Emmanouil Smyrnakis
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Emmanouil Smyrnakis.
BMC Health Services Research | 2011
Elias Kondilis; Magda Gavana; Stathis Giannakopoulos; Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Nikolaos Dombros; Alexis Benos
BackgroundEmpirical evidence on how ownership type affects the quality and cost of medical care is growing, and debate on these topics is ongoing. Despite the fact that the private sector is a major provider of hospital services in Greece, little comparative information on private versus public sector hospitals is available. The aim of the present study was to describe and compare the operation and performance of private for-profit (PFP) and public hospitals in Greece, focusing on differences in nurse staffing rates, average lengths of stay (ALoS), and Social Health Insurance (SHI) payments for hospital care per patient discharged.MethodsFive different datasets were prepared and analyzed, two of which were derived from information provided by the National Statistical Service (NSS) of Greece and the other three from data held by the three largest SHI schemes in the country. All data referred to the 3-year period from 2001 to 2003.ResultsPFP hospitals in Greece are smaller than public hospitals, with lower patient occupancy, and have lower staffing rates of all types of nurses and highly qualified nurses compared with public hospitals. Calculation of ALoS using NSS data yielded mixed results, whereas calculations of ALoS and SHI payments using SHI data gave results clearly favoring the public hospital sector in terms of cost-efficiency; in all years examined, over all specialties and all SHI schemes included in our study, unweighted ALoS and SHI payments for hospital care per discharge were higher for PFP facilities.ConclusionsIn a mixed healthcare system, such as that in Greece, significant performance differences were observed between PFP and public hospitals. Close monitoring of healthcare provision by hospital ownership type will be essential to permit evidence-based decisions on the future of the public/private mix in terms of healthcare provision.
European Journal of Public Health | 2016
Dimitris Papamichail; Ioanna Petraki; Chrisoula Arkoudis; Agis Terzidis; Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Alexis Benos; Takis Panagiotopoulos
Abstract Background: Research on Roma health is fragmentary as major methodological obstacles often exist. Reliable estimates on vaccination coverage of Roma children at a national level and identification of risk factors for low coverage could play an instrumental role in developing evidence-based policies to promote vaccination in this marginalized population group. Methods: We carried out a national vaccination coverage survey of Roma children. Thirty Roma settlements, stratified by geographical region and settlement type, were included; 7–10 children aged 24–77 months were selected from each settlement using systematic sampling. Information on children’s vaccination coverage was collected from multiple sources. In the analysis we applied weights for each stratum, identified through a consensus process. Results: A total of 251 Roma children participated in the study. A vaccination document was presented for the large majority (86%). We found very low vaccination coverage for all vaccines. In 35–39% of children ‘minimum vaccination’ (DTP3 and IPV2 and MMR1) was administered, while 34–38% had received HepB3 and 31–35% Hib3; no child was vaccinated against tuberculosis in the first year of life. Better living conditions and primary care services close to Roma settlements were associated with higher vaccination indices. Conclusions: Our study showed inadequate vaccination coverage of Roma children in Greece, much lower than that of the non-minority child population. This serious public health challenge should be systematically addressed, or, amid continuing economic recession, the gap may widen. Valid national estimates on important characteristics of the Roma population can contribute to planning inclusion policies.
BMJ Open | 2018
Michael Harris; Peter Vedsted; Magdalena Esteva; Peter Murchie; Isabelle Aubin-Auger; Joseph Azuri; Mette Brekke; Krzysztof Buczkowski; Nicola Buono; Emiliana Costiug; Geert-Jan Dinant; Gergana Foreva; Svjetlana Gašparović Babić; Robert Hoffman; Eva Jakob; Tuomas H. Koskela; Mercè Marzo-Castillejo; Ana Luísa Neves; Davorina Petek; Marija Petek Šter; Jolanta Sawicka-Powierza; Antonius Schneider; Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Sven Streit; Hans Thulesius; Birgitta Weltermann; Gordon Taylor
Objectives Cancer survival and stage of disease at diagnosis and treatment vary widely across Europe. These differences may be partly due to variations in access to investigations and specialists. However, evidence to explain how different national health systems influence primary care practitioners’ (PCPs’) referral decisions is lacking. This study analyses health system factors potentially influencing PCPs’ referral decision-making when consulting with patients who may have cancer, and how these vary between European countries. Design Based on a content-validity consensus, a list of 45 items relating to a PCP’s decisions to refer patients with potential cancer symptoms for further investigation was reduced to 20 items. An online questionnaire with the 20 items was answered by PCPs on a five-point Likert scale, indicating how much each item affected their own decision-making in patients that could have cancer. An exploratory factor analysis identified the factors underlying PCPs’ referral decision-making. Setting A primary care study; 25 participating centres in 20 European countries. Participants 1830 PCPs completed the survey. The median response rate for participating centres was 20.7%. Outcome measures The factors derived from items related to PCPs’ referral decision-making. Mean factor scores were produced for each country, allowing comparisons. Results Factor analysis identified five underlying factors: PCPs’ ability to refer; degree of direct patient access to secondary care; PCPs’ perceptions of being under pressure; expectations of PCPs’ role; and extent to which PCPs believe that quality comes before cost in their health systems. These accounted for 47.4% of the observed variance between individual responses. Conclusions Five healthcare system factors influencing PCPs’ referral decision-making in 20 European countries were identified. The factors varied considerably between European countries. Knowledge of these factors could assist development of health service policies to produce better cancer outcomes, and inform future research to compare national cancer diagnostic pathways and outcomes.
Maternal and Child Health Journal | 2012
Akram Abusalah; Magda Gavana; Anna-Bettina Haidich; Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Nikos Papadakis; Papanikolaou A; Alexis Benos
British Journal of General Practice | 2012
Elias Kondilis; Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Magda Gavana; Stathis Giannakopoulos; Theodoros Zdoukos; Steve Iliffe; Alexis Benos
Rural and Remote Health | 2013
Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Magda Gavana; Elias Kondilis; Stathis Giannakopoulos; Panos A; Chainoglou A; Stardeli T; Kavaka N; Alexis Benos
Aristotle University Medical Journal | 2009
Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Smaragda Arvanitidou; John Kotsinos; Alexis Benos
Aristotle University Medical Journal | 2017
Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Olga Nikitidou; Aliki Xohelli; Areti Triantafyllou; Gesthimani Mintziori; Evangelia Tsiga; Nicholas Dombros; Alexis Benos
Education for primary care | 2016
Kathleen Leedham-Green; Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Ann Wylie; Michael Chourdakis; Anne Stephenson; Alexis Benos
Hippokratia | 2011
Ampanozi G; Leda Kovatsi; Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Zaggelidou E; Magda Gavana; Nikolaos Papadakis; Alexis Benos