Enrico Grande
National Institute of Statistics
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Enrico Grande.
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes | 2016
Antonella Zucchetto; Saverio Virdone; Martina Taborelli; Enrico Grande; Laura Camoni; Marilena Pappagallo; Vincenza Regine; Francesco Grippo; Jerry Polesel; Luigino Dal Maso; Barbara Suligoi; Luisa Frova; Diego Serraino
Background:Non–AIDS-defining cancers (non-ADCs) have become the leading non-AIDS-related cause of death among people with HIV/AIDS. We aimed to quantify the excess risk of cancer-related deaths among Italian people with AIDS (PWA), as compared with people without AIDS (non-PWA). Methods:A nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study was carried out among 5285 Italian PWA, aged 15–74 years, diagnosed between 2006 and 2011. Date of death and multiple-cause-of-death data were retrieved up to December 2011. Excess mortality, as compared with non-PWA, was estimated using sex- and age-standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results:Among 1229 deceased PWA, 10.3% reported non-ADCs in the death certificate, including lung (3.1%), and liver (1.4%), cancers. A 7.3-fold (95% CI: 6.1 to 8.7) excess mortality was observed for all non-ADCs combined. Statistically significant SMRs emerged for specific non-ADCs, ie, anus (5 deaths, SMR = 227.6, 95% CI: 73.9 to 531.0), Hodgkin lymphoma (12 deaths, SMR = 122.0, 95% CI: 63.0 to 213.0), unspecified uterus (4 deaths, SMR = 52.5, 95% CI: 14.3 to 134.5), liver (17 deaths, SMR = 13.2, 95% CI: 7.7 to 21.1), skin melanoma (4 deaths, SMR = 10.9, 95% CI: 3.0 to 27.8), lung (38 deaths, SMR = 8.0, 95% CI: 5.7 to 11.0), head and neck (9 deaths, SMR = 7.8, 95% CI: 3.6 to 14.9), leukemia (5 deaths, SMR = 7.6, 95% CI: 2.4 to 17.7), and colon-rectum (10 deaths, SMR = 5.4, 95% CI: 2.6 to 10.0). SMRs for non-ADCs were particularly elevated among PWA infected through injecting drug use. Conclusion:This population-based study documented extremely elevated risks of death for non-ADCs among PWA. These findings stress the need of preventive interventions for both virus-related and non–virus-related cancers among HIV-infected individuals.
World Journal of Gastroenterology | 2017
Ugo Fedeli; Enrico Grande; Francesco Grippo; Luisa Frova
AIM To analyze mortality associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Italy. METHODS Death certificates mentioning either HBV or HCV infection were retrieved from the Italian National Cause of Death Register for the years 2011-2013. Mortality rates and proportional mortality (percentage of deaths with mention of HCV/HBV among all registered deaths) were computed by gender and age class. The geographical variability in HCV-related mortality rates was investigated by directly age-standardized rates (European standard population). Proportional mortality for HCV and HBV among subjects aged 20-59 years was assessed in the native population and in different immigrant groups. RESULTS HCV infection was mentioned in 1.6% (n = 27730) and HBV infection in 0.2% (n = 3838) of all deaths among subjects aged ≥ 20 years. Mortality rates associated with HCV infection increased exponentially with age in both genders, with a male to female ratio close to unity among the elderly; a further peak was observed in the 50-54 year age group especially among male subjects. HCV-related mortality rates were higher in Southern Italy among elderly people (45/100000 in subjects aged 60-79 and 125/100000 in subjects aged ≥ 80 years), and in North-Western Italy among middle-aged subjects (9/100000 in the 40-59 year age group). Proportional mortality was higher among Italian citizens and North African immigrants for HCV, and among Sub-Saharan African and Asian immigrants for HBV. CONCLUSION Population ageing, immigration, and new therapeutic approaches are shaping the epidemiology of virus-related chronic liver disease. In spite of limits due to the incomplete reporting and misclassification of the etiology of liver disease, mortality data represent an additional source of information for surveillance.
Population Health Metrics | 2017
Enrico Grande; Antonella Zucchetto; Barbara Suligoi; Francesco Grippo; Marilena Pappagallo; Saverio Virdone; Laura Camoni; Martina Taborelli; Vincenza Regine; Diego Serraino; Luisa Frova
BackgroundMultiple cause-of-death (MCOD) data allow analyzing the contribution to mortality of conditions reported on the death certificate that are not selected as the underlying cause of death. Using MCOD data, this study aimed to fully describe the cause-specific mortality of people with AIDS (PWA) compared to people without AIDS.MethodsWe conducted a nationwide investigation based on death certificates of 2,515 Italian PWA and 123,224 people without AIDS who had died between 2006 and 2010. The conditions most frequently associated with PWA mortality, compared to people without AIDS, were identified using an age-standardized proportion ratio (ASPR) calculated as the ratio between the age-standardized proportion of a specific cause among PWA and the same proportion among people without AIDS.ResultsThe most frequently reported conditions at death among PWA were infectious/parasitic diseases (52%), digestive (36%), respiratory (33%), and circulatory (32%) system diseases, and neoplasms (29%). All AIDS-defining conditions resulted highly associated (ASPR significantly greater than unity) with PWA deaths. Significant associations also emerged for leishmaniasis (ASPR = 188.0), encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis (ASPR = 14.3), dementia (ASPR = 13.1), chronic viral hepatitis (ASPR = 13.1), liver fibrosis/cirrhosis (ASPR = 4.4), pneumonia (ASPR = 4.4), anal (ASPR = 12.1) and liver (ASPR = 1.9) cancers, and Hodgkin’s disease (ASPR = 3.1).ConclusionsStudy findings identified the contribution of several non-AIDS-defining conditions on PWA mortality, emphasizing the need of preventive public health interventions targeting this population.
JAMA | 2018
Ugo Fedeli; Enrico Grande
expensive. For example, the marginal cost of a reusable instrument set is less than a few hundred dollars per procedure and disposable instruments, although more expensive, still cost less than
BMC Infectious Diseases | 2015
Barbara Suligoi; Antonella Zucchetto; Enrico Grande; Laura Camoni; Luigino Dal Maso; Luisa Frova; Saverio Virdone; Stefano Boros; Marilena Pappagallo; Martina Taborelli; Vincenza Regine; Paolo De Paoli; Diego Serraino
1000 for common laparoscopic procedures.6 In this study, the instruments and accessories used in robotic surgery cost an average of
Genus | 2013
Francesco Grippo; Enrico Grande; Monica Pace
1866 per procedure. In part, this reflects a limitation imposed by the company because of specifications to not use most instruments for more than 10 procedures. To our knowledge, no clinical data support this limit. In addition,
BMC Infectious Diseases | 2018
Barbara Suligoi; Saverio Virdone; Martina Taborelli; Luisa Frova; Enrico Grande; Francesco Grippo; Marilena Pappagallo; Vincenza Regine; Lucia Pugliese; Diego Serraino; Antonella Zucchetto
1701 per procedure was dedicated to purchasing and maintaining the system, costs that are novel to robotic surgical procedures. The primary limitation of this study is the ability to estimate only the hospital costs imposed by the manufacturer. Because robotic surgery increases operating room time,1,2 and there are other hospital expenses such as staff training, infrastructure upgrades, and marketing, this study’s estimate represents the lower bound for the total cost of this technology. Reductions in downstream expenses, such as reduced length of stay, may offset these costs. However, especially in robotic vs laparoscopic comparisons, there are few data supporting this assertion.1,2 The continued use of the robotic platform in surgery requires demonstrating the superior clinical benefit of these devices while considering the full set of costs for these systems.
Public Health | 2017
Martina Taborelli; Saverio Virdone; Laura Camoni; Vincenza Regine; Antonella Zucchetto; Luisa Frova; Enrico Grande; Stefano Boros; L. Dal Maso; P. De Paoli; D. Serraino; Barbara Suligoi
Rivista di statistica ufficiale | 2015
Francesco Grippo; Enrico Grande; Silvia Simeoni; Simona Pennazza; Simona Cinque; Tania Bracci; Luisa Frova
Giornate di Studio sulla Popolazione 2015 | 2014
Enrico Grande; Luisa Frova; Francesco Grippo