Emmanuelle Nicolas-Virelizier

Early event status informs subsequent outcome in newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma

Recent advances in follicular lymphoma (FL) have resulted in prolongation of overall survival (OS). Here we assessed if early events as defined by event‐free survival (EFS) at 12 and 24 months from diagnosis (EFS12/EFS24) can inform subsequent OS in FL. 920 newly diagnosed grade 1‐3A FL patients enrolled on the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) from 2002‐2012 were initially evaluated. EFS was defined as time from diagnosis to progression, relapse, re‐treatment, or death due to any cause. OS was compared to age‐and‐sex‐matched survival in the general US population using standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used a cohort of 412 FL patients from two Lyon, France hospital registries for independent replication. Patients who failed to achieve EFS12 had poor subsequent OS (MER SMR = 3.72, 95%CI: 2.78‐4.88; Lyon SMR = 8.74, 95%CI: 5.41‐13.36). Conversely, patients achieving EFS12 had no added mortality beyond the background population (MER SMR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.56‐0.94, Lyon SMR = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.58‐1.65). Patients with early events after immunochemotherapy had especially poor outcomes (EFS12 failure: MER SMR = 17.63, 95%CI:11.97‐25.02, Lyon SMR = 19.10, 95%CI:9.86‐33.36; EFS24 failure: MER SMR = 13.02, 95%CI:9.31‐17.74, Lyon SMR = 7.22, 95%CI:4.13‐11.74). In a combined dataset of all patients from both cohorts, baseline FLIPI was no longer informative in EFS12 achievers. Reassessment of patient status at 12 months from diagnosis in follicular lymphoma patients, or at 24 months in patients treated with immunochemotherapy, is a strong predictor of subsequent overall survival in FL. Early event status provides a simple, clinically relevant endpoint for studies assessing outcome in FL. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1096–1101, 2016.

The Durable Clearance of the T315I BCR-ABL Mutated Clone in Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients on Omacetaxine Allows Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Rechallenge

PURPOSE The onset of a BCR-ABLT315I mutation during the course of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) usually results in poor survival, and therapeutic options remain few in the absence of any allogeneic donor. PATIENTS AND METHODS We have investigated the affect of subcutaneous omacetaxine (OMA, or homo-harringtonine) cycles on unmutated and T315I-mutated BCR-ABL transcripts in a series of 8 TKI-resistant chronic-phase CML patients and we have addressed the question of whether the administration of OMA could resensitize patients to TKIs. Patients were regularly monitored for total disease burden and for BCR-ABLT315I transcripts using a new quantitative sensitive technique (sensitivity threshold, 0.05%), for up to 27 cycles of OMA. RESULTS Overall, patients demonstrated hematologic, cytogenetic, or molecular improvement. An initial rapid decline and a sustained disappearance of T315I-mutated transcripts were observed in 50% of patients, after a median of 10.5 cycles (range, 3-27 cycles) of OMA. As the unmutated leukemic burden reduction was modest, 2 patients were submitted to nilotinib after 9 months of sustained BCR-ABLT315I transcripts negativity on OMA and mutated transcripts remained undetectable after a median follow-up of 12 months on nilotinib challenge. CONCLUSION We suggest that OMA (ie, a non-targeted therapy) might provide a better disease control allowing the disappearance of the mutated clone probably elicited by the clone deselection after TKI release, and/or a preferential activity of OMA on the T315I-mutated cells through unknown mechanisms. These observations suggest that OMA could allow a safe TKI rechallenge in patients with resistant chronic-phase CML.

Combination of romidepsin with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone in previously untreated patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma: a non-randomised, phase 1b/2 study

BACKGROUND Romidepsin is a histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in the USA for patients with recurrent or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma and has shown activity in this setting with mainly haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity. Although it has limited efficacy, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) therapy is widely used for treatment of de-novo peripheral T-cell lymphoma. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and activity of romidepsin combined with CHOP in patients with previously untreated disease. METHODS We enrolled patients aged 18-80 years with histologically proven, previously untreated, peripheral T-cell lymphoma (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2) into a dose-escalation (phase 1b) and expansion (phase 2) study at nine Lymphoma Study Association centres in France. In the dose-escalation phase, we allocated consecutive blocks of three participants to receive eight 3 week cycles of CHOP (intravenous cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), and vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) [maximum 2 mg] on day 1 and oral prednisone 40 mg/m(2) on days 1-5) in association with varying doses of romidepsin. The starting dose was 10 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle, and we used a 3 + 3 design. We assessed dose-limiting toxicities only during the first two cycles. The primary endpoint was to determine the recommended dose for the combination. For the phase 2 study, we aimed to increase the cohort of patients receiving the recommended dose to a total of 25 patients. Patients were assessed for safety outcomes at least twice per cycle according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of romidepsin and CHOP. This trial is registered at the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), number 2010-020962-91 and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01280526. FINDINGS Between Jan 13, 2011, and May 21, 2013, we enrolled 37 patients (18 treated in phase 1b and 19 patients in phase 2). Three of six patients initially treated at 10 mg/m(2) had a dose-limiting toxicity. The dose-escalation committee decided to modify the study protocol to redefine dose-limiting toxicities with regard to haematological toxicity. Three patients were treated with 8 mg/m(2) of romidepsin, an additional three at 10 mg/m(2) (one dose-limiting toxicity), and six patients at 12 mg/m(2) (three dose-limiting toxicities). We chose romidepsin 12 mg/m(2) as the recommended dose for phase 2. Of the 37 patients treated, three had early cardiac events (two myocardial infarctions and one acute cardiac failure). No deaths were attributable to toxicity. 25 (68%) of 37 patients had at least one serious adverse event. Overall, the most frequent serious adverse events were febrile neutropenia (five [14%] of 37 patients), physical health deterioration (five [14%]), lung infection (four [11%]), and vomiting (three [8%]). 33 (89%) of patients had grade 3-4 neutropenia, and 29 (78%) had grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. INTERPRETATION Romidepsin can be combined with CHOP but this combination should now be tested in comparison to CHOP alone in a randomised trial. FUNDING Celgene.

Impact of post-brentuximab vedotin consolidation on relapsed/refractory CD30+ Hodgkin lymphomas: a large retrospective study on 240 patients enrolled in the French Named-Patient Program

Brentuximab vedotin was reported to be effective and safe against refractory/relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma in cohorts of between 12 to 102 patients. Herein we report our retrospective analysis of the French experience with brentuximab vedotin used alone to treat 240 refractory/relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma patients enrolled in a named patient program between 2011 and 2013. All patients had histologically documented CD30+ Hodgkin lymphoma; 74% had refractory disease or early relapses. After a median of 3 lines of chemotherapy, brentuximab vedotin was infused intravenously (1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was best response. Response at the end of treatment, its duration, survival data and toxicity profile were secondary endpoints. Patients received a median of 6 cycles; 68 underwent a consolidation thereafter. The best response was observed after a median of 4 cycles in 145 (60.4%) patients: 33.8% complete response/unconfirmed complete response, 26.7% partial response. Objective responses were observed as decreased (39.3%) in the 28 patients >60 years. The median response duration was 8.4 months. With median follow-up at 16.1 months, median progression-free survival was 6.8 months and this was significantly longer for patients transplanted after brentuximab vedotin (a median of 18,8 months); median overall survival was not reached. No death has been linked to brentuximab vedotin toxicity. The most common adverse events were peripheral sensory neuropathy (29.3%) and hematological toxicity. The results of this analysis support the previously reported brentuximab vedotin efficacy with manageable toxicity. Because of the short-term responses in most patients, a high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation for responders should be considered as quickly as possible.

Autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: efficacy in the rituximab era and comparison to first allogeneic transplants. A report from the EBMT Lymphoma Working Party.

In the era of chemoimmunotherapy, the optimal treatment paradigm for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has been challenged. We reviewed the outcome of standard salvage therapy with an autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT) over the last two decades and the outcome of allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) in the most recent decade. AutoSCT recipients diagnosed between 1992 and 2002 (n=2737) were compared with those diagnosed between 2002 and 2010 (n=3980). Patients diagnosed after 2002 had a significantly lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse incidence (RI) and a superior PFS and overall survival (OS). A total of 4210 patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2010 underwent either an autoSCT or an alloSCT as their first transplant procedure. Two-hundred and thirty patients received an alloSCT (myeloablative (MACalloSCT) n=132, reduced intensity (RICalloSCT) n=98). The 4-year NRM rates were 7%, 20% and 27% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. The 4-year RI was 45%, 40% and 38% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively (NS). The 4-year PFS were 48%, 52% and 35% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. The 4-year OS was 60%, 52% and 38% for autoSCT, RIC alloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. After adjustment for confounding factors NRM was significantly worse for patients undergoing alloSCT whilst there was no difference in the RI.

Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: a Lymphoma Study Association retrospective study

Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma represents a distinct entity from classical Hodgkin lymphoma. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the management of patients with nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of adult patients with nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma were collected in Lymphoma Study Association centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed, and the competing risks formulation of a Cox regression model was used to control the effect of risk factors on relapse or death as competing events. Among 314 evaluable patients, 82.5% had early stage nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Initial management consisted in watchful waiting (36.3%), radiotherapy (20.1%), rituximab (8.9%), chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy (21.7%), combined modality treatment (12.7%), or radiotherapy plus rituximab (0.3%). With a median follow-up of 55.8 months, the 10-year PFS and OS estimates were 44.2% and 94.9%, respectively. The 4-year PFS estimates were 79.6% after radiotherapy, 77.0% after rituximab alone, 78.8% after chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy, and 93.9% after combined modality treatment. For the whole population, early treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, but not rituximab alone (Hazard ratio 0.695 [0.320–1.512], P=0.3593) significantly reduced the risk of progression compared to watchful waiting (HR 0.388 [0.234–0.643], P=0.0002). Early treatment appears more beneficial compared to watchful waiting in terms of progression-free survival, but has no impact on overall survival. Radiotherapy in selected early stage nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, and combined modality treatment, chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy for other patients, are the main options to treat adult patients with a curative intent.

Impact of the introduction of rituximab in first‐line follicular lymphoma: a retrospective study of 247 unselected patients referred to a single institution with a long‐term follow‐up

Rituximab was approved in France in 2004, following randomized trials that demonstrated efficacy in newly diagnosed high tumour burden follicular lymphoma (FL). This retrospective study compared the management and outcome of FL in unselected patients treated in a single institution before and after rituximab approval. Two hundred and forty‐seven adult patients were referred with first‐line FL between 1996 and 2010 and are included in this study. The 103 pre‐rituximab patients comprising cohort 1 were diagnosed between January 1996 and December 2003; cohort 2 includes the 144 patients diagnosed after the approval of rituximab between January 2004 and December 2010. Baseline clinical and biological data, type of therapy, treatment response, progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared. There were no statistically significant differences between the two cohorts with respect to baseline clinical and disease characteristics, including FL International Prognostic Index score. The major difference between the two cohorts is the use of rituximab in first line. Seventy‐one per cent of patients in cohort 2 received rituximab (19% alone, 52% with chemotherapy) versus 10% in cohort 1 (2% alone, 8% with chemotherapy; p < 0.0001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher for cohort 2 (ORR 84% compared with 72% for cohort 1; p = 0.03). The PFS and OS rates were also significantly better: 3‐year PFS 72% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64–80%] versus 55% (95% CI 45–64%), p = 0.0039 and 3‐year OS 98% (95% CI 94–99%) versus 83% (95% CI 74–90%), p = 0.0007. Effect of period of study is significant when using multivariate analysis on PFS and OS and lactate dehydrogenase level (PFS and OS) and age (OS). These data from everyday practice confirm the benefit for patients with FL treated in the last decade through availability of rituximab in first line used alone or in association with various chemotherapy regimens. Copyright

Role of up-front autologous stem-cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma for patients in response after induction: an analysis of patients from LYSA centers

Background Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) remains a therapeutic challenge. Due to the rarity and the heterogeneity of PTCL, no consensus has been achieved regarding even the type of first-line treatment. The benefit of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is, therefore, still intensely debated. Patients and methods In the absence of randomized trials addressing the role of ASCT, we performed a large multicentric retrospective study and used both a multivariate proportional hazard model and a propensity score matching approach to correct for sample selection bias between patients allocated or not to ASCT in intention-to-treat (ITT). Results Among 527 patients screened from 14 centers in France, Belgium and Portugal, a final cohort of 269 patients ≤65 years old with PTCL-not otherwise specified (NOS) (N = 78, 29%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) (N = 123, 46%) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK-ALCL) (N = 68, 25%) with partial (N = 52, 19%) or complete responses (N = 217, 81%) after induction was identified and information about treatment allocation was carefully collected before therapy initiation from medical records. One hundred and thirty-four patients were allocated to ASCT in ITT and 135 were not. Neither the Cox multivariate model (HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.69-1.50 for PFS and HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.68-1.69 for OS) nor the propensity score analysis after stringent matching for potential confounding factors (logrank P = 0.90 and 0.66 for PFS and OS, respectively) found a survival advantage in favor of ASCT as a consolidation procedure for patients in response after induction. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any further difference for patients according to response status, stage disease or risk category. Conclusions The present data do not support the use of ASCT for up-front consolidation for all patients with PTCL-NOS, AITL, or ALK-ALCL with partial or complete response after induction.

Salvage high-dose chemotherapy in female patients with relapsed/refractory germ-cell tumors: a retrospective analysis of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Background High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation is a standard option for relapsed/refractory testicular germ-cell tumor (GCT), but only few data have been reported in female patients with GCT. We conducted a retrospective analysis of female patients with GCT treated with HDC and registered with the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Patients and methods Between 1985 and 2013, 60 registered female patients with GCT, median age 27 years (range 15-48), were treated with salvage HDC. Forty patients (67%) had primary ovarian GCT, 8 (13%) mediastinal, 7 (12%) retroperitoneal and 5 (8%) other primary sites/unknown. Twenty-two patients (37%) received HDC as second-line therapy, 29 (48%) as third-line, and 9 (15%) as fourth- to sixth-line. Nine of 60 patients (15%) received HDC as late-intensification with no evidence of metastasis before HDC. The conditioning HDC regimens comprised carboplatin in 51 of 60 cases (85%), and consisted of a single HDC cycle in 31 cases (52%), a multi-cycle HDC regimen in 29 (48%). Results Nine cases who underwent late intensification HDC were not evaluable for response. Of the other 51 assessable patients, 17 (33%) achieved a complete response (CR), 8 (16%) a marker-negative partial remission (PRm-), 5 (10%) a marker-positive partial remission, 5 (10%) stable disease, and 13 (25%) progressive disease. There were 3 toxic deaths (6%). With an overall median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-219), 7 of 9 (78%) patients with late intensification and 18 of the 25 patients (72%) achieving a CR/PRm- following HDC were free of relapse/progression. In total, 25 of 60 patients (42%) were progression-free following HDC at a median follow-up of 87 months (range 3-219 months). Conclusions Salvage HDC based on carboplatin represents a therapeutic option for female patients with relapsed/refractory GCT.

A single dose pegfilgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia by the EMA 2000 schedule

Abstract Dose intensity has been demonstrated to be one determinant for treatment efficacy in younger adults with high-risk (relapsed and refractory) acute myelogenous leukemia. Between 2000 and 2006, 56 patients entered the EMA 2000 study and received timed sequential reinduction chemotherapy. From 2004, chemotherapy was also followed by one subcutaneous dose of pegfilgrastim. Thirty-six patients reached a complete remission, while nine obtained a partial remission. Median time to granulocyte and platelet recovery was 34 and 38 days respectively. The major non-hematologic toxicities were severe infections but despite this 23 remitters could proceed to their post-remission treatment, although 13 did not because of severe toxicity or early relapse. The median overall survival was 9·3 months. The EMA 2000 regimen is a highly effective treatment with a response rate of 64% and a low early death rate. The period of critical neutropenia was relatively short in both phases and the supportive use of pegfilgrastim, although showing a trend toward reduced neutropenic period, did not appear to reduce the risk of infection in this group and may not be a critical requirement for reducing the risk of treatment-related toxicity.