Ennio Giulio Favalli

TNF-α Antagonist Survival Rate in a Cohort of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Observed under Conditions of Standard Clinical Practice

A cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in the Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LOHREN) registry and receiving anti‐TNF therapy was evaluated after 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Of the 1114 patients in the registry 1064 met the clinical criteria for inclusion with 519 receiving infliximab, 303 adalimumab, and 242 etanercept. The therapeutic survival curve of these patients showed that the likelihood of continuing anti‐TNF therapy was 78.8% after 12 months, 65.2% after 24 months, and 52.9% after 36 months, with a risk of dropout similar for inefficacy and adverse events. There were 405 anti‐TNF therapy discontinuations (38.1%): 180 (16.9%) due to inefficacy, 194 (18.2%) adverse events, and 31 (2.9%) other reasons. Four deaths (2 septicemia, 1 postinfective cerebritis, 1 heart failure) were considered to be related to anti‐TNF therapy. Of the discontinuations, 219 (54.1%) occurred within the first 12 months: 110 due to adverse events, 89 inefficacy, and 20 due to other reasons. After 36 months, the likelihood of survival on etanercept (62.5%) was significantly greater than the likelihood of survival on infliximab (49.1%) or adalimumab (53.6%). A higher risk of therapy discontinuations due to adverse events was associated with increasing age, a corticosteroid >5 mg/day, a high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), a higher risk of therapy discontinuations due to inefficacy was associated with the previous use of ≥4 disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and a high ESR. Comorbidities, increasing DAS28 values and co‐therapy with methotrexate were associated with a lower risk of discontinuation.

Serious infections during anti-TNFα treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients ☆

The objective was to estimate the incidence of serious infections in the patients treated with anti-TNFalpha agents for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recorded in the Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LORHEN) registry. The study inclusion criteria were met by 1064 of the 1114 patients with long-standing RA, 519 treated with infliximab, 303 with adalimumab, and 242 with etanercept; their mean age was 55.8 years and the mean duration of RA 9.4 years. Seventy-three patients (6.9%) experienced a total of 74 serious infections, an incidence rate for all treatment courses of 35.9 per 1000 patient-years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 27.66-44.13). Most were lower respiratory tract (34.2%) or skin and soft tissue infections (20.5%). Of the 1064 patients, the 790 treated with anti-TNFalpha after March 2002 underwent screening tests for LTBI; five patients developed active tuberculosis. Three patients died of septic shock. The type of anti-TNFalpha agent did not seem to affect the incidence or site of the infections. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified age at the start of anti-TNFalpha treatment (p=0.008), baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate ([ESR] p=0.014), and the concomitant use of corticosteroids (p=0.029) as significant predictors of infections. There was no statistically significant difference in risk between the anti-TNFalpha agents.

Long-term anti-TNF therapy and the risk of serious infections in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab in the GISEA registry

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk of serious infections (SIs) in RA patients receiving anti-TNF therapy on the basis of the data included in the GISEA register. METHODS The study involved 2769 adult patients with long-standing RA (mean age 53.2±13.4 years; mean disease duration 9.0±8.3 years) enrolled in the GISEA register, who had been treated for at least 6 months with TNF inhibitors or had discontinued therapy due to SI: 837 (30%) treated with infliximab (IFN), 802 (29%) with adalimumab (ADA), and 1130 (41%) with etanercept (ETN). RESULTS 176 patients had experienced at least one of the 226 Sis during the 9 years of treatment with an anti-TNF agent, an overall incidence of 31.8/1000 patient-years (95% CI 25.2-38.3): 23.7/1000 patient-years (95% CI 13.1-34.2) on ADA; 12.8/1000 patient-years (95% CI 6.3-19.4) on ETN and 65.1/1000 patient-years (95% CI 48.4-81.8) on IFN. The risk was higher in the first than in the second year of treatment, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.08) (38.9% of the SIs were recorded in the first 12 months of treatment). The risk of SI was significantly different among the three treatment groups (p<0.0001). Multivariate models confirmed that the use of steroids (p<0.046), concomitant DMARD treatment during anti-TNF therapy (p=0.004), advanced age at the start of anti-TNF treatment (p<0.0001), and the use of IFN or ADA rather than ETN (respectively p<0.0001 and p=0.023) were strong and statistically significant predictors of infection. CONCLUSIONS Anti-TNF therapy is associated with a small but significant risk of SI that is associated with the concomitant use of steroids, advanced age at the start of anti-TNF treatment, and the type of anti-TNF agent.

Obesity and reduction of the response rate to anti–tumor necrosis factor α in rheumatoid arthritis: An approach to a personalized medicine

Obesity is a mild, long‐lasting inflammatory disease and, as such, could increase the inflammatory burden of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study aim was to determine whether obesity represents a risk factor for a poor remission rate in RA patients requiring anti–tumor necrosis factor α (anti‐TNFα) therapy for progressive and active disease despite treatment with methotrexate or other disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with anti-TNF-alpha agents: A reappraisal

It has been found that tumour necrosis factor(TNF)-alpha plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the development of drugs targeting this molecule has extended the therapeutical approaches to RA patients. A number of observational studies of large patient series have also been published over the last few years, many of which have been based on national registries designed to monitor the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF agents, and allow healthcare institutions to control expenditure. Registry data can also help in identifying clinical and laboratory findings capable of predicting response. It has been suggested that the percentage of responding patients is lower in everyday clinical practice than that observed in RCTs, possibly because of patient selection, the use of a washout period before inclusion (which may artificially increase disease activity), and differences in doses, co-morbidities and adherence to therapy. A number of safety concerns have been raised since the introduction of anti-TNF agents, and they are now contraindicated in patients with advanced heart failure; however, the most widely debated current issues regard infections and neoplastic diseases. Moreover, the marketing of new and expensive biological agents has made strictly necessary to create systems capable of monitoring their safety and effectiveness in everyday practice, including the use of longitudinal observational studies. As the first published registry of anti-TNFalpha-treated patients in Italy, Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LORHEN) is already making its contribution in this direction.

Inflammatory and prothrombotic biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Effects of tumor necrosis factor-α blockade

OBJECTIVE Increased cardiovascular (CV) risk is a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) hallmark and it has been mainly related to chronic systemic inflammation. Since inflammation is linked to coagulation perturbation, both may play a role in increasing CV risk. Treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha blocking agents is effective in RA and reduces local and systemic inflammation but there is little information on its effect on coagulation. We therefore investigated inflammation and coagulation plasma biomarkers before and after infliximab treatment in RA patients. METHODS We studied 20 patients with active RA and 40 healthy controls. Patients were treated with: a stable dose of methotrexate (10mg/week), and infliximab (3mg/kg) at weeks 0, 2, 6 and 14. At baseline and week 14, we determined: disease activity score (DAS-28), visual analogue scale pain, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), TNF-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) and D-dimer. The same inflammation and coagulation parameters were evaluated 1h after infliximab infusion in 10 patients. RESULTS At baseline, ESR, CRP, TNF-alpha, IL-6, F1+2 and D-dimer levels were significantly higher in RA patients than in controls (P=0.0001). After 14weeks of infliximab treatment, there was a significant clinical improvement and ESR and CRP, IL-6, F1+2 and D-dimer level decrease (P=0.001-P=0.008). The levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6, F1+2 and D-dimer significantly decreased 1h after infliximab infusion (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Infliximab decreases inflammation and coagulation biomarkers in RA patients. Such a combined effect may be pivotal in reducing the whole thrombotic risk in these patients.

Drug-induced lupus following treatment with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis.

After introduction of infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there have been many reports of patients developing asymptomatic higher rate of antinuclear antibodies and antidsDNA antibodies than in non-infliximab-treated patients. However, only five clinical drug-induced lupus (DIL) cases have been documented following treatment with infliximab, in RA and in Crohns diseases. We report a case of a 69-year-old female with a 5 year history of RA, who was successfully treated with low-dose methotrexate (MTX) and infliximab (initially 3 mg/kg and from the fourth infusion 5 mg/kg) for 23 weeks. Before the sixth infusion, she was diagnosed with DIL by both clinical features (fever> 38°C, recurrence of active synovitis, myalgia, erythematous rash and general malaise) and laboratory findings (antinuclear antibodies 1:160, anti-double-stranded DNA positive by ELISA assay, decreased serum complement C3 and C4, hypergammaglobulinaemia, increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate). After discontinuation of treatment and therapy with oral prednisone, lupus resolved within 8 weeks.

Tumour necrosis factor antagonist therapy and cancer development: Analysis of the LORHEN registry

OBJECTIVE The objective was to compare cancer risk in a RA cohort population treated with TNF antagonists, and identify the characteristics of the patients at higher risk. METHODS The study involved 1114 RA patients treated with anti-TNF agents after failing to respond to traditional DMARDs, 1064 of whom were evaluable for adverse events over an average observational period of 23.32 months. The relative cancer risks (expressed as hazard ratios) in the anti-TNF treated patients were estimated using univariate and multivariate analyses. The rate of cancer in this cohort was compared with that in the general population using data from the Varese and Milan Cancer Report. RESULTS There were 18 incident cases (1.7%), 4 of which involved lymphomas. Comparison with the general population showed that the overall cancer risk was similar, but the risk of lymphoma was about five times higher in the RA patients treated with a biological agent. Higher RR were found in males (HR 4.95, 95% CI 1.97-12.48; p=0.001) and patients aged >65 years (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.08-6.84; p=0.034); combined therapy with methotrexate seemed to be protective (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.87; p=0.026). CONCLUSION The overall cancer risk in RA patients treated with anti-TNF seemed to be similar to that in the general population in the same geographical area, but the risk of haematological cancer was significantly greater. The demographic and clinical factors associated with a higher risk of cancer in our cohort were male gender and an age of >65 years.

Predicting response to anti-TNF treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients

OBJECTIVE To identify the clinical factors predicting failure or a good clinical response in the cohort of RA patients entered in the Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LORHEN) registry after 3 years of treatment with anti-TNF agents. METHODS We studied the patients who had received anti-TNF agents and been followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Disease activity at baseline and after 6 months was assessed using the DAS28, and response was evaluated according to the EULAR improvement criteria. RESULTS 1005 patients (55.72 years) were included in the analysis. at baseline the DAS-28 was 5.91+/-0.95 and a HAQ score was 1.46+/-0.61. At mean of 14.57 months, 29.9% of the patients achieved a DAS-28 of <or=2.6 (remission). A higher RR for remission was associated with male gender (AHR 1.51, 95% CI 1.14-2.00; p: 0.004) and a lower RR for remission with: prior treatment with >3 DMARDs (AHR 0.077, 95% CI 0.58-1.03; p: 0.074), a high ESR (AHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.92; p: 0.000), Steinbrockers functional class III/IV (AHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.90; p: 0.010), a high TJC (AHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99; p: 0.011). A 12-month EULAR non-response was observed in 153/821 (18.6%) associated with a higher baseline HAQ score (AOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.03-2.20, p: 0.033), prior treatment with >3 DMARDs (AOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.09-2.85; p: 0.021) and corticosteroid >5 mg/day (AOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.06-3.97; p: 0.034). CONCLUSION We found that only a minority of patients with long-standing RA treated with anti-TNF agents achieve a good clinical response or remission.

Newly identified antiatherosclerotic activity of methotrexate and adalimumab: complementary effects on lipoprotein function and macrophage cholesterol metabolism.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis. The reduction in cardiovascular risk that is induced by methotrexate (MTX) and anti–tumor necrosis factor α agents in RA is considered secondary to their anti‐inflammatory action, but their effects on serum lipoprotein function and foam cell formation are unknown. The reduced capacity of high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) to promote cell cholesterol efflux and the increased serum cell cholesterol‐loading capacity (CLC) demonstrated in RA may contribute to foam cell development. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of MTX and adalimumab treatment on serum cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) and CLC in RA patients and to study the in vitro effects of the two drugs on macrophage cholesterol handling.