Emma Dargie

Go Long! Predictors of Positive Relationship Outcomes in Long-Distance Dating Relationships

Little is known about long-distance dating relationships. This study aimed to investigate differences between long-distance dating relationships and geographically close relationships and to explore predictors of relationship quality. Participants were 474 women and 243 men in long-distance dating relationships and 314 women and 111 men in geographically close relationships. Few differences existed between long-distance dating relationships and geographically close relationships, while individual and relationship characteristics predicted relationship quality. These results indicate that individuals in long-distance dating relationships are not at a disadvantage and that relationship and individual characteristics predict relationship quality. This knowledge could be a powerful tool for helping those in long-distance dating relationships.

The Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire inventory.

Abstract Millions suffer from chronic vulvar pain (ie, vulvodynia). Vulvodynia represents the intersection of 2 difficult subjects for health care professionals to tackle: sexuality and chronic pain. Those with chronic vulvar pain are often uncomfortable seeking help, and many who do so fail to receive proper diagnoses. The current research developed a multidimensional assessment questionnaire, the Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire (VPAQ) inventory, to assist in the assessment and diagnosis of those with vulvar pain. A large pool of items was created to capture pain characteristics, emotional/cognitive functioning, physical functioning, coping skills, and partner factors. The item pool was subsequently administered online to 288 participants with chronic vulvar pain. Of those, 248 participants also completed previously established questionnaires that were used to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the VPAQ. Exploratory factor analyses of the item pool established 6 primary scales: Pain Severity, Emotional Response, Cognitive Response, and Interference with Life, Sexual Function, and Self-Stimulation/Penetration. A brief screening version accompanies a more detailed version. In addition, 3 supplementary scales address pain quality characteristics, coping skills, and the impact on ones romantic relationship. When relationships among VPAQ scales and previously researched scales were examined, evidence of convergent and discriminant validity was observed. These patterns of findings are consistent with the literature on the multidimensional nature of vulvodynia. The VPAQ can be used for assessment, diagnosis, treatment formulation, and treatment monitoring. In addition, the VPAQ could potentially be used to promote communication between patients and providers, and point toward helpful treatment options and/or referrals.

Women in “Sexual” Pain: Exploring the Manifestations of Vulvodynia

This study explored the sexual and pain histories and pain presentations of women with forms of chronic vulvar pain (i.e., vulvodynia). One hundred and seventy-seven women with five subtypes of vulvodynia completed an online questionnaire. Groups were similar across several domains: participants experienced pain for many years during sexual and nonsexual activities, and pain was rated as moderate to severe. However, several differences emerged when considering pain development, number of sexual partners, and treatment seeking. This study illustrates how severe vulvodynia pain can be, regardless of subtype. However, not all vulvodynia sufferers are alike, and distinctions between research and clinical practice are highlighted.

Provoked Vestibulodynia: Diagnosis, Self-Reported Pain, and Presentation During Gynaecological Examinations

OBJECTIVE To explore factors associated with the diagnosis of provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) through (1) self-reported pain characteristics and (2) Friedrichs criteria (vestibular pain during sexual activity/gynaecological examination). We also identified cases in which incorrect diagnoses were assigned and explored group differences in gynaecological examination presentation and associations with self-reported pain. METHODS Data were extracted from nine studies conducted in our research laboratory. Information obtained during a telephone interview and a standardized gynaecological examination was compiled for 106 participants with vulvar pain and 106 pain-free control participants, matched for age, hormonal contraceptive use, and parity. RESULTS Cohens kappa (0.78) indicated substantial agreement (87.3%) between the telephone interview group categorization and diagnosis after the gynaecological examination. A discriminant function analysis yielded one significant function: Friedrichs first two criteria correctly classified 84.2% of cases, accounting for 76.0% of group membership variance. Of note, those in the other genital pain group were most likely to have received an incorrect diagnosis following the telephone interview (P < 0.001). Paired-samples t tests showed that those with pain reported lower pain intensity during the gynaecological examination than during intercourse (P < 0.001) and that intercourse pain was not necessarily related to pain during the examination. However, many participants (72.8%) indicated that the pain elicited during the cotton swab test was similar to the pain they felt with intercourse. CONCLUSION These results support the use of a targeted clinical interview and the evaluation of vestibular pain during sexual activity and the gynaecological examination for diagnosing PVD. Caution should be exercised when a patient presents with genital pain symptoms other than those typically observed in PVD. Furthermore, the cotton swab test may underestimate the degree of pain regularly experienced.

Provoked Vestibulodynia: A Comparative Examination of Mental Health, Sleep, Sexual Functioning, and Relationship Adjustment.

Objectives: Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is an idiopathic vulvar pain condition characterized by burning pain at the vaginal opening in response to contact or pressure. Previous research has established some of the psychosocial difficulties experienced by these patients, but direct comparisons with other pain conditions are needed. The purpose of this study was to compare women with PVD to those with postherpetic neuralgia and pain-free control participants. Materials and Methods: Participants were invited to complete an anonymous online survey consisting of sociodemographic questions and a range of validated measures. Results: Women with PVD and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) did not differ in terms of pain catastrophizing or pain anxiety, but women with PHN reported greater pain disability than those with PVD. Participants in both pain groups reported significantly more symptoms of stress, depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances than pain-free controls; women with PHN reported more symptoms of depression than those with PVD, with no other differences between pain groups. Groups did not differ on relationship adjustment, but participants with PVD reported poorer sexual functioning than the other groups. Discussion: These results indicate that women with PVD and PHN experience similar mental health difficulties, but women with PHN experience more severe impact on their day-to-day functioning and mood. These results support the classification of PVD as a chronic pain condition, as both the pain groups differed from pain-free control participants on a range of measures. Finally, the presence of mental health difficulties and poorer sexual functioning highlights the importance of conducting biopsychosocial pain assessments.