Ennio Pisano

Circular Mapping and Ablation of the Pulmonary Vein for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation Impact of Different Catheter Technologies

OBJECTIVES We conducted this study to compare the efficacy and safety of different catheter ablation technologies and of distal versus ostial pulmonary veins (PV) isolation using the circular mapping technique. BACKGROUND Electrical isolation of the PVs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a technical challenge. METHODS Two hundred eleven patients (163 men; mean age 53 +/- 11 years) with symptomatic AF were included in this study. In the first 21 patients (group 1), distal isolation (> or = 5 mm from the ostium) was achieved targeting veins triggering AF. In the remaining 190 patients (group 2), ostial isolation of all PVs was performed using 4-mm tip (47 patients), 8-mm tip (21 patients), or cooled-tip (122 patients) ablation catheters. RESULTS Distal isolation was able to eliminate premature atrial contractions (PACs) and AF in six of 21 patients (29%) and 10 of 34 PVs. After a mean follow-up time of 6 +/- 4 months, no patients treated with the 8-mm tip catheter experienced recurrence of AF, whereas 21% (10 of 47 patients) and 15% (18 of 122 patients) of the patients ablated with the 4-mm tip and the cooled-tip ablation catheters experienced recurrence of AF after a mean follow-up of 10 +/- 3 and 4 +/- 2 months, respectively. Significant complications including stroke, tamponade, and severe stenosis occurred in 3.5% (8/211) of patients. CONCLUSIONS Catheter technologies designed to achieve better lesion size appeared to have a positive impact on procedure time, fluoroscopy time, number of lesions, and overall efficacy. Although distal isolation can be achieved with fewer lesions, ostial isolation is required in the majority of patients to eliminate arrhythmogenic PACs and AF.

Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Functional Characterization, Evolution, and Influence of the Ablation Strategy

Background—Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is a complication of ablation for atrial fibrillation. The impact of different ablation strategies on the incidence of PV stenosis and its functional characterization has not been described. Methods and Results—PV isolation was performed in 608 patients. An electroanatomic approach was used in 71 and circular mapping in 537 (distal isolation, 25; ostial isolation based on PV angiography, 102; guided by intracardiac echocardiography, 140; with energy delivery based on visualization of microbubbles, 270). Severe (≥70%) narrowing was detected in 21 patients (3.4%), and moderate (50% to 69%) and mild (<50%) narrowing occurred in 27 (4.4%) and 47 (7.7%), respectively. Severe stenosis occurred in 15.5%, 20%, 2.9%, 1.4%, and 0%, respectively. Development of symptoms was correlated with involvement of >1 PV with severe narrowing (P =0.01), whereas all patients with mild and moderate narrowing were asymptomatic. In the latter group, lung perfusion (V/Q) scans were normal in all but 4 patients. All patients with severe stenosis had abnormal perfusion scans. Conclusions—V/Q scans are useful to assess the functional significance of PV stenosis. Mild and moderate degrees of PV narrowing are not associated with development of symptoms and seem to have no or minimal detrimental effect on pulmonary flow. The incidence of severe PV stenosis seems to be declining with better imaging techniques to ensure ostial isolation and to guide power titration. Mild narrowing 3 months after ablation does not preclude future development of severe stenosis and should be assessed with repeat imaging studies.

Response of Atrial Fibrillation to Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation Is Directly Related to Resumption and Delay of Pulmonary Vein Conduction

Background—The role of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in ablative treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been debated in conflicting reports. We sought to compare PV conduction in patients who had no AF recurrence (group I), patients who could maintain sinus rhythm on antiarrhythmic medication (group II), and patients who had recurrent AF despite antiarrhythmic medication (group III) after PV antrum isolation (PVAI). Methods and Results—PV conduction was examined in consecutive patients undergoing second PVAI for AF recurrence. We also recruited some patients cured of AF to undergo a repeat, limited electrophysiological study at >3 months after PVAI. All patients underwent PVAI with an intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)–guided approach with complete isolation of all 4 PV antra (PVA). The number of PVs with recurrent conduction and the shortest atrial to PV (A-PV) conduction delay was measured with the use of consistent Lasso positions defined by ICE. Late AF recurrence was defined as AF >2 months after PVAI with the patient off medications. Patients in groups I (n=26), II (n=37), and III (n=44) did not differ at baseline (38% permanent AF; ejection fraction 53±6%). Recurrence of PV–left atrial (LA) conduction was seen in 1.7±0.8 and 2.2±0.8 PVAs for groups II and III but only in 0.2±0.4 for group I (P=0.02). In patients with recurrent PV-LA conduction, the A-PV delay increased from the first to second procedure by 69±47% for group III, 267±110% for group II, and 473±71% for group I (P<0.001). When pacing was at a faster rate, A-PV block developed in all 5 of the group I patients with recurrent PV-LA conduction. Conclusions—The majority of patients with drug-free cure show no PV-LA conduction recurrence. Substantial A-PV delay is seen in patients able to maintain sinus rhythm on antiarrhythmic medication or cured of AF compared with patients who fail PVAI.

First Human Experience With Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a Through-the-Balloon Circumferential Ultrasound Ablation System for Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation

BackgroundStandard mapping and ablation of focal sources of atrial fibrillation are associated with very long procedure times and low efficacy. An anatomic approach to complete pulmonary vein isolation could overcome these limitations. Methods and ResultsFifteen patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to medication underwent circumferential isolation of the pulmonary veins by using a novel catheter, with an ultrasound transducer (8-MHz) mounted near the tip, in a saline-filled balloon. Twelve atrial foci and/or atrial fibrillation triggers were identified in 9 patients (pulmonary vein locations: left upper, 3; right upper, 6; right middle, 1; right lower, 1; and left inferior, 1). In 5 patients, lesions were placed in the absence of any mapped triggers. Irrespective of trigger mapping, circumferential isolation of both upper pulmonary veins was attempted in all patients. The lower pulmonary veins were ablated when sinus rhythm activation mapping revealed evidence of a sleeve of atrial muscle in the vein. The median number of lesions per patient required to isolate 1 pulmonary vein was 4 (range, 1 to 29). After ablation, no evidence of narrowing was seen with repeat venography or follow-up computed tomography scan. After a mean follow-up of 35±6 weeks, 5 patients had recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Three responded to drugs that were previously ineffective, and 2 remained in atrial fibrillation. ConclusionsThis novel ultrasound ablation system can successfully isolate multiple pulmonary veins. At early follow-up, this approach seems to be effective in preventing recurrent atrial fibrillation in a significant number of patients.

Randomized Study Comparing Combined Pulmonary Vein–Left Atrial Junction Disconnection and Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation Versus Pulmonary Vein–Left Atrial Junction Disconnection Alone in Patients Presenting With Typical Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation

Background—Atrial flutter (AFL) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist in the same patient. Recently it has been demonstrated that the triggers for both AF and AFL may originate in the pulmonary veins (PVs). We hypothesized that in patients with both AF and typical AFL, pulmonary vein–left atrial junction (PV-LAJ) disconnection may eliminate both arrhythmias. Methods and Results—Consecutive patients with documented symptomatic AF and typical AFL were randomly assigned to have PV-LAJ disconnection combined with cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation (group 1, n=49) or PV-LAJ disconnection alone (group 2, n=59). Within the first 8 weeks after ablation, 32 of the group 2 patients had typical AFL documented, whereas none was seen in group 1. Twenty of these 32 converted to sinus rhythm after initiating antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Twelve were cardioverted, and AADs were started. After 8 weeks, all AADS were stopped, and only 3 patients continued to have recurrent sustained typical AFL that was eliminated by CTI ablation. Beyond 8 weeks of follow-up, 7 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 (14% and 11%, respectively) continued to have AF. Ten of these 13 patients underwent a repeat PV-LAJ disconnection procedure and were cured. The remaining 3 remained in normal sinus rhythm while taking AADs. Conclusions—In patients with both AFL and AF, PV-LAJ disconnection alone may be sufficient to control both arrhythmias. CTI block reduced early postablation recurrence of arrhythmias, which in the majority of patients reflects a short-term clinical problem.

Incidence and Clinical Relevance of the Occurrence of Bundle-Branch Block in Patients Treated With Thrombolytic Therapy

BACKGROUND Whether thrombolytic therapy alters the incidence and clinical outcome of bundle-branch block is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS We examined the occurrence of new-onset bundle-branch block, both transient and persistent, in 681 patients with acute myocardial infarction enrolled in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction 9 and Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Arteries 1 protocols. Each patient underwent continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring for 36 to 72 hours with the Mortara ST monitoring system. Bundle-branch block was characterized as right, left, alternating, transient, or persistent. The overall incidence of bundle-branch block was 23.6% (n = 161), with transient block in 18.4% (n = 125) and persistent block in 5.3% (n = 36). Right bundle-branch block was found in 13% (n = 89) of the population; left bundle-branch block was found in 7% (n = 48). Alternating bundle-branch block was seen in 3.5% (n = 24) of patients. Left anterior descending artery infarcts accounted for most bundles (54%, n = 79). Patients with bundle-branch block had lower ejection fractions, higher peak creatine phosphokinase levels (P < .0001), and more diseased vessels (P < .019). Mortality rates in patients with and without bundle-branch block were 8.7% and 3.5%, respectively (P < .007). A higher mortality rate was observed in the presence of persistent (19.4%) versus transient (5.6%) or no (3.5%) bundle-branch block (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Thrombolytic therapy reduces the overall mortality rate associated with persistent bundle-branch block. However, persistent bundle-branch block remains predictive of a higher mortality rate than either transient or no bundle-branch block. Continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring provides an accurate characterization of the incidence and type of conduction disturbances after acute myocardial infarction.

AV node ablation and pacemaker implantation after withdrawal of effective rate-control medications for chronic atrial fibrillation: effect on quality of life and exercise performance.

We assess whether AV node ablation and pacemaker implantation after discontinuation of effective rate‐control medical therapy for chronic atrial fibrillation had a positive impact on quality of life and exercise performance. To assess the possibility of a placebo effect following pacemaker implantation, the study included three groups of patients. Group 1 underwent an echocardiogram, treadmill exercise, and quality of life measurement 1 month prior to and 6 months following AV node ablation and pacemaker implantation associated with discontinuation of rate‐control medications. Group 2 underwent AV node ablation and pacemaker implantation without discontinuation of antiarrhythmic rate‐control drugs. Group 3 underwent pacemaker implantation without performing AV node ablation and continuing rate‐control medical therapy. At the 1‐ and 6‐month evaluation, the patients in group 1 showed a significant improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction, quality of life, and activity scores. The exercise duration and the maximal VO2 consumption, however, did not change significantly. A slight improvement of the quality of life and physical activity scores was observed in the group undergoing AV node ablation without withdrawal of medications. However, no significant changes were observed in the group receiving only the pacemaker without modification of medical therapy and with intact AV node conduction. In conclusion, in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, discontinuation of effective rate‐control medical therapy followed by AV node ablation and permanent pacing appeared to improve quality of life and activity scores despite no change in exercise duration. The improvement observed does not seem to reflect a placebo effect.

Catheter ablation approach on the right side only for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation therapy: long-term results.

We report the long‐term follow‐up of a right side only catheter ablation approach for paroxysmal AF. Eighteen patients with AF refractory to drugs entered the study. Ablation was attempted in the right atrium only by creating linear lesions based on a specific design including from two to four linear lesions. Induction of AF was attempted before ablation and after placement of the lesions. A septal lesion was performed in nine patients. In ten patients atrial defibrillation thresholds (ADFTs) before ablation and following creation of the linear lesions were compared. After a mean follow‐up of 22±11 months, seven patients had recurrence of AF, and another nine patients experienced atria flutter or atrial tachycardia. Five patients remained in sinus rhythm without medications and four required the use of drugs. Three patients had sporadic AF and six were in chronic AF. The recurrence rate was similar in patients with and without the septal lesion. However, a cure with right side ablation appeared to be predicted by the presence of disorganized and earlier activity in the high right atrium and crista terminalis. Linear lesions in the right atrium were associated with a lower ADFT (pre 2.6 ± 04 J vs post 1.7 ± 0.6 J). In conclusion, in a small number of patients, control of AF can be obtained with a right side only approach. Certain activation patterns may identify patients suitable to this approach. No specific lesion pattern appeared more effective. Eight atrial linear lesions resulted in lower ADFT.

Safety of nurse-administered deep sedation for defibrillator implantation in the electrophysiology laboratory

ICD and Sedation. Implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory has been shown to be safe. However, general endotracheal anesthesia and/or administration of sedatives is mostly performed by anesthesiologists. In 53 patients undergoing ICD implantation in the EP laboratory, we prospectively assessed whether deep sedation without endotracheal intubation can be administered by nursing personnel under medical supervision. The mean patient age was 67 ± 7 years, and the mean ejection fraction was 32 ± 8%. All ICDs were placed in the abdomen requiring lead tunneling. Patients were monitored with pulse oximetry and noninvasive blood pressure recordings. The level of consciousness and vital signs were evaluated at 5‐minute intervals. Deep sedation was induced with phenergan and midazolam and maintained with either meperidine or fentanyl. The mean doses given were as follows: phenergan 0.33 ± 0.15 mg/kg, midazolam 0.05 ± 0.03 mg/kg, meperidine 0.46 ± 0.10 mg/kg per hour, and fentanyl 1.94 ± 0.71 μg/kg per hour. None of the patients required intubation during or after the procedure. No death occurred and no patient had any recollection of the procedure. In three patients, O2 desaturation was easily managed by transient reversion of the effects of meperidine or fentanyl with naloxone. No patient experienced prolonged hospitalization after the implant (mean 2.4 ± 0.5 days). In conclusion: (1) adequate sedation for ICD implantation and testing can be administered safely by nursing staff in the EP lab; (2) optimum sedation protocols should include drugs easy to reverse in case of excessive respiratory depression; and (3) this may represent a more cost‐effective approach to ICD implantation.

QT prolongation and dispersion in myocardial ischemia and infarction

The ability of QT interval dispersion to predict the occurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) after acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy is controversial. Continuous 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring for 48 hours or longer provides an opportunity to detect transient changes of QT dispersion and correlate such changes with the clinical outcome. In 543 consecutive patients enrolled in the TAMI-9 and GUSTO I studies, serial changes of the QT dispersion were analyzed in an attempt to predict the occurrence of VF with a system that monitored continuously the 12-lead ECG and stored it at least every 20 minutes. Measurements of QT dispersion were made at a median time of 2.37 hours after the onset of chest pain and at 24- and 48-hour intervals. A total of 43 patients experienced VF during the acute phase of myocardial infarction; of these patients, 33 (77%) had anterior infarcts. However, despite the higher preponderance of anterior myocardial infarcts in the VF group, patients with anterior infarcts did not have longer QT dispersion than those with other infarct locations. Similarly, no significant differences in the QT dispersion were observed at any time between the group with VF and that without. Women had increased QT dispersion in the initial and 24-hour ECG as compared with men (P = .005). However, this normalized at the 48-hour measurements. Despite this difference, there was no higher incidence of VF in female patients. In conclusion, the data suggest that QT dispersion alone is not sufficient to explain the occurrence of VF in the acute phase of myocardial infarction after thrombolytic therapy.