Emmanuel Chrysos

Laparoscopic vs open approach for Nissen fundoplication

Background: Several studies, most of them nonrandomized, have shown similar functional results for both laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication, the operation of choice for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods: A total of 106 patients with documented GERD were randomized to receive either a laparoscopic or an open Nissen fundoplication. Preoperative and postoperative investigations included clinical assessment, esophagogram, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-h ambulatory pHmetry. Results: Both approaches were successful in controlling reflux. There was an overall improvement in esophageal peristalsis and an increase in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in both groups. Open Nissen fundoplication was associated with a significantly increased rate of wound (p <0.001) and respiratory (p <0.05) complications. Hospitalization was also longer after the open technique (p <0.001). At 3-month follow-up, although the rate of postoperative dysphagia was similar for the two approaches, the open approach was associated with a significantly higher incidence of postprandial epigastric fullness (p <0.05) and bloating syndrome (p <0.01). Conclusions: The open and laparoscopic approaches for the Nissen fundoplication are equally effective in controlling GERD. The open approach is associated with a significantly higher rate of wound and respiratory complications and, at early stages, an increased rate of postprandial epigastric fullness and abdominal bloating. The dysphagia rate is similar with both methods.

Laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with impaired esophageal peristalsis: Total or partial fundoplication?

BACKGROUND It has been proposed that partial fundoplication is associated with less incidence of postoperative dysphagia and consequently is more suitable for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and impaired esophageal body motility. The aim of this study was to assess whether outcomes of Toupet fundoplication (TF) are better than those of Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication (NF) in patients with GERD and low-amplitude esophageal peristalsis. STUDY DESIGN Thirty-three consecutive patients with proved GERD and amplitude of peristalsis at 5 cm proximal to lower esophageal sphincter (LES) less than 30 mmHg were randomly allocated to undergo either TF (19 patients: 11 men, 8 women; mean age: 61.7 +/- 8.7 SD years) or NF (14 patients: 7 men, 7 women; mean age: 59.2 +/- 11.5 years), both by the laparoscopic approach. Pre- and postoperative assessment included clinical questionnaires, esophageal radiology, esophageal transit time study, endoscopy, stationary manometry, and 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH testing. RESULTS Duration of operation was significantly prolonged in the TF arm (TF: 90 +/- 12 minutes versus NF: 67 +/- 15 minutes; p < 0.001). At 3 months postoperatively, the incidences of dysphagia (grades I, II, III) and gas-bloat syndrome were higher after NF than after TF (NF: 57% versus TF: 16%; p < 0.01 and NF: 50% versus TF: 21%; p = 0.02, respectively), but decreased to the same level in both groups at the 1-year followup (NF: 14% versus TF: 16% and NF: 21% versus TF: 16%, respectively). At 3 months postoperatively, patients with NF presented with significantly increased LES pressure than those with TF (p = 0.02), although LES pressure significantly increased after surgery in both groups, as compared with preoperative values. Amplitude of esophageal peristalsis at 5 cm proximal to LES increased postoperatively to the same extent in both groups (TF, preoperatively: 21 +/- 6 mmHg versus postoperatively: 39 +/- 12 mmHg; p < 0.001, and NF, preoperatively: 20 +/- 8 mmHg versus postoperatively: 38 +/- 12 mmHg; p < 0.001). Reflux was abolished in all patients of both groups. CONCLUSIONS Both TF and NF efficiently control reflux in patients with GERD and low amplitude of esophageal peristalsis. Early in the postoperative period, TF is associated with fewer functional symptoms, although at 1 year after surgery those symptoms are reported at similar frequencies after either procedure.

Prospective randomized trial comparing Nissen to Nissen-Rossetti technique for laparoscopic fundoplication.

BACKGROUND It has been suggested that division of the short gastric vessels (SGV) provides a more floppy Nissen fundoplication, for the treatment of reflux disease. The aim of the study was to assess whether Nissen fundoplication with division of SGV is associated with improved clinical outcome and laboratory findings. METHODS Fifty-six consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were randomly assigned to have a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication either with division (24 patients; 15 men; mean age 51 +/- 15 years) or without division (32 patients; 23 men, mean age 47 +/- 14 years) of the SGV. Preoperative and postoperative investigation included clinical assessment, esophagoscopy, esophagogram, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. RESULTS Division of the SGV resulted in a significant increase of the operating time (P <0.0001). The operation abolished reflux in both groups. Also, both types of Nissen fundoplication significantly increased the amplitude of peristalsis at distal esophagus (division group: from 56 +/- 20 mm Hg to 64 +/- 25 mm Hg, P = 0.01; nondivision group: from 65 +/- 27 mm Hg to 75 +/- 26 mm Hg, P <0.001) and the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (division group: from 16 +/- 10 mm Hg to 24 +/- 7 mm Hg, P <0.001; nondivision group: from 22 +/- 8 mm Hg to 28 +/- 5 mm Hg, P <0.001). No differences in the incidence of postoperative severe dysphagia (division group: 5 of 24; nondivision group: 3 of 32) and overall esophageal transit were accounted between groups. However, division of the SGV was associated with a significant increased incidence of gas-bloating syndrome (division group, 13 of 24, versus nondivision group, 9 of 32, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Division of the SGV at laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for GERD does not improve clinical outcome and laboratory findings, while it is associated with prolongation of the operating time and increased incidence of gas-bloating syndrome.

Effect of nifedipine on rectoanal motility

PURPOSE: Based on the rationale that the calcium channel blocker, nifedipine, decreases lower esophageal sphincter pressure in achalasia, a prospective controlled trial was performed to evaluate the effect of sublingual nifedipine on the anal sphincter of controls and patients with high anal resting pressures. METHODS: Ten age-matched and sex-matched controls without evidence of anal disorder and ten patients with hemorrhoids and/or fissure-in-ano were included in the study. Anorectal manometry, with an eight-channel, water-perfused catheter was performed on all patients before and 30 minutes after administration of 20 mg of sublingual nifedipine. RESULTS: Nifedipine significantly reduced anal resting pressure in both controls and patients by approximately 30 percent (P<0.001 andP<0.0001, respectively). A significant reduction was also noted in the length of high-pressure zone of the anal sphincter (P<0.02 for both groups) and in the frequency (controls,P<0.05; patients,P<0.03) and amplitude (controls,P<0.03; patients,P<0.009) of slow waves in both groups, whereas the presence, frequency, and amplitude of ultraslow waves were significantly reduced only in the patient group (P<0.05;P<0.01;P<0.0005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Nifedipine reduces the activity of the internal anal sphincter both in controls and patients with high anal resting pressure. The drug might be of some use in relieving symptoms in patients with hemorrhoids or anal fissure.

Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. The laparoscopic approach.

AbstractBackground: Resection rectopexy through open laparotomy is an established procedure for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Methods: Resection rectopexy was successfully performed in 10 multiparous women by the laparoscopic approach (LAP), and the results were compared to those of eight women with laparotomy resection rectopexy (OPEN). Preoperative and postoperative assessment included anorectal manometry, defecography, and measurement of large-bowel transit. Results: The duration of the operation was longer in the LAP than in the OPEN group (p < 0.01). Morbidity was lower (p < 0.01) and hospital stay was shorter (p < 0.001) after the LAP than in the OPEN group. Prolapse was cured in all cases. Postoperatively, anal resting and squeeze pressures and rectal compliance increased significantly in both groups of patients (p= 0.007, p= 0.003, and p < 0.001, respectively). In all patients, the operation resulted in acceleration of large-bowel transit (p < 0.001) and in more obtuse anorectal angles at rest (p= 0.007). In addition, sampling events were observed more commonly (p= 0.008) postoperatively. Preoperatively, incontinence was present in 13 patients (seven LAP and six OPEN) and persisted in four of them after rectopexy (two LAP and two OPEN). Conclusions: Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse can be performed safely via the laparoscopic route. Recovery is uneventful and of shorter duration after the laparoscopic than after the open approach. Similarly satisfactory functional results are obtained with both procedures.

Effect of Hiatal Hernia on Esophageal Manometry and pH-Metry in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

An increased frequency of reflux events and a prolonged acid clearance have been shown in gastroesophageal reflux (GER) patients with a hiatal hernia as compared to those without. The objective of the present study was to further investigate esophageal motility and patterns of reflux in GER patients, in relation to the presence or absence of hiatal hernia. Esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hr esophageal pH-metry were used in 42 patients with GER and 18 controls. Eighteen of the patients were considered to have a nonreducing hiatal hernia on endoscopy. Hiatal hernia patients showed a higher extent of reflux (total composite score,P=0.016; total reflux time,P=0.008, reflux time in supine position,P=0.024; reflux time in upright position,P=0.008), a lower frequency of reflux events (P=0.005), a more severe esophagitis on endoscopy (P<0.01) and a lower amplitude of peristalsis at 5 cm proximal to LES (P=0.0009) as compared to patients without hiatal hernia. The amplitude of peristalsis at the distal esophagus was inversely related to the extent of reflux (P=0.024). Acid clearance was also significantly prolonged in the hernia subgroup (P=0.011). Although LES resting pressure did not differ significantly between the two subgroups of patients, it was inversely related to the extent of reflux in the patients with hiatal hernia (P=0.0005). It is concluded, that GER patients with hiatal hernia present with an increased amount of reflux and more severe esophagitis, which results in more severely impaired esophageal peristalsis as compared to patients without hernia. Prolonged acid clearance and impaired esophageal emptying observed in patients with hiatal hernia could be the result of both the presence of the hernia itself and the reduced peristaltic activity of the esophagus.

Rectoanal Intussusception: Presentation of the Disorder and Late Results of Resection Rectopexy

BACKGROUNDRectoanal intussusception may cause symptoms of obstructed defecation, and functional results of prosthesis rectopexy are usually not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to assess several parameters of the disorder and to evaluate the outcome of resection rectopexy.METHODSDuring a 10-year period, 27 female patients with symptomatic large rectoanal intussusception had resection rectopexy (23 laparoscopy; 4 laparotomy). Conservative treatment, including biofeedback treatment in 22 patients, had failed in all cases. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation included clinical assessment, anorectal manometry, evacuation defecography, and colon transit studies. Follow-up ranged between one and five years.RESULTSLength of intussusception was 2 to 4.9 cm and was significantly related to pelvic floor descent (P = 0.003) and inversely related to resting anal pressures (P < 0.001). Eleven patients had undergone a previous hysterectomy, 9 had enterocele-sigmoidocele, 7 had incontinence of varying severity, and 8 had a solitary rectal ulcer. Colon transit was abnormal in all but five cases. Immediate functional results were bad in two-thirds of the cases; tenesmus, urge to defecate, and frequent stools were the main complaints. By the time these symptoms had subsided, and one year after surgery, all but two patients were satisfied with the outcome. Intussusception was reduced in all cases, anal sphincter tone recovered (P = 0.002), perineal descent decreased (P < 0.001), and colonic transit was accelerated (P < 0.001). Patients available at five-year follow-up had no or only minor defecatory problems.CONCLUSIONResection rectopexy improves symptoms of obstructed defecation attributed to large rectoanal intussusception.

Pancreatic trauma in the adult: current knowledge in diagnosis and management.

Background/Aims: Although pancreatic trauma, isolated or not, is uncommon, it carries significant morbidity and mortality because of the delay in recognition and consequent treatment. Methods: The current knowledge of pancreatic injury, concerning the incidence, mechanism of induction, diagnosis, treatment, complications and outcome, is herein presented based on a literature review and our limited experience. Results: The diagnosis of pancreatic trauma entails a high index of suspicion because neither clinical nor laboratory evaluation provide pathognomonic elements. Patients with penetrating injuries are usually evaluated during laparotomy, while those with a blunt trauma can be managed conservatively, provided they are in a stable condition, there is no pancreatic duct involvement and care is intensive. At laparotomy, minor pancreatic injuries are best managed by drainage. Distal pancreatectomy is best suited for distal pancreatic trauma with ductal involvement. For severe trauma, Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy, pancreaticogastrostomy, duodenal diversion operations and Whipple’s procedure are all indicated according to the preoperative evaluation and intraoperative findings. Independent of the procedure to be performed, drainage is mandatory. Conclusion: Because pancreatic injury is rare, most general surgeons lack experience and ability to deal with such injured patients. Therefore, an experienced and skilled surgeon should govern the management of pancreatic trauma in order to minimize the incidence of morbidity and mortality.

The effect of erythromycin on human esophageal motility is mediated by serotonin receptors

OBJECTIVE:Erythromycin exhibits prokinetic properties. The drug enhances esophageal and gastric motility by acting as a motilin agonist and promoting acetylocholine release. 5-HT3 receptors are involved in the spontaneously occurring migrating motor complex and the effect of erythromycin on antral motility in dogs. The aim of the study was to investigate the hypothesis that 5-HT3 receptors are also involved in the action of erythromycin on the human esophagus.METHODS:A total of 18 healthy volunteers underwent standard esophageal manometry on three different occasions in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized manner, as follows: 1) after placebo, 2) after 200 mg of erythromycin i.v., and 3) after 200 mg of i.v. erythromycin subsequent to pretreatment with either 4 mg of i.v. ondansetron (serotonin receptor antagonist) (10 subjects) or 12 μg/kg of i.v. atropine (8 subjects).RESULTS:Erythromycin significantly increased a) the amplitude of peristalsis at 5 cm (from 87 ± 19 mm Hg to 108 ± 26 mm Hg; p= 0.0007), 10 cm (from 72 ± 24 mm Hg to 81 ± 26 mm Hg; p= 0.016), and 15 cm (from 47 ± 15 mm Hg to 55 ± 17 mm Hg; p= 0.014) proximal to LES, b) the duration of peristalsis at 5 cm (from 4.5 ± 0.9 s to 5.7 ± 1.2 s; p < 0.0001) and 10 cm (from 4.1 ± 1 s to 4.9 ± 1 s; p < 0.0001) proximal to the LES and c) the strength of peristalsis at 5 cm proximal to the LES (from 180 ± 49 mm Hg · s to 276 ± 100 mm Hg · s; p < 0.0001), and decreased the velocity of peristalsis at distal esophagus (from 4.1 ± 1 cm/s to 3.8 ± 0.9 cm/s; p= 0.03). In addition, erythromycin significantly increased the resting pressure of the LES (from 36 ± 10 mm Hg to 44 ± 12 mm Hg; p= 0.002). Pretreatment with ondansetron totally reversed all of the effects of erythromycin to the placebo state. Pretreatment with atropine not only prevented the effects of erythromycin, but it reduced the amplitude and strength of peristalsis at the distal esophagus at significantly lower levels than after placebo.CONCLUSIONS:Erythromycin exerts its prokinetic action on the lower esophagus by stimulating cholinergic pathways. This action includes not only an increase in LES pressure, but significant increases in the amplitude and duration of esophageal peristalsis, as well. 5-HT3 receptors are also involved in this process.

Erythromycin enhances oesophageal motility in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux

Background: Intravenous (i.v.) erythromycin enhances gastric emptying and oesophageal motility in both healthy and disease situations, acting either as a motilin or acetylcholine agonist. The purpose of the present paper was to investigate any possible effect of i.v. erythromycin on oesophageal motility in patients with gastro‐oesophageal reflux (GOR).