Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Enrico Benzoni is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Enrico Benzoni.


Transplant International | 2008

Superiority of transplantation versus resection for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma

Umberto Baccarani; Miriam Isola; Gian Luigi Adani; Enrico Benzoni; Claudio Avellini; Dario Lorenzin; Fabrizio Bresadola; Alessandro Uzzau; Andrea Risaliti; Antonio Paolo Beltrami; Franca Soldano; Dino De Anna; Vittorio Bresadola

The best therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still debated. Hepatic resection (HR) is the treatment of choice for single HCC in Child A patients, whereas liver transplantation (LT) is usually reserved for Child B and C patients with single or multiple nodules. The aim of this study was to compare HR and LT for HCC within the Milan criteria on an intention‐to‐treat basis. Forty‐eight patients were treated by LT and 38 by HR. The median time on the waiting list for transplantation was 118 days. The estimated overall survival was significantly higher (P = 0.005) in the LT group than in the HR one. The estimated freedom from recurrence was also significantly higher (P < 0.0001) for LT patients than for HR ones. Indeed, the probability of HCC recurrence after resection was higher than after transplantation achieving 31% and 76% for HR and 2% and 2% for LT at 3 and 5 years after surgery. Multivariate analysis confirmed that transplantation was superior to resection in terms of patient’s survival and risk of HCC recurrence. We conclude that LT is superior to HR for small HCC in cirrhotic patients assuming that LT should be performed within 6–10 months after listing to reduce the dropouts for reasons of tumor progression.


Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques | 2006

Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastroplasty in Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparative Study

Vittorio Bresadola; Giovanni Terrosu; Alessandro Cojutti; Enrico Benzoni; Elena Baracchini; Fabrizio Bresadola

How best to approach esophagectomy is a controversial issue. In the last decade, the opportunity to use minimally invasive surgical methods for esophagectomy has been documented, but their real advantages over conventional surgery have yet to be clearly established. The aim of this study was to compare a series of patients who underwent laparoscopic esophagectomy with those who underwent open surgery to ascertain the feasibility, safety, and clinical advantages of the former surgical techniques. Between January 2002 and May 2004, 14 patients with cancer of the esophagus underwent laparoscopic esophagectomy and another 14 had conventional open esophagectomy. Their demographic features, and intraoperative and postoperative data were compared. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and site of the neoplasm. The operating times were the same for transhiatal laparoscopic esophagectomy and conventional surgery, although using the thoraco-laparoscopic access took longer than the thoraco-laparotomic procedure (P<0.05). The hospital stay was shorter after laparoscopy (P<0.05). No differences emerged in terms of morbidity, mortality, number of transfusions, and time in the intensive care. The numbers of lymph nodes removed were comparable. In conclusion, it is feasible and safe to use a laparoscopic approach instead of open surgery for esophagectomy, but the former does not offer very significant clinical advantages in the postoperative stage. A shorter hospital stay seems to be the most significant finding. The minimally invasive procedure would seem to assure oncological radicality because it enables lymphadenectomy to be as thorough as in the conventional surgical approach.


Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2006

Prognostic value of tumour regression grading and depth of neoplastic infiltration within the perirectal fat after combined neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer

Enrico Benzoni; Donatella Intersimone; Giovanni Terrosu; Vittorio Bresadola; Alessandro Cojutti; Franz Cerato; Claudio Avellini

Objective: To evaluate histological variables correlated with pathological response to chemo-radiotherapy protocols for rectal cancer and with local recurrence and survival. Methods: From 1994 to 2003, 58 patients with rectal cancer were enrolled in a non-randomised study based on standardised treatment with radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, and surgical resection, followed by histological examination, including tumour regression grading and depth of neoplastic infiltration within the perirectal fat. All patients were followed up. Mean (SD) length of follow up was 55.3 (28.1) months, range 5 to 108. Results: No case was found with no regression (grade 0). Tumour regression was defined as grade 1 in 24.5% of cases, grade 2 in 58.5%, grade 3 in 7.5%, and grade 4 (complete regression) in 9.5%. Neoplastic infiltration of >4 mm within the perirectal fat was found in 25.6% of cases in grade 1, 55.8% in grade, 2.7% in grade 3, and 11.6% in grade 4. In 80% cases of pT4 depth of neoplastic infiltration within the perirectal fat was >4 mm (100% were pN+), and the same spread was also found in 53.4% of pT2 and 86.2% of pT3. Pathological response was associated with regression grade (p = 0.006) and depth of neoplastic infiltration within the perirectal fat (p = 0.04). Tumour regression grading was an independent variable for pT (p = 0.0002), pN status (p = 0.00004), pathological staging (p = 0.000001), and local recurrence (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Involvement of the lateral resection margins correlates with a poor prognosis and indicates the likelihood of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Tumour regression grading and the depth of neoplastic infiltration within the perirectal fat are important prognostic factors that need to be evaluated routinely.


Tumori | 2007

LIVER RESECTION FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED PROGNOSIS. THE ROLE OF CLINICAL, PATHOLOGICAL AND SURGICAL RELATED FACTORS

Enrico Benzoni; Dario Lorenzin; Alessandro Favero; G.L. Adani; Umberto Baccarani; Roberta Molaro; Aron Zompicchiatti; Enrico Saccomano; Claudio Avellini; Fabrizio Bresadola; Alessandro Uzzau

Aims and background Hepatocellular carcinoma (Hcc) is the third most common cause of cancer death. The aim of this study is to examine the factors associated with improved prognosis in Hcc after liver resection. Patients and methods From September 1989 to March 2005, 134 consecutive patients had liver resection for Hcc on cirrhosis at our department. We performed 54 major liver resections and 80 limited resections. All patients enrolled in the study were followed-up three times during the first year after resection and twice the next years. Results In-hospital mortality rate was 7.4%, about 50% of these cases were Child-Pugh B patients. Morbidity rate was 47.7%, caused by the rising of ascites, temporary liver impairment function, biliary fistula, hepatic abscess, hemoperitoneum and pleural effusion. Overall survival resulted to be influenced by etiology (P = 0.03), underlying liver disease, in particular Child A vs BC (P = 0.04), Endmondson-Steiner grading (P = 0.01), the absence of a capsule (P = 0.004), the presence of more than one lesion (P = 0.02), lesions size over 5 cm (P = 0.04), Pringle maneuver length over than 20 minutes (P = 0.03), an amount of resected liver volume lesser than 50% of total liver volume (P = 0. 03), and the relapse of Hcc (P = 0.01). Conclusions The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma should be both the most radical to obtain the best outcome and to reduce the recurrences rate, and the most suitable according to the patients condition, lesions characteristics and underlying liver disease: because of the large number of factors affecting the outcome of Hcc, unfortunately, we are still far from an agreement upon a group of criteria useful to select the best candidates for liver resection.


Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques | 2008

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a comparative study of transhiatal laparoscopic approach versus laparoscopic right transthoracic esophagectomy.

Enrico Benzoni; Vittorio Bresadola; Giovanni Terrosu; Alessandro Uzzau; Carla Cedolini; Sergio Intini; Luigi Noce; Fabrizio Bresadola

Background The development of minimally invasive surgery gave birth to an interest in a mini-invasive approach to esophageal cancer; however, it is still considered to be one of the most complex gastrointestinal surgical operations, and many questions still remain unanswered, regarding the oncologic results of a mini-invasive approach in long-term follow-ups. Here, the authors report on the short-term and long-term results of a series of laparoscopic esophagectomies. Patients and Methods From January 2002 to March 2006, 22 nonrandomized patients were recruited to undergo an esophagectomy for neoplastic disease. The esophagectomy and esophagogastroplasty were carried out using the laparoscopic transhiatal technique in 9 patients; whereas, a combined laparoscopic and right-transthoracic incision was performed in the other 13 patients. Results The mean follow-up was 21±3.23 months (mean±SD); range, 2 to 46 months. The overall survival rate resulted 84.0% at 12 months, 61.3% at 24 months, and 51.0% at 36 months. The proportions of cumulative survival showed significant differences when the following variables were considered: site of neoplasm (lower esophagus), American Society of Anesthesiologists 2, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type of surgical procedure, and inclusion in neoadjuvant protocol and staging. Recurrence rates were 3 (25%) in the radio-chemotherapy–treated group, and 5 (50%) in the primary surgery group (P=n.s.). Conclusions The two-year survival rates (61.3%) recorded in our series are comparable with those reported in other series of both laparoscopic and open surgeries. The logical conclusion was that a less invasive procedure did not imply a less curative one.


Tumori | 2005

The predictive value of clinical evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer.

Enrico Benzoni; Franz Cerato; Alessandro Cojutti; Elisa Milan; Daniele Pontello; Germana Chiaulon; Cosimo Sacco; Vittorio Bresadola; Giovanni Terrosu

Introduction Multimodality therapy has become the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced (T3 and T4) rectal carcinoma. Accurate preoperative staging of the patients with rectal cancer has increased in importance because the selection of patients with transmural rectal cancer (T3 or T4) or node-positive disease leads to a previous nonsurgical neoadjuvant treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy on the basis of pathological results obtained on rectal cancer patients treated by chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Methods From 1994 to 2003, 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of rectal cancer were studied at our department and enrolled in a neoadjuvant protocol of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. All patients were treated by 30 days of chemoradiotherapy. At the end of the chemoradiotherapy, each patient underwent clinical examination, including digital rectal examination, proctoscopy and abdominal-pelvic computerized tomography to define the clinical response to the chemoradiotherapy. Surgical resection was performed in all patients three weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy, and histological analysis was performed on all resected specimens. Results The clinical complete response rate corresponded to the pathological complete response rate, whereas the clinical evaluation overestimated partial response and stable disease. The pathologic examination revealed that 3.5% of clinical partial responses and 3.4% of clinical stable disease were really pathological progressive disease. Clinical partial response and clinical stable disease positive predictive values were 92.8% and 90.9%, respectively, whereas the clinical progressive disease negative predictive value was 20%. Then, 6.9% of patients believed to have responded to the therapy, or not to have responded or worsened, actually had worsened by the end of the chemoradiotherapy. Conclusions Positive and negative predictive values, in particular for partial response and stable disease, of clinical evaluation of the response to chemoradiotherapy were not high enough to consider clinical evaluation accurate enough to make treatment decisions.


Tumori | 2003

Schwannoma of the sympathetic cervical chain presenting as a lateral cervical mass.

Enrico Benzoni; Alessandro Cojutti; Sergio Intini; Alessandro Uzzau; Fabrizio Bresadola

We discuss about the diagnosis and treatment of Schwannoma arising from the sympathetic cervical chain on the basis of a case report on a patient whose previously diagnosis was paraganglioma.


International Journal of Colorectal Disease | 2006

Instrumental clinical restaging, pathological evaluation, and tumor regression grading: how to assess the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

Enrico Benzoni; Giovanni Terrosu; Donatella Intersimone; Elisa Milan; Germana Chiaulon; Vittorio Bresadola; Cosimo Sacco; Elisa Sattin; Fabrizio Bresadola; Claudio Avellini

IntroductionThe object of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens is a downstaging or downsizing of advanced rectal tumor to increase the rate of curative resection and reduce loco-regional failure. A reliable method of assessing response to adjuvant therapies is required to help standardize the assessments of new multimodality therapies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role played by tumor regression grading on the evaluation of pathological response to chemoradiotherapy, compared with both the predicting value of the clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy and pathologic response evaluation.MethodsFrom 1994 to 2003, 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of rectal cancer were studied at our department and enrolled in a single center, not randomized study based on 5-week sessions of radiotherapy associated with a 30-day 5-fluorouracil (FU) infusion, followed by surgical resection. Instrumental restaging and routine histological examination, including tumor regression grading, were performed to asses the response to neoadjuvant therapy.ResultsThe cCR rate corresponds to pCR rate, while a 3.5% of cPR and a 3.4% of cSD corresponded to a pPD. cPR and cSD show a PPV of 92.8% and 90.9% respectively, while cPD NPV is 20%. No case was found with no regression (grade 0). Tumor regression was defined grade 1 in 24.5% of cases, grade 2 was found in 58.5% of cases, 7.5% were grade 3, and 9.5% showed complete regression (grade 4). Pathologic response resulted to be associated with regression grade (p=0.006). Tumor regression grading is an independent variable for pT (p=0.0002), pN status (p=0.00004), pathologic staging (p=0.000001) and local recurrence (p=0.003).ConclusionOur results lead us to consider only pathologic evaluation to determine the response to neoadjuvant treatment: the application of tumor regression grading on the specimens obtained after combined neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery is useful to plan a better therapeutic strategy on the ground of a quantitative evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant treatment; it shows it is an important comparable pathological feature, useful in comparing different protocols’ results and differences between patient’s response as well as prognostic factors.


Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques | 2008

Laparoscopic reconstruction after esophageal resection for perforation: a new surgical approach.

Vittorio Bresadola; Giovanni Terrosu; Enrico Benzoni; Vittorio Cherchi; Gian Luigi Adani; Alessandro Favero; Dino De Anna

The authors present 2 cases of esophageal perforation treated using a new 2-step approach, consisting of esophageal resection and delayed reconstruction of the digestive tract after laparoscopic preparation and transposition of the stomach. The method is characterized by the minimally invasive insertion of a gastric tube through the precardial esophageal stump for postoperative enteral nutrition, and by the use of a laparoscopic method in the reconstruction step for gastrolysis and transposition of the stomach. The benefits lie in the opportunity for enteral feeding preparatory to the reconstruction, with no need for any gastrostomy or jejunostomy, and with fewer complications and a better recovery after reconstruction surgery thanks to the use of a laparoscopic method instead of a laparotomy.


Current Urology | 2007

Ureterovesical Anastomosis and Urinary Infections after Kidney Transplantation: Two Techniques Comparison

Gian Luigi Adani; Umberto Baccarani; Dario Lorenzin; Enrico Benzoni; Domenico Montanaro; Patrizia Tulissi; Maria Gropuzzo; Clotilde Vallone; Andrea Risaliti; Dino De Anna; Vittorio Bresadola

Objective: Urinary infections developing after kidney transplantation may depend on the type of ureterovesical anastomosis performed. Patients and Methods: A randomized prospective study was performed on 56 patients, from October 2004 to March 2006, receiving kidney transplants from cadaveric donors to compare 2 types of ureterovesical anastomosis. We considered the number and types of urinary infections, the duration of their treatment, and their complete/ partial resolution during the first year after transplantation. Twenty-eight patients (group A) underwent ureterovesical anastomosis according to the Lich-Gregoir technique, the other 28 patients (group B) using the Knechtle method. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of donor and recipient characteristics. Results: The mean duration of the period of antibiotic treatment was 17 ± 11 days in group A and 15 ± 7 days in group B (p = 0.63), while the intravenous antibiotic treatment lasted a mean 11 ± 6 days in group A and 10 ± 3 days in group B (p = 0.54). The antibiotic treatment completely resolved the urinary infection in all cases treated. No grafts were lost due to complications of urinary infections. Conclusion: Our data revealed no statistically significant differences between the 2 types of ureterovesical anastomosis considered in terms of the prevalence of infections or graft survival during the first year of follow-up.

Collaboration


Dive into the Enrico Benzoni's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge