary over the three contacts (p = 0.166). A similar mean confidence score of 7.76 (2.6) was reported for walking with a non-statistical change also noted (p = 0.223). When patient recall of primary health care contact was compared with actual use, there was statistical significance shown (p = 0.002); patients underestimated the amount of care they received. The data indicate that patients do recover at home within the support of an early intervention. Patients are positive about the benefit of ER in the process of recovery; however, this is uncontrolled data.


European Respiratory Journal | 2013

Early pulmonary rehabilitation for exacerbations of chronic respiratory disease (CRD): Functional results

Theresa Harvey-Dunstan; Neil Greening; Johanna Williams; John Bankart; Syed Fayyaz Hussain; Emma Chaplin; Emma Vincent; Rudo Chimera; Mike Morgan; Sally Singh; Michael Steiner


american thoracic society international conference | 2010

Neuromuscular Stimulation Of Quadriceps In Acutely Unwell Hospitalised Patients: A Comparison Of Low (35Hz) And High (50Hz) Frequencies

Emma Chaplin; Neil Greening; Theresa Harvey-Dunstan; Laura Turner; Amandeep Dhaliwal; Michael Steiner; Sally Singh


European Respiratory Journal | 2017

Longitudinal change to quadriceps thickness following admission to hospital for an exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease

Neil Greening; Theresa Harvey-Dunstan; Emma Chaplin; Sally Singh; Michael Steiner


European Respiratory Journal | 2016

An interactive web-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme: A randomised controlled feasibility trial

Emma Chaplin; Stacey Hewitt; Lindsay Apps; Kelly Edwards; Chris Brough; Aga Glab; John Bankart; Ruth Jacob; Sally Schreder; Johanna Williams; Sally Singh

Collaboration


Dive into the Emma Chaplin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sally Singh

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Bankart

University of Leicester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rudo Chimera

Kettering General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge