Enrico Deidda Gagliardo

Rethinking the sacred and secular divide: Accounting and accountability practices in the Diocese of Ferrara (1431-1457)

Purpose - Informed by the work of Laughlin and Booth, this paper aims to analyze the role of accounting and accountability practices within the fifteenth century Roman Catholic Church, more specifically within the Diocese of Ferrara (northern Italy), in order to determine the presence of a sacred-secular dichotomy. Pope Eugenius IV had embarked on a comprehensive reform of the Church to counter the spreading moral corruption within the clergy and the subsequent disaffection with the Church by many believers. The reforms were notable not only for the Popes determination to restore the moral authority and power of the Church, but also for the essential contributions of “profane” financial and accounting practices to the success of the reforms. Design/methodology/approach - Original fifteenth century Latin documents and account books of the Diocese of Ferrara are used to highlight the link between the new sacred values imposed by Pope Eugenius IVs reforms and accounting and accountability practices. Findings - The documents reveal that secular accounting and accountability practices were not regarded as necessarily antithetical to religious values, as would be expected by Laughlin and Booth. Instead, they were seen to assume a role which was complementary to the Churchs religious mission. Indeed, they were essential to its sacred mission during a period in which the Pope sought to arrest the moral decay of the clergy and reinstate the Churchs authority. Research limitations/implications - The paper shows that the sacred-secular dichotomy cannot be considered as Originality/value - The paper presents a critique of the sacred-secular divide paradigm by considering an under-researched period and a non-Anglo Saxon context.

Performance Management Systems and Public Value Strategy: A Case Study

Abstract Purpose This article aims to analyze the role of performance management systems (PMS) in supporting public value strategies. Design/methodology/approach This article draws on the public value dynamic model by Horner and Hutton (2010). It presents the results of a case study of implementation of a PMS model, the ‘Value Pyramid’ (VP). Findings The results stress the need for an improved conceptualization of PMS within public value strategy. Through experimentation using the VP, the case site was able to measure and visualize what it considered public value and reflect on the internal/external causes of both creation and destruction of public value. Research limitations/implication This article is limited to just one case study, although in-depth and longitudinal. Originality/value This article is one of the first attempting to understand the role of PMS within the public value strategy framework, answering the call of Benington and Moore (2010) to consider public value from an accounting perspective.

Francesco Marchi and the Development of Logismology

Abstract This study aims to provide an outline of the contribution made by Francesco Marchi to the personalistic theory of accounts in the context of the evolution of the language of logismology. In particular, our attention is focused on the increase in the quality of the theoretical arguments in this field made possible by the innovative contribution provided by Marchi which, for the first time, made logismology the object of a systematic and structured analysis.

Measuring public value: a conceptual and applied contribution to the debate

Countries facing austerity measures need to create public value. Academics and practitioners have been discussing the ways in which public value can be created, managed and measured. This paper contributes to this conversation by proposing a public value measurement model. An Italian case study is presented to demonstrate the feasibility of the model and the organizational implications when public value measures are available to public sector managers, politicians and the public.