Emmanuel M. Landau

Signaling Networks: The Origins of Cellular Multitasking

One characteristic common to all organisms is the dynamic ability to coordinate constantly ones activities with environmental changes. The function of communicating with the environment is achieved through a number of pathways that receive and process signals, not only from the external environment but also from different regions within the cell. Individual pathways transmit signals along linear tracts resulting in regulation of discrete cell functions. This type of information transfer is an important part of the cellular repertoire of regulatory mechanisms. However, as increasingly larger numbers of cell signaling components and pathways are being identified and studied, it has become apparent that these linear pathways are not free-standing entities but parts of larger networks. Several articles in this review series describe in exquisite detail how individual classes of signaling pathways are organized and function. As we understand the details of such functional organization and move to the next level of analyzing integrated cellular functions, it will become increasingly important to identify and study the properties and capabilities of signaling networks as a whole. One of the more surprising revelations that is coming from the initial studies of networks and component interactions in different cell types is that there may be a general signaling network that receives signals from cell type–specific inputs (i.e., receptors) and engage cell type–specific machinery. The molecular identity of the signaling components and their interacting partners may be cell type–specific, but the overall function of these components and the logic of the circuitry is preserved from cell type to cell type. We will compare two cell types, T cells (Dustin and Chan, 2000 [this issue of Cell]) and the postsynaptic region of glutamatergic synapses, to develop this argument. Signaling networks are likely to have a variety of emergent properties and capabilities. We will describe some of our current insights into how signaling networks are organized and how this dynamic spatial organization can lead to higher order cellular capabilities. As an example of such capabilities, we further develop the concept that the ability of a cell to regulate spatially resolved multiple functions in a coordinated manner arises from the organization of signaling pathways into networks.

Postsynaptic CAMP pathway gates early LTP in hippocampal CA1 region

The role of the cAMP pathway in LTP was studied in the CA1 region of hippocampus. Widely spaced trains of high frequency stimulation generated cAMP postsynaptically via NMDA receptors and calmodulin, consistent with the Ca2+/calmodulin-mediated stimulation of postsynaptic adenylyl cyclase. The early phase of LTP produced by the same pattern of high frequency stimulation was dependent on postsynaptic cAMP. However, synaptic transmission was not increased by postsynaptic application of cAMP. Early LTP became cAMP-independent when protein phosphatase inhibitors were injected postsynaptically. These observations indicate that in early LTP the cAMP signaling pathway, instead of transmitting signals for the generation of LTP, gates LTP through postsynaptic protein phosphatases.

Local protein synthesis mediates a rapid increase in dendritic elongation factor 1A after induction of late long-term potentiation.

The maintenance of long-term potentiation (LTP) requires a brief period of accelerated protein synthesis soon after synaptic stimulation, suggesting that an early phase of enhanced translation contributes to stable LTP. The mechanism regulating protein synthesis and the location and identities of mRNAs translated are not well understood. Here, we show in acute brain slices that the induction of protein synthesis-dependent hippocampal LTP increases the expression of elongation factor 1A (eEF1A), the mRNA of which contains a 5′ terminal oligopyrimidine tract. This effect is blocked by rapamycin, indicating that the increase in EF1A expression is mediated by the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. We find that mRNA for eEF1A is present in pyramidal cell dendrites and that the LTP-associated increase in eEF1A expression was intact in dendrites that had been severed from their cell bodies before stimulation. eEF1A levels increased within 5 min after stimulation in a translation-dependent manner, and this effect remained stable for 3 h. These results suggest a mechanism whereby synaptic stimulation, by signaling through the mTOR pathway, produces an increase in dendritic translational capacity that contributes to LTP maintenance.

Cholinergic stimulation enhances long-term potentiation in the CA1 region of rat hippocampus.

The effect of the cholinergic agonist carbachol on a putative substrate for memory (long-term potentiation; LTP) was investigated in slices of rat hippocampus (CA1 region). Carbachol (5 microM) increased LTP when the presynaptic depression of the EPSP was controlled. The results indicate that carbachol enhances the effectiveness of the tetanus, probably through postsynaptic mechanisms. This effect may have implications for the role of acetylcholine in memory and the use of cholinergics in memory disorders.

Long-term potentiation in rat hippocampus is inhibited by low concentrations of ethanol.

Acute ethanol ingestion impairs memory in humans at concentrations associated with mild intoxication. A possible neurophysiological correlate of this effect is the suppression by ethanol of long-tem potentiation (LTP), a persistent increase in synaptic efficiency which has been proposed as a substrate for memory. However, in previous studies ethanol has been shown to impair LTP only at very high concentrations, near the lethal level in humans. We now report that ethanol can significantly reduce LTP in rat hippocampus at concentrations as low as 5 mM, a level attainable following ingestion of a single alcoholic drink. We also demonstrate that the potency of ethanol in depressing LTP correlates well with its potency in inhibiting the response to N-methyl-D-aspartate, an agonist at the glutamate receptors implicated in LTP induction. The influence of low ethanol concentrations on LTP may contribute to the memory impairment associated with its use in humans.

Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Upregulates the Dendritic Translation Machinery in Long-Term Potentiation by Controlling the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway

Protein synthesis is required for persistent forms of synaptic plasticity, including long-term potentiation (LTP). A key regulator of LTP-related protein synthesis is mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which is thought to modulate translational capacity by facilitating the synthesis of particular components of the protein synthesis machinery. Recently, extracellularly regulated kinase (ERK) also was shown to mediate plasticity-related translation, an effect that may involve regulation of the mTOR pathway. We studied the interaction between the mTOR and ERK pathways in hippocampal LTP induced at CA3–CA1 synapses by high-frequency synaptic stimulation (HFS). Within minutes after HFS, the expression of multiple translational proteins, the synthesis of which is under the control of mTOR, increased in area CA1 stratum radiatum. This upregulation was detected in pyramidal cell dendrites and was blocked by inhibitors of the ERK pathway. In addition, ERK mediated the stimulation of mTOR by HFS. The possibility that ERK regulates mTOR by acting at a component further upstream in the phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)–mTOR pathway was tested by probing the phosphorylation of p90-S6 kinase, phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1), and Akt. ERK inhibitors blocked HFS-induced phosphorylation of all three proteins at sites implicated in the regulation of mTOR. Moreover, a component of basal and HFS-induced ERK activity depended on PI3K, indicating that mTOR-mediated protein synthesis in LTP requires coincident and mutually dependent activity in the PI3K and ERK pathways. The role of ERK in regulating PDK1 and Akt, with their extensive effects on cellular function, has important implications for the coordinated response of the neuron to LTP-inducing stimulation.

An analysis of the depolarization produced in guinea‐pig hippocampus by cholinergic receptor stimulation.

1. The effects of carbachol on hippocampal pyramidal neurones were studied in tissue slices in vitro with intracellular microelectrodes, employing current clamp and voltage clamp methods. 2. The calcium‐dependent potassium current, IAHP, and the voltage‐dependent potassium current, IM, were both reversibly blocked by the application of carbachol (5‐10 microM). 3. Carbachol (1‐10 microM) induced a steady inward current under circumstances in which both IAHP and IM were inactive. This inward current was sometimes difficult to reverse upon carbachol wash‐out, an effect possibly related to receptor desensitization. 4. The depolarizing effect of carbachol was reversed by 0.1 microM‐atropine, and exhibited an apparent dissociation coefficient of 1.2 microM for carbachol and 18 nM for pirenzepine, indicating that it is mediated by activation of an M1 muscarinic receptor. 5. The depolarizing effect or inward current induced by carbachol was completely blocked by the potassium channel blockers caesium, tetraethylammonium and barium. 6. The slope of the current‐voltage (I‐V) plots in carbachol was reduced in the majority of cells, and crossed the control I‐V plots at a negative membrane potential. The reversal potentials in carbachol shifted in a positive direction when bathing potassium concentration was increased. 7. In a number of cells, the I‐V curves in carbachol were parallel to or converged positively with the control I‐V curves. 8. The effects of carbachol were compared to those of serotonin, which increases a ‘pure’ potassium conductance. Serotonin (10 microM) produced an increase in the slope of the I‐V curve, with a reversal potential sensitive to changes in bathing potassium concentration. The carbachol reversal potential values were negative to those of serotonin at 5 and 10 mM‐potassium. The equilibrium potentials for carbachol and serotonin were equal at 25 mM‐potassium. 9. The negative values of the reversal potential at 5 and 10 mM‐potassium and the occurrence of non‐crossing I‐V characteristics in carbachol could be explained by postulating a second effect of carbachol: namely, a non‐specific conductance increase in the dendrites. 10. It is concluded that carbachol depolarizes pyramidal cells in the hippocampus by blocking a voltage‐insensitive potassium leak channel and does so by activating M1 muscarinic receptors. In addition, carbachol may also activate a second conductance in the dendrites, which could account for the anomalous I‐V characteristics sometimes seen in response to carbachol in these cells.

Postsynaptic signaling networks: Cellular cogwheels underlying long-term plasticity

Learning depends on positive or negative changes in synaptic transmission that are synapse-specific and sustained. Synaptic signals can be directly measured and respond to certain kinds of stimulation by becoming persistently enhanced (long-term potentiation, LTP) or decreased (long-term depression, LTD). Studying LTP and LTD opens a window on to the molecular mechanisms of memory. Although changes in both pre- and postsynaptic strength have been implicated in LTP and LTD, most attention has been focused on changes in postsynaptic glutamate receptor density. This is controlled by intracellular Ca(2+) ions via a network of signaling molecules. Changes in postsynaptic Ca(2+) concentration depend on the coincidence of appropriate synaptic signals, as is found in learning situations. The long-term persistence of LTP and LTD requires gene transcription and translation. It is posited that local translation at the synapse, in a self-sustaining manner, mediates the persistence of long-term changes despite constant turnover of the synaptic components.

MuSK Expressed in the Brain Mediates Cholinergic Responses, Synaptic Plasticity, and Memory Formation

Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase receptor (MuSK) has been believed to be mainly expressed and functional in muscle, in which it mediates the formation of neuromuscular junctions. Here we show that MuSK is expressed in the brain, particularly in neurons, as well as in non-neuronal tissues. We also provide evidence that MuSK expression in the hippocampus is required for memory consolidation, because temporally restricted knockdown after training impairs memory retention. Hippocampal disruption of MuSK also prevents the learning-dependent induction of both cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation and CCAAT enhancer binding protein β (C/EBPβ) expression, suggesting that the role of MuSK during memory consolidation critically involves the CREB–C/EBP pathway. Furthermore, we found that MuSK also plays an important role in mediating hippocampal oscillatory activity in the theta frequency as well as in the induction and maintenance of long-term potentiation, two synaptic responses that correlate with memory formation. We conclude that MuSK plays an important role in brain functions, including memory formation. Therefore, its expression and role are broader than what was believed previously.

Synaptic Stimulation of mTOR Is Mediated by Wnt Signaling and Regulation of Glycogen Synthetase Kinase-3

The persistent or “late” phase of long-term potentiation (L-LTP), which requires protein synthesis, can be induced by relatively intense synaptic activity. The ability of such strong synaptic protocols to engage the translational machinery and produce plasticity-related proteins, while weaker protocols activate only posttranslational processes and transient potentiation (early LTP; E-LTP), is not understood. Among the major translation control pathways in neurons, the stimulation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key event in the induction of L-LTP. We report that mTOR is tonically suppressed in rat hippocampus under resting conditions, a consequence of the basal activity of glycogen synthetase kinase 3 (GSK3). This suppression could be overcome by weak synaptic stimulation in the presence of the β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol, a combination that induced L-LTP, and activation of mTOR coincided with the Akt-mediated phosphorylation of GSK3. Surprisingly, while isoproterenol alone elevated Akt activity, it failed to increase GSK3 phosphorylation or mTOR signaling, showing that Akt was uncoupled from these effectors in the absence of synaptic stimulation. With the addition of weak stimulation, Akt signaled to GSK3 and mTOR, a gating effect that was mediated by voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and the Wnt pathway. mTOR could be stimulated by pharmacological inhibition, enabling weak HFS to induce L-LTP. These results establish GSK3 as an integrator of Akt and Wnt signals and suggest that overcoming GSK3-mediated suppression of mTOR is a key event in the induction of L-LTP by synaptic activity.