Emma Link

A high rate of durable responses with romidepsin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

We report results from a study exploring the combination of romidepsin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with > 1 prior therapy. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination using a novel accelerated dose-escalation schedule in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The secondary objective was to determine overall response (OR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). The MTD identified was bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) (days 1, 4, 8, and 11), dexamethasone 20 mg (days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12), and romidepsin 10 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15) every 28 days. Thrombocytopenia (64%) was the most common ≥ grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 76% of patients (n = 19) (≥ grade 3, 8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1%-26%). Maintenance romidepsin 10 mg/m(2) (on days 1 and 8 of a 28-day cycle) proved feasible, with 12 patients receiving a median of 7.5 cycles (range: 1-29). An OR (M-protein) of > minor response (MR) was seen in 18 of 25 patients (72%); 2 (8%) had complete remissions (CRs) and 13 (52%) had partial responses (PRs), including 7 (28%) with very good PRs (VGPRs). The median TTP was 7.2 (95% CI: 5.5-19.6) months, and the median OS was > 36 months. This regimen shows activity with manageable toxicity and warrants further evaluation. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00431990.

Effect of PET/CT on Management of Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Prospective Study with 5-Year Survival Data

We investigated the incremental management impact and prognostic value of staging with 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being considered for potentially curative therapies. Methods: Information on 168 consecutive patients with NSCLC being considered for surgery or definitive radiotherapy with curative intent before PET/CT was entered into a prospective database. The pre-PET/CT management plan, based on conventional imaging (conventional CT, appropriately supplemented by bone scintigraphy or other modalities), was defined prospectively by referring clinicians before PET/CT results became available. After PET/CT, actual clinical management was recorded, and patients were followed up until 5 y or death. The appropriateness of PET/CT management plans was assessed by biopsy when available, clinical follow-up, and survival analysis. Results: Stage was discordant on PET/CT and conventional imaging in 50.6% of patients (41.1% upstaged, 9.5% downstaged), with high management impact (change in treatment modality or curative intent) in 42.3% of patients. Both conventional imaging stage and PET/CT stage were strongly predictive of overall survival (OS) but there were greater differences between hazard rates and separations in the OS curves for stage groupings determined using PET/CT. OS was also strongly predicted by PET/CT-directed choice of therapy (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: PET/CT frequently affects patient management and strongly predicts OS in NSCLC, supporting the appropriateness of such changes.

Twenty-Five-Year Experience With Radical Chemoradiation for Anal Cancer

PURPOSE To evaluate the prognostic factors, patterns of failure, and late toxicity in patients treated with chemoradiation (CRT) for anal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Consecutive patients with nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus treated by CRT with curative intent between February 1983 and March 2008 were identified through the institutional database. Chart review and telephone follow-up were undertaken to collect demographic data and outcome. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-four patients (34% male; median age 62 years) were identified. The stages at diagnosis were 23% Stage I, 48% Stage II, 10% Stage IIIA, and 18% Stage IIIB. The median radiotherapy dose to the primary site was 54 Gy. A complete clinical response to CRT was achieved in 89% of patients. With a median follow-up time of 5.3 years, the 5-year rates of locoregional control, distant control, colostomy-free survival, and overall survival were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78-88), 92% (95% CI, 89-96), 73% (95% CI, 68-79), and 82% (95% CI, 77-87), respectively. Higher T stage and male sex predicted for locoregional failure, and higher N stage predicted for distant metastases. Locoregional failure occurred most commonly at the primary site. Omission of elective inguinal irradiation resulted in inguinal failure rates of 1.9% and 12.5% in T1N0 and T2N0 patients, respectively. Pelvic nodal failures were very uncommon. Late vaginal and bone toxicity was observed in addition to gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS CRT is a highly effective approach in anal cancer. However, subgroups of patients fare relatively poorly, and novel approaches are needed. Elective inguinal irradiation can be safely omitted only in patients with Stage I disease. Vaginal toxicity and insufficiency fractures of the hip and pelvis are important late effects that require prospective evaluation.

FDG-PET metabolic response predicts outcomes in anal cancer managed with chemoradiotherapy

Background:The aim was to investigate the correlation between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) metabolic response to chemoradiotherapy and clinical outcomes in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anus.Methods:A total of 48 patients with biopsy-proven anal SCC underwent FDG-PET scans at baseline and post chemoradiotherapy (54 Gy, concurrent 5-FU/mitomycin). Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to determine survival outcomes according to FDG-PET metabolic response.Results:In all, 79% patients (n=38) had a complete metabolic response (CMR) at all sites of disease, 15% (n=7) had a CMR in regional nodes but only partial response in the primary tumour (overall partial metabolic response (PMR)) and 6% (n=3) had progressive distant disease despite CMR locoregionally (overall no response (NR)). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 95% for patients with a CMR, 71% for PMR and 0% for NR (P<0.0001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 88% in CMR, 69% in PMR and 0% in NR (P<0.0001). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses for PFS and OS found significant associations for incomplete (PMR+NR) vs complete FDG-PET response to treatment only, (HR 4.1 (95% CI: 1.5–11.5, P=0.013) and 6.7 (95% CI: 2.1–21.6, P=0.002), respectively).Conclusion:FDG-PET metabolic response to chemoradiotherapy in anal cancer is significantly associated with PFS and OS, and in this cohort incomplete FDG-PET response was a stronger predictor than T or N stage.

Metabolic response of rectal cancer assessed by 18-FDG PET following chemoradiotherapy is prognostic for patient outcome.

BACKGROUND: Complete pathological response has proven prognostic benefits in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Sequential 18-FDG PET may be an early surrogate for pathological response to chemoradiotherapy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify whether metabolic response measured by FDG PET following chemoradiotherapy is prognostic for tumor recurrence and survival following neoadjuvant therapy and surgical treatment for primary rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients with primary rectal cancer treated by long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery had FDG PET performed before and 4 weeks after treatment, before surgical resection was performed. Retrospective chart review was undertaken for patient demographics, tumor staging, recurrence rates, and survival. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2007, 78 patients were identified (53 male, 25 female; median age, 64 y). After chemoradiotherapy, 37 patients (47%) had a complete metabolic response, 26 (33%) had a partial metabolic response, and 14 (18%) had no metabolic response as assessed by FDG PET (1 patient had missing data). However, only 4 patients (5%) had a complete pathological response. The median postoperative follow-up period was 3.1 years during which 14 patients (19%) had a recurrence: 2 local, 9 distant, and 3 with both local and distant. The estimated percentage without recurrence was 77% at 5 years (95% CI 66%–89%). There was an inverse relationship between FDG PET metabolic response and the incidence of recurrence within 3 years (P = .04). Kaplan-Meier analysis of FDG PET metabolic response and overall survival demonstrated a significant difference in survival among patients in the 3 arms: complete, partial, and no metabolic response (P = .04); the patients with complete metabolic response had the best prognosis. CONCLUSION: Complete or partial metabolic response on PET following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery predicts a lower local recurrence rate and improved survival compared with patients with no metabolic response. Metabolic response may be used to stratify prognosis in patients with rectal cancer.

Pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim for cytokine-alone mobilization of autologous haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

Haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) mobilization, using cytokine-alone, is a well-tolerated regimen with predictable mobilization kinetics. Single-dose pegfilgrastim mobilizes HSPC efficiently; however, there is surprisingly little comparative data on its use without chemotherapy for HSPC mobilization. Pegfilgrastim-alone and filgrastim-alone mobilization regimens were compared in 52 patients with haematological malignancy. Pegfilgrastim 12 mg (n=20) or 6 mg (n=2) was administered Day 1 (D1) in 22 patients (lymphoma n=17; myeloma n=5). Thirty historical controls (lymphoma n=18; myeloma n=12) received filgrastim 10 mcg/kg daily from D1. Peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ counts reached threshold (⩾5 × 106/L) and apheresis commenced on D4(4–5) and D4(4–6). Median PB CD34+ cell count on D1 of apheresis was similar (26.0 × 106/L (2.5–125.0 × 106/L) and 16.2 × 106/L (2.6–50.7 × 106/L); P=0.06), for pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups, respectively. Target yield (⩾2 × 106 per kg CD34+ cells) was collected in 20/22 (91%) pegfilgrastim patients and 24/30 (80%) in the filgrastim group (P=0.44), in a similar median number of aphereses (3(1–4) versus 3(2–6), respectively; P=0.85). A higher proportion of pegfilgrastim patients tended to yield ⩾4 × 106 per kg CD34+ cells; 16/22 (73%) versus 14/30 (47%) filgrastim patients (P=0.09). One pegfilgrastim patient developed hyperleukocytosis that resolved without incident. Pegfilgrastim-alone is a simple, well-tolerated, and attractive option for outpatient-based HSPC mobilization with similar mobilization kinetics and efficacy to regular filgrastim.

Aggressive behavior of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Immunosuppression in organ transplant recipients increases the incidence and aggressiveness of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. However, there are little clinical data on cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients with immunosuppression due to chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In this study we evaluated the clinical features, patterns of recurrence, and outcomes of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Plerixafor plus pegfilgrastim is a safe, effective mobilization regimen for poor or adequate mobilizers of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells: a phase I clinical trial

The safety, kinetics and efficacy of plerixafor+pegfilgrastim for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization are poorly understood. We treated 12 study patients (SP; lymphoma n=10 or myeloma n=2) with pegfilgrastim (6 mg SC stat D1) and plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC nocte from D3). Six SP were ‘predicted poor-mobilizers’ and six were ‘predicted adequate-mobilizers’. Peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ monitoring commenced on D3. Apheresis commenced on D4. Comparison was with 22 historical controls (HC; lymphoma n=18, myeloma n=4; poor mobilizers n=4), mobilized with pegfilgrastim alone. Eight (67%) SP had PB CD34+ count ⩽5 × 106/L D3 post pegfilgrastim; all SP surpassed this threshold the morning after plerixafor. In SP, PBCD34+ counts peaked D4 6/12 (50%), remaining ⩾5 × 106/L for 4 days in 8/12 (67%). All SP successfully yielded target cell numbers (⩾2 × 106/kg) within four aphereses. After maximum four aphereses, median total CD34+ yield was higher in SP than HC; 8.0 (range 2.4–12.9) vs 4.8 (0.4–14.0) × 106/kg (P=0.04). Seven of twelve (58%) SP achieved target yield after one apheresis. Flow cytometry revealed no tumor cells in PB or apheresis product of SP. Plerixafor+pegfilgrastim was well tolerated with bone pain (n=2), diarrhoea (n=2) and facial paraesthesiae (n=3). Plerixafor+pegfilgrastim is a simple, safe and effective HSPC mobilization regimen in myeloma and lymphoma, in both poor and good mobilizers, and is superior to pegfilgrastim alone.

Improving Patient Selection for 18F-FDG PET Scanning in the Staging of Gastric Cancer

Standard pretreatment staging for gastric cancer includes CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis; gastroscopy; and laparoscopy. Although 18F-PET combined with CT has proven to be a useful staging tool in many cancers, some gastric cancers are not 18F-FDG–avid and its clinical value is still debatable. Methods: Gastric cancer patients who underwent staging 18F-FDG PET scans from 2002 to 2013 at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed, and a systematic review was also conducted using PubMed between 2000 to March 2014 to investigate clinicopathologic parameters associated with 18F-FDG avidity. A pretreatment PET scoring system was developed from predictors of 18F-FDG avidity. Results: Both the retrospective analysis of the patients and the systematic literature review showed similar significant predictors of 18F-FDG avidity, including large tumor size, non–signet ring cell carcinoma type, and glucose transporter 1–positive expression on immunohistochemistry. A PET scoring system was developed from these clinicopathologic parameters that allowed 18F-FDG–avid tumors to be detected with a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 71%. Conclusion: A pretreatment PET scoring system can assist in the selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma when staging 18F-FDG PET is being considered.

Laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology: important prognostic tools to guide treatment selection in gastric adenocarcinoma

Previous studies have suggested that patients with occult peritoneal metastases not seen on preoperative imaging have poor prognosis. In this study, we aim to evaluate the utility and impact of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.